UGS 303- Research Methods Dr. Stuart Reichler

Similar documents
Labs start this week Inquiry 1 proposal due in lab next week Class communication via Blackboard and/or webpage

From the Greek Oikos = House Ology = study of

Content Area Variations of Academic Language

Already Gone by Ken Ham & Britt Beemer

SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS GENERAL YEAR 11

Now you know what a hypothesis is, and you also know that daddy-long-legs are not poisonous.

Introductory Statistics Day 25. Paired Means Test

Alchemistry. in sequential order as part of the larger historical context, the two seem natural neighbors in the

A Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript

The Nature of Human Brain Work. Joseph Dietzgen

Ethics (ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

Philosophy 102 Ethics Course Description: Course Requirements and Expectations

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS C H A P T E R 3

Chong Ho Yu, Ph.D., D. Phil Azusa Pacific University. February Presented at Southern California Christian in Science Conference, Azusa, CA

CHURCH DENOMINATIONS

C. S. Lewis The Problem of Pain

Why Good Science Is Not Value-Free

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

x Philosophic Thoughts: Essays on Logic and Philosophy

Ethics in Science in particular ethics in publishing. Prof. dr. Henrik Rudolph Editor-in-Chief Applied Surface Science


Scripture. Parable of the Farmer Scattering Seeds GOING DEEPER. Parables: A Closer Look at the Stories of Jesus Week 1 of 5

Predicate logic. Miguel Palomino Dpto. Sistemas Informáticos y Computación (UCM) Madrid Spain

Session Two. The Critical Thinker s Toolkit

7AAN2004 Early Modern Philosophy report on summative essays

Master of Arts in Intercultural and Urban Studies (MAIS/US)

Controlled Experiments

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS

Olle Häggström, Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology.

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

Lecture 9. A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism

Religious Beliefs of Higher Secondary School Teachers in Pathanamthitta District of Kerala State

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018

Susan Vineberg. Ph.D. University of California, Berkeley, Logic and the Methodology of Science, 1992.

Experimental Design. Introduction

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY DHAKA, BANGLADESH

FINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET. objectivity intersubjectivity ways the peer review system is supposed to improve objectivity

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1. PHIL 56. Research Integrity. 1 Unit

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

THE GOOD LIFE Lessons from Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe

THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2014 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

ACC 420 Cost Accounting Section Day Time Instructor Location Format G1 Monday 6:00pm - 9:15pm Green Bay Center 10W BlendEd [6/3/19 to 8/9/19] *LIVE*

Logical (formal) fallacies

Gary Krenz, Special Counsel to the President, Lecturer in Philosophy

The evolution of the meaning of SCIENCE. SCIENCE came from the latin word SCIENTIA which means knowledge.

The Secret of Building a Logical Argument

Strong Inference: The WAY of SCIENCE T HOMAS B. KINRAIDE R. FORD D ENISON

Your Paper. The assignment is really about logic and the evaluation of information, not purely about writing

INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS: QUESTIONS AND SOLUTIONS TERESA KWIATKOWSKA

Assessing Confidence in an Assurance Case

Other Logics: What Nonclassical Reasoning Is All About Dr. Michael A. Covington Associate Director Artificial Intelligence Center

POLI 343 Introduction to Political Research

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE LOGIC BOOK PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

What. A New Way of Thinking...modern consciousness.

Revisiting the Socrates Example

What Is Science? Mel Conway, Ph.D.

Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading

Critical Thinking - Section 1

Why Science Doesn t Weaken My Faith

Atheism: A Christian Response

The Crisis of Expertise? Continuities and Discontinuities.

RELS 241/ PHIL SCIENCE AND RELIGION FALL 2014

REJOICE IN THE LORD ALWAYS

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

Defining Science: The Scientific Method

The Seventh-day Adventist Church Today and Tomorrow

Civic Engagement and Life at the end of life: four stories that lead to questions Robert Pollack Professor of Biological Sciences, Columbia University

The Development of Knowledge and Claims of Truth in the Autobiography In Code. When preparing her project to enter the Esat Young Scientist

Scientific Arguments

Everything s An Argument. Chapter 1: Everything Is an Argument

Guidelines for Research Essays on Scriptural Interpretation

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

PHI 171 PROBLEMS OF PHILOSOPHY

Potten End Church of England Primary School Curriculum Map. Year 6

THE TRUTH ABOUT TRUTH

Review of Science and Ethics. Bernard Rollin Cambridge University Press pp., paper

Indian Science and IISER: Raising Aspirations, Climbing New heights

Introduction to Ethics MWF 2:30-3:20pm BRNG 1230

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Philosophy Courses Fall 2011

The Challenge of God. Julia Grubich

Mementos from Excursion 2 Tour II: Falsification, Pseudoscience, Induction (first installment, Nov. 17, 2018) 1

Defining Science The Scientific Method

GLOBAL WARMING OR CLIMATE CHANGE?

