Response to comments on Being, humanity, and understanding
|
|
- Marjorie Evans
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Book Symposium Response to comments on Being, humanity, and understanding G. E. R. LLOYD, University of Cambridge It is a great privilege to have such careful readers of my book. In particular I appreciate the reactions from practicing anthropologists to my endeavors to combine what I think I have learned from ethnography with philosophy, cognitive science, and ancient history in order to try to illuminate issues that have often been tackled from within one of those disciplines in isolation from the others. Some parts of my discussion, such as the more technical analyses of Greek and Chinese thought, naturally attracted little comment. But several contributions register difficulties with my use of the term ontologies to cover both the explicit theorizing of ancient Greeks and Chinese on the one hand, and the implicit beliefs brought to light by ethnographic fieldwork, on the other. I shall accordingly concentrate my own comments here on that fundamental issue. First, however, I shall give my own reactions to some of the other points that have been raised. Thus Tanya Luhrmann interestingly suggests that recent anthropological developments pose problems for us that are analogous to those that earlier ethnography raised for the generation of E. E. Evans-Pritchard. How are apparently exotic, even irrational, beliefs and practices to be understood? Luhrmann remarks that in my book I offer no answer to the question of what is real, and indeed I remain profoundly dissatisfied with the way that topic has often been treated, especially when the old dichotomy between realism and relativism was wheeled out and those two were treated as mutually exclusive and exhaustive alternatives. Nor am I happy with other traditional moves, such as the notion that the statements in question were not intended literally, but only metaphorically or symbolically (another dichotomy I have sought to undermine by way of the notion of semantic stretch to which I shall be returning). Again the idea of searching for some set of transcendent criteria on the basis of which judgements can be made on anyone else s view of reality also seems to me chimerical, even though that does not mean that, on simple matters of calculation, for instance, we are incapable of diagnosing error either in ourselves or in others. If imposing our own preconceptions (whatever they are) is hopelessly parochial, we should not, on the other hand, retreat to an extreme relativism that allows that anything goes, and my analysis of error in Chapter 2 of my book was designed precisely to draw a line at This work is licensed under the Creative Commons G. E. R. Lloyd. Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. ISSN (Online)
2 FURTHER COMMENTS ON BEING, HUMANITY, AND UNDERSTANDING 205 that point. The pluralism I advocate allows for the multidimensionality of the phenomena, and indeed for the multidimensionality of the real. But to spell that out, and to answer Luhrmann s question, involves engaging in first-order inquiries in each and every one of the domains to which human experience exposes us, from everything from our perception of color or space to the realities of our cultural persona. We should not expect simple answers to such questions: tempting as they may be, they are always misleading. Philosophy has sometimes claimed to deliver general solutions by wielding all-purpose epistemological arguments. But physics already gives such the lie and that is before we make the most of our multifarious anthropological sources. We have, as Luhrmann says, to get on with the business of understanding one another: and we should not be misled by the wouldbe all-purpose strategies of positivism, postmodernism, and their successors. Luhrmann cites Aparecida Vilaça s fieldwork and Vilaça s own contribution pursues the question of Wari perspectivism a good deal further, notably to challenge whether the notion of semantic stretch is applicable in such a case. While I was endeavouring to develop an analysis of language use to enable comprehension between different worlds, Vilaça shows that the Wari are concerned to maintain distances between worlds, rather than to overcome them. Transontological translation is not just a matter of Wari perspectives and those, for instance, of jaguars (who see themselves as humans, that is as Wari, while seeing the Wari as animals, as prey) but also nowadays in a post-pacification era of coming to terms with Whites who inhabit a world still dominated (as Vilaça notes) by multiculturalism and mononaturalism. So they must do anthropology (understand: make sense of the other) on the Whites, who are, of course, doing anthropology on them. They searched (and still search) for another world to which the same word refers in controlled equivocation. So the objection can be put that while semantic stretch locates the problem in the language used, for the Wari the problem is one in the worlds themselves. So what is the nature of the concessions I should now make with regard to my venturing a semantic stretch analysis in the footnote (Lloyd 2012: 107, n. 11) that Vilaça cites? I certainly paid insufficient attention to the way the Wari, like others, discuss what is going on, as in the exchange Vilaça cites between To o Xak Wa and her husband, though I did have quite a bit to say about debate and skepticism across all human societies. I also should have acknowledged the point about maintaining distance, for without it Wari society cannot reproduce itself. She herself speaks of the multiple entries in the Wari jaguar dictionaries her friends use, and thus far it seems that we are dealing with semantic issues, for up to that point our dictionaries too have multiple entries to which my notion of semantic stretch can be applied (as I did with my examples from Roget s Thesaurus). But what is needed to deal with the trans-ontological translation situations she describes has to be more than just semantics. My (limited) optimism in that regard, I now see, was misplaced, not that elsewhere in the book I was in danger of presupposing ontological uniformity (as I shall be discussing in a moment) or of ignoring the pragmatics of communication, where for example I brought Zhuangzi s lodge sayings to bear to insist on the need to place yourself in the position of your interlocutor. P. Steven Sangren s reaction, next, concentrated on very different aspects of the problems. To get beyond the surface phenomena of stated or implied beliefs we need to examine the underlying desires and feelings of those responding to those
