Humanities 4: Lectures Kant s Ethics

Similar documents
Duty and Categorical Rules. Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena

Summary of Kant s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals

Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes. Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2.

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT

Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy

Mill s Utilitarian Theory

Kant's Moral Philosophy

Kantian Deontology - Part Two

Kant. Deontological Ethics

Deontological Ethics. Kant. Rules for Kant. Right Action

Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals

In-Class Kant Review Dialogue 1

Lecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics

Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals

Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant

CMSI Handout 3 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.

Duty Based Ethics. Ethics unit 3

Deontology. Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6

Foundations of Bioethics

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus

Unifying the Categorical Imperative* Marcus Arvan University of Tampa

38 Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. [Ak 4:422] [Ak4:421]

Happiness and Personal Growth: Dial.

Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals Immanuel Kant (1785)

IMMANUEL KANT Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals [Edited and reduced by J. Bulger, Ph.D.]

24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life

Ethics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur

Two Kinds of Ends in Themselves in Kant s Moral Theory

Ethical Theories. A (Very) Brief Introduction

Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Class 26 - April 29 Kantian Ethics. Hamilton College Russell Marcus

Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.

Backward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology

Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics.

NOTE ON KANT'S GROUNDWORK, PP PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 Dick Arneson

[Forthcoming in The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, ed. Hugh LaFollette. (Oxford: Blackwell), 2012] Imperatives, Categorical and Hypothetical

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:

Psychological Aspects of Social Issues

ON THE INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN ARISTOTLE S AND KANT S IMPERATIVES TO TREAT A MAN NOT AS A MEANS BUT AS AN END-IN- HIMSELF

Short Answers: Answer the following questions in one paragraph (each is worth 5 points).

Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons

Categorical Imperative by. Kant

Download: Two clips from Star Trek. The needs of the many and The needs of the one found in Course Content Kant folder.

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

A Categorical Imperative. An Introduction to Deontological Ethics

Ethical Theory: an Overview

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT

PHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Part%I:%Challenges%to%Moral%Theory 1.%Relativism%and%Tolerance.

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Chapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics

A Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1

FINAL EXAM SHORT-ANSWER QUESTIONS PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004

Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals

Lecture 6 Kantianism. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

An Epistemological Assessment of Moral Worth in Kant s Moral Theory. Immanuel Kant s moral theory outlined in The Grounding for the Metaphysics of

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

A CONTRACTUALIST READING OF KANT S PROOF OF THE FORMULA OF HUMANITY. Adam Cureton

From the Categorical Imperative to the Moral Law

CHAPTER 2 Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE

the good will (based on the new SQA Arrangement Documents)

Plato s Republic Book 3&4. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior

Excerpts from Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Numbered as the class handout is numbered

The Kant vs. Hume debate in Contemporary Ethics : A Different Perspective. Amy Wang Junior Paper Advisor : Hans Lottenbach due Wednesday,1/5/00

Peter Bornedal, General Lecture, 203. Copyright (C) by P. Bornedal

Tuesday, September 2, Idealism

(naturalistic fallacy)

Kantianism: Objections and Replies Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 March 2017

The Formula of Humanity as an End in Itself

AUTONOMY, TAKING ONE S CHOICES TO BE GOOD, AND PRACTICAL LAW: REPLIES TO CRITICS

factors in Bentham's hedonic calculus.

Honors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions

Animals in the Kingdom of Ends

The Pleasure Imperative

Freedom as Morality. UWM Digital Commons. University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. Hao Liang University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Theses and Dissertations

Philosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.

acting on principle onora o neill has written extensively on ethics and political philosophy

FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS by Immanuel Kant (1785) translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott

The Role of Love in the Thought of Kant and Kierkegaard

Natural Goodness, Rightness, and the Intersubjectivity of Reason: A Reply to Arroyo, Cummisky, Molan, and Bird-Pollan

Teleological: telos ( end, goal ) What is the telos of human action? What s wrong with living for pleasure? For power and public reputation?

Excerpts from Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals Numbered as the class handout is numbered

Philosophical Ethics. Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics)

Deontology. Marianne Talbot University of Oxford Department for Continuing Education

Groundlaying toward the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant. Second Edition. Riga, by Johann Friedrich Hartknoch 1786.

