An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism (review)
|
|
- Annabella Cory Bryant
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism (review) Bryan W. Van Norden China Review International, Volume 15, Number 1, 2008, pp (Review) Published by University of Hawai'i Press DOI: For additional information about this article No institutional affiliation (29 Jun :35 GMT)
2 Features 39 JeeLoo Liu. An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, xviii, 434 pp. Hardcover $84.95, ISBN Paperback $34.95, ISBN by University of Hawai i Press No one history of the early Chinese Masters can meet the needs of every audience. Benjamin Schwartz s The World of Thought in Ancient China (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985) has special appeal, I think, to scholars working in the broad humanistic traditions of religious studies and intellectual history. In contrast, A. C. Graham s Disputers of the Tao (Chicago: Open Court Press, 1989) is written from a more distinctively philosophical perspective. To give just two more examples, although neither has written a general history of the period, the works of Mark Lewis and Paul Goldin particularly emphasize the interplay between social history, archaeology, and philology. 1 Scholars will sometimes dismiss methodologies other than their own as uninteresting, as projecting concepts onto the text, or as making claims that are improvable. But interesting, like delicious, is a matter of taste; all interpretation is projection to one degree or another; and as if anything nontrivial were provable! So we should not begrudge our colleagues their own methodologies and interests because each is potentially legitimate. Of course, this does not mean that anything goes. Someone can be using a particular methodology well or poorly, expertly or crudely. My own primary approach to Chinese thought is that of analytic philosophy. (Other scholars working in this style include Kwong-loi Shun and David Wong.) 2 Consequently, it was with great pleasure and anticipation that I discovered that JeeLoo Liu s An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy is written from a similar perspective. As she explains, analytic philosophy emphasizes the analysis of concepts, the formulation of arguments, the examination of basic assumptions, and the pursuit of clarity in language (p. ix). Unfortunately, I was disappointed with the author s execution of this methodology. This book covers most of the major figures of pre-qin Chinese thought and then skips over the Han dynasty Confucians and Daoists to discuss the main schools of Chinese Buddhism. Neo-Confucianism is mentioned in passing, but is not a focus of the book. My own knowledge of Buddhism is limited, so my comments on this section of the book will be briefer and more diffident. Although the first half of the book focuses on pre-qin thought, Liu says nothing about Gongsun Longzi, Huizi, or the later Mohists. I think this is an unfortunate and significant lacuna. Linguistic paradoxes are particular favorites of analytic philosophers, so any work using that approach should find rich material in these Chinese sources. Even more important, without the background provided by thinkers like these, one cannot fully understand
3 40 China Review International: Vol. 5, No. 1, 2008 texts like the Daodejing or Zhuangzi. I follow Graham in thinking that the antirationalism of both is motivated to a great extent by the development of linguistic paradoxes by earlier thinkers. How can language and argumentation be reliable guides when one can persuasively argue that a white horse is not a horse? Issues of coverage aside, the first significant error in this book occurs on the third page, where the author writes, The earliest form of divination that we now know of was the method of tortoiseshell reading. To perform this divination, some encrypted words were first written on a tortoise-shell. (These writings were the earliest writing samples found in China, dating back to BCE.) The shell was then put into a fire until it started to crack at various points. The reader of the sign would decipher the code depending on how those words were separated. (p. 3) There are at least four things wrong here. (1) I am not sure what the author means by saying that the words were encrypted. The inscriptions are very hard for us to read today, but that is because the characters and the grammar differ so much from classical Chinese. The expressions were being written in a ritual context, so they presumably used stylized locutions, but this is not encryption either. (2) Some words may have been written on a given shell prior to divination, but this was not a general rule. (If anything was inscribed prior to divination, it was merely the preface, giving the time of divination and name of the diviner. And we have discovered some shells that show no inscriptions at all [p. 3]). We do not have any inscribed oracle bones dating back to 1700 BCE, and we have some that date from after 1100 BCE. (I suspect that the author simply inserted the approximate dates of the Shang dynasty.) (4) The notion that the shells were interpreted according to how the words written on the shell were separated by the cracks is nothing better than tea-house Sinology. We all make mistakes. No one can stay current on every issue that is relevant to one s topic. The problem is that the above is representative of errors that occur in each chapter of the book. I will list a few more examples. The author announces that [b]efore paper was invented in China (in the first century AD), books had to be carved onto bamboo plates, which were then assembled with the aid of ropes (p. 12). But one can easily consult reference works that show photographs of excavated bamboo strips (not plates ) on which text was written in ink (not carved ). Furthermore, writing was also done on silk from a fairly early period. The author declares that, with Mencius, we witness the beginning of philosophical argumentation in Chinese philosophy (p. 84). There is debate over whether Confucius can be described as philosophical. Obviously, this depends on what one means by philosophy. But analytic philosophers are often inclined to deny the designation to Confucius because of the paucity of explicit arguments in the Analects. So it is at least a defensible view that Confucius does not argue philosophically. However, the author s own discussion of the Mohists makes clear that it is erroneous to suggest that philosophical argumentation begins with Mencius.