3 206 G. E. R. LLOYD phenomena and trying to make sense of them. Ontology must be seen as underpinned by psychology and indeed by ideology. I have always been wary of attempts to offer psychological diagnoses of whole human populations, just as I have resisted varieties of strong linguistic determinism. But I accept that there are possibly fruitful avenues of exploration not just of the psychological dimensions of the problems of human attempts to order experience, but also of the ideological interferences to which such endeavors may be subject, and in both cases that could have done with greater attention than I devoted to them in my book. Meanwhile Webb Keane, too, helpfully suggests that one way for us to come to grips with the variety of systems of belief and practice that I was discussing is to examine the ethical consequences, justifications, and conditions of those systems. Indeed I might well have said more than I did about the difference it makes to how we should behave when we adopt or presuppose one or another attitude to the differences between humans and other animals, not to mention the differences between humans you feel you can identify with and those you cannot. But I would see that ethical turn, if I may call it such, as complimentary to, not a replacement of, the analysis of ontologies that I was undertaking. One way or another most contributors focus on that issue of ontologies. Some are worried that it is inherently deeply ambiguous, and that it is quite misleading to lump together my ancient Greek and Chinese materials with the recent ontological turn in anthropology. As Keane puts it, we should distinguish between weak ontologies (representations of the world) and strong ones (where the worlds themselves differ). Anne-Christine Taylor adds an extra layer of complication in insisting on the difference between Philippe Descola s tetradic schema, and the heavily political agenda that colors the most recent explorations of Cannibal Metaphysics by Eduardo Viveiros de Castro (2009) and here (too) I stand corrected. I would accept that she is right in seeing Descola s four ontologies rather as ideal types, since none exists in any society in a pure form. Viveiros de Castro, for his part, clearly wages war (to put it at its starkest) with the still prevailing mononaturalism and multiculturalism of our own society. As Taylor points out, I did not tackle the dynamics underlying different sets of practices, and various correlations that they bring to light. Indeed my brief survey omitted much in its bid to open up possible lines of inquiry for further comparative study, and indeed this discussion has already begun to expand the agenda in ways I find fruitful. Then Carlo Severi s take is different again, though he shares with other contributors the perception that what I treated under the general rubric of ontologies needs sifting and dividing. In a series of interesting comments on Presocratic philosophy he drives a wedge between Parmenides and the rest. The rest are concerned to identify the fundamental elements of matter, for instance, and with explaining origins and change. Parmenides by contrast alone provides a unified theory, a metaphysics closer to Aristotle s discussion of being qua being. This leaves the appearances behind to consider conditions of intelligibility, the principles that govern both the world and thought. This is not the place to go into the finer points of the interpretation of Presocratic thought. Rather, I accept that my discussion at that point should have emphasized (even) more than it did that different ancient Greeks had different agenda. I note however one interesting consequence of Severi s critique, namely that it brings some Greek thinkers those other Presocratics closer to Melanesian
4 FURTHER COMMENTS ON BEING, HUMANITY, AND UNDERSTANDING 207 and Amazonian thought, even while it identifies Parmenides problematic as quite distinctive. That contrasts, rather, with some of my other critics who would have it that the key Great Divide is the gap that separates the explicit theorists of ancient literate communities as a whole, on the one hand, from the implicit assumptions under discussion in ethnography on the other. Laidlaw perhaps especially points to a contrast in my own handling of the two main types of material I discuss. When I was dealing with ancient Greece and China, I examined the particular communication situation in which the theories in question were propounded, often in direct opposition to rival views. But where my ethnographic examples were concerned, I did not similarly challenge how the material has been collected and processed, indeed processed several times over, first by indigenous informants and then in ethnographic interpretation. Let me first concede something to that last point. While I feel confident, at least up to a point, to comment on the circumstances in which plural explicit theories were developed in ancient societies, namely the situations in which persuaders, sophists, or whoever tried out new ideas often in explicit contradistinction to those of rivals, I was, I am, in no position to look over the shoulders of the ethnographers who tease out the implications of their indigenous informants ideas and practices, let alone to access those informants themselves. All I can do is comment on the end result of that double process of interpretation. Yet none of that, I believe, makes the rubric of ontology just hopelessly ambiguous and not fit for purpose. That some ontologies are fully elaborate and explicit, others implicit, some go beyond the appearances, others classify them, does not alter the fact that all those types deal with what there is, the onta as the Greeks would say which is just a word for things whatever is though it then provided the root for our fancy term ontology. Even the Presocratics in Severi s discussion had what is as their target, though it was only Parmenides who tackled that by insisting that reason alone can deliver the answer in the shape of the necessary pronouncements of the Way of