APPENDIX D Uses of Dia

Similar documents
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

Philosophy 125 Day 13: Overview

Re-thinking the Trinity Project Hebrews and Orthodox Trinitarianism: An Examination of Angelos in Part One Appendix #2 A

Gal 4:1-7 mws. ὤν PPtcpMSN fr. eivmi to be in close connection with, is, statement of identity or equasion, as a copula to be identical with, to be

Russell: On Denoting

Jesus as Spirit. 1 John 2: if anyone sins, we have an [paraklete] with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.

New Testament Exegesis Outline Template by Rev. D. E. Norczyk

What is the Frege/Russell Analysis of Quantification? Scott Soames

Early Russell on Philosophical Grammar

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

What Is The Doctrine Of The Trinity?

The Spirit (Breath) of God By Tim Warner, Copyright 4Winds Fellowships

A Model of Decidable Introspective Reasoning with Quantifying-In

The Journey to Discovering Your Spiritual Gifts:

Metaphysics by Aristotle

Bible Authority. Tim Haile. Bible Authority

A Framework for the Good

Quine: Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes

Trinity. - Immanuel Kant, philosophical giant

Phenomenal Consciousness and Intentionality<1>

The Illusion of Scientific Realism: An Argument for Scientific Soft Antirealism

Phil 114, Wednesday, April 11, 2012 Hegel, The Philosophy of Right 1 7, 10 12, 14 16, 22 23, 27 33, 135, 141

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

G = Omnipotent, omniscient, etc. P* =Rationality, P = Rationality,

What Did Christ Experience on the Cross?

2017 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

Realism and instrumentalism

CHAPTER 1 A PROPOSITIONAL THEORY OF ASSERTIVE ILLOCUTIONARY ARGUMENTS OCTOBER 2017

Elements of Mind (EM) has two themes, one major and one minor. The major theme is

1. Introduction Case in New Testament Greek The meaning of the preposition dia Absolute uses of dia with reference to God 6

Tuesday, July 14, 2015 Grace Impact Summer Family Bible Conference Inheritance

On the intentionality-relative features of the world

Wright on response-dependence and self-knowledge

Aspects of Western Philosophy Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Glossary of Terms Jim Pryor Princeton University 2/11/03

INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES OF CHRIST A California Nonprofit Religious Corporation An Affiliation of Churches. Charter Affiliation Agreement

The Dispensing. In this message we come to the very heart, the center, of. by Witness Lee

Do The Scriptures Authorize Multiple Cups?

Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics 1. By Tom Cumming

Vol 2 Bk 7 Outline p 486 BOOK VII. Substance, Essence and Definition CONTENTS. Book VII

Philosophy 125 Day 12: Overview

WHY IS GOD GOOD? EUTYPHRO, TIMAEUS AND THE DIVINE COMMAND THEORY

FREEDOM OF CHOICE. Freedom of Choice, p. 2

Chapter Six. Aristotle s Theory of Causation and the Ideas of Potentiality and Actuality

QUESTION 45. The Mode of the Emanation of Things from the First Principle

LOCKE STUDIES Vol ISSN: X

SPIRITUAL GIFTS INVENTORY

Ryle on Systematically Misleading Expresssions

Global Change Network, U.S.A. Membership Agreement

Fundamentals of Metaphysics

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents

Virtue Ethics without Character Traits

Ministry Diversity and the Centrality of Christ in the Local Assembly Issues of Diversity Understanding Spiritual Gifting

Anti-intellectualism and the Knowledge-Action Principle

Neo-Confucianism: Metaphysics, Mind, and Morality

Wenstrom Bible Ministries Pastor-Teacher Bill Wenstrom Sunday October 16, 2016

Response to The Problem of the Question About Animal Ethics by Michal Piekarski

Spirit Baptism. 1. Spirit baptism began in the New Covenant era (Matt 3:11; Mark 1:8; Acts 1:4-8; 2:1-4; 10:47 with 11:15-16).

15 Does God have a Nature?

***** [KST : Knowledge Sharing Technology]

Buck-Passers Negative Thesis

THE METHODIST CHURCH, LEEDS DISTRICT

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

Functions of the Mind and Soul

COURSE SYLLABUS - ST5534 Systematic Christian Theology 1

Running head: NICENE CHRISTIANITY 1

Sounds of Love Series. Mysticism and Reason

Stewards. In our reading and studying of the Word of God, it is. The New Testament uses the word mystery to speak. of the Mysteries of G od

Review of Ontology and the Ambitions of Metaphysics by Thomas Hofweber Billy Dunaway University of Missouri St Louis

COOPERATING WITH THE HEAVENLY MINISTRY OF THE ASCENDED CHRIST. Message One Seeking the Things Which Are Above