4 Features 41 The author asserts that even though Mozi s ultimate goal was the overall benefit of the world, he understood that everyone is intrinsically a self-interested creature (p. 114). This interpretation is implausible, and the author cites no textual evidence in support of it. She seems to be implicitly assimilating the Mohists to the Western philosophy of Thomas Hobbes, for whom the source of human conflict is our natural egoism. However, at the opening of Obeying One s Superior, when Mozi describes what Western philosophers would call the state of nature (that is, the human condition prior to government and civilization), he stresses the conflict that will result from humans having different conceptions of yi righteousness not from innate self-interest. The author also claims that even though Mozi s fundamental doctrine is based on a belief in mutual benefits, throughout his entire book there is not a single chapter devoted to the argument for the importance of mutual benefits (p. 127). Actually, Impartial Caring is devoted to this topic. 3 She even quotes from this chapter earlier in her discussion of Mozi. (This is such a striking mistake that I assume the author means something different from what I think she means by the argument for the importance of mutual benefit. But what could she have in mind?) In discussing the Yijing, the author states that the [sixty-four] hexagrams demonstrate [sixty-four] sequences of causal relations. Each of the six lines of the hexagram represents a stage in the causal development; hence, there are minimally 384 possible transitory situations (pp ). This passage distracted me for a long time, as I tried to figure out where she was getting the number 384. I think what she means is that, since each line in a hexagram is a stage in a causal process, we can think of an additional hexagram governing the development of that stage. So each of the sixtyfour hexagrams can itself be associated with any one of a series of six hexagrams. Now, six (the number of lines of a hexagram) multiplied by sixty-four (the number of hexagrams) does give us 384. However, that product is mathematically meaningless in this context. What the author is probably looking for is the number of possible sequences of six hexagrams. That would be sixty-four to the sixth power (not 64 times 6), which would be 1,073,741,824 (not 384). My correction here may seem overly exacting, but the point is that the text presents itself as giving a precise analytic approach, but this is just the kind of mistake that an analytic philosopher would not make. Criticizing the interpretation given by Herbert Fingarette, the author writes that textual evidence shows that Confucius does not interpret li [ritual] to consist merely of formal ceremonies, and he does not think that morality simply lies in observing the rites (p. 59). I am critical of many aspects of Fingarette s interpretation myself, but he specifically denies that rituals are merely formal ceremonies for Confucius. And he would certainly deny that our obligations are exhausted by simply according with the rites externally, regardless of whether we are, for example, sincere. (Fingarette s views are complex. He was influenced deeply by the logical behaviorism of Gilbert Ryle. But people like Ryle do not want to deny that we can and should use the language of beliefs and desires. They just want to analyze these
5 42 China Review International: Vol. 5, No. 1, 2008 as referring to publicly available states. Again, if one is being serious in presenting a genuinely analytic philosophical approach, one would be careful to get this right.) The author frequently takes passages in the original texts and paraphrases them into premise and conclusion form. Those without a background in philosophy may find this jarring, but it is a common technique of analytic philosophers, and it can be very illuminating in principle. For example (to use an example that I borrow from A. C. Graham), Wang Chong writes in his Dao xu: Man is a thing; though honored as king or noble, by nature he is no different from other things. No thing does not die, how can man be immortal? 4 An analytic philosopher s instinct would be to paraphrase this as Premise 1: No (living) thing does not die. Premise 2: Every (living) thing dies. [This follows logically from Premise 1.] Premise 3: Man is a (living) thing. Conclusion: Therefore, man dies. This interpretation of the passage highlights the logical structure of what Wang Chong is asserting. (In doing so, it obscures other aspects of the passage, but any interpretation highlights some things to the detriment of others.) Notice several features of a premise-and-conclusion paraphrase. Some things get left out: not every sentence in the original is either a premise or a conclusion (e.g., though honored as king or noble ). Some things get added: we may need to make explicit assumptions that are left implicit by the original author (e.g., Wang Chong is talking about living things). Finally, it may be more perspicuous for us to present the premises and conclusion in a different order than they occur in the original text. To illustrate Liu s use of this technique, I shall examine how she converts Mencius 6A10 into its logical form. But it will make things clearer if I first explain what I think is going on in the original passage. Compare 6A10 to 2A6. In the latter passage, Mencius says, Suppose someone suddenly saw a child about to fall into a well: anyone in such a situation would have a feeling of alarm and compassion. 5 This reaction, Mencius says, is the sprout of benevolence. Also in 2A6, he refers in passing to the universal human sprout of righteousness, but does not provide an illustration. Then in 6A10 Mencius writes, A basket of food and a bowl of soup if one gets them then one will live; if one doesn t get them then one will die. But if they re given with contempt, then even a homeless person will not accept them. If they re trampled upon, then even a beggar won t take them. It is plausible to read the beggar stories of 6A10 as providing an illustration of the sprout of righteousness mentioned in 2A6. It is a virtue of Liu s account that she sees this (p. 75), but her own logical paraphrase of the passage obscures it. She writes, 1. Everyone desires life and detests death. But if you humiliate someone by giving him food, he would not accept the food even if he needs it for survival. 2. Hence, there is always something that one desires more than life itself, or something that one detests more than death itself.