An academic field devoted to meanings of life and humanisation

Existentialism Philosophy 303 (CRN 12245) Fall 2013

Naturalism vs. Conceptual Analysis. Marcin Miłkowski

SEVENTH GRADE RELIGION

Symposia on Gender, Race and Philosophy

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

My name is Karen Friesen. My husband, and I and our 2 children, own and

What is truth? what is. Are we responsible. Have free will? Could robots ever What is be conscious?

(Refer Slide Time 03:00)

Syllabus for THE 470 Philosophy of Religion 3.0 Credit Hours Fall The major goals are to enable the student to do the following:

Transcription:

UGS 303- Research Methods Dr. Stuart Reichler

CO2 levels in Hawaii and average global temp. Fig 55.21

Ideas for using Geoengineering to lessen the impacts of Global Climate Change

Global area planted with GM crops Texas=70ha http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/agri_biotechnology/gmo_planting/257.global_gm_planting_2006.html And http://www.monsanto.com.au/_images/global_area_chart.gif

Should we explore/colonize space?

What is the best search engine?

Robots?

How much autonomy should our computer networks have?

Date Class Lab July 12 Introduction and Strong Inference no lab 14 What is an inquiry? Database Searches, Strong Inference, Termites 19 Statistics Inquiry 1 Proposals due 21 Statistics, Lab Safety and Inquiry 2 Statistics Practice 26 Peer Review and Authorship Inquiry 1 Reports and Presentations 28 Ethics: Using Animals and People in Research Inquiry 2 Proposals due Aug. 2 The Art of Presenting and Writing Ethics Discussion 4 Funding Research and Patents Peer Review 9 What happens after graduation? What is success? Aug. 11 University Research (Who are all these people?), and Why do we not solve more problems? Inquiry 2 Reports and Presentations

Most classes...

This class...

Getting Answers: Start with a question. For example: How? Why? When? Where? Etc? How do we get answers? Strong Inference presents one method (article on webpage)

Cause of Peptic Ulcers: Overabundance of stomach acid due to Stress Diet Anxiety

Cause of Peptic Ulcers: Overabundance of stomach acid due to Stress Diet Anxiety Treatment: Antacids U.S. bought $4.4 billion in 1992 Tranquilizers

Dr. Barry Marshall

the bacteria H. pylori

H. pylori is the cause of 80% of peptic ulcers

The obvious or accepted answer was not the correct answer... Without alternative ideas, the answer would not have been found.

Strong Inference Knowledge is gained by eliminating incorrect ideas. Disproof is more reliable than proof.

Where does the matter come from for plants to grow? Matter can not normally be created or destroyed, only moved from one place to another.

Aristotle (~2,300 y.a.): Plants gain mass by taking it from the soil. Supporting Evidence: Plants need soil to grow. If roots are removed, plants die. After several years of cultivation, soil loses its ability to support plant growth.

Johann Baptista van Helmont did a simple experiment in the early 1600 s

What is the major difference between these two approaches to science? Johann Baptista van Helmont Aristotle (~2,300 y.a.): Plants gain mass by taking it in 1600 s from the soil Supporting Evidence: Plants need soil to grow. If roots are removed, plants die. After several years of cultivation, soil loses its ability to support plant growth.

The Rules of Strong Inference: Strong Inference is a method for looking at scientific problems by trying to disprove hypotheses and accepting the hypotheses that can not be disproved. Using Strong Inference entails following these rules (from an article by John Platt, 1964): 1. Devise multiple hypotheses.

The Rules of Strong Inference: Strong Inference is a method for looking at scientific problems by trying to disprove hypotheses and accepting the hypotheses that can not be disproved. Using Strong Inference entails following these rules (from an article by John Platt, 1964): 1. Devise multiple hypotheses. 2. Design experiment(s) to eliminate one or more of the hypotheses.

The Rules of Strong Inference: Strong Inference is a method for looking at scientific problems by trying to disprove hypotheses and accepting the hypotheses that can not be disproved. Using Strong Inference entails following these rules (from an article by John Platt, 1964): 1. Devise multiple hypotheses. 2. Design experiment(s) to eliminate one or more of the hypotheses. 3. Carry out the experiments to get reliable results.

What experimental errors might have been made? Johann Baptista van Helmont did a simple experiment in the early 1600 s

The Rules of Strong Inference: Strong Inference is a method for looking at scientific problems by trying to disprove hypotheses and accepting the hypotheses that can not be disproved. Using Strong Inference entails following these rules (from an article by John Platt, 1964): 1. Devise multiple hypotheses. 2. Design experiment(s) to eliminate one or more of the hypotheses. 3. Carry out the experiments to get reliable results. 4. Repeat. Refine hypotheses.

Webpage and Blackboard fully functional this afternoon Strong Inference article on webpage Get notebook, bound Next: Details about Inquiries, Practicing Strong Inference, Academic Literature