(1) a phrase may be denoting, and yet not denote anything e.g. the present King of France

Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1

WHAT ARISTOTLE TAUGHT

THE HOLY SPIRIT (101)

Skepticism and Internalism

Metametaphysics. New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology* Oxford University Press, 2009

Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument

Responses to Respondents RESPONSE #1 Why I Reject Exegetical Conservatism

1/10. Primary and Secondary Qualities and the Ideas of Substance

What is Wittgenstein s View of Knowledge? : An Analysis of the Context Dependency

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism

Entailment as Plural Modal Anaphora

Against Sainsbury and Tye s Originalism

Does God Love Me? Some Notes Version 1.0 John A. Jack Crabtree April 20, 2018

Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies

Violations of God's Revealed Pattern. Bobby Duncan. Most of what has been said and written about perversions of God's pattern with reference to

Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods

CONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC

Testimony and Moral Understanding Anthony T. Flood, Ph.D. Introduction

Great Commission Fulfilled

Definition and Meaning of Trinity Descriptions of the Trinity: Biblical Proofs used for the Trinity: Illustrations of the Trinity

A Short Course in Logic Example 3

SCHOOL ^\t. MENTAL CURE. Metaphysical Science, ;aphysical Text Book 749 TREMONT STREET, FOR STUDENT'S I.C6 BOSTON, MASS. Copy 1 BF 1272 BOSTON: AND

There is only One Body not Three

In Part I of the ETHICS, Spinoza presents his central

HOW TO BE (AND HOW NOT TO BE) A NORMATIVE REALIST:

The Problem with Complete States: Freedom, Chance and the Luck Argument

Is the Blood of Jesus Christ in Heaven? Pastor Kelly Sensenig

Understanding, Modality, Logical Operators. Christopher Peacocke. Columbia University

Introduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )

Transcription:

APPENDIX D Uses of Dia To understand what dia(+gen) means in certain key verses (Col. 1:16, John 1:10, Hebrews 1:2, and 1 Cor. 8:6) is crucial to the debate between Transcendent Monotheism and Trinitarianism. The summary below is based on an unfinished study of all the uses of dia(+gen) in the New Testament. While it is incomplete, it nonetheless makes clear that dia(+gen) is used in a variety of different ways. [I have identified 31 different uses of dia(+gen).] The procedure I am following in this study is as follows: (1) I examine each statement in the New Testament in which the preposition dia followed by the genitive occurs. (2) I determine, on the basis of its immediate context, what each statement must mean. (3) Having determined the meaning of any given statement, I analyze what semantic relationship is being indicated by the occurrence of the preposition dia in that statement.(4) As I define the semantic relationship that is indicated by each occurrence of dia, I attempt to organize it into a taxonomy of all the various uses of dia(+gen). Because the study is incomplete, it is only a provisional, working taxonomy at this point. But I think it is nonetheless instructive with regard to the issues being examined in this series of papers. Another problem that results from the fact that this study is still in process and currently incomplete is that there may still be various sorts of clerical errors in the current state of the written summary. Accordingly, I cannot vouch for the accuracy of what is printed below. In terms of the summary below, here is how I have interpreted the verses that form the crux of our controversy in these papers: John 1:3 meaning #13 John 1:10 meaning #10 Colossians 1:16 meaning #10 1 Corinthians 8:6 meaning #10 Hebrews 1:2 meaning #10 page 1

ANALYSIS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT USE OF dia/ / FOLLOWED BY THE GENITIVE by J. A. (Jack) Crabtree Syntactical structure being analyzed: S dia/ G where S = any substantive or any assertion and G = any substantive in the genitive case KEY: p=a person a=an action o=a concrete object s=a state of affairs ab=an abstract entity at=an attribute of something e=an event Used to denote PERSONAL AGENCY DIRECT PERSONAL AGENCY G is used to denote a person who does S or whose actions directly bring about S. 1. G identifies the personal agent that does or brings about S; and who does so on his own initiative. Matthew 18:7 [G=p]; Matthew 26:24 [G=p]; Mark 6:2 [G=p]; Mark 14:21 [G=p]; Luke 17:1 [G=p]; Luke 22:22 [G=p]; Acts 19:26 [G=p]; Acts 24:2 (first) [G=p]; Romans 5:12 (first) [G=p]; Romans 5:16 [G=p]; 1 Corinthians 1:9 [G=p]; 2 Corinthians 1:19 [G=p] page 2