6 Features If there is something that one would not do to preserve life and to avoid death, then one is not simply a creature for whom self-survival is the only goal (whereas other animals are). 4. Therefore, we all have our own principle on what to do and what not to do, even when it comes to matters of life and death. 5. A righteous person is simply someone who holds on to his own principle in all matters. 6. Therefore, we all have within ourselves what it takes to be a righteous person. (p. 74) The first problem with this paraphrase is that, when the author quotes 6A10, she leaves out the sentences about the beggars that I cited above, so the unwary reader will think the second sentence in her premise 1 is gratuitous. It looks like the author thinks that Mencius has two conclusions here (expressed in lines 4 and 6). Line 4 presumably is supposed to follow from 1, 2, and 3. But it is not clear whether it does, because it is unclear what Liu means by we all have our own principle. Furthermore, what function is premise 3 performing? Although I am not sure what 4 means, on the plausible readings I can think of, premise 3 seems superfluous to the truth of 4. The conclusion in line 6 is presumably supposed to follow from 4 and 5. It is very hard to tell whether it does, though, because of the obscurity in the expressions have our own principle, hold on to his own principle, and what it takes to be something. There is a way of understanding these phrases on which 6 follows from 4 and 5 by definition. But then we do not really need 4 and 5 at all. Here is another way of seeing what is problematic about Liu s paraphrase: Consider just 1, 2, and 6. Does 6 not follow from 1 and 2 alone? What need is there for 3, 4, and 5? If you think 6 does not follow from 1 and 2, fine, but then ask yourself whether 3, 4, and 5 help at all. The first requirement of a premise-and-conclusion paraphrase is that it be clearer than the original. So on that account alone, the above paraphrase fails. Liu s paraphrase also frustrates her own efforts to evaluate the argument. She begins by asserting that [a]s stated, this argument... is not even valid, because from Premise 1 to Premise 2 Mencius is committing a form of hasty generalization. One example, even if it is a well-known real-life example, does not warrant the claim (pp , emphasis in original). Hasty generalization is the fallacy of going from too few particulars or unrepresentative particulars to a generalization. ( Every person I work with lives above the poverty line. Therefore, everyone in the U.S. lives above the poverty line. ) However, as Liu has stated premise 1 and premise 2, they are both universal in form. Premise 1 makes a claim about what any human would do in a given sort of situation (not just what some particular humans have done), and premise 2 makes a general claim about human motivation based on this. So if there is a non sequitur between 1 and 2, it is not hasty generalization. But Liu immediately
7 44 China Review International: Vol. 5, No. 1, 2008 goes on to say, [h]owever, Mencius is not making such a faulty inference here. His point is rather to use it as an illustration of a general human trait, as stated in Premise 2 (p. 75). So, within the space of a few sentences, Liu has flatly told us that Mencius is guilty of an invalid argument, misdiagnosed what the problem is (even according to her own paraphrase), then assured us that his argument is valid. The really regrettable fact is that Liu is very close to making an insightful and important point. Mencius does state the generalization that any human would refuse handouts given with contempt, even if he were on the brink of starvation. As my students have pointed out every time I teach this passage, this does not seem to be a true generalization. In extreme circumstances, many humans will debase themselves in all sorts of ways in order to survive. Those who will not debase themselves to survive we regard as heroic. (So if there is a hasty generalization here, it is within premise 1 itself.) However, Mencius s view suggests something much more plausible. Is it the case that, for any normal human, there are some things that she will not do, even if it would be in her narrow self-interest to do them, simply because she disdains them as unrighteous? If we answer yes to this question, Mencius has all that he needs to establish the existence of a sprout of righteousness. It is important to note that this is not precisely what Mencius himself asserted. However, it allows us to see how Mencius might have had an insight that we can appropriate and appreciate. 6 Again, it may seem that I am being overly demanding of Liu s exegesis. But this illustrates a general problem with her approach. On the one hand, if one really is a serious analytic philosopher, one will find her approach careless. Analytic philosophers are, after all, the ones who stress the formulation of arguments and the pursuit of clarity in language (p. ix). On the other hand, scholars whose methodologies do not emphasize these things will find distorting or irrelevant her emphasis upon argument and analysis. The second half of the book, which discusses Chinese Buddhism, seems stronger to me than the first half. Even here, though, I had concerns. The author contrasts Consciousness-Only Buddhism with Hua-yan by saying that the former is a form of objective idealism, while the latter is a version of subjective idealism (pp ). These terms are drawn from the Western tradition, in which Hegel is the paradigmatic objective idealist and Berkeley is the paradigmatic subjective idealist. Consciousness-Only Buddhism is certainly some kind of idealism, but one has to be very careful in invoking a term that might encourage comparison with Hegel s notion that the real is the rational and the rational is the real. Similarly, Hua-yan Buddhists do say some things that sound like subjective idealism. However, the Hua-yan patriarch Fa-zang s example of the golden lion suggests something quite different from Berkeley s notion that to be is to be perceived. The gold of the statue really is there, independent of any subjective consciousness; it is only our seeing it as a lion that is, in some way, a mental projection. Overall, I thought this book s treatment of Buddhism from an analytic
8 Features 45 philosophical perspective was less clear and incisive than that in, say, Mark Siderits s Buddhism as Philosophy (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2007). Despite its weaknesses, An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy is a book that suggests a great deal of talent. The author nicely lays out the similarities and differences between Xunzi s view and contemporary metaphysical naturalism (p. 87). Her comparison of Mencius and Rousseau is brief but includes a quotation from the latter that is fascinatingly similar to the child-at-the-well example (p. 73). She argues persuasively that Zhuangzi s butterfly dream story is only superficially similar to a Cartesian dream argument (pp ). So what went wrong? On the one hand, authors have to resist the pressure to publish too soon. Good undergraduate lecture notes (especially those written under a heavy teaching load) do not convert easily into a solid textbook. On the other hand, publishers have to do their job. An editor has to find not only responsible referees but also take their reports seriously. If reports call for substantial revisions, the publisher has to make sure they are completed prior to sending a manuscript to press. To state the obvious: philosophizing is hard; philosophizing about texts from another millennium that are written in another language is harder still. So we should approach our task in the spirit of Confucius s disciple Yan Yuan: The more I look up at it, the higher it seems; the more I delve into it, the harder it becomes. Catching a glimpse of it before me, I then find it suddenly at my back. (Analects 9.11) Bryan W. Van Norden Bryan W. Van Norden is a professor in the Department of Chinese and Japanese at Vassar College. He specializes in pre-qin Chinese philosophy and Neo-Confucianism. Notes 1. See, for example, Paul R. Goldin, After Confucius: Studies in Early Chinese Philosophy (Honolulu: University of Hawai i Press, 2005), and Mark Edward Lewis, Writing and Authority in Early China (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999). Obviously, this list could go on indefinitely. I do not mean to slight anyone by not mentioning them here (or in my examples of analytic philosophers below). 