Final Exam due on December 13, 2001

Similar documents
Exercises Introduction to morphosyntax

Introduction to Transformational Grammar, LINGUIST 601 December 3, Wh-Movement

Some Anaphoric/Elliptical Constructions of English

Solutions for Assignment 1

Extra Syntax Exercises 5

Reconsidering Raising and Experiencers in English

Comments on Lasersohn

WH-Movement. Ling 322 Read Syntax, Ch. 11

3. Negations Not: contradicting content Contradictory propositions Overview Connectives

Pragmatic Presupposition

ACD in AP? Richard K. Larson. Stony Brook University

Question Formulation Made Simple. By Daniel M. Schweissing Community College of Aurora

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

A Typology of Clause Combining

GRAMMAR IV HIGH INTERMEDIATE

Be Bound or Be Disjoint! Andrew Kehler and Daniel Büring. UCSD and UCLA

Reminder: Yes-no questions

10. Presuppositions Introduction The Phenomenon Tests for presuppositions

Russell: On Denoting

Writing your Paper: General Guidelines!

Everyone, anyone, someone, nobody, each, much, one, neither, and either are considered plural. A)True B) False

BBC LEARNING ENGLISH The Grammar Gameshow

The structure of this lecture. 1. Introduction (coordination vs. subordination) 2. Types of subordinate clauses 3. Functions of subordinate clauses

CONDITIONAL SENTENCES CONDITIONAL SENTENCES

Could have done otherwise, action sentences and anaphora

yes Head of chain in posidon where Case is assigned Head of chain in posidon where theta- role is assigned Foot of chain in posidon no somedmes

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview

BBC LEARNING ENGLISH 6 Minute Grammar The second conditional

If I hadn t studied as much as I did, I wouldn t have passed my exams.

Complex demonstratives as quantifiers: objections and replies

Neg-Raising. The Case of Persian. Zahra Mirrazi & Ali Darzi University of Massachusetts, Amherst University of Tehran. April 28, 2017.

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

Russell s Problems of Philosophy

Some observations on identity, sameness and comparison

Exhaustification over Questions in Japanese

If you hadn t. Well, if you hadn t braked so hard, we wouldn t have had the accident Page 1 of 6

Adverb Clause. 1. They checked their gear before they started the climb. (modifies verb checked)

Based on the translation by E. M. Edghill, with minor emendations by Daniel Kolak.

Long-distance anaphora: comparing Mandarin Chinese with Iron Range English 1

Satisfied or Exhaustified An Ambiguity Account of the Proviso Problem

Inglês CHAPTERS 13 to 14

FUTURE FORMS SIMPLE FUTURE

The structure of this lecture. 1. Introduction (coordination vs. subordination) 2. Types of subordinate clauses 3. Functions of subordinate clauses

CAS LX 523 Syntax II February 10, 2009 Prep for week 5: The fine structure of the left periphery

ENGLISH VERB TENSES FORMS, USES, AND EXAMPLES

Bennett s Ch. 17: Even If Maile Holck, 11/16/04

II sem./ 2 anno - CdL LM 85-bis (Scienze della Formazione Primaria) / A.A LABORATORIO DI LINGUA INGLESE GRUPPO 3 Prof.

NICHOLAS J.J. SMITH. Let s begin with the storage hypothesis, which is introduced as follows: 1

What is infinitival to?

Pronominal, temporal and descriptive anaphora

On Interpretation. Section 1. Aristotle Translated by E. M. Edghill. Part 1

Standing. Tall. After Feeling. Small. A Purple Monsters guide for professionals. A better childhood. For every child.