INTERMEDIATE PERSONAL AGENCY G is used to denote a person acting on behalf of another to do S or to bring about S. 2. G identifies the personal agent that does or brings about S; and who does so on the initiative of someone else, as his intermediary. Matthew 2:15 [G=p]; Acts 3:18 [G=p]; Acts 3:21 [G=p]; Acts 12:9 [G=p]; Acts 28:25 [G=p]; Romans 1:2 [G=p]; Romans 15:8 [G=p]; 2 Corinthians 5:20 [G=p] 3. G identifies the intermediate personal agent whom God sends to proclaim a message on his behalf. Matthew 1:22 [G=p]; Matthew 2:5 [G=p]; Matthew 2:17 [G=p]; Matthew 2:23 [G=p]; Matthew 3:3 [G=p]; Matthew 4:14 [G=p]; Matthew 8:17 [G=p]; Matthew 12:17 [G=p]; Matthew 13:35 [G=p]; Matthew 21:4 [G=p]; Matthew 24:15 [G=p]; Matthew 27:9 [G=p]; Luke 1:70 [G=p]; Luke 18:31 [G=p]; John 1:17 (both) [G=p]; Acts 1:16 [G=p]; Acts 2:16 [G=p]; Acts 2:23 [G=p] ULTIMATE PERSONAL AGENCY G is used to denote the personal agent who is ultimately causing or responsible for S, even if other intermediate causes were present. 4. G identifies the ultimate personal agent who is ultimately responsible for doing or bringing about S; but who does so through intermediary means or agents. Acts 1:2 [G=p]; Acts 4:25 [G=p]; Romans 8:37 [G=p] 5. G identifies the ultimate agent who sends some intermediate agent to do or bring about S. Matthew 11:2 [G=p]; Mark 16:8 [G=p]; Acts 11:30 [G=p]; Acts 15:7 [G=p]; Acts 15:23 [G=p] page 3

PERCEIVED (PHENOMENAL) PERSONAL AGENCY G is used to denote a person whose actions are perceived to be connected with bringing about S, but whose actions were not the actual cause of S. 6. G identifies the person whose actions would naturally appear to suggest that he is the personal agent that does or brings about S; but whose actions, in fact, are not the actual cause of S. Acts 2:22 [G=p]; Acts 2:43 [G=p]; Acts 4:16 [G=p]; Acts 5:12 [G=p]; Acts 7:25 [G=p]; Acts 14:3 [G=p]; Acts 15:12 [G=p]; Acts 19:11 [G=p] Used to denote BASIS EPISTEMIC BASIS G is used to denote someone or something that serves in some significant and noteworthy way as the epistemic basis for S. 7. G identifies the epistemic basis for the epistemic act specified in S. John 1:7 [G=p]; John 17:20 [G=?]; Romans 1:12 [G=?]; Romans 3:20 [G=?] 8. G identifies the epistemic basis for the epistemic state specified in S. 9. G identifies the epistemic basis for the epistemic status of an assertion or set of assertions specified in S. Mark 16:20 [G=?] NON-EPISTEMIC BASIS G is used to denote someone or something that makes a significant and noteworthy contribution to the basis for S. 10. G identifies the basis for S by identifying the purpose, the intended aim, or the raison d etre of S. John 1:10 [G=p]; Romans 3:25 [G=a]; Romans 11:36 [G=p]; 1 Corinthians 8:6 [G=p] page 4

11. G identifies the basis for S by identifying someone or something that provides the occasion or opportunity for S. John 3:17 [G=p]; John 11:4 [G=?]; Acts 10:36 [G=p]; Romans 3:24 [G=a]; Romans 5:1 [G=p]; Romans 5:2 [G=p]; Romans 5:9 [G=p]; Romans 5:11 (2 nd ) [G=p]; Romans 5:17 (2 nd ) [G=p]; Romans 5:21 (2 nd ) [G=p]; Romans 7:25 [G=p]; 1 Corinthians 3:5 [G=p]; 1 Corinthians 15:21 (2 nd ) [G=p]; 1 Corinthians 15:57 [G=p]; 2 Corinthians 2:14 [G=p]; 2 Corinthians 5:18 [G=p] 12. G identifies the basis for S by identifying the act of a person that logically or naturally leads to or results in S. Romans 5:17 (1st) [G=p]; 1 Corinthians 15:21 (1st) [G=p] 13. G identifies the basis for S by identifying the plan, template, blueprint, or standard for S. John 1:3 [G=?]; Romans 15:32 [G=?]; 1 Corinthians 1:1 [G=?]; 2 Corinthians 1:1 [G=?] 14. G identifies the basis for S by identifying a fulfilled condition for S. Romans 8:11 [G=?] 15. G identifies the basis for S by identifying a cause of S. Romans 2:23 [G=?]; Romans 6:4 [G=?]; Romans 8:3 [G=?]; Acts 24:2 (2 nd ) [G=?] 16. G identifies the basis for S by identifying a motivation for S. 2 Corinthians 2:4 [G=?] 17. G identifies the basis for S by identifying the source of power and/or authority for S. Acts 11:28 [G=?]; Acts 21:4 [G=?]; Romans 1:5 [G=?]; Romans 2:16 [G=?]; Romans 12:1 [G=?]; 1 Corinthians 2:10 [G=?]; 1 Corinthians 6:14 [G=?]; 1 Corinthians 12:8 [G=?] page 5

