INFERENCES LING106 KNOWLEDGE OF MEANING DOROTHY AHN SECTION 2 [2/12/2016]

Similar documents
Presuppositions (Ch. 6, pp )

Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 1)

A Linguistic Interlude

Towards a Solution to the Proviso Problem

Topics in Linguistic Theory: Propositional Attitudes

Quantifiers: Their Semantic Type (Part 3) Heim and Kratzer Chapter 6

The projection problem of presuppositions

Pragmatic Presupposition

Presupposition: Introduction

Presupposition Projection and At-issueness

91. Presupposition. Denial, projection, cancellation, satisfaction, accommodation: the five stages of presupposition theory.

A presupposition is a precondition of a sentence such that the sentences cannot be

In Defense of Truth functional Theory of Indicative Conditionals. Ching Hui Su Postdoctoral Fellow Institution of European and American Studies,

Denying the antecedent and conditional perfection again

Lying and Asserting. Andreas Stokke CSMN, University of Oslo. March forthcoming in the Journal of Philosophy

Uli Sauerland (Berlin) Implicated Presuppositions. 1 Introduction

The Myth of Factive Verbs

Mandy Simons Carnegie Mellon University June 2010

Lexical Alternatives as a Source of Pragmatic Presuppositions

Pragmatic Considerations in the Interpretation of Denying the Antecedent

Exercise Sets. KS Philosophical Logic: Modality, Conditionals Vagueness. Dirk Kindermann University of Graz July 2014

Satisfied or Exhaustified An Ambiguity Account of the Proviso Problem

Lecture 1. Yasutada Sudo 12 January 2018

10. Presuppositions Introduction The Phenomenon Tests for presuppositions

The main plank of Professor Simons thoroughly pragmatic account of presupposition

LGCS 199DR: Independent Study in Pragmatics

TWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW

Lecture 9: Presuppositions

Presupposed ignorance and exhaustification: how scalar implicatures and presuppositions interact

Second North American Summer School in Language, Logic and Information Student Session Proceedings

ZHANG Yan-qiu, CHEN Qiang. Changchun University, Changchun, China

On Conceivability and Existence in Linguistic Interpretation

Presupposition and Rules for Anaphora

Abominable KK Failures

Obligatory presupposition and discourse management. Pascal Amsili, Université Paris Diderot 1

(naturalistic fallacy)

Slides: Notes:

Presupposition: An (un)common attitude?

BART GEURTS EXISTENTIAL IMPORT

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

How Do Inferences Get Invited?

Cohen 2004: Existential Generics Shay Hucklebridge LING 720

Week Nine: Pragmatics, Metaphysics and Possibility

I can t believe it! Expressive meaning in belief reports

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

CONDITIONAL PROPOSITIONS AND CONDITIONAL ASSERTIONS

Philosophy 427 Intuitions and Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2011

Millian responses to Frege s puzzle

Comments on Lasersohn

Conditionals II: no truth conditions?

Semantics Semantics is the study of meaning.

Semantics and Pragmatics of NLP DRT: Constructing LFs and Presuppositions

Ayer and Quine on the a priori

Inglês CHAPTERS 13 to 14

Experimental Investigations of the Typology of Presupposition Triggers

Factivity and Presuppositions David Schueler University of Minnesota, Twin Cities LSA Annual Meeting 2013

Introduction and Preliminaries

Slovenian (Rivero, 2001) a.janez se oblaci.

What should should mean?

Modal disagreements. Justin Khoo. Forthcoming in Inquiry

Class 4 - The Myth of the Given

Logic I, Fall 2009 Final Exam

Hybrid Views in Meta-ethics: Pragmatic Views

SAVING RELATIVISM FROM ITS SAVIOUR

Presupposition projection: Global accommodation, local accommodation, and scope ambiguities

Embedded Questions Revisited : An answer, not necessarily The answer

Chapter 3: Basic Propositional Logic. Based on Harry Gensler s book For CS2209A/B By Dr. Charles Ling;

Vagueness Without Ignorance

Logic I or Moving in on the Monkey & Bananas Problem

IMPLICATURE AS A DISCOURSE PHENOMENON

Epistemic modals: relativism vs. cloudy contextualism

HAVING FALSE REASONS

AWhetherForecast. Kjell Johan Sæbø. University of Oslo Department of European Languages

A Scopal Theory of Presupposition I

Homogeneity, Non-Maximality, and all

Chapter 2. A Little Logic

One Kind of Asking. Dennis Whitcomb. Forthcoming in Philosophical Quarterly

Elena Paducheva (Moscow)

