Social Perception Survey. Do people make prejudices based on appearance/stereotypes? We used photos as a bias to test this.

Similar documents
INTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING. Unit 4A - Statistical Inference Part 1

Introduction to Inference

The World Wide Web and the U.S. Political News Market: Online Appendices

Module 02 Lecture - 10 Inferential Statistics Single Sample Tests

Logical (formal) fallacies

On the Relationship between Religiosity and Ideology

August Parish Life Survey. Saint Benedict Parish Johnstown, Pennsylvania

PSY 202 Sample 2. Question/Prompt: It is logical that others see us differently than we see ourselves, and there is

A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS

May Parish Life Survey. St. Mary of the Knobs Floyds Knobs, Indiana

Introductory Statistics Day 25. Paired Means Test

Probability Distributions TEACHER NOTES MATH NSPIRED

January Parish Life Survey. Saint Paul Parish Macomb, Illinois

Detachment, Probability, and Maximum Likelihood

FACTS About Non-Seminary-Trained Pastors Marjorie H. Royle, Ph.D. Clay Pots Research April, 2011

Christians Say They Do Best At Relationships, Worst In Bible Knowledge

How many imputations do you need? A two stage calculation using a quadratic rule

Religious affiliation, religious milieu, and contraceptive use in Nigeria (extended abstract)

Marcello Pagano [JOTTER WEEK 5 SAMPLING DISTRIBUTIONS ] Central Limit Theorem, Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing

Jury Service: Is Fulfilling Your Civic Duty a Trial?

Brandeis University Maurice and Marilyn Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies

POLS 205 Political Science as a Social Science. Making Inferences from Samples

April Parish Life Survey. Saint Elizabeth Ann Seton Parish Las Vegas, Nevada

NUMBERS, FACTS AND TRENDS SHAPING THE WORLD FOR RELEASE DECEMBER 30, 2013

Pastor Views on Tithing. Survey of Protestant Pastors

Module - 02 Lecturer - 09 Inferential Statistics - Motivation

NCLS Occasional Paper 8. Inflow and Outflow Between Denominations: 1991 to 2001

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

If I were to give an award for the single best idea anyone has ever had, I d give it to... Darwin

On the Verge of Walking Away? American Teens, Communication with God, & Temptations

Trends among Lutheran Preachers

While Most Americans Believe in God, Only 36% Attend a Religious Service Once a Month or More Often. by Humphrey Taylor

Same-different and A-not A tests with sensr. Same-Different and the Degree-of-Difference tests. Outline. Christine Borgen Linander

Introduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing Prof. Arun K Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

A FIRST COURSE IN PARAMETRIC INFERENCE BY B. K. KALE DOWNLOAD EBOOK : A FIRST COURSE IN PARAMETRIC INFERENCE BY B. K. KALE PDF

Identity and Curriculum in Catholic Education

Introduction Chapter 1 of Social Statistics

Churchgoer Views on Ethnic Diversity of Church. Survey of 994 American Christian church attendees

NPTEL NPTEL ONINE CERTIFICATION COURSE. Introduction to Machine Learning. Lecture-59 Ensemble Methods- Bagging,Committee Machines and Stacking

Statistics for Experimentalists Prof. Kannan. A Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology - Madras

Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands

Chapter 20 Testing Hypotheses for Proportions

Pray, Equip, Share Jesus:

Many feel Christmas is under seige

Nigerian University Students Attitudes toward Pentecostalism: Pilot Study Report NPCRC Technical Report #N1102

American Views on Religious Freedom. Phone Survey of 1,000 Americans

Opinions about the Latin Mass have shifted over time A Majority of adult Catholics express no opinion on return of older liturgy

A Survey of Christian Education and Formation Leaders Serving Episcopal Churches

Six Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Radiomics for Disease Characterization: An Outcome Prediction in Cancer Patients

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next

About Type I and Type II Errors: Examples

A Comprehensive Study of The Frum Community of Greater Montreal

Pastor Plans for Super Bowl Sunday Activities. Survey of Protestant Pastors in Churches Typically Conducting Sunday Night Activities

Discussion Notes for Bayesian Reasoning

Tests of Homogeneity and Independence

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

U.S. Catholics Express Favorable View of Pope Francis

Parish Needs Survey (part 2): the Needs of the Parishes

Results from the Johns Hopkins Faculty Survey. A Report to the Johns Hopkins Committee on Faculty Development and Gender Dr. Cynthia Wolberger, Chair

Torah Code Cluster Probabilities

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

6 WEEK REALITY CHECK

New Presbyterian Congregations

U.S. Jewish Young Adults React to the Gaza Conflict: A Survey of Birthright Israel Applicants

Evangelicals, the Gospel, and Jewish People

CHAPTER 17: UNCERTAINTY AND RANDOM: WHEN IS CONCLUSION JUSTIFIED?