Used to denote an EXPLANATORY REFERENCE POINT G is used to denote someone or something that serves as a context or a reference point that serves to explain something significant and noteworthy about the nature of S. 18. G identifies the context or reference point from which to look at and understand S. Acts 3:16 [G=p]; Acts 4:30 [G=p]; Acts 10:43 [G=p]; Acts 13:38 [G=p]; Romans 2:27 [G=?]; Romans 4:11 [G=p]; Romans 4:13 [G=?]; Romans 7:4 [G=?]; Romans 4:20 [G=p]; 1 Corinthians 1:21 [G=p]; 1 Corinthians 4:15 [G=?] Used to denote HOW SOMETHING CAME TO BE G is used to denote how it is that S is done or how S comes to be. MEDIUM 19. G identifies the medium of the action specified by S. Acts 8:20 [G=?]; Acts 15:27 [G=?]; Acts 18:9 [G=?]; Romans 16:26 [G=?]; 1 Corinthians 16:3 [G=?] MANNER 20. G identifies the manner in which S is done. Romans 8:25 [G=?] MODE 21. G identifies the mode of the action specified by S. Luke 8:4 [G=?]; Acts 15:32 [G=?] METHOD or TECHNIQUE 22. G identifies the method or technique employed to perform the action specified by S. Acts 8:18 [G=?]; Romans 16:18 [G=?] page 6

INSTRUMENTALITY 23. G identifies the instrument employed to perform the action specified by S. 1 Corinthians 13:12 [G=?]; 1 Corinthians 14:9 [G=?]; 2 Corinthians 5:10 [G=?] Used to denote an ATTRIBUTE 24. G identifies a quality or attribute of some event specified by S. 2 Corinthians 3:11 [G=?] Used to denote the CONTENT of something 25. G identifies the content or substance of some thing specified by S. Romans 5:5 [G=?]; Romans 5:21 [G=?]; Romans 10:17 [G=?] Used to denote WHAT IS TRANSVERSED SPACE TRANSVERSED 26. G identifies the route that is transversed by the movement specified by S. Matthew 2:12 [G=?]; Matthew 8:28 [G=?]; John 14:6 [G=?]; Acts 20:3 [G=?]; Rom 15:28 [G=?]; 2 Cor 1:16 [G=?] 27. G identifies the sort of thing that is transversed by the movement specified by S. Matthew 12:1 [G=?]; Matthew 4:4 [G=?]; Matthew 7:13 [G=?]; Matthew 12:43 [G=?]; Matthew 19:24 [G=?]; Mark 2:23 [G=?]; Mark 7:31 [G=?]; Mark 9:30 [G=?]; Mark 10:25 [G=?]; Mark 11:16 [G=?]; Luke 4:30 [G=?]; Luke 5:19 [G=?]; Luke 6:1 [G=?]; Luke 11:24 [G=?]; Luke 13:24 [G=?]; Luke 17:11 [G=?]; Luke 18:25 [G=?]; John 4:4 [G=?]; John 10:1 [G=?]; John 10:2 [G=?]; John 10:9 [G=?]; Acts 9:25 [G=?]; Acts 9:32 [G=?]; Acts 14:22 [G=?]; 1 Cor 10:1 [G=?] page 7

28. dia/ o^ lou indicates extent through the whole of some space or region with respect to something; hence it is usually translated as entirely or throughout. John 19:23 [G=?]; Acts 13:49 [G=?] TIME TRANSVERSED 29. G identifies the extent of time that is transversed by the movement specified by S. Matthew 26:61 [G=?]; Mark 2:1 [G=?]; Mark 5:5 [G=?]; Mark 14:58 [G=?]; Luke 5:5 [G=?]; Acts 1:3 [G=?] 30. G identifies the nature of the sort of time that is transversed by the movement specified by S. Acts 5:19 [G=?]; Acts 16:9 [G=?]; Acts 17:10 [G=?]; Acts 23:31 [G=?] 31. dia/ pantou indicates duration through the whole of time with respect to something; hence it is usually translated continually or unceasingly. Matthew 18:10 [G=?]; Luke 24:53 [G=?]; Acts 2:25 [G=?]; Acts 10:2 [G=?]; Acts 24:17 [G=?]; Rom 11:10 [G=?] page 8