Value and Implicature

Contextualism and the Epistemological Enterprise

The Paradox of the Question

Noûs 50 (2016): Gricean Quality. Matthew A. Benton. University of Oxford

College of Basic Education Researchers Journal Vol. 7, No. 4. The Pragmatic Behaviour of Implicative Relations in Political Discourse

Negation And The Strength Of Presuppositions Or There Is More To Speaking Than Words

Argument as reasoned dialogue

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

THE LARGER LOGICAL PICTURE

ROB VAN DER SANDT R V D S A N D H I L.K U N.N L

Presupposition: What went wrong? *

Two Puzzles About Deontic Necessity

Avoiding the Dogmatic Commitments of Contextualism. Tim Black and Peter Murphy. In Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (2005):

Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

The Unexpected Projection of Some Presupposition Triggers

ESSAYS ON THE SEMANTICS OF MODALITY

Biased Questions. William A. Ladusaw. 28 May 2004

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori

On the Aristotelian Square of Opposition

Normative accounts of assertion: from Peirce to Williamson, and back again 1

Pronominal, temporal and descriptive anaphora

G. H. von Wright Deontic Logic

Transcription:

INFERENCES LING106 KNOWLEDGE OF MEANING DOROTHY AHN SECTION 2 [2/12/2016]

WHAT DOES SEMANTICS DO FOR US? What does knowing meaning do for us? INFERENCES! ENTAILMENTS IMPLICATURES PRESUPPOSITIONS

ENTAILMENT A entails B if and only if in every situation that A is true, B is also true. For any situation s, if A is true, B must be true. To test A B: If it is possible for A to be true and B to be false, then A does NOT entail B. (1) John and Mary left. (2) John left.

ENTAILMENT (9) This is a nice table. (10) This has legs. (11) Jeff is a dog (12) Jeff barks. Lexical definitions are world-specific. In our world a table (usually) has legs and dogs bark. But what about w 2, w 3, etc.? [from handout 2/8]

ENTAILMENT (13) John killed Mary yesterday. (14) Mary was dead yesterday. John! STOP! :( [Luke] Mary s being dead at all time yesterday [Ryan] Entailment test works because (14) says there is no point in yesterday when Mary was dead. BUT! Also weird to say that (13) entails that there is no point in yesterday when Mary was alive. to be dead is a state to die is an achievement [from handout 2/8]

ASSIGNMENT 1 #1 (1a) You may have two cookies. (1b) You are not obliged to have two cookies. #2 (2a) If you flunk two courses, you have to pay a fee. (2b) If you flunk exactly two courses, you have to pay a fee. (3a) Mary or Peter will be hired. (3b) Either Mary or Peter, but not both, will be hired.

ENTAILMENT Entailment-based relations: SYNONYMY: entails each other (a) John is a year older than Mary. (b) Mary is a year younger than John. They are true and false in the same worlds [from handout 2/8]

ENTAILMENT Entailment-based relations: SYNONYMY: entails each other (a) John is a year older than Mary. (b) Mary is a year younger than John. They are true and in the same worlds TAUTOLOGY: always true Oracle bone inscription from the Shang Dynasty! [from handout 2/8]

SHANG ORACLE BONES (1200 1045 BCE) Oracle bone inscriptions: texts etched in tortoise plastrons or ox shoulder blades Represented questions asked of the gods Bone heated in a fire, then cracks interpreted

dīng mǎo bǔ ( ) Xuān zhēn yǔ (day names) crack (name) divine rain "(On) ding mao, cracks (were made), Xuan divined: (it will) rain."

bù qí yǔ not perhaps rain "Perhaps (it will) not rain."

ENTAILMENT Entailment-based relations: SYNONYMY: entails each other (a) John is a year older than Mary. (b) Mary is a year younger than John. They are true and in the same worlds TAUTOLOGY: always true Oracle bone inscription from the Shang Dynasty! (c) It will rain or it will not rain. p p is always true! [from handout 2/8]

ENTAILMENT Entailment-based relations: SYNONYMY: entails each other (a) John is a year older than Mary. (b) Mary is a year younger than John. They are true and in the same worlds TAUTOLOGY: always true Oracle bone inscription from the Shang Dynasty! (c) It will rain or it will not rain. p p is always true! CONTRADICTION: always false (d) It will rain and it will not rain. (p p) [from handout 2/8]

IMPLICATURE It will rain or it will not. Mary is Mary. WHY would Speaker say this to me? Grice 1967: We follow some normative principles of language use when talking to each other. We try to be cooperative Gricean Maxims: Quality: Say only what you believe to be true. Relevance: Be relevant. Quantity: Say as much as you can to be informative.

