I Causation. II Explanation

Similar documents
Must we have self-evident knowledge if we know anything?

First of all, I will describe what I mean when I use the terms regularity (R) and law of

Unit 2. Spelling Most Common Words Root Words. Student Page. Most Common Words

What does it mean if we assume the world is in principle intelligible?

Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of

Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism

Lecture 4: Transcendental idealism and transcendental arguments

Treatise I,iii,14: Hume offers an account of all five causes: matter, form, efficient, exemplary, and final cause.

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

John Locke. British Empiricism

1/6. The Second Analogy (2)

Projection in Hume. P J E Kail. St. Peter s College, Oxford.

KANT S EXPLANATION OF THE NECESSITY OF GEOMETRICAL TRUTHS. John Watling

Does God exist? The argument from miracles

Ayer on the argument from illusion

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

PHLA10F 2. PHLA10F What is Philosophy?

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.

To the first questions the answers may be obtained by employing the process of going and seeing, and catching and counting, respectively.

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

A New Argument Against Compatibilism

Kant s Misrepresentations of Hume s Philosophy of Mathematics in the Prolegomena

Idealism. Contents EMPIRICISM. George Berkeley and Idealism. Preview: Hume. Idealism: other versions. Idealism: simplest definition

David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature ( ), Book I, Part III.

Functions of the Mind and Soul

COURSE GOALS: PROFESSOR: Chris Latiolais Philosophy Department Kalamazoo College Humphrey House #202 Telephone # Offices Hours:

Establishing premises

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Genuine dichotomies expressed using either/or statements are always true:

Hume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

Logic: inductive. Draft: April 29, Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of premises P1,

HUME S IDEA OF NECESSARY CONNECTION A POSITIVE VIEW AGAINST THE TRADITIONAL MISUNDERSTANDING

First Treatise <Chapter 1. On the Eternity of Things>

Cosmological arguments for the Existence of God Gerald Jones Dialogue Issue 26 April 2006

Perception and Mind-Dependence: Lecture 2

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

History of Modern Philosophy. Hume ( )

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

Hume's Conception of Time and its Implications for his Theories of Causation and Induction

Knowledge and Reality

Summer Preparation Work

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

Dr. Carlo Alvaro Reasoning and Argumentation Distribution & Opposition DISTRIBUTION

Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism

Critical Thinking - Section 1

Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

ORIGINS OF MODERN PHILOSOPHY The Problem of Induction

Well, how are we supposed to know that Jesus performed miracles on earth? Pretty clearly, the answer is: on the basis of testimony.

VI. CEITICAL NOTICES.

Time, Self and Mind (ATS1835) Introduc;on to Philosophy B Semester 2, Dr Ron Gallagher Week 5: Can Machines Think?

Oxford Scholarship Online: The Cement of the Universe

Can Rationality Be Naturalistically Explained? Jeffrey Dunn. Abstract: Dan Chiappe and John Vervaeke (1997) conclude their article, Fodor,

Logic. A Primer with Addendum

Philosophy 428M Topics in the History of Philosophy: Hume MW 2-3:15 Skinner Syllabus

The Principle of Sufficient Reason and Free Will

God s Wisdom SALLY MICHAEL. Teaches biblical wisdom in a way that is clear, fun, and engaging for children. Marty Machowski

Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Aquinas s Third Way Keith Burgess-Jackson 24 September 2017

Hume s Missing Shade of Blue as a Possible Key. to Certainty in Geometry

PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING

New Chapter: Philosophy of Religion

John Buridan. Summulae de Dialectica IX Sophismata

INTUITION AND CONSCIOUS REASONING

Final grades will be determined by 6 components: Midterm 20% Final 20% Problem Sets 20% Papers 20% Quizzes 10% Section 10%

Lecture 6 Keynes s Concept of Probability

PHIL / PSYC 351. Thinking and Reasoning

In general, the simplest of argument maps will take the form of something like this:

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier

EXERCISES: (from

Lecture One: The Aspiration for a Natural Science of the Social

Some remarks regarding the regularity model of cause in Hume and Kant

From Heaven Or From Men?

ABSTRACT OF A TREATISE OF HUMAN NATURE. 6: The derivation of ideas from impressions can help resolve or dissolve longstanding philosophical disputes.