Truth. Even the implicit cosmologies in my discussion can be seen as being indeed cosmologies, accounts of the cosmos, the world what is even while the degree to which the problematic was made explicit certainly varies. We are all in the business of trying to make sense of others, and for that we have always more or less to process the materials we use to answer the question. In my brief discussion in my book attempting to clarify the issue between plural worlds and plural worldviews, I sought to have it both ways, though evidently I did not persuade everyone that that is the right move. There is just the one world, to repeat myself, if by world we mean everything there is: that becomes true by definition. But that should not lead us to ignore the point that everyone inhabits their own world, bounded by the limits of their inevitably partial and incomplete experience. That applies to myself and any other commentator, though I certainly lived and live in hopes that my exploration of others views can lead me to revise my own as I am doing right here. If ontology itself is allowed semantic stretch in our usage, then indeed both explicit and implicit, both strong and weak, and both metaphysical and phenomenal versions are grist to my exploration of its, their, multidimensionality. That may make it seem that I have learned nothing from these interesting contributions. But on the contrary I welcome the new avenues of inquiry that they
5 208 G. E. R. LLOYD have opened up, though the extent to which I can myself in future do justice to them depends on the limitations of my own expertise. But just to come back to four such avenues that I have alluded to already. Sangren usefully suggests that we look beyond ontology to desire, personhood, ideology, and that does seem to me a fruitful way to access aspects of the human condition that are relevant to my enterprise. Luhrmann calls for greater use of comparison to enable us to explain the causal consequences of particular orientations and again this has great potentiality for illuminating both the commonalities of different lived experiences and their distinctive characteristics. Keane points to the ethical consequences of ontological commitments: we should ask what is at stake for our relations with other peoples, with other animals, with other things. Severi warns that the agenda of some of the theorists may include the conditions of possibility of understanding the world, while others have taken that for granted: but I treat that as a plea for greater methodological caution rather than as pronouncing a death sentence for the exploration as a whole. So I return to the point that to make any advance in understanding the problems we need to pool the resources of several academic disciplines that are used to considering themselves as autonomous. Social anthropology, philosophy, cognitive science, even history need to join forces. Cognitive science needs to get beyond the narrow focus on WEIRD subjects, as Henrich, Heine, and Norenzayan (2010) have demanded when they protested at the distortions that arise from concentrating, as often happens, on Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic persons. Philosophy needs to see that ontology is an issue in social anthropology, where a traditional attack on the problems by way of epistemological argument is inadequate. Social anthropology, in turn, needs philosophy (as Severi too insists), not just to do justice to cannibal metaphysics, but indeed to appreciate how to cope with those apparent dichotomies between realism and relativism that lie below the surface of ethnographic interpretation too. Ancient history, meanwhile, should raise its eyes from the fundamental task of assessing the disparate sources with which it has to deal, to consider the wider implications of what they reveal. What is at stake is to do justice both to human diversity and to human unity, and to learn from what we can discover about those to challenge our own unexamined assumptions. If the problems are, as I claim, multidimensional, many of them are only now being opened up, especially by recent developments for which we have anthropology to thank. So may I express my gratitude to the editor, and to this forum in particular, for taking some steps along that road, raising fundamental issues not just for my interpretative explorations, but even indeed (as Luhrmann says) for anthropological practice. References Henrich, Joseph, Steven Heine, and Ara Norenzayan The weirdest people in the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33: Lloyd, G. E. R Being, humanity, and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6 FURTHER COMMENTS ON BEING, HUMANITY, AND UNDERSTANDING 209 Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo Métaphysiques cannibales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. G. E. R. Lloyd Needham Research Institute 8 Sylvester Road Cambridge CB3 9AF UK gel20@cam.ac.uk
Philosophies without ontology
Book Symposium Philosophies without ontology Comment on LLOYD, G. E. R. 2012. Being, humanity, and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Carlo SEVERI, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales
More informationOntologies, anthropologists, and ethical life
Book Symposium Ontologies, anthropologists, and ethical life Comment on LLOYD, G. E. R. 2012. Being, humanity, and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Webb KEANE, University of Michigan What
More informationWittgenstein on forms of life: a short introduction
E-LOGOS Electronic Journal for Philosophy 2017, Vol. 24(1) 13 18 ISSN 1211-0442 (DOI 10.18267/j.e-logos.440),Peer-reviewed article Journal homepage: e-logos.vse.cz Wittgenstein on forms of life: a short
More informationTitle: Wittgenstein on forms of life: a short introduction.
Tonner, Philip (2017) Wittgenstein on forms of life : a short introduction. E-Logos Electronic Journal for Philosophy. ISSN 1211-0442, 10.18267/j.e-logos.440 This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/62192/
More informationPhilosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology
Philosophy of Science Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophical Theology 1 (TH5) Aug. 15 Intro to Philosophical Theology; Logic Aug. 22 Truth & Epistemology Aug. 29 Metaphysics
More informationProjection in Hume. P J E Kail. St. Peter s College, Oxford.