2. See, for example, Kwong-loi Shun and David B. Wong, eds., Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004). 3. For a philosophical analysis and evaluation of this essay, see Bryan W. Van Norden, A Response to the Mohist Arguments in Impartial Caring, in Kim-chong Chong, Sor-hoon Tan, and C. L. Ten, eds., The Moral Circle and the Self (Chicago: Open Court Press, 2003), pp Cited in Graham, Reflections and Replies, in Henry Rosemont, ed., Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts (Chicago: Open Court Press, 1991), p Translations here and below from Philip J. Ivanhoe and Bryan W. Van Norden, eds., Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy, 2nd rev. ed. (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2006). 6. For more on this issue, see Bryan W. Van Norden, The Virtue of Righteousness in Mencius, in Shun and Wong, pp , and Van Norden, Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Outline of Chinese Culture (UGEA2100F)
Outline of Chinese Culture (UGEA2100F) 2012/13 second term Lecture Hours Classroom : MMW 710 : Friday 1:30 pm - 3:15 pm Lecturer e-mail : Dr. Wan Shun Chuen (Philosophy Department) : shunchuenwan@gmail.com
More informationRECENT WORK THE MINIMAL DEFINITION AND METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY: A REPORT FROM A CONFERENCE STEPHEN C. ANGLE
Comparative Philosophy Volume 1, No. 1 (2010): 106-110 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org RECENT WORK THE MINIMAL DEFINITION AND METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY: A REPORT
More informationConfucian and Buddhist Philosophy Syllabus
Instructor: Justin Tiwald Confucian and Buddhist Philosophy Syllabus (modified for Neo-Confucianism.com website) Course structure: seminar, 15-20 students, 3-hour meetings once per week Course Description:
More informationTheories of Truth in Chinese Philosophy: A Comparative Approach, Alexus McLeod. London:
Version of August 20, 2016. Forthcoming in Philosophy East and West 68:1 (2018) Theories of Truth in Chinese Philosophy: A Comparative Approach, Alexus McLeod. London: Rowman and Littlefield International,
More informationHISTORY OF CHINESE PHILOSOPHY: ANTIQUITY TO 1200
Winter 2017 Tues. and Weds 9:00-10:40 Location TBA HISTORY OF CHINESE PHILOSOPHY: ANTIQUITY TO 1200 Tracing its beginnings back to the time of the pre-socratics, the Chinese philosophical tradition is
More informationTraditional Chinese Philosophy PHIL 191
Traditional Chinese Philosophy PHIL 191 Accreditation through Loyola University Chicago Please Note: This is a sample syllabus, subject to change. Students will receive the updated syllabus and textbook
More informationPHIL 035: Asian Philosophy
General Information PHIL 035: Asian Philosophy Term: 2018 Summer Session Class Sessions Per Week: 5 Instructor: Staff Total Weeks: 4 Language of Instruction: English Total Class Sessions: 20 Classroom:
More informationConfucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism: Intellectual History of China Fall 2014 [Class location & meeting time]
Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism: Intellectual History of China Fall 2014 [Class location & meeting time] Instructor: Macabe Keliher Office Hours: Office: Email: keliher@fas.harvard.edu Course website:
More informationCh. 3 China: Confucianism, Taoism and Legalism
Ch. 3 China: Confucianism, Taoism and Legalism China before Confucius The Yellow Emperor Xia and Shang Dynasties 2070 B.C. - 1046 B.C. Zhou Dynasty 1046 B.C. - 256 B.C. Spring and Autumn period 770 B.C.
More informationON WRITING PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAYS: SOME GUIDELINES Richard G. Graziano
ON WRITING PHILOSOPHICAL ESSAYS: SOME GUIDELINES Richard G. Graziano The discipline of philosophy is practiced in two ways: by conversation and writing. In either case, it is extremely important that a
More informationThe SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy
The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy Overview Taking an argument-centered approach to preparing for and to writing the SAT Essay may seem like a no-brainer. After all, the prompt, which is always
More informationRECENT WORK BOOK REVIEW ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL CHALLENGE FROM CHINA (EDITED BY BRIAN BRUYA) HANS VAN EYGHEN 1. INTRODUCTION
Comparative Philosophy Volume 7, No. 1 (2016): 90-95 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org RECENT WORK BOOK REVIEW ON THE PHILOSOPHICAL CHALLENGE FROM CHINA (EDITED BY BRIAN BRUYA)
More informationUGEA2160: Mainstream Chinese Philosophical Thought Fall (Tentative; subject to change) Instructor: HUANG Yong, Professor of Philosophy
UGEA2160: Mainstream Chinese Philosophical Thought Fall 2014 (Tentative; subject to change) Instructor: HUANG Yong, Professor of Philosophy Course Overview The course introduces the philosophical thought
More informationLesson 2 Student Handout 2.2 Confucius (Kong Fuzi), BCE
Lesson 2 Student Handout 2.2 Confucius (Kong Fuzi), 551-479 BCE Confucius was a sage, that is, a wise man. He was born in 551 BCE, during a period when China was divided into many small states, each with
More informationUBCx CHINA 300x. Foundations of Chinese Thought
UBCx CHINA 300x Foundations of Chinese Thought Edward Slingerland University of British Columbia Fall 2014 October 14 December 8 This course is designed to give students a thorough introduction to Warring
More informationo Was born in 551 B.C. o Lost his father at an early age and was raised by his mother. o Was a master of the six arts of :
History of Confucius o Was born in 551 B.C. o Lost his father at an early age and was raised by his mother. o Was a master of the six arts of : o Ritual o Music o Archery o Charioteering o Calligraphy
More informationChrist-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking
Christ-Centered Critical Thinking Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking 1 In this lesson we will learn: To evaluate our thinking and the thinking of others using the Intellectual Standards Two approaches to evaluating
More informationBoghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori
Boghossian & Harman on the analytic theory of the a priori PHIL 83104 November 2, 2011 Both Boghossian and Harman address themselves to the question of whether our a priori knowledge can be explained in
More informationDoes the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:
Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore I argue that Moore s famous response to the skeptic should be accepted even by the skeptic. My paper has three main stages. First, I will briefly outline G. E.
