Claim-trigger module

Similar documents
Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

GENERAL ADVICE ABOUT WJEC GCSE RS

Chapter 15. Elements of Argument: Claims and Exceptions

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

Writing the Argumentative Essay

Alcohol, idols, and stumbling blocks Westminster Presbyterian Church January 28, Corinthians 8:1-13

Ethical Relativism 1. Ethical Relativism: Ethical Relativism: subjective objective ethical nihilism Ice cream is good subjective

SUPPORT MATERIAL FOR 'DETERMINISM AND FREE WILL ' (UNIT 2 TOPIC 5)

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

November 1/2, 2008 Flee Sexual Immorality Living Like a Christian 1 Corinthians 6:12-20 Pastor Bryan Clark

The Colorado report: beyond the cheerleading

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

LAW04. Law and Morals. The Concepts of Law

In Defense of Culpable Ignorance

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center

Tool 1: Becoming inspired

End-of-Life Choices in Mexico Public opinions and the Catholic Church influence. Asunción Álvarez del Río. DMD México

War Protests & Free Speech: Guide to Critical Analysis

THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING

Guidelines for Intervention/Response To Clergy Addicted to a Substance or Behavior

The Toulmin Model in Brief

Cato Institute 2017 Free Speech and Tolerance Survey

Ethics and Science. Obstacles to search for truth. Ethics: Basic Concepts 1

Ethics. Road map. Outline. Gary W. Oehlert. February 5, Three class sessions on ethics:

A Framework for Thinking Ethically

English II Writing Persuasive Prompt

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

C: Cloe Madanes T: Tony Robbins D: Dana G: Greg

GLOBAL CHALLENGES NORDIC EXPERIENCES

Module 7: ethical behavior 1. Steps in this module: 2. Complete the case study Framework for Ethical Decision Making

Counterarguments. This presentation will: 1. Define counterargument 2. Show you how to construct a counterargument.

State of the First Amendment 2009 Commissioned by the First Amendment Center

Positions 1 and 2 are rarely useful in academic discourse Issues, evidence, underpinning assumptions, context etc. make arguments complex and nuanced

Writing an Argumentative Essay Counter-Arguments

Church of God. Ministerial Licensure Application NAME OF APPLICANT: MINISTERIAL FILE NUMBER: STATE/REGION: CHURCH OF GOD INTERNATIONAL OFFICES

Patience for Relationships Cross Culture February 19, 2011 Joel Shorey

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Chapter Overviews. Who Am I?: Discovering My True Identity CHAPTER ONE. Objectives. Key Concept. In Your Faith. Definitions

IGNITED IN CHRIST Healing Ministry Setting the Captives free

Ethical Theory for Catholic Professionals

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

Three Ethics Reasoning Assessment (TERA) Lene Arnett Jensen, Clark University

CHRISTIAN COMMUNICATORS OF OHIO SPEECH AND DEBATE PROGRAM

I Have A Dream. New Far East Book Six Lesson Four 黃昭瑞. Judy Huang 台南女中

Handout 2: The Ethical Use of PEDs

CHRISTIANITY vs HUMANISM

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

GRATEFUL FOR THE FOUNDATION OF FREEDOM Galatians 3:13-14

LYING TEACHER S NOTES

Women and Violent Radicalization. Summary

I got a right! By Tim Sprod

IV. Economics of Religion

Calling of God Janet Taillight Ohlin May 1, 2011

Christians. Rom. 13:1-7

Sermon for Second Midweek Service. Stir Up the Power of Preparation

We Become What We Worship. 2 Peter 1: 3-4 and Psalm 115: 8. Lifepath Church. November 6, 2016

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies?