Projection in Hume P J E Kail St. Peter s College, Oxford Peter.kail@spc.ox.ac.uk A while ago now (2007) I published my Projection and Realism in Hume s Philosophy (Oxford University Press henceforth abbreviated
More informationReflections on sociology's unspoken weakness: Bringing epistemology back in
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Reflections on sociology's unspoken weakness: Bringing epistemology back in This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository
More informationSkepticism and Internalism
Skepticism and Internalism John Greco Abstract: This paper explores a familiar skeptical problematic and considers some strategies for responding to it. Section 1 reconstructs and disambiguates the skeptical
More informationSaving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy
Res Cogitans Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 20 6-4-2014 Saving the Substratum: Interpreting Kant s First Analogy Kevin Harriman Lewis & Clark College Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/rescogitans
More informationWho is a person? Whoever you want it to be Commentary on Rowlands on Animal Personhood
Who is a person? Whoever you want it to be Commentary on Rowlands on Animal Personhood Gwen J. Broude Cognitive Science Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, New York Abstract: Rowlands provides an expanded definition
More informationxiv Truth Without Objectivity
Introduction There is a certain approach to theorizing about language that is called truthconditional semantics. The underlying idea of truth-conditional semantics is often summarized as the idea that
More informationWe recommend you cite the published version. The publisher s URL is:
Cole, P. (2014) Reactions & Debate II: The Ethics of Immigration - Carens and the problem of method. Ethical Perspectives, 21 (4). pp. 600-607. ISSN 1370-0049 Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/27941
More informationCommentary on Sample Test (May 2005)
National Admissions Test for Law (LNAT) Commentary on Sample Test (May 2005) General There are two alternative strategies which can be employed when answering questions in a multiple-choice test. Some
More informationComments on Scott Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, volume I
Comments on Scott Soames, Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, volume I (APA Pacific 2006, Author meets critics) Christopher Pincock (pincock@purdue.edu) December 2, 2005 (20 minutes, 2803
More informationKant and the Problem of Metaphysics 1. By Tom Cumming
Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics 1 By Tom Cumming Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics represents Martin Heidegger's first attempt at an interpretation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781). This
More informationRECENT WORK THE MINIMAL DEFINITION AND METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY: A REPORT FROM A CONFERENCE STEPHEN C. ANGLE
Comparative Philosophy Volume 1, No. 1 (2010): 106-110 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 www.comparativephilosophy.org RECENT WORK THE MINIMAL DEFINITION AND METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY: A REPORT
More informationEpistemology and sensation
Cazeaux, C. (2016). Epistemology and sensation. In H. Miller (ed.), Sage Encyclopaedia of Theory in Psychology Volume 1, Thousand Oaks: Sage: 294 7. Epistemology and sensation Clive Cazeaux Sensation refers
More informationSummary Kooij.indd :14
Summary The main objectives of this PhD research are twofold. The first is to give a precise analysis of the concept worldview in education to gain clarity on how the educational debate about religious
More informationRealism and Idealism Internal realism
Realism and Idealism Internal realism Owen Griffiths oeg21@cam.ac.uk St John s College, Cambridge 12/11/15 Easy answers Last week, we considered the metaontological debate between Quine and Carnap. Quine
More informationA copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge
Leuenberger, S. (2012) Review of David Chalmers, The Character of Consciousness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90 (4). pp. 803-806. ISSN 0004-8402 Copyright 2013 Taylor & Francis A copy can be downloaded
More information* Dalhousie Law School, LL.B. anticipated Interpretation and Legal Theory. Andrei Marmor Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 193 pp.
330 Interpretation and Legal Theory Andrei Marmor Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992, 193 pp. Reviewed by Lawrence E. Thacker* Interpretation may be defined roughly as the process of determining the meaning
More informationThe Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia
Francesca Hovagimian Philosophy of Psychology Professor Dinishak 5 March 2016 The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia In his essay Epiphenomenal Qualia, Frank Jackson makes the case
More informationInstructor's Manual for Gregg Barak s Integrating Criminologies. Prepared by Paul Leighton (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997) * CHAPTER 4
Instructor's Manual for Gregg Barak s Integrating Criminologies. Prepared by Paul Leighton (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997) * CHAPTER 4 Theory and Practice: On the Development of Criminological Inquiry OVERVIEW
More informationPositive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones
Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy Roger Bishop Jones Started: 3rd December 2011 Last Change Date: 2011/12/04 19:50:45 http://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/www/books/ppfd/ppfdpam.pdf Id: pamtop.tex,v
More informationLÉVY BRUHL AND ONTOLOGICAL DÉJÀ VU: AN APPENDIX TO VIGH AND SAUSDAL DAVID ZEITLYN
LÉVY BRUHL AND ONTOLOGICAL DÉJÀ VU: AN APPENDIX TO VIGH AND SAUSDAL DAVID ZEITLYN Vigh and Sausdal have recently (2014) raised some concerns about the ontological turn or what I call de Castristism. They
More informationPHILOSOPHY (413) Chairperson: David Braden-Johnson, Ph.D.