More informationOn the Cultivation of Confucian Moral Practices
US-China Education Review B, August 2018, Vol. 8, No. 8, 365-369 doi: 10.17265/2161-6248/2018.08.005 D DAV I D PUBLISHING On the Cultivation of Confucian Moral Practices ZHU Mao-ling Guangdong University
More information2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1
Chapter 1 What Is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life CHAPTER SUMMARY Philosophy is a way of thinking that allows one to think more deeply about one s beliefs and about meaning in life. It
More informationChinese Intellectual History 508:348 -Draft syllabus
Sukhee Lee Spring 2012 Chinese Intellectual History 508:348 -Draft syllabus History is made by people s actions. But we can t fully understand the meaning of other people s actions until we understand
More informationThe Philosophy of the Mòzǐ: The First Consequentialists
1 The Philosophy of the Mòzǐ: The First Consequentialists Chris Fraser Preface History has not been kind to Mòzǐ and the social and intellectual movement he founded. The Mohists were tremendously influential
More informationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY BACHELOR OF ARTS IN LIBERAL STUDIES PROGRAM
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY BACHELOR OF ARTS IN LIBERAL STUDIES PROGRAM RELIGIONS OF CHINA: DAOISM, CONFUCIANISM, AND BUDDHISM BLHV 454-01 Three Credits Fall Semester, 2017 Classes meet Thursdays, September
More informationCONFUCIANISM, DAOISM, BUDDHISM: INTELLECTUAL HISTORY OF CHINA
HISTORY AND ASIAN STUDIES 233 (Spring, 2007) CONFUCIANISM, DAOISM, BUDDHISM: INTELLECTUAL HISTORY OF CHINA Instructor: Paul Ropp Office Phone: 793-7213 Office: 309 JEFF Office Hours: MTh 10:00-11:00 Email
More informationRichard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING
1 REASONING Reasoning is, broadly speaking, the cognitive process of establishing reasons to justify beliefs, conclusions, actions or feelings. It also refers, more specifically, to the act or process
More informationHas Nagel uncovered a form of idealism?
Has Nagel uncovered a form of idealism? Author: Terence Rajivan Edward, University of Manchester. Abstract. In the sixth chapter of The View from Nowhere, Thomas Nagel attempts to identify a form of idealism.
More informationCOPYRIGHT NOTICE Wai-ming Ng/The I Ching in Tokugawa Thought and Culture
COPYRIGHT NOTICE Wai-ming Ng/The I Ching in Tokugawa Thought and Culture is published by University of Hawai i Press and copyrighted, 2000, by the Association for Asian Studies. All rights reserved. No
More information[3.] Bertrand Russell. 1
[3.] Bertrand Russell. 1 [3.1.] Biographical Background. 1872: born in the city of Trellech, in the county of Monmouthshire, now part of Wales 2 One of his grandfathers was Lord John Russell, who twice
More informationCan Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn. Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor,
Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor, Cherniak and the Naturalization of Rationality, with an argument
More informationHelpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000)
Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000) (1) The standard sort of philosophy paper is what is called an explicative/critical paper. It consists of four parts: (i) an introduction (usually
More informationPlease let us know if there is any additional information we can share with you about the conference.
DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY 350 HIGH STREET, MIDDLETOWN, CONNECTICUT 06459-0280 TEL (860) 685-2680 FAX (860) 685-3861 To: David Schrader, Executive Director, APA Re: Final Report on use of APA Grant Date:
More informationthe notion of modal personhood. I begin with a challenge to Kagan s assumptions about the metaphysics of identity and modality.
On Modal Personism Shelly Kagan s essay on speciesism has the virtues characteristic of his work in general: insight, originality, clarity, cleverness, wit, intuitive plausibility, argumentative rigor,
More informationNo Love for Singer: The Inability of Preference Utilitarianism to Justify Partial Relationships
No Love for Singer: The Inability of Preference Utilitarianism to Justify Partial Relationships In his book Practical Ethics, Peter Singer advocates preference utilitarianism, which holds that the right
More informationFatalism and Truth at a Time Chad Marxen
Stance Volume 6 2013 29 Fatalism and Truth at a Time Chad Marxen Abstract: In this paper, I will examine an argument for fatalism. I will offer a formalized version of the argument and analyze one of the
More informationTwo Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory
Western University Scholarship@Western 2015 Undergraduate Awards The Undergraduate Awards 2015 Two Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory David Hakim Western University, davidhakim266@gmail.com
More informationA primer of major ethical theories
Chapter 1 A primer of major ethical theories Our topic in this course is privacy. Hence we want to understand (i) what privacy is and also (ii) why we value it and how this value is reflected in our norms
More informationVideo: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?