MODAL VERBS. The modal verbs are a special group of auxiliary verbs. They are different from most other verbs in four ways: + infinitives without to

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

I. PATTERNS OF CONNECTION

do not when the train leaves what her name is. what I write who I'm talking to

start up underlying VALUE Hope Life Isn t Easy get into it go for it teaching tip Additional Notes Lesson HOT LESSON 8

Brainstorming exercise

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

16 Free Will Requires Determinism

ING 204 Academic English II Can GÜR (2017)

Factivity and Presuppositions David Schueler University of Minnesota, Twin Cities LSA Annual Meeting 2013

For what does the scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness." (NRS)

Modal verbs of obligation. LEVEL NUMBER LANGUAGE Beginner A2_1057G_EN English

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers

Identifying Anaphoric and Non- Anaphoric Noun Phrases to Improve Coreference Resolution

Overview of Today s Lecture

Correlation to Georgia Quality Core Curriculum

AUXILIARIES AND MODALS

StoryTown Reading/Language Arts Grade 2

See Hintikka (1975), Lewis (1982), Boër and Lycan (1986), and Higginbotham (1996) for a defense of reductionism. 2

Information Extraction. CS6200 Information Retrieval (and a sort of advertisement for NLP in the spring)

Unit 6 Transformation of Sentences

B. Key Question: What does the text say or What do I see

ZHANG Yan-qiu, CHEN Qiang. Changchun University, Changchun, China

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not text, cite appropriate resource(s))

HS01: The Grammar of Anaphora: The Study of Anaphora and Ellipsis An Introduction. Winkler /Konietzko WS06/07

REPORTED SPEECH STATEMENTS

Logophors, variable binding and the interpretation of have. *

The City School PAF Chapter Comprehensive Worksheet December 2015 Class 6 (Answering Key)

UNIVERSIDAD AMÉRICA LATINA Estudios Universitarios Abiertos de México Bachillerato General en la Modalidad No Escolarizada

Responses to the sorites paradox

When we talk about things that are generally or always true, we can use: If/When/Unless plus a present form PLUS present simple or imperative

TEXT MINING TECHNIQUES RORY DUTHIE

An introduction to grammatical-relation changing processes

Four Proposals for German Clause Structure

World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.

JUDICIAL OPINION WRITING

Embedded Attitudes *

Stratford School Academy Schemes of Work

Epistemic Contextualism as a Theory of Primary Speaker Meaning

Parents Seminar English Language Sharing 11 February 2017

Module 3 : English Grammar. Index

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

Entailment as Plural Modal Anaphora

Learning with the Irrawaddy 10 To accompany January 2006 Issue of Irrawaddy Magazine

Message for THE LORD S DAY MORNING, June 5, 2011 Christian Hope Church of Christ, Plymouth, North Carolina by Reggie A.

Do Anti-Individualistic Construals of Propositional Attitudes Capture the Agent s Conceptions? 1

Chadwick Prize Winner: Christian Michel THE LIAR PARADOX OUTSIDE-IN

A Freezing Approach to the Ish-Construction in English

Transcription:

Syntax 380L December 6, 2001 Final Exam due on December 13, 2001 Please take the judgements as given. 1.1. The following examples illustrate the phenomenon of Comparative Deletion. (1) a. John is taller [than Mary is]. b. John is taller [than Mary told us that Bill is]. These examples are said to involve Comparative Deletion (CD) because they are perceived to be semantically related to the (ungrammatical) examples in (2). Most speakers strongly prefer the examples in (1) to the examples in (2). This could plausibly be related to a general principle of natural language that avoids redundancy. (2) a. (*) John is taller [than Mary is tall]. b. (*) John is taller [than Mary told us that Bill is tall]. In certain dialects of English, it is acceptable to say the following: (3) a. John is taller [than what Mary is]. b. John is taller [than what Mary told us that Bill is]. This phenomena is also found in the following sentences. (4) a. Mary isn t taller [than [what she was 5 years ago]]. (ok for some speakers). b. Mary isn t taller [than [she was 5 years ago]]. c. Mary isn t taller [than [what John believes [that Bill claimed [that she was 5 years ago]]]. (ok for some speakers). d. Mary isn t taller [than [John believes [that Bill claimed [that she was 5 years ago]]]. e. *Mary isn t taller [than [John believes [Bill s claim [that she was 5 years ago]]]. f. *Mary isn t taller [than [what John believes [Bill s claim [that she was 5 years ago]]]. g. *Mary isn t taller [than [what I wonder [whether she was five years ago]]]. h. *Mary isn t taller [than [I wonder [whether she was five years ago]]]. Provide an analysis of Comparative Deletion. Does Comparative Deletion involve A 0 -movement? If CD does involve A 0 -movement, what is moving from where to where? Using constituency tests (e.g. coordination, fronting etc.), determine the structural location of the than-clause with respect to the matrix clause. Your analysis should account for the following contrasts. Demonstrate that it does.