Position Papers. Debating Positions to Develop a Complex Argument

Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade

Suicide. 1. Rationality vs. Morality: Kagan begins by distinguishing between two questions:

Case 1:13-cv EGS Document 7-3 Filed 09/19/13 Page 1 of 8 EXHIBIT 3

The Wellbeing Course. Resource: Managing Beliefs. The Wellbeing Course was written by Professor Nick Titov and Dr Blake Dear

The Mandarin Game. By Gary Giombi

LESSON 1: DIRECT & PROTECT INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION QUESTIONS MOVING FORWARD SCRIPTURE

BUT WAIT THERE S MORE

SoulCare Foundations I : The Basic Model

Morally Adaptive or Morally Maladaptive: A Look at Compassion, Mercy, and Bravery

CAPITAL BAPTIST CHURCH MAY 2, Faith Needed to Please God Hebrews 11:4-7 Faith s Hall of Fame

Session Two. The Critical Thinker s Toolkit

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International Advanced Subsidiary and Advanced Level

Violence in the gospel of Mark

An Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating

Relationships between the Genders By David Hutchison

Considering Gender and Generations in Lybarger's Pathways to Secularism

ARGUMENT ESSAY WRITING

Modal verbs of obligation. LEVEL NUMBER LANGUAGE Beginner A2_1057G_EN English

Problems in Philosophy Final Review. Some methodological points

Post-Seminary Formation

Ethnicity and Politics

the polling company, inc./womantrend Kellyanne Conway, President & CEO August 2015

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

Understanding Scripture. Outline. The Formation of Christian Understanding Theological Hermeneutics. Spirit Ethics Scripture and the Moral Life

Why Ethics? Lightly Edited Transcript with Slides. Introduction

Minutes: Watersmeet Township Planning Commission Regular Meeting of September 10, 2014

THE ETHICS OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: WINTER 2009

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

Creativity and Education *

Understanding Thesis and Support

Channelling Wisdom from the Spirit Energ y Known as Zoltach. The Message. The Message. Seek Your Truth

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

10 Studies in Ecclesiastes

ANTI-ADDICTION DAY LECTIONARY COMMENTARY

LOUISIANA PUBLIC SQUARE

ARGUMENT AS INQUIRY: QUESTIONING A TEXT

or did not happen. Some questions of fact are easily answered. These include the many

The Illusion of Limitations in Making Choices. The problem with discussing the idea of freedom is that the concept of it is

love thy neighbor as thyself.

Transcription:

Claim-trigger module

Believability of Statements Imagine reading a novel. The truth of the statements presented in the novel usually doesn t matter. We are often willing to suspend our disbelief while reading novels. We whole-heartedly accept the world created by the author. On the other hand, when we read to learn, understand, or make decisions, then the truth of statements does matter. You have to be able to notice when a claim is being made, and then evaluate the quality of the claim and supporting reasons. Some of the claims will be well-founded, whereas others may have little to no support at all.

Importance of claims People make claims all the time such as: LCD TVs are most energy efficient. You should take Prozac if you are depressed. Whole foods has the best fresh produce. Americans should buy American-made products. The Rayma Bracelet will balance your body s ions and renew your body s energy.

Importance of claims When people make these claims, their intension is to persuade you to believe or do something. Generally, however, they do not provide reasons or support to tell you why they think their statement is true. It is important for you to notice when people make claims so you can determine whether they have enough support for their claim. Thus, this power point we help you become more skilled in detecting claims.

What is a claim? Claims are debatable statements that the speaker is trying to persuade you to believe a certain way about. By debatable, we mean that people can have different opinions or stances on the issue. Because the claim is not agreed upon, it requires support. The more controversial the claim, the more support it requires if you want to convince your audience. Question: List all the ways you can notice that a claim is presented.

Clues to claims There are many clues that can help you decide that you have encountered a claim. We are going to show you 4 such ways: 1. Use of knowledge or beliefs 2. Presence of evidence 3. Use of modal verbs 4. Use of evaluative terms

(1) Use your knowledge or beliefs to identify claims One way to identify claims is to check the believability of statements you hear against your own knowledge or beliefs. A statement may be a claim if it runs counter to your beliefs. Remember that claims are debatable statements. So finding someone that disagrees with a statement will indicate that the statement is debatable. If you notice that a statement is against your personal beliefs or those of others, you can classify it as a claim. E.g., Let s say you believe that TV isn t harmful and you hear Watching violent TV programs is harmful Since it is against your beliefs, you can see it is a claim and then ask What s your evidence?

(1) Use your knowledge or beliefs to identify claims A statement may also be detected as a claim if you have knowledge that the topic is controversial the easiest way to recognize a claim is to be familiar with different opinions on the topic. E.g., If you know that that the topic of TV violence is controversial. It will than be easy to notice that the following statement is a claim: Watching violent TV programs is harmful. So pay attention to your own knowledge and beliefs when trying to identify claims.