Page 1 of 10 10b Learn how to evaluate verbal and visual arguments. Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me? Download transcript Three common ways to
More informationThis handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first.
Michael Lacewing Three responses to scepticism This handout follows the handout on The nature of the sceptic s challenge. You should read that handout first. MITIGATED SCEPTICISM The term mitigated scepticism
More informationCraig on the Experience of Tense
Craig on the Experience of Tense In his recent book, The Tensed Theory of Time: A Critical Examination, 1 William Lane Craig offers several criticisms of my views on our experience of time. The purpose
More informationSome Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.
Common Topics for Literary and Cultural Analysis: What kinds of topics are good ones? The best topics are ones that originate out of your own reading of a work of literature. Here are some common approaches
More informationDocument Based Question. Three Chinese Philosophies 5 Paragraph Exploratory Essay
Document Based Question Three Chinese Philosophies 5 Paragraph Exploratory Essay Confucianism Confucianism Social-political philosophy (to aid with problems on earth, not the Heavens) End of the Zhou Dynasty
More informationCritical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics
Critical Thinking The Very Basics (at least as I see them) Dona Warren Department of Philosophy The University of Wisconsin Stevens Point What You ll Learn Here I. How to recognize arguments II. How to
More informationPL245: Chinese Philosophy Spring of 2012, Juniata College Instructor: Dr. Xinli Wang
Chinese Philosophy, Spring of 2012 1 PL245: Chinese Philosophy Spring of 2012, Juniata College Instructor: Dr. Xinli Wang Office: Good-Hall 414, x-3642, wang@juniata.edu Office Hours: MWF: 10-11, TuTh
More informationPHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE
PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE One: What ought to be the primary objective of your essay? The primary objective of your essay is not simply to present information or arguments, but to put forward a cogent argument
More informationAs I Enter. Think about. Agenda. Homework: Tasting Essay. How you view the world. Chinese Religions ppt. Tao of Pooh! Tasting
As I Enter Think about How you view the world Glass half-full or half-empty? Agenda Chinese Religions ppt. Tao of Pooh! Tasting Homework: Tasting Essay 1. Which of the following originated in South Asia
More informationRELIGIONS OF CHINA RELI 360/2a
RELI 360 RELIGIONS OF CHINA (3 credits) 2016 LECTURE : MoWe 10:15-11:30 Location: FG B055 SGW Instructor: Marc des Jardins, Ph.D., C.M.D. Office: 2050 Mackay R-205 Phone: 848-2424 ext. 5732 Email: marc.desjardins@concordia.ca
More informationPihlström, Sami Johannes.
https://helda.helsinki.fi Peirce and the Conduct of Life: Sentiment and Instinct in Ethics and Religion by Richard Kenneth Atkins. Cambridge University Press, 2016. [Book review] Pihlström, Sami Johannes
More informationAnnotated Works Consulted
Annotated Works Consulted Step One Find the sources Tip: Find more than 12 sources, because some may not be as informative or ontopic as they first appear. Keeping Your Research Organized Keep a folder
More information2004 by Dr. William D. Ramey InTheBeginning.org
This study focuses on The Joseph Narrative (Genesis 37 50). Overriding other concerns was the desire to integrate both literary and biblical studies. The primary target audience is for those who wish to
More informationLuck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational. Joshua Schechter. Brown University
Luck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational Joshua Schechter Brown University I Introduction What is the epistemic significance of discovering that one of your beliefs depends
More informationScott Soames: Understanding Truth
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. LXV, No. 2, September 2002 Scott Soames: Understanding Truth MAlTHEW MCGRATH Texas A & M University Scott Soames has written a valuable book. It is unmatched
More informationHANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)
1 HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.) I. ARGUMENT RECOGNITION Important Concepts An argument is a unit of reasoning that attempts to prove that a certain idea is true by
More informationRiver Hawk! River Hawk!
River Hawk! River Hawk! A Translation of The Constant Pivot from the Confucianist Tradition Richard Bertschinger Tao Booklets 2010 Tao Booklet - mytaoworld.com River Hawk! River Hawk! is a new translation
More informationWhat God Could Have Made
1 What God Could Have Made By Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky I. Introduction Atheists have argued that if there is a God who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, then God would have made
More informationFree Ebooks Confucian Analects, The Great Learning & The Doctrine Of The Mean
Free Ebooks Confucian Analects, The Great Learning & The Doctrine Of The Mean Central to the study of Chinese civilization at its widest extension is the thought of the great sage K'ung, usually known
More informationForeknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments
Foreknowledge, evil, and compatibility arguments Jeff Speaks January 25, 2011 1 Warfield s argument for compatibilism................................ 1 2 Why the argument fails to show that free will and
More information7AAN2004 Early Modern Philosophy report on summative essays
7AAN2004 Early Modern Philosophy report on summative essays On the whole, the essays twelve in all were pretty good. The marks ranged from 57% to 75%, and there were indeed four essays, a full third of
More informationThese theories were developed to reinstate peace after the Period of the Warring States.