Survey of Pastors. Source of Data in This Report

Measuring religious intolerance across Indonesian provinces

The Reform and Conservative Movements in Israel: A Profile and Attitudes

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN CRISIS New Jersey Residents Blame Church Leaders

The numbers of single adults practising Christian worship

Non-Religious Demographics and the Canadian Census Speech delivered at the Centre For Inquiry Ontario April 29, 2011

Support, Experience and Intentionality:

Serial numbers, duplicates etc July at 2:10 AM

American Views on Islam. Phone Survey of 1,000 Americans

CS485/685 Lecture 5: Jan 19, 2016

BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 600 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101

Classroom Voting Questions: Statistics

Studying Adaptive Learning Efficacy using Propensity Score Matching

Family Studies Center Methods Workshop

Chapter 2 Science as a Way of Knowing: Critical Thinking about the Environment

Pastor Views on Sermons and the IRS

Recoding of Jews in the Pew Portrait of Jewish Americans Elizabeth Tighe Raquel Kramer Leonard Saxe Daniel Parmer Ryan Victor July 9, 2014

Survey Report New Hope Church: Attitudes and Opinions of the People in the Pews

occasions (2) occasions (5.5) occasions (10) occasions (15.5) occasions (22) occasions (28)

Causal fallacies; Causation and experiments. Phil 12: Logic and Decision Making Winter 2010 UC San Diego 2/26/2010

Comprehension Strategy. I think: Determining a Purpose for Reading. Why am I reading this? What do I need to remember?

Working Paper Anglican Church of Canada Statistics

The Diocese of Winchester

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

PHIL 480: Seminar in the History of Philosophy Building Moral Character: Neo-Confucianism and Moral Psychology

Statistical Inference Casella

Christian Media in Australia: Who Tunes In and Who Tunes It Out. Arnie Cole, Ed.D. & Pamela Caudill Ovwigho, Ph.D.

Men practising Christian worship

Religious Beliefs of Higher Secondary School Teachers in Pathanamthitta District of Kerala State

State of the First Amendment 2009 Commissioned by the First Amendment Center

ECONOMETRIC METHODOLOGY AND THE STATUS OF ECONOMICS. Cormac O Dea. Junior Sophister

New Research Explores the Long- Term Effect of Spiritual Activity among Children and Teens

Sociology Exam 1 Answer Key February 18, 2011

Transcription:

SOCIAL PERCEPTIONS

Social Perception Survey Do people make prejudices based on appearance/stereotypes? We used photos as a bias to test this.

Randomization Using the master schedule, our group immediately disregarded all classes without a second period Next, we used the random number table (line 125) to produce three random numbers that were associated with the teachers alphabetically Our random number table gave us three teachers (two first choice, one back-up): Krogh, Lockheart, and Leal

The Survey Biased: Had only pictures, there was no way for the sample to tell what the people were like, their personalities, or behavior outside of what they saw and what their first impression was Unbiased: Given short descriptions and no pictures, made more logical and accurate inferences on behavior and personality

The Survey The sample size for the unbiased survey was 38 and the sample size for the biased survey was 33. Since both of these samples are greater than 30, the CLT applies here and we can assume normality for all calculations.

Question 1 Who would you trust with wiping the tears of your 4-year-old child: Man or Woman? Photos to provide bias:

Data for Question 1 Unbiased Biased Man Woman Man Woman n=38 Man: 2.0526 Woman: 36.9474 n=33 Man: 25.7576 Woman: 8.2424 Here it is clear that the photo created a bias. The unbiased survey showed that woman was the most frequently chosen response, but when we added photos, the responses changed completely, with an over-whelming support of the answer man.

Statistical Inference, Question 1 (unbiased) P: We want to estimate the actual proportion of people in CCA who would rather have a man wipe their child s tears, than a woman. A: SRS-We took a random sample of CCA students Normality- n(p) and n(1-p) 10? 38(.0526)=1.999 38(.9474)=36.0012 But, sample 30, so normality should apply. Independent- Population of CCA 10(38) T: pˆ±z* [ {pˆ(1-pˆ)/n}].0526±1.96 {(.0526*.9474)/38}.0526±1.96(.0362).7105±.0709 (-.0183,.1235) (0,.1235) C: We are 95% confident that between 0% and 12.35% of the students at CCA would rather have man wipe their child s tears instead of a woman.

Question 2 Who would you rather have cook you a 3-course meal? Contestant on America s Next Food Network Star or a first year student in culinary school? Photos to provide bias:

Data for Question 2 Unbiased Biased Middle-Ager 6-year-old Food Net. Star Student n=38 Food Net. Star: 27.7105 Culinary Student: 11.2895 n=33 Food Net. Star: 10.303 Culinary Student: 23.697 When no photo was provided, most people said that they would rather have a Food Network Star cook their food as opposed to a culinary school student. But when shown pictures, most people ended up choosing the culinary student. This shows that the bias was effective in changing people s opinions.

Statistical Inference, Question 2 (unbiased) P: We want to estimate the actual proportion of people in CCA who would rather have a contestant on America s Next Food Network Star cook them a meal rather than a student in culinary school. A: SRS-We took a random sample of CCA students Normality- Normal because n(p) and n(1-p) are 10 38(.7105)=26.999 38(.2895)=11.001 Independent- Population of CCA 10(38) T: pˆ±z* [ {pˆ(1-pˆ)/n}].7105±1.96 {(.7105*.2895)/38}.7105±1.96(.0736).7105±.1442 (.5663,.8547) C: We are 95% confident that between 56.63% and 85.47% of the students at CCA would rather have a contestant on America s Next Food Network Star cook them a 3-course meal.

