What Everyone Should Know about Evolution and Creationism

Similar documents
SAMPLE. What Is Intelligent Design, and What Does It Have to Do With Men s. Chapter 3

Science and Ideology

Evolution? What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools?

Intelligent Design. What Is It Really All About? and Why Should You Care? The theological nature of Intelligent Design

Protect Science Education! A Toolkit for Students Who Want to Keep Evolution in Schools

CALENDAR OF EVENTS DECEMBER DINNER MEETING. Intelligent Design and the Attack on Science

INTELLIGENT DESIGN: FRIEND OR FOE FOR ADVENTISTS?

Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach? Author: Eugenie C. Scott, Director Affiliation: National Center for Science Education

Science, Evolution, And Creationism By National Academy of Sciences, Institute of Medicine READ ONLINE

The Answer from Science

McCollum v. Board of Education (1948) Champaign Board of Education offered voluntary religious education classes for public school students from

Why is life on Earth so incredibly diverse yet so strangely similar? Similarities among Diverse Forms. Diversity among Similar Forms

1/18/2009. Signatories include:

FAITH & reason. The Pope and Evolution Anthony Andres. Winter 2001 Vol. XXVI, No. 4

Science And Creationism READ ONLINE

Trevathan ieba0268.tex V2-01/27/ :48 A.M. Page 1

FLAME TEEN HANDOUT Week 18 Religion and Science

Intelligent Design. Kevin delaplante Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies

Cedarville University

(Quote of Origen, an early Christian theologian not a saint)

For ticket and exhibit information, visit creationmuseum.org. complete with misty sea breezes and rumbling seats

Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action

- Origen (early Christian theologian, Philocalia

A Textbook Case THE TEACHING OF EVOLUTION: BSCS RESPONDS TO A STUDENT'S QUESTIONS

The Nature of Science: Methods for Seeking Natural Patterns in the Universe Using Rationalism and Empiricism Mike Viney

UPDATED November 1, The Honorable Mitch McConnell Senate Majority Leader S-230 The Capitol Washington, D.C

Introduction. Framing the Debate. Dr. Brent Royuk is Professor of Physics Concordia University, Nebraska.

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION

Dear Speaker Ryan, Majority Leader McConnell, Chairman Brady, and Chairman Hatch:

Whose God? What Science?: Reply to Michael Behe

Scientific Dimensions of the Debate. 1. Natural and Artificial Selection: the Analogy (17-20)

The attitude of various populations toward teaching Creation and evolution in public schools

Forum on Public Policy

Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide)

February 24, Dear Mr. President and Members of Congress:

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE, RELIGION AND ARISTOTELIAN THEOLOGY TODAY

Attorney for Amici Curiae Colorado Citizens for Science, et al.

Plantinga, Van Till, and McMullin. 1. What is the conflict Plantinga proposes to address in this essay? ( )

April 11, Dear Member of Congress,

Universe and Child: Presiding Over the Meeting

Charles Robert Darwin ( ) Born in Shrewsbury, England. His mother died when he was eight, a

Egor Ivanov Professor Babcock ENGL 137H: Section 24 October 28, 2013 The Paradigm Shift from Creation to Evolution

Annotated Comments on the Intelligent Design Crea3onist Bill (SB433) Submi<ed to the New Mexico State Senate for the 2009 Regular Session

God After Darwin. 1. Evolution s s Challenge to Faith. July 23, to 9:50 am in the Parlor All are welcome!

An NSTA Q&A on the Teaching of Evolution



The Debate Between Evolution and Intelligent Design Rick Garlikov

Did the Scopes Trial Prove that Evolution is a Fact?

Are Judaism and Evolution Compatible? Parashat B reishit 5779 October 6, 2018 Rabbi Carl M. Perkins Temple Aliyah, Needham

Dawkins has claimed that evolution has been observed. If it s true, doesn t this mean that creationism has been disproved?

Lecture 5.2Dawkins and Dobzhansky. Richard Dawkin s explanation of Cumulative Selection, in The Blind Watchmaker video.