Chinese Philosophy Three major Chinese theories 1.Confucianism 2.Daoism 3.Legalism These theories were developed to reinstate peace after the Period of the Warring States. China was in a state of chaos
More informationA Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1
310 Book Review Book Review ISSN (Print) 1225-4924, ISSN (Online) 2508-3104 Catholic Theology and Thought, Vol. 79, July 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.21731/ctat.2017.79.310 A Review on What Is This Thing
More informationPortfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7
Portfolio Project Phil 251A Logic Fall 2012 Due: Friday, December 7 1 Overview The portfolio is a semester-long project that should display your logical prowess applied to real-world arguments. The arguments
More informationBOOK REVIEW: Gideon Yaffee, Manifest Activity: Thomas Reid s Theory of Action
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications - Department of Philosophy Philosophy, Department of 2005 BOOK REVIEW: Gideon Yaffee, Manifest Activity:
More informationPHIL 470 ( : Term 2). Comparative Conceptions of the Self. Tues & Thurs. 3:30-5:00pm. Buchanan B-215. Professor Evan Thompson
PHIL 470 (2018-19: Term 2). Comparative Conceptions of the Self. Tues & Thurs. 3:30-5:00pm. Buchanan B-215. Professor Evan Thompson. 604-827-2071. evan.thompson@ubc.ca Office hours: Tues & Thurs 2:00-3:00pm,
More informationThe Quest for Sagehood: An Introduction to Chinese Philosophical and Religious Thought
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY Department of Philosophy and Religion The Quest for Sagehood: An Introduction to Chinese Philosophical and Religious Thought Instructor: Institution: Warren G. Frisina, Department of
More informationWolterstorff on Divine Commands (part 1)
Wolterstorff on Divine Commands (part 1) Glenn Peoples Page 1 of 10 Introduction Nicholas Wolterstorff, in his masterful work Justice: Rights and Wrongs, presents an account of justice in terms of inherent
More informationTara Smith s Ayn Rand s Normative Ethics: A Positive Contribution to the Literature on Objectivism?
Discussion Notes Tara Smith s Ayn Rand s Normative Ethics: A Positive Contribution to the Literature on Objectivism? Eyal Mozes Bethesda, MD 1. Introduction Reviews of Tara Smith s Ayn Rand s Normative
More informationSaul Kripke, Naming and Necessity
24.09x Minds and Machines Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity Excerpt from Saul Kripke, Naming and Necessity (Harvard, 1980). Identity theorists have been concerned with several distinct types of identifications:
More informationb. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;
IV. RULES OF LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATE A. General 1. Lincoln-Douglas Debate is a form of two-person debate that focuses on values, their inter-relationships, and their relationship to issues of contemporary
More information5 A Modal Version of the
5 A Modal Version of the Ontological Argument E. J. L O W E Moreland, J. P.; Sweis, Khaldoun A.; Meister, Chad V., Jul 01, 2013, Debating Christian Theism The original version of the ontological argument
More informationPhilosophy 341. Confucianism and Virtue Ethics Spring 2012
Philosophy 341 Confucianism and Virtue Ethics Spring 2012 儒家思想與德性倫理學 2012 年春天 Syllabus COURSE OBJECTIVES In recent Western moral philosophy, virtue ethics has been undergoing a renaissance: many philosophers
More informationChapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics
Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics TRUE/FALSE 1. The statement "nearly all Americans believe that individual liberty should be respected" is a normative claim. F This is a statement about people's beliefs;
More informationThe Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle
This paper is dedicated to my unforgettable friend Boris Isaevich Lamdon. The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle The essence of formal logic The aim of every science is to discover the laws
More informationLIFE, DEATH, FREEDOM A Comparative Introduction to Philosophy: The Classical Greek, Indian and Chinese Traditions
LIFE, DEATH, FREEDOM A Comparative Introduction to Philosophy: The Classical Greek, Indian and Chinese Traditions Course: PHIL 100-03 Semester: Spring 2014 Professor: Peter Groff Times: TR 9:30-10:52 am
More informationWriting Essays at Oxford
Writing Essays at Oxford Introduction One of the best things you can take from an Oxford degree in philosophy/politics is the ability to write an essay in analytical philosophy, Oxford style. Not, obviously,
More informationSpinoza and the Axiomatic Method. Ever since Euclid first laid out his geometry in the Elements, his axiomatic approach to
Haruyama 1 Justin Haruyama Bryan Smith HON 213 17 April 2008 Spinoza and the Axiomatic Method Ever since Euclid first laid out his geometry in the Elements, his axiomatic approach to geometry has been
More informationA Comparison of Eastern and Western Views on Freedom. Xie Wenyu
A Comparison of Eastern and Western Views on Freedom Xie Wenyu The concept of ziyou 1 in English is two words: liberty and freedom. The former refers to rights and the latter is related to will and action.
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE AND META-ETHICS
The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 217 October 2004 ISSN 0031 8094 PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE AND META-ETHICS BY IRA M. SCHNALL Meta-ethical discussions commonly distinguish subjectivism from emotivism,
More informationHSC EXAMINATION REPORT. Studies of Religion
1998 HSC EXAMINATION REPORT Studies of Religion Board of Studies 1999 Published by Board of Studies NSW GPO Box 5300 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia Tel: (02) 9367 8111 Fax: (02) 9262 6270 Internet: http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au
More informationMarcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC. Introduction
RBL 09/2004 Collins, C. John Science & Faith: Friends or Foe? Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway, 2003. Pp. 448. Paper. $25.00. ISBN 1581344309. Marcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC
More informationTaoist and Confucian Contributions to Harmony in East Asia: Christians in dialogue with Confucian Thought and Taoist Spirituality.