PHILOSOPHY (413) 662-5399 Chairperson: David Braden-Johnson, Ph.D. Email: D.Johnson@mcla.edu PROGRAMS AVAILABLE BACHELOR OF ARTS IN PHILOSOPHY CONCENTRATION IN LAW, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY PHILOSOPHY MINOR
More informationPositive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy. Roger Bishop Jones
Positive Philosophy, Freedom and Democracy Roger Bishop Jones June 5, 2012 www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/www/books/ppfd/ppfdbook.pdf c Roger Bishop Jones; Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Metaphysical Positivism 3
More informationNeo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality
Neo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality BOOK PROSPECTUS JeeLoo Liu CONTENTS: SUMMARY OF CHAPTERS Since these selected Neo-Confucians had similar philosophical concerns and their various philosophical
More informationCritiquing the Western Account of India Studies within a Comparative Science of Cultures
Critiquing the Western Account of India Studies within a Comparative Science of Cultures Shah, P The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11407-014-9153-y For additional
More informationHuman Rights: Both Universal and Relative (A Reply to Michael Goodhart)
HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY Human Rights: Both Universal and Relative (A Reply to Michael Goodhart) Jack Donnelly* Abstract Academics generally endorse the Hollywood maxim that there is no such thing as bad
More informationCosmopolitan Theory and the Daily Pluralism of Life
Chapter 8 Cosmopolitan Theory and the Daily Pluralism of Life Tariq Ramadan D rawing on my own experience, I will try to connect the world of philosophy and academia with the world in which people live
More informationVol. II, No. 5, Reason, Truth and History, 127. LARS BERGSTRÖM
Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol. II, No. 5, 2002 L. Bergström, Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy 1 Putnam on the Fact-Value Dichotomy LARS BERGSTRÖM Stockholm University In Reason, Truth and History
More informationConditions of Fundamental Metaphysics: A critique of Jorge Gracia's proposal
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor Critical Reflections Essays of Significance & Critical Reflections 2016 Mar 12th, 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM Conditions of Fundamental Metaphysics: A critique of Jorge
More informationPHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION A-Z
PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION A-Z Forthcoming Volumes in the Philosophy A-Z Series Chinese Philosophy A-Z, Bo Mou Christian Philosophy A-Z, Daniel Hill Epistemology A-Z, Martijn Blaauw and Duncan Pritchard Ethics
More informationDISCUSSION PRACTICAL POLITICS AND PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY: A NOTE
Practical Politics and Philosophical Inquiry: A Note Author(s): Dale Hall and Tariq Modood Reviewed work(s): Source: The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 117 (Oct., 1979), pp. 340-344 Published by:
More informationMethod in Theology. A summary of the views of Bernard Lonergan, i taken from his book, Method in Theology. ii
Method in Theology Functional Specializations A summary of the views of Bernard Lonergan, i taken from his book, Method in Theology. ii Lonergan proposes that there are eight distinct tasks in theology.
More informationPhilosophy 125 Day 1: Overview
Branden Fitelson Philosophy 125 Lecture 1 Philosophy 125 Day 1: Overview Welcome! Are you in the right place? PHIL 125 (Metaphysics) Overview of Today s Class 1. Us: Branden (Professor), Vanessa & Josh
More informationTo Provoke or to Encourage? - Combining Both within the Same Methodology
To Provoke or to Encourage? - Combining Both within the Same Methodology ILANA MAYMIND Doctoral Candidate in Comparative Studies College of Humanities Can one's teaching be student nurturing and at the
More informationPhenomenal Knowledge, Dualism, and Dreams Jesse Butler, University of Central Arkansas
Phenomenal Knowledge, Dualism, and Dreams Jesse Butler, University of Central Arkansas Dwight Holbrook (2015b) expresses misgivings that phenomenal knowledge can be regarded as both an objectless kind
More informationFIRST STUDY. The Existential Dialectical Basic Assumption of Kierkegaard s Analysis of Despair
FIRST STUDY The Existential Dialectical Basic Assumption of Kierkegaard s Analysis of Despair I 1. In recent decades, our understanding of the philosophy of philosophers such as Kant or Hegel has been
More informationHow Not to Defend Metaphysical Realism (Southwestern Philosophical Review, Vol , 19-27)
How Not to Defend Metaphysical Realism (Southwestern Philosophical Review, Vol 3 1986, 19-27) John Collier Department of Philosophy Rice University November 21, 1986 Putnam's writings on realism(1) have
More informationIn Search of a Political Ethics of Intersubjectivity: Between Hannah Arendt, Emmanuel Levinas and the Judaic
Ausgabe 1, Band 4 Mai 2008 In Search of a Political Ethics of Intersubjectivity: Between Hannah Arendt, Emmanuel Levinas and the Judaic Anna Topolski My dissertation explores the possibility of an approach
More informationEpistemology and Metaphysics: A Theological Critique
Epistemology and Metaphysics: A Theological Critique (An excerpt from Prolegomena to Critical Theology) Epistemology is the discipline which analyzes the limits of knowledge while asserting universal principles
More informationBOOK SYMPOSIUM. What kind of God?