(5) a. More students i flunked than anyone/*they i thought would flunk. b. More students i flunked than thought they i would flunk. (6) a. More Democrats i voted than anyone/*they i expected to vote. b. More Democrats i voted than had expected that they i would vote. (7) a. More Democrats i voted than anyone/*?their i friends expected to vote. b. More Democrats i voted than had expected that anyone/their i friends would vote. (8) a. More books were published than the editor said (*that) would be. b. Mimi published more books than her publisher said (that) she would. c. More students flunked than I predicted (*that) would pass. d. Mimi flunked more students than I predicted (that) she would. (9) a. I thought that there was more meat than there is/* s. b. John was more upset then than he is/* s now. c. She was as happy about it then as she is/* s now. (10) a. I threw away more books than I kept [without reading]. (ok: # of books thrown away > # of books kept without reading) (unavailable: # of books thrown without reading > # of books kept) b. Jerome followed more suspects than Arthur interrogated [without arresting]. (ok: # of suspects followed > # of suspects interrogated without arresting) (unavailable: # of suspects followed without arresting > # of suspects interrogated) (Focus on the licensing of the object gap within the without clause.) 1.2. Consider now the phenomenon of Comparative Subdeletion (CSD). (11) a. Michael Jordan has more scoring titles than Dennis Rodman has tattoos. b. The shapes seem to be wider than they are thick. c. My sister drives as carefully as I drive carelessly. Unlike CD, it may not be obvious that CSD involves a gap/deletion of any sort. But there is good evidence that there is a gap in CSD (cf. 12). (12) a. *Michael has more scoring titles than Dennis has two/many tattoos. b. *The shapes seem to be wider than they are 2 inches/that thick. c. *My sister drives as carefully as I drive so/very carelessly. CSD is similar to CD in certain ways. CSD behaves like CD with respect to extraction. (13) a. *Michael has more scoring titles than Dennis is a guy who has. (CD) b. *Michael has more scoring titles than Dennis is a guy who has tattoos. (CSD) 2

(14) a. *The shapes were longer than I wondered whether they would be. (CD) b. *The shapes were longer than I wondered whether they would be thick. (CSD) (15) a. *My sister drives as carefully as I avoid accidents when I drive. b. *My sister drives as carefully as I get into accidents when I drive carelessly. CSD also behaves like CD with respect to the interpretation of pronouns. (16) a. More Democrats i voted than anyone/*they i expected to vote. (CD) b. More Democrats voted than anyone/*they j expected Republicans j to vote. (CSD) (17) a. More Democrats i voted than anyone/*?their i friends expected to vote. (CD) b. More Democrats voted than anyone/*?their j friends expected Republicans j to vote. (CSD) However, CSD does not always behave like CD. The following data illustrates some cases where CSD and CD do not behave alike. ffl The presence of that: (18) CD a. More books were published than the editor said (*that) would be. b. More boys flunked than I predicted (*that) would pass. (19) CSD a. More books were published than the editor said (that) articles would be. b. More boys flunked than I predicted (that) girls would pass. ffl The possibility of auxiliary contraction: (20) CD a. I thought there was more meat than there is/* s. b. John was more upset then than he is/* s now. c. She was as happy about it then as she is/* s now. (21) CSD a. There s more meat than there s rice. b. John was more upset then than he s angry now. c. She was as happy about it then as she s sad now. 3