Taoist and Confucian Contributions to Harmony in East Asia: Christians in dialogue with Confucian Thought and Taoist Spirituality. Final Statement 1. INTRODUCTION Between 15-19 April 1996, 52 participants
More informationBlueprint for Writing a Paper
Khalifa Blueprint for Papers 1 Blueprint for Writing a Paper Kareem Khalifa Philosophy Department Middlebury College The following is my best attempt to give you a color-by-numbers approach to writing
More informationInfusion of Sustainability
1 Phil 419J: Philosophy East and West University of Scranton Spring 2006 Instructor: Dr. Ann Pang-White pangwhitea2@scranton.edu Infusion of Sustainability Phil 419J (Philosophy East and West) is a required
More informationTreasure Rozier (Comments Please) 19 March 2012
Treasure Rozier (Comments Please) 19 March 2012 What beliefs from each of the three religious traditions of the region might explain the East Asian peoples unique capacity for sustaining the three without
More informationWHY IS GOD GOOD? EUTYPHRO, TIMAEUS AND THE DIVINE COMMAND THEORY
Miłosz Pawłowski WHY IS GOD GOOD? EUTYPHRO, TIMAEUS AND THE DIVINE COMMAND THEORY In Eutyphro Plato presents a dilemma 1. Is it that acts are good because God wants them to be performed 2? Or are they
More informationMcCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism
48 McCLOSKEY ON RATIONAL ENDS: The Dilemma of Intuitionism T om R egan In his book, Meta-Ethics and Normative Ethics,* Professor H. J. McCloskey sets forth an argument which he thinks shows that we know,
More informationMoral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary
Moral Objectivism RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary The possibility, let alone the actuality, of an objective morality has intrigued philosophers for well over two millennia. Though much discussed,
More informationThe role of ethical judgment based on the supposed right action to perform in a given
Applying the Social Contract Theory in Opposing Animal Rights by Stephen C. Sanders Copyright 2016. All rights reserved. The role of ethical judgment based on the supposed right action to perform in a
More informationEthics (ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus
(ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus Required Items: Ethical Theory: An Anthology 5 th ed. Russ Shafer-Landau. Wiley-Blackwell. 2013 The Fundamentals of 2 nd ed. Russ Shafer-Landau. Oxford University Press.
More informationUnderstanding Truth Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002
1 Symposium on Understanding Truth By Scott Soames Précis Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Volume LXV, No. 2, 2002 2 Precis of Understanding Truth Scott Soames Understanding Truth aims to illuminate
More informationReligion 232 Religions of China: the Ways and their Power
Religion 232 Religions of China: the Ways and their Power Course Description In this course we examine the religious worlds of China from antiquity to the present. Not only will we read key works of Chinese
More informationThe Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind
criticalthinking.org http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-critical-mind-is-a-questioning-mind/481 The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind Learning How to Ask Powerful, Probing Questions Introduction
More informationPHIL 202: IV:
Draft of 3-6- 13 PHIL 202: Core Ethics; Winter 2013 Core Sequence in the History of Ethics, 2011-2013 IV: 19 th and 20 th Century Moral Philosophy David O. Brink Handout #9: W.D. Ross Like other members
More informationSuperior Human. Wong Tsz Yan Chinese Medicine, New Asia College
Superior Human Wong Tsz Yan Chinese Medicine, New Asia College A symposium held last week was a great experience for me and I decided to make a good record of this wonderful symposium. The following conversation
More informationEmptiness Appraised: A Critical Study of Nagarjuna's Philosophy (review)
Emptiness Appraised: A Critical Study of Nagarjuna's Philosophy (review) William Edelglass Philosophy East and West, Volume 53, Number 4, October 2003, pp. 602-605 (Review) Published by University of Hawai'i
More informationPresuppositional Apologetics
by John M. Frame [, for IVP Dictionary of Apologetics.] 1. Presupposing God in Apologetic Argument Presuppositional apologetics may be understood in the light of a distinction common in epistemology, or
More informationDepartment of Philosophy. Module descriptions 20118/19. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules
Department of Philosophy Module descriptions 20118/19 Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules Please be aware that all modules are subject to availability. If you have any questions about the modules,
More informationHaberdashers Aske s Boys School
1 Haberdashers Aske s Boys School Occasional Papers Series in the Humanities Occasional Paper Number Sixteen Are All Humans Persons? Ashna Ahmad Haberdashers Aske s Girls School March 2018 2 Haberdashers
More informationAsian Philosophy Timeline. Confucius. Human Nature. Themes. Kupperman, Koller, Liu
Confucius Timeline Kupperman, Koller, Liu Early Vedas 1500-750 BCE Upanishads 1000-400 BCE Siddhartha Gautama 563-483 BCE Bhagavad Gita 200-100 BCE 1000 BCE 500 BCE 0 500 CE 1000 CE I Ching 2000-200 BCE
More informationCourses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year
1 Department/Program 2012-2016 Assessment Plan Department: Philosophy Directions: For each department/program student learning outcome, the department will provide an assessment plan, giving detailed information
More informationUtilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp Reprinted in Moral Luck (CUP, 1981).
Draft of 3-21- 13 PHIL 202: Core Ethics; Winter 2013 Core Sequence in the History of Ethics, 2011-2013 IV: 19 th and 20 th Century Moral Philosophy David O. Brink Handout #14: Williams, Internalism, and
More information