Question 3 Who would you allow to use your bathroom? Middle-Ager or 6-year old? Photos to provide bias:

Data for Question 3 Unbiased Biased Middle-Ager 6-year-old Middle-Ager 6-year-old n=38 Middle-Ager: 27.7105 6-year-old: 11.2895 n=33 Middle-Ager: 28.8485 6-year-old: 5.1515 We hypothesized that people would be more likely to allow a 6-yearold to use their bathroom as opposed to a middle-ager just because they re typically seen as more innocent. Therefore, our bias wasn t much of a bias at all and only shifted the results slightly.

Statistical Inference, Question 3 (unbiased) P: We want to estimate the actual proportion of people in CCA who would rather allow a middle-ager to use their bathroom than a 6-year-old. A: SRS-We took a random sample of CCA students Normality- Normal because n(p) and n(1-p) are 10 38(.7105)=26.999 38(.2895)=11.001 Independent- Population of CCA 10(38) T: pˆ±z* [ {pˆ(1-pˆ)/n}].7105±1.96 {(.7105*.2895)/38}.7105±1.96(.0736).7105±.1442 (.5663,.8547) C: We are 95% confident that between 56.63% and 85.47% of the students at CCA would rather allow a middle-ager to use their bathroom than a 6-year-old.

Question 4 Who would write a more beautiful poem? Old man or young girl? Photos to provide bias:

Data for Question 4 Unbiased Biased Old Man Young Woman Old Man Young Woman n=38 Old Man: 25.6579 Young Girl: 13.3421 n=33 Old Man: 22.6667 Young Girl: 11.3333 Again, there was not a large shift in results after adding a bias. That means the general population of CCA thinks an old man would write a better poem, and images of the writers would not change their opinions.

Statistical Inference, Question 4 (unbiased) P: We want to measure the actual proportion of people in CCA who think that an old man would write a better poem than a young girl. A: SRS-We took a random sample of CCA students Normality- Normal because n(p) and n(1-p) are 10 38(.6579)=26.999 38(.3421)=11.001 Independent- Population of CCA 10(38) T: pˆ±z* [ {pˆ(1-pˆ)/n}].6579±1.96 [ (.6579*.3421)/38].6579±1.96(.0769).6579±.1508 (.5071,.8087) C: We are 95% confident that between 50.71% and 80.87% of the students at CCA believe an old man would write a better poem than a young girl.

Question 5 Megan is a 16-year-old girl who is hard working and pays attention in class. She likes to knit, ice-skate, and play soccer. What do you think her GPA is (4.0 maximum)? Photo to provide bias:

Data for Question 5 Unbiased (no photo) Mean GPA: 3.64 Median: 3.7 St. dev:.3107 Variance:.0965 Min: 2.9 Max: 4.0 n=32 95% CI for the mean: (3.5374,3.7416) Biased (photo) Mean GPA: 3.71 Median: 3.75 St. dev:.2884 Variance:.0832 Min: 3.0 Max: 4.0 n=38 95% CI for the mean: (3.6048,3.8127)

Question 5 Unbiased Biased

Overall-Unbiased All unbiased responses were as predicted, apart from the public s apparent preference for allowing middle-aged strangers to use their bathrooms over 6-year-old strangers. We had anticipated the results might have been opposite. Reason for this was probably a flaw in our own hypothesis. Perhaps we were wrong to think people would feel sensitive about what kinds of strangers use their bathrooms. Perhaps these results were more indicative of this uselessness of a question, or apathy on our surveyees parts.

Overall-Biased Our use of visual bias seems to have been effective. For example, both tearwiping and meal-cooking responses completely changed. Bathroom-using slightly increased as a result of our bias, though we feel it should have been more dramatic, if only its unbiased responses were not so strange in favoring middle-aged strangers. Last, the question of poem-writing changed in favor of our bias as well, though not as obviously as we would have hoped. The concepts tested in these last two questions may not have been significant enough to show strong results in such a small sample size. We might also just have very strange ideas about social perception that would not have been statistically supported in any survey, no matter the sample size.

More There are not really statistics on these topics, but research on national opinion. Studies say most people feel more comfortable with a female babysitter, and our unbiased survey supports that. Our surveys did not suffer from undercoverage or nonresponse. Bias naturally occurred from people s prejudices and long-standing opinions.

In conclusion We found that by changing the survey in most cases changed the outcome of how people answered. In almost all cases when we made the question bias, the response followed and people answered exactly as we expected them to do. One big problem we had with our bias is in some cases it is hard to find the exact visual aid we needed in order to introduce the exact bias we were looking for, so we had to use pictures slightly different then we intended. While conducting this survey, we were surprised to find that the mean GPA of the student with the picture showing was.07 higher, as we expected it to be significantly lower with the bias of the picture introduced. If we were to repeat the survey, we may consider removing the description of the girl in the biased survey and simply show a picture of her and ask what the survey taker suspects is her GPA.

Any Questions?