Introduction to Ethics

Introduction to Ethics

Dignity, Contractualism and Consequentialism

The Aristotelian Principle in Mill and Kant

In Kant s Conception of Humanity, Joshua Glasgow defends a traditional reading of

Some Ethical Theories

Transcription:

Humanities 4: Lectures 17-19 Kant s Ethics 1

Method & Questions Purpose and Method: Transition from Common Sense to Philosophical Understanding of Morality Analysis of everyday moral concepts Main Questions: What is unconditionally good? Which actions have moral worth? What are our moral duties? (What to do?) What is of value in the world? 2

Answers to Main Qs Answers: Good will (intentions, Principles, Character) What makes it good? not consequences Actions done from duty have moral worth not from inclinations Content of Morality: Categorical Imperative not Hypothetical Imperatives Basic Value: Humanity/Rationality/Autonomy 3

Groundwork I What might one think is unconditionally good? 1. Talents of the Mind - intelligence, wit, judgment 2. Temperament - Courage, Perseverance 3. Gifts of Fortune - Power, Money, Happiness 4

Arguments Against Are all of these Goods Unconditionally Good? I.e., are these goods good in every context? 1. Talents of the Mind - Can be harmful if will is not good. 2. Temperament - coolness of villain makes villain worse. 3. Gifts of Fortune - Power obviously depends on one s will. - Money can be put to bad use. - happiness, if not deserved, is not good. - condition of being worthy of happiness. 5

What makes A Good will good? Its intrinsic Goodness Anti-consequentialist not effects/consequences not fitness in attaining some other end Why? It is better than what it might cause. Good, even if one s will is ineffectual. It would, like a jewel, still shine Its usefulness or fruitlessness can neither augment nor diminish its value 6

Which Actions have moral worth? Concept of duty includes concept of good will Actions contrary to duty have no moral worth Actions in mere conformity to duty have no mw No immediate inclination shopkeeper immediate inclination self-preservation Actions from duty against inclination? Why? otherwise, only contingent connection 7

Why do they have mw? An action from duty has its moral worth not in the purpose to be attained by it, but in the maxim in accordance with which it is decided on again, not effects, but principle of volition motivations, not results Definition of duty: the necessity of an action done from respect for law respect for law vs. satisfaction of desire desires could be satisfied without rat. will But what is law for which we have respect? 8

Categorical Imperative K distinguishes between Hypothetical and Categorical Imperatives. His derive normative force from incentive/end If you want x, then you should do Y. CIs do not. Do not do X. (period) Moral duties and law are expressed with CIs. 9

First Formulation of CI Act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law (or a law of nature) Don t make an exception of yourself Process: Take maxim universalize (what if everyone did it?) Is it consistent? (If not, then it s immoral.) If so, can one still will it? (If not,...) 10

Four Examples (2X2) 1. and 2. suicide and false promise universalized maxim: End life or make false promise from self-love Contradiction (clearest in promising case) 3. and 4. Undeveloped talents and beneficence Universalized Maxim: Neglect talents for pleasure or let each person help himself Consistent, but not willable (esp. benef.) 11

Second Formulation So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means Humans are not things. (dignity vs. price) don t use them, respect them. Examples: suicide and neglecting your talents: use yourself as a means false Promise and beneficence: use others 12

2nd Formulation cont. Humanity formulation not merely negative: positive harmonizing I must make others ends my own. the ends of a subject who is end in itself What is humanity? in promising example, it s rational agency. In beneficence example, it s setting ends. 13

Further Formulations Kingdom of Ends Formulation: A rational Being belongs as a member to the kingdom of ends when he gives universal laws in it but is also himself subject to these laws. (not in reader) Autonomy Formulation: Autonomy of the will is the property of the will by which it is a law to itself (independently of any property of the objects of volition) (not in reader) 14

What is of Value? Happiness and Virtue happiness is the satisfaction of all desires. virtue is the capacity to act morally. Highest good subordinates happiness to virtue. rational agency/autonomy is most valuable. reason (and duty) has priority over desires. 15

Kant and the Enlightenment Kant develops an ethical system that emphasizes reason and rational agency in contrast with desire satisfaction explains how duty is a central moral concept in contrast with consequences articulates duty and its relation to reason in the form of the categorical imperative places autonomy and humanity at its core man has a unique, inviolable dignity 16