BOOK SYMPOSIUM What kind of God? Annelin ERIKSEN, University of Bergen Ruy BLANES, University of Bergen Comment on LUHRMANN, Tanya. 2012. When God talks back: Understanding the American Evangelical relationship
More informationUnit 1 Philosophy of Education: Introduction INTRODUCTION
Unit 1 Philosophy of Education: Introduction INTRODUCTION It is not easy to say what exactly philosophy is, how to study it, or how to do it. Philosophy, like all other field, is unique. The reason why
More informationWorld Religions. These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide.
World Religions These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide. Overview Extended essays in world religions provide
More informationCan Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn. Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor,
Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor, Cherniak and the Naturalization of Rationality, with an argument
More informationJournal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2011 BOOK REVIEW
Journal of Philosophy of Education, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2011 BOOK REVIEW Critical Religious Education, Multiculturalism and the Pursuit of Truth. Andrew Wright, Cardiff, University of Wales Press, 2007. Pp.
More informationReading/Study Guide: Rorty and his Critics. Richard Rorty s Universality and Truth. I. The Political Context: Truth and Democratic Politics (1-4)
Reading/Study Guide: Rorty and his Critics Richard Rorty s Universality and Truth I. The Political Context: Truth and Democratic Politics (1-4) A. What does Rorty mean by democratic politics? (1) B. How
More informationPhilosophy Courses-1
Philosophy Courses-1 PHL 100/Introduction to Philosophy A course that examines the fundamentals of philosophical argument, analysis and reasoning, as applied to a series of issues in logic, epistemology,
More informationEvidence and Transcendence
Evidence and Transcendence Religious Epistemology and the God-World Relationship Anne E. Inman University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana Copyright 2008 by University of Notre Dame Notre Dame,
More informationJohn Scottus Eriugena: Analysing the Philosophical Contribution of an Forgotten Thinker
John Scottus Eriugena: Analysing the Philosophical Contribution of an Forgotten Thinker Abstract: Historically John Scottus Eriugena's influence has been somewhat underestimated within the discipline of
More informationNaturalism and is Opponents
Undergraduate Review Volume 6 Article 30 2010 Naturalism and is Opponents Joseph Spencer Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/undergrad_rev Part of the Epistemology Commons Recommended
More informationIs there a good epistemological argument against platonism? DAVID LIGGINS
[This is the penultimate draft of an article that appeared in Analysis 66.2 (April 2006), 135-41, available here by permission of Analysis, the Analysis Trust, and Blackwell Publishing. The definitive
More informationLuck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational. Joshua Schechter. Brown University
Luck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational Joshua Schechter Brown University I Introduction What is the epistemic significance of discovering that one of your beliefs depends
More informationReligious Studies. The Writing Center. What this handout is about. Religious studies is an interdisciplinary field
The Writing Center Religious Studies Like What this handout is about This handout will help you to write research papers in religious studies. The staff of the Writing Center wrote this handout with the
More informationTHE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM
SKÉPSIS, ISSN 1981-4194, ANO VII, Nº 14, 2016, p. 33-39. THE SEMANTIC REALISM OF STROUD S RESPONSE TO AUSTIN S ARGUMENT AGAINST SCEPTICISM ALEXANDRE N. MACHADO Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR) Email:
More informationPhilosophy Courses-1
Philosophy Courses-1 PHL 100/Introduction to Philosophy A course that examines the fundamentals of philosophical argument, analysis and reasoning, as applied to a series of issues in logic, epistemology,
More informationBehavior and Other Minds: A Response to Functionalists
Behavior and Other Minds: A Response to Functionalists MIKE LOCKHART Functionalists argue that the "problem of other minds" has a simple solution, namely, that one can ath'ibute mentality to an object
More informationThe Question of Metaphysics
The Question of Metaphysics metaphysics seriously. Second, I want to argue that the currently popular hands-off conception of metaphysical theorising is unable to provide a satisfactory answer to the question
More informationR. Keith Sawyer: Social Emergence. Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge University Press
R. Keith Sawyer: Social Emergence. Societies as Complex Systems. Cambridge University Press. 2005. This is an ambitious book. Keith Sawyer attempts to show that his new emergence paradigm provides a means
More informationINSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY towards a productive sociology an interview with Dorothy E. Smith
INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY towards a productive sociology an interview with Dorothy E. Smith Published in Sosiologisk Tidsskrift 2004 (2) Vol 12: 179-184 Karin Widerberg, University of Oslo karin.widerberg@sosiologi.uio.no
More informationThe Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge:
The Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge: Desert Mountain High School s Summer Reading in five easy steps! STEP ONE: Read these five pages important background about basic TOK concepts: Knowing
More informationOutline Lesson 2 - Philosophy & Ethics: Says Who?