(2) Use the presentation of evidence to identify claims Another clue that indicates a claim was made is the presence of evidence when the arguer gives you a reason to support the statement, then they are acknowledging that it is controversial E.g., TV violence is harmful. We know this because of studies showing increased violence in kids that also watch more violent TV programs. Notice that the speaker gives you a reason to try to persuade you that the claim is believable. Therefore, the speaker is indicating that a claim is being made.

(3) Use of modal verbs to identify claims A statement may be a claim if it has a modal verb. Certain types of claims have modals verbs such as should, must, ought to, might, shall, could. These verbs forms indicate a claim about how the world should be. E.g., Kids should not watch violent TV programs. These type of claims with modal verbs are a special type. We call them policy claims. Policy claims are those in which the speaker is trying to convince you to change a behavior.

(3) Use of modal verbs to identify claims E.g., Hunting animals for sport should be prohibited. We should be allowed to hunt animals for sport. Parents should encourage their children to hunt animals for sport. We must hunt animals for sport to keep their population down.

(4) Use of evaluative terms A statement may be a claim if it has one or more evaluative terms. Some terms such as good, immoral, harmful, pretty, indicate that the arguer is making an evaluation or judgment of something. E.g., It is important to monitor the number of violent TV programs your kids watch. These type of claims with evaluative terms are a special type. We call them value claims. Value claims are those in which the speaker is trying to convince you to trying to change a belief.

(4) Use of evaluative terms E.g., Hunting animals for sport is moral appropriate. Hunting animals for sport is enjoyable. It is harmful for rents to encourage their children to hunt animals for sport. Hunt animals for sport is effective in keeping their population down.

Value claims use evaluative terms Value claims often have is or are and an evaluation or opinion term. Things can be evaluated on many dimensions including: value (worthy/unworthy, valuable/not valuable, important/unimportant) E.g., It is important to monitor the number of violent TV programs your kids watch. goodness (right/wrong, approve/disapprove, benefit/harm, good/bad) E.g., Watching violent TV programs is harmful. justice (just/unjust) E.g., It is unfair to restrict kids viewing of violent TV programs. ascetics or preference (like/dislike, pleasant/unpleasant, pretty/ugly) E.g., Most kids dislike watching violent TV programs. interpretation of data (what a finding means) E.g., Recent research shows that watching violent TV programs is harmful. You can argue that your value or evaluation is best, but it can not be determined to be true objectively. These are always claims!

Evaluating claim-ness 1 2 3 4 5 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Less obvious More obvious claim claim 1. Kids do not have sex until they are 25 years old. 2. It is important to educate students about birth control. 3. It is important to educate students about birth control because of the detrimental effects of teen pregnancy. 4. Condoms should be provided to students. 5. Condoms are effective. 6. Condoms are a safe method of birth control. 7. Studies show that condoms are 95% effective.

Name that claim Chicago should legalize river-boat gambling. Helping the underprivileged is a worthwhile and rewarding practice. Poverty in the U.S. in 2010 is below a family income of $11,000 per year. Recycling materials is a right thing to do. Physician-assisted suicide must not be permitted for terminally ill patients. Do you really think we should have to pay taxes? It is inappropriate for the United States to intervene in other countries affairs. Ignoring air resistance, an object falling freely near the Earth's surface increases its velocity by 32.2 ft/s for each second of its descent. Chewing gum while peeling onions will keep you from crying.

Illinois should mandate recycling. Name that claim The first Harley Davidson motorcycle was built in 1903, and used a tomato can for a carburetor. Sexually explicit music lyrics should be banned. It is important for people to recycle. Six-year-olds laugh an average of 300 times a day while adults only laugh 15 to 100 times a day. The highway speed should not be limited to 55mph. We must return children to their natural parents whenever possible. Google is actually the common name for a number with a million zeros. Grading is an effective way to motivate high school students.

What is the support for your assertion? We hope this tutorial helped you learn to better identify claims using: 1. Your knowledge or beliefs 2. Presence of evidence 3. Presence of modal verbs 4. Presence of evaluative terms When you detect such claims, ask yourself did the speaker provide evidence or support for their claim? The more controversial the claim, the more support it requires if you want to convince your audience.

OK. Why did I call this the Claim-trigger module?