Christianity and Science. Understanding the conflict (WAR)? Must we choose? A Slick New Packaging of Creationism

March 27, We write to express our concern regarding the teaching of intelligent design

1 Peter 4:17 Hebrews 9:27 (Updated ) Hebrews 9: After Time has taken its toll. His-story Timeline End. to to to to


A Survey of How the Subject of Origins Is Taught. Jerry R Bergman

In the beginning. Evolution, Creation, and Intelligent Design. Creationism. An article by Suchi Myjak

Cover design: Brandie Lucas Interior layout: Diane King Editors: Becky Stelzer, Stacia McKeever & Michael Matthews

Intelligent Judging Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom George J. Annas, J.D., M.P.H.

Slaughter of the Dissidents. Jerry Bergman PhD

Lars Johan Erkell. Intelligent Design

Should Teachers Aim to Get Their Students to Believe Things? The Case of Evolution

DARWIN and EVOLUTION

Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial

Keeping Your Kids On God s Side - Natasha Crain

Science and Religion Interview with Kenneth Miller

Media Critique #5. Exercise #8 4/29/2010. Critique the Bullshit!

The evolutionizing of a culture CARL KERBY & KEN HAM

our full humanity. We must see ourselves whole, living in a creative world we can never fully know. The Enlightenment s reliance on reason is too

3.4: WRITING AN ARGUMENT ABOUT THE CHANNEL ON MARS

Religious Groups in the 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study

Can You Defend Your Faith?

Church Information Form (Part II) Step 1 of 7

NCSE Clergy Outreach Project Developing a common Lexicon 20 April 2014

Christopher Heard Pepperdine University Malibu, California

Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description

Creationism. Robert C. Newman

Theists versus atheists: are conflicts necessary?

Preaching and Leadership

Abstract. Introduction

Contents Faith and Science

Feb 3 rd. The Truth Project

BIO 221 Invertebrate Zoology I Spring Course Information. Course Website. Lecture 1. Stephen M. Shuster Professor of Invertebrate Zoology

INTRODUCTION to ICONS of EVOLUTION: Science or Myth? Why much of what we teach about evolution is wrong

When I Left the Darwin Day Committee. Bruce Ledewitz *

Critique of Proposed Revisions to Science Standards Draft 1

Understanding and acceptance of biological evolution and the nature of science: Studies on university faculty

A Christian Perspective on Origins: A Plea for Civility. Dr. John Robert Schutt Taylor University Fort Wayne

Philosophy 1104: Critical Thinking. Practice Quiz #3

Concordia and Newman s University

SAMPLE. Creationism in the Public Arena

Greg Nilsen. The Origin of Life and Public Education: Stepping Out of Line 11/06/98. Science Through Science-Fiction. Vanwormer

In the matter of Berkeley v. Berkeley

Rev Bob Klein First UU Church Stockton February 7, 2016 DARWIN & EVOLUTION

Study Programmes in Foreign Languages

Coyne, G., SJ (2005) God s chance creation, The Tablet 06/08/2005

SOME ISSUES BEFORE US

Can I Believe in the book of Genesis and Science? Texts: Genesis 2:1-9,15; Genesis 1:1-27 Occasion: Ask, series Themes: Science, creationism,

Why Creation Science must be taught in schools

Transcription:

What Everyone Should Know about Evolution and Creationism Science is a way of discovering the causes of physical processes - the best way yet conceived. Scientific theories are critically tested and well supported ideas about the causes of physical processes. Science depends upon intellectual honesty putting aside preconceptions and evaluating the evidence on its merits Evolution is a scientific theory

Evolution is an explanation of the similarities and differences of living things in terms of physical processes - genetics, biochemistry, development, physiology, ecology, mutation, natural selection. The idea that evolution has occurred has been compared with a vast amount of data from biology, paleontology, geology, chemistry, and physics - it has not been found wanting. Within the fields of science, the theory of evolution is accepted - it is not controversial.

Scientific Organizations That have Issued Statements in Support of Evolution: Academy Of Science Of The Royal Society Of Canada Alabama Academy Of Science American Anthropological Association American Anthropological Association American Association For The Advancement Of Science American Association Of Physical Anthropologists American Astronomical Society American Geophysical Union American Institute Of Biological Sciences American Astronomical Society American Society Of Biological Chemists American Chemical Society American Geological Institute American Psychological Association American Physical Society American Society Of Parasitologists Association for Women Geoscientists Australian Academy of Science California Academy Of Sciences Ecological Society of America Genetics Society of America Geological Society Of America Geological Society of Australia Georgia Academy Of Science History of Science Society Iowa Academy Of Science Kentucky Academy Of Science Kentucky Paleontological Society Louisiana Academy Of Sciences National Academy Of Sciences North American Benthological Society North Carolina Academy Of Science New Orleans Geological Society New York Academy Of Sciences Ohio Academy Of Science Ohio Math and Science Coalition Oklahoma Academy Of Sciences Sigma Xi, Louisiana State University Chapter Society For Amateur Scientists Society For Integrative and Comparative Biology Society For The Study Of Evolution Society Of Systematic Biologists Society Of Vertebrate Paleontology Southern Anthropological Society Virginia Academy Of Science West Virginia Academy Of Science