ffl The possibility of adjunct gaps: (22) CD a. I threw away more books than I kept without reading. b. Jerome followed more suspects than Arthur interrogated without arresting. (23) CSD a. *I threw away more books than I kept magazines without reading. b. *Jerome followed more leads than Arthur interrogated suspects without arresting. ffl The possibility of multiple comparisons: (24) CSD a. Christmas makes as many children as happy as it makes adults unhappy. b. Max persuaded more men to buy more cars than you persuaded women to buy trucks. (25) CD a. *Christmas makes as many children as happy as birthdays make. b. *Max persuaded more people to buy more cars than you persuaded to buy. Provide an account of CSD that captures the above data. Show that it does so. Your account should reveal why CSD behaves like CD with respect to certain tests but not others. If you assume that CSD involves A 0 -movement, indicate what you think moves from where to where and when. 2. Consider the following data from West Ulster English. (26) a. What all did you get for Christmas? b. Who all did you meet when you were in Derry? c. Where all did they go for their holidays? (27) a. What did you get for Christmas? b. Who did you meet when you were in Derry? c. Where did they go for their holidays? (28) a. What did you get all for Christmas? b. Who did you meet all when you were in Derry? c. Where did they go all for their holidays? (29) a. I don t remember what all I said. b. I don t remember what I said all. (30) a. What all did he say (that) he wanted? b. What did he say (that) he wanted all? c. What did he say all (that) he wanted? 4

(31) a. Where do you think all they ll want to visit? b. Who did Frank tell you all that they were after? c. What do they claim all (that) we did? (32) a. What all did he tell him (that) he wanted? b. What did he tell him all (that) he wanted? c. *What did he tell all him (that) he wanted? d.?what did he tell his friends/mickey all (that) he wanted? e. *What did he tell all his friends/mickey (that) he wanted? (33) a. What all did he say to him that he wanted to buy? b. *What did he say all to him that he wanted to buy? c.?what did he say to him all that he wanted to buy? d.?*what did he say to his friends all that he wanted to buy? e. *What did he say all to his friends that he wanted to buy? (34) a. What all do you think (that) he ll say (that) we should buy? b. What do you think all (that) he ll say (that) we should buy? c. What do you think (that) he ll say all (that) we should buy? d. What do you think (that) he ll say (that) we should buy all? Propose a hypothesis to explain the above data. How does the entire set of West Ulster English data provided above bear on the the theory of wh-movement? While you do not have to discuss each example individually, your proposal should handle all the above examples and your discussion should show that it does. The fact that (32d) and (33c) are not perfectly grammatical might remain unexplained. Similarly, you should assume that (33d) is simply ungrammatical. 3. This question deals with the phenomenon of to-contraction displayed in (35-37). (35) a. I want to go there tomorrow. b. I wanna go there tomorrow. (36) a. You have to go there tomorrow. b. You hafta go there tomorrow. (37) a. I used to go to the movies. b. I useta go to the movies. (35-37b) illustrate the so-called to-contraction phenomenon, in which the infinitival marker to is contracted with the preceding verb. The sequence want+ to in (35a), for instance, is replaced by wanna in (35b). The contraction of want + to to wanna is referred to more specifically as wannacontraction. To-contraction is not completely free. It is not the case that any seqeunce of want to, for instance, can be contracted to wanna. Consider (38-40). 5

(38) a. Whom do you want to invite? b. Whom do you wanna invite? c. Whom do you want to invite Mary? d. *Whom do you wanna invite Mary? e. Whom do you want to succeed? (ambiguous) f. Who do you wanna succeed? (unambiguous) (39) a. I don t want to flagellate oneself in public to become standard practice in this monastery. b. *I don t wanna flagellate oneself in public to become standard practice in this monastery. (40) a. I don t want anyone who continues to want to stop wanting. b. *I don t want anyone who continues to wanna stop wanting. On the basis of the data in (38-40), identify the constraints that are operative on wanna-contraction. Now consider the data in (41). (41) a. This is the car in which she used to go to the movies. b. This is the car in which she usedta go to the movies. c. This is the car which she used to go to the movies. d. *This is the car which she usedta go to the movies. Do your constraints on wanna-construction predict the paradigm in (41). If not, modify your constraints so that they do. 6