Outline Lesson 2 - Philosophy & Ethics: Says Who? I. Introduction Have you been taken captive? - 2 Timothy 2:24-26 A. Scriptural warning against hollow and deceptive philosophy Colossians 2:8 B. Carl Sagan
More informationKevin Scharp, Replacing Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, At 300-some pages, with narrow margins and small print, the work
Kevin Scharp, Replacing Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 352pp., $85.00, ISBN 9780199653850. At 300-some pages, with narrow margins and small print, the work under review, a spirited defense
More informationTempleton Fellowships at the NDIAS
Templeton Fellowships at the NDIAS Pursuing the Unity of Knowledge: Integrating Religion, Science, and the Academic Disciplines With grant support from the John Templeton Foundation, the NDIAS will help
More informationBreaking New Ground in Confucian-Christian Dialogue?
Breaking New Ground in Confucian-Christian Dialogue? Peter K. H. LEE The Second International Confucian-Christian Conference was held at the Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, California, July 7-11,
More informationthe paradigms have on the structure of research projects. An exploration of epistemology, ontology
Abstract: This essay explores the dialogue between research paradigms in education and the effects the paradigms have on the structure of research projects. An exploration of epistemology, ontology and
More informationExamining the nature of mind. Michael Daniels. A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000).
Examining the nature of mind Michael Daniels A review of Understanding Consciousness by Max Velmans (Routledge, 2000). Max Velmans is Reader in Psychology at Goldsmiths College, University of London. Over
More informationAnalogical Investigations Introduction. G.E.R. Lloyd
G.E.R. Lloyd Western philosophy and science are jointly responsible for constructing some amazingly powerful tools of investigation, aiming at discovering the truth, delivering explanations, verifying
More informationAN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING
AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING LEVELS OF INQUIRY 1. Information: correct understanding of basic information. 2. Understanding basic ideas: correct understanding of the basic meaning of key ideas. 3. Probing:
More informationMoral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View
Chapter 98 Moral Argumentation from a Rhetorical Point of View Lars Leeten Universität Hildesheim Practical thinking is a tricky business. Its aim will never be fulfilled unless influence on practical
More informationTHE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY
THE STUDY OF UNKNOWN AND UNKNOWABILITY IN KANT S PHILOSOPHY Subhankari Pati Research Scholar Pondicherry University, Pondicherry The present aim of this paper is to highlights the shortcomings in Kant
More informationPlato's Epistemology PHIL October Introduction
1 Plato's Epistemology PHIL 305 28 October 2014 1. Introduction This paper argues that Plato's theory of forms, specifically as it is presented in the middle dialogues, ought to be considered a viable
More informationFaults and Mathematical Disagreement
45 Faults and Mathematical Disagreement María Ponte ILCLI. University of the Basque Country mariaponteazca@gmail.com Abstract: My aim in this paper is to analyse the notion of mathematical disagreements
More information131 seventeenth-century news
131 seventeenth-century news Michael Edwards. Time and The Science of The Soul In Early Modern Philosophy. Brill s Studies in Intellectual History 224. Leiden: Brill, 2013. x + 224 pp. $128.00. Review
More informationReliabilism: Holistic or Simple?
Reliabilism: Holistic or Simple? Jeff Dunn jeffreydunn@depauw.edu 1 Introduction A standard statement of Reliabilism about justification goes something like this: Simple (Process) Reliabilism: S s believing
More informationA conversation about balance: key principles
A conversation about balance: key principles This document contains an outline of our basic premise that the key to effective RE is a balance between three key disciplines. Implicit within this is a specific
More informationThe unity of the normative
The unity of the normative The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Scanlon, T. M. 2011. The Unity of the Normative.
More informationHow Subjective Fact Ties Language to Reality
How Subjective Fact Ties Language to Reality Mark F. Sharlow URL: http://www.eskimo.com/~msharlow ABSTRACT In this note, I point out some implications of the experiential principle* for the nature of the
More informationPhilosophica 67 (2001, 1) pp. 5-9 INTRODUCTION
Philosophica 67 (2001, 1) pp. 5-9 INTRODUCTION Part of the tasks analytical philosophers set themselves is a critical assessment of the metaphysics of sciences. Three levels (or domains or perspectives)
More informationHABERMAS ON COMPATIBILISM AND ONTOLOGICAL MONISM Some problems
Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 10, No. 1, March 2007 HABERMAS ON COMPATIBILISM AND ONTOLOGICAL MONISM Some problems Michael Quante In a first step, I disentangle the issues of scientism and of compatiblism
More informationThe Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence
Filo Sofija Nr 30 (2015/3), s. 239-246 ISSN 1642-3267 Jacek Wojtysiak John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin The Paradox of the stone and two concepts of omnipotence Introduction The history of science
More informationIs the Skeptical Attitude the Attitude of a Skeptic?