A note on science and essentialism

Christian Evidences. The Verification of Biblical Christianity, Part 2. CA312 LESSON 06 of 12

Acting without reasons

TWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW

Introduction to Philosophy

Philosophy 168 Lecture on The World and Treatise on Man G. J. Mattey October 1, 2008

Free Will or Determinism - A Conundrum Mark Dubin February 14, 1994

Different kinds of naturalistic explanations of linguistic behaviour

Lecture 25 Hume on Causation

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

Basic Concepts and Skills!

CONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC

Address 307 Valley Street Purdue University, Department of Philosophy

24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy. Hume on Causation. I. Recap of Hume on impressions/ideas

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

God Made Birds Genesis 1:20-25

The Empirical Skepticism of David Hume. Dustin M. Sigsbee

Chapter 16 George Berkeley s Immaterialism and Subjective Idealism

The Ontological Argument

HUME S EPISTEMOLOGICAL COMPATIBILISM

A (Very) Brief Introduction to Epistemology Lecture 2. Palash Sarkar

Teaching the Metatheoretics of Qualitative Methodology. David Waldner Department of Politics University of Virginia. May 14, 2003

Transcription:

Why? Because...

I Causation II Explanation

I Causation (yah boo!) II Explanation (huzza!)

I Causation (yah boo!)

This calls for a beating... castigation

we are never sensible* of any connexion betwixt causes and effects David Hume A Treatise on Human Nature 1.4, #165 *ie we never observe such a connection, never perceive causation at work.

Light travels in straight lines

Light travels in straight lines LIGHT CAUGHT BENDING

Time Refraction Spectrum? Gravity Ball falls

whenever X, always Y, whenever X, often Y.

Causes of the English Civil War (Document Questions for Common Entrance) by R. J. Acheson

II Explanation (huzza!)

Explanation. That which produces understanding how or why something is as it is. (Oxford Companion to Philosophy)

That which produces understanding how or why something is as it is Explanation, an act of making something understandable. (Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy 3 rd Ed)

Why?

Why? Because...

Why? Because... I see!

There was an old woman who swallowed a cow, [How?] I don't know how she swallowed a cow! [Why?] She swallowed the cow to catch the goat, Why? She swallowed the goat to catch the dog, Why? She swallowed the dog to catch the cat, Why?

She swallowed the cat to catch the bird, Why? She swallowed the bird to catch the spider, That wriggled and jiggled and tickled inside her, Why? She swallowed the spider to catch the fly, Why? I don't know why she swallowed the fly, Perhaps she'll die.

There was an old woman who swallowed a horse... She's dead of course!

Since Aristotle obviously conceives of a causal investigation as the search for an answer to the question why?, and a whyquestion is a request for an explanation, it can be useful to think of a cause as a certain type of explanation. (Stanford Encyclopaedia)

Why are those dominoes lying like that?

Why are those dominoes lying like that? Because it s a stable position. All forces equal and opposite.

How did they get to be like that?

How did they get to be like that? Because they knocked each other over.

Why did they knock each other over?

Why did they knock each other over? Because Alenka flipped them

Why did Alenka flip them?

Why did Alenka flip them? Because she wanted to try a forking domino effect.

Because she wanted to try a forking domino effect. I see!

A singular event e (the explicandum) is explained if and only if a description of e is the conclusion of a valid deductive argument, whose premises, the explanans, involve essentially a lawlike statement L and a set C of initial or antecedent conditions. (Psillos summarising Hempel)

The event e Or e 1 + e 2 +... + e n Exact time space coordinates which include all e (and no non-e)? Full verbal description of every observable aspect of e within those co-ordinates?

the lawlike statement L Light travels in straight lines LIGHT CAUGHT BENDING

the set C of initial or antecedent conditions

epistemology About knowledge Επ + ίστημι = I stand on or by

I have found you an argument; but I am not obliged to find you an understanding. Dr Johnson

We understand Negative explanations Because not...

We understand Negative explanations Because not... Multiple but not exhaustive explanations Because this... and that... and the other

We understand Negative explanations Because not... Multiple but not exhaustive explanations Because this... and that...and the other Statistical explanations Because often...

We understand Negative explanations Because not... Multiple but not exhaustive explanations Because this... and that...and the other Statistical explanations Because often... Non consecutive explanations Because once...

We understand Negative explanations Because not... Multiple but not exhaustive explanations Because this... and that...and the other Statistical explanations Because often... Non-consecutive explanations Because once... Intentional explanations Because they wanted to...

Why? Because... I see!