IMPLICATURE (3) You know, politics is politics. [Paul] Sometimes you use tautologies when you don t know what to say. Yes! Ignorance implicature (3) implies [S doesn t know what to say] (4) It will rain or it will not rain. (4) implies [S doesn t know whether it will rain]

IMPLICATURE To test A implicates B: You can cancel B. You can reinforce B without being redundant. (5) Some students passed the test. (6) It is not the case that all students passed. Some students passed the test. In fact, all students passed the test. YES Some students passed the test, and it is not the case that all students passed. YES

ASSIGNMENT 1 #1 (1a) You may have two cookies. (1b) You are not obliged to have two cookies. #2 (2a) If you flunk two courses, you have to pay a fee. (2b) If you flunk exactly two courses, you have to pay a fee. (3a) Mary or Peter will be hired. (3b) Either Mary or Peter, but not both, will be hired.

PRESUPPOSITION

PRESUPPOSITION A presupposes B iff B must be true for A to be asserted or denied felicitously. B must be true for A to have a truth value (to be true OR false). B is taken for granted when asserting A.

PRESUPPOSITION (5) The King of the USA is in New York. Presupposes: There is a King of the USA. In our world (w 0 ), there is no King of the USA: Presupposition failure (5) is not true; (5) is not false. You cannot say (5) is false because what is false is the presupposition that there is a King of the USA.

PRESUPPOSITION (5) The King of the USA is in New York. Presupposes: There is a King of the USA. [Luke] Depends on how flexible you are in interpreting the definite article the.

PRESUPPOSITION (5) The King of the USA is in New York. Presupposes: There is a King of the USA. [Luke] Depends on how flexible you are in interpreting the definite article the. (6) A King of the USA is in New York [[5]] = (there is a K.USA). HE is in NY. [[6]] = There is a K.USA if you go to NY.

PRESUPPOSITION Testing for presupposition: Projection If B is presupposed, B is background information. B has to hold for us to have any kind of felicitous conversation about A, which depends on B. P-Family: Asserting A: John stopped smoking. Negating A: John didn t stopped smoking. Asking A: Did John stop smoking? Conditionalizing A: If John stopped smoking, à In all cases, B (John used to smoke) is preserved!

PRESUPPOSITION [Sam & Athena] Is presupposed material also entailed? Entailment test: Contradiction to have A and ~B. Presupposition: Non-sense to have A and ~B. [Jenny] What is the difference?

PRESUPPOSITION [Sam & Athena] Is presupposed material also entailed? Entailment test: Contradiction to have A and ~B. Presupposition: Non-sense to have A and ~B. [Jenny] What is the difference? A B A p à B A & B A & ~B??? ~A & ~B???

(7) Only John is bringing beer. Presupposes: (7p) John is bringing beer. Entails: (7e) Others aren t. Let s test for contradiction/non-sense! [[7p]] [[7]] [[7p]] [[7]] [[7]] [[7e]] [[7]] [[7e]]

(7) Only John is bringing beer. Presupposes: (7p) John is bringing beer. Entails: (7e) Others aren t. Let s test for contradiction/non-sense! [[7p]] [[7]]??? [[7p]] [[7]]??? [[7]] [[7e]] F [[7]] [[7e]] T

PRESUPPOSITION Presupposition Triggers Factives John discovered that A. It is crazy/amazing that A. Operators John met the/his King. John jumped too/again. Aspectuals John stopped/continues smoking. Lexical meanings John scared Mary.

[Schwarz 2014]

NOT SO SIMPLE! (5) Is Mary about to give birth? [Kayla] (5) can be used to ask if Mary is pregnant. Kayla asks (5), and the hearer makes some inferences: Asking (5) seems to suggest that Kayla assumes it is background knowledge that Mary is pregnant. But it is not, because I m not good friends with Mary. Kayla knows that, so she probably doesn t assume that I know the answer. Then, it must be that she is implying that Mary has a big belly. I agree, and I will answer accordingly:

NOT SO SIMPLE! (5) Is Mary about to give birth? [Kayla] (5) can be used to ask if Mary is pregnant. Kayla asks (5), and the hearer makes some inferences: Asking (5) seems to suggest that Kayla assumes it is background knowledge that Mary is pregnant. But it is not, because I m not good friends with Mary. Kayla knows that, so she probably doesn t assume that I know the answer. Then, it must be that she is implying that Mary has a big belly. I agree, and I will answer accordingly: H: Yea, right?