Is the Skeptical Attitude the Attitude of a Skeptic? KATARZYNA PAPRZYCKA University of Pittsburgh There is something disturbing in the skeptic's claim that we do not know anything. It appears inconsistent
More informationReview Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion)
Review Tutorial (A Whirlwind Tour of Metaphysics, Epistemology and Philosophy of Religion) Arguably, the main task of philosophy is to seek the truth. We seek genuine knowledge. This is why epistemology
More informationThe Theory of Reality: A Critical & Philosophical Elaboration
55 The Theory of Reality: A Critical & Philosophical Elaboration Anup Kumar Department of Philosophy Jagannath University Email: anupkumarjnup@gmail.com Abstract Reality is a concept of things which really
More informationIn Defense of Culpable Ignorance
It is common in everyday situations and interactions to hold people responsible for things they didn t know but which they ought to have known. For example, if a friend were to jump off the roof of a house
More informationREASON AND PRACTICAL-REGRET. Nate Wahrenberger, College of William and Mary
1 REASON AND PRACTICAL-REGRET Nate Wahrenberger, College of William and Mary Abstract: Christine Korsgaard argues that a practical reason (that is, a reason that counts in favor of an action) must motivate
More informationEthical Theory for Catholic Professionals
The Linacre Quarterly Volume 53 Number 1 Article 9 February 1986 Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals James F. Drane Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq Recommended
More informationDelusions and Other Irrational Beliefs Lisa Bortolotti OUP, Oxford, 2010
Book Review Delusions and Other Irrational Beliefs Lisa Bortolotti OUP, Oxford, 2010 Elisabetta Sirgiovanni elisabetta.sirgiovanni@isgi.cnr.it Delusional people are people saying very bizarre things like
More informationContemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies
Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies ST503 LESSON 16 of 24 John S. Feinberg, Ph.D. Experience: Professor of Biblical and Systematic Theology, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. At
More informationReligious Studies. Name: Institution: Course: Date:
Running head: RELIGIOUS STUDIES Religious Studies Name: Institution: Course: Date: RELIGIOUS STUDIES 2 Abstract In this brief essay paper, we aim to critically analyze the question: Given that there are
More informationGCE. Religious Studies. Mark Scheme for June Advanced Subsidiary GCE Unit G572: Religious Ethics. Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations
GCE Religious Studies Advanced Subsidiary GCE Unit G572: Religious Ethics Mark Scheme for June 2011 Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body, providing
More informationWilliamson, Knowledge and its Limits Seminar Fall 2006 Sherri Roush Chapter 8 Skepticism
Chapter 8 Skepticism Williamson is diagnosing skepticism as a consequence of assuming too much knowledge of our mental states. The way this assumption is supposed to make trouble on this topic is that
More informationPhilosophy in Review XXXIII (2013), no. 1
G. E. M. Anscombe From Plato to Wittgenstein: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe, ed. Mary Geach and Luke Gormally. Exeter: Imprint Academic 2011. 249 pages $34.90 (paper ISBN 978 184540233 4) Pathiaraj Rayappan
More informationPostscript: Reply to McLeod
Postscript: Reply to McLeod Lajos Brons (mail@lajosbrons.net) Department of Philosophy, Nihon University, and Lakeland University, Japan Campus, Tokyo, Japan This is the pre-publication version of my reply
More informationProcess Thought and Bridge Building: A Response to Stephen K. White. Kevin Schilbrack
Archived version from NCDOCKS Institutional Repository http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/ Schilbrack, Kevin.2011 Process Thought and Bridge-Building: A Response to Stephen K. White, Process Studies 40:2 (Fall-Winter
More informationIt doesn t take long in reading the Critique before we are faced with interpretive challenges. Consider the very first sentence in the A edition:
The Preface(s) to the Critique of Pure Reason It doesn t take long in reading the Critique before we are faced with interpretive challenges. Consider the very first sentence in the A edition: Human reason
More informationBOOK REVIEWS. The arguments of the Parmenides, though they do not refute the Theory of Forms, do expose certain problems, ambiguities and
BOOK REVIEWS Unity and Development in Plato's Metaphysics. By William J. Prior. London & Sydney, Croom Helm, 1986. pp201. Reviewed by J. Angelo Corlett, University of California Santa Barbara. Prior argues
More informationNote: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is
The Flicker of Freedom: A Reply to Stump Note: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is scheduled to appear in an upcoming issue The Journal of Ethics. That
More information