What Everyone Should Know about Evolution and Creationism Within the mainstream branches of religion, the theory of evolution is not controversial.

Religious Organizations That Have Issued Statements in Support of the Scientific Theory of Evolution: American Jewish Congress Center For Theology And The Natural Sciences Central Conference Of American Rabbis Episcopal Bishop Of Atlanta General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church The General Convention Of The Episcopal Church Lexington Alliance Of Religious Leaders The Lutheran World Federation Roman Catholic Church Unitarian Universalist Association United Church Board For Homeland Ministries United Methodist Church United Presbyterian Church In The U.S.A. Source: Voices for Evolution - National Center for Science Education http://www.ncseweb.org/

The idea that evolution has produced biological diversity is opposed by fundamentalist and evangelical branches of Christianity - They insist that the Bible is literally correct or they insist man is a special case and could not have evolved. A modern world was created in six days Eve was created from Adam s rib Noah saved one pair of each kind of animal... Most branches of Christianity allow interpretation of the Bible from a modern point of view.

Pope John Paul II - Address to the Pontifical Academy Oct 22 1996 Today, almost half a century after the publication of the Encyclical, fresh knowledge has led to the recognition that evolution is more than a hypothesis. It is indeed remarkable that this theory has been progressively accepted by researchers, following a series of discoveries in various fields of knowledge. The convergence, neither sought nor fabricated, of the results of work that was conducted independently is in itself a significant argument in favour of this theory. Pope Benedict XVI On evolution and creationism This clash (between evolution and creationism) is an absurdity because on the one hand there is much scientific proof in favor of evolution, which appears as a reality that we must see and which enriches our understanding of life and being as such.

Opponents of the scientific theory of evolution are trying to remove evolution from, or insert creationism into, the curriculum of primary and secondary schools by making it a political issue. Controlling or influencing school boards Controlling or influencing state legislatures Influencing public opinion

Acceptance or rejection of scientific theories is not a political issue. Scientists do not vote on which theories to accept. Scientific ideas are accepted and become theories when they stand up to critical testing. They are rejected when contrary evidence is found. Scientists try to identify critical contrary evidence. If there was evidence against evolution, scientists of all religious persuasions, would be telling each other about it in their scientific journals. They are not.

Those opposed to the theory of evolution have tried to invent a field called creation science. Creation science has been pushed as a scientific alternative to evolution that should be taught in science classes. State and Federal courts have evaluated the field of creation science, and have found that it is not science. Federal courts concluded that creation science advocated a particular branch of Christianity. Therefore, teaching creation as advocated by creation science in public schools violates the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion through a separation of church and state.

The latest strategy to attempt to cast doubt on what is known about evolution is called Intelligent Design Theory. Many structures are too complex to have evolved. Therefore, they must have been designed - with an idea in mind. Who designed them? Either God, or the designer can t be known. ID is a reworking of creation science and has been exposed as such in Creationism s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design.

The latest court case involving ID (Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District) resulted in a ruling that clearly labeled ID as a religious ideology. ID aspires to change the ground rules of science to make room for religion, specifically, beliefs consonant with a particular version of Christianity. The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory. ID cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents. (Judge John E. Jones III U.S. District Judge)

Creationism is a dangerous ideology It is really an attack on all of science. Conclusions of geologists, astronomers, physicists, and anthropologists are not consistent with literal interpretations of the Bible. Creationists are threatening, harassing, and intimidating our public schools, universities, museums, and federal agencies. The attempts to undermine the teaching of science has contributed to the American public s scientific illiteracy. America has fallen behind other nations in technological and scientific supremacy, which threatens our economic future. Denial of evolution threatens our health and well-being. Allowing any ideology to suppress real science through political means is dangerous for society.