LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

Similar documents
MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Common Logical Fallacies

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Full file at

CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

3.2: FAULTY REASONING AND PROPAGANDA. Ms. Hargen

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each.

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

What an argument is not

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Bellwork Friday November 18th

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image

The Argumentative Essay

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

TOK FALLACIES Group 1: Clark Godwin, Kaleigh Rudge, David Fitzgerald, Maren Dorne, Thanh Pham

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

The Philosopher s World Cup

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Everything s an Argument Guided Study Notes, Chapters Chapter 16: What Counts in Evidence

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Sebastiano Lommi. ABSTRACT. Appeals to authority have a long tradition in the history of

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Logic Practice Test 1

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Bell Ringer. find ALL 10 errors.

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

This document consists of 10 printed pages.

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Circularity in ethotic structures

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

1 Chapter 8: Assessing Adequacy

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

I. Subject-verb agreement (393-4), parallelism (402), and mixed construction (418-19).

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies?

LOGICAL FALLACIES. Common Mistakes in Weak Arguments. (these are bad don t use them ) AP English Language & Composition

Some Transition Words and Phrases

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

Purdue OWL Logic in Argumentative Writing

Grade 9 District Formative Assessment-Extended Response Name Teacher

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

All About Arguments. I. What is an Argument? II. Identifying an Author s Argument

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

Comparison between Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon s Scientific Method. Course. Date

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Critical Reasoning for Beginners: Four. Marianne Talbot Department for Continuing Education University of Oxford Michaelmas 2009

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center

Logic and Nosich s Elements

Convincing People You re Right, With Style. actuality it is not. Writing in this form is simply making use of both critical thought, and

But we may go further: not only Jones, but no actual man, enters into my statement. This becomes obvious when the statement is false, since then

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction?

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Chapter Five. Persuasive Writing

1. Clarity: Understandable, the meaning can be grasped; free from confusion or ambiguity; to remove obscurities.

What is Debate? Debating vs. Arguing. Formal Debate vs. Informal Debate

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

stage 2 Logic & Knowledge

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Critical thinking and the art of questioning - introduction

Chapter 6: Relevance Fallacies

TEMPORAL NECESSITY AND LOGICAL FATALISM. by Joseph Diekemper

Fallacies Keep in Your Binder

Physics 496 Introduction to Research. Lecture 2.0: Tools for the Scientific Skeptic (Based on a talk by Lance Cooper)

5: Preliminaries to the Argument

Logical Appeal (Logos)

Transcription:

LOGIC Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning Arguments reason from the specific to the general. It is important because this reasoning is based on what we learn from our experiences. Specific observations can be used to formulate general rules of laws about the universe. Specific examples from our own lives lead us to think about how general these instances might be. Inductive reasoning allows general conclusions to be reached as a result of several examples of observation of an occurrence.

Philosophers Aristotle believed that all of us need to learn from our experience, drawing conclusions from the observations of specific objects and the experience of specific events in the world around us. Francis Bacon 16th century philosophers turn to experimentation, which involved the observation and comparison of objects and movements. Putting nature to the test : Experimentation became a powerful tool because it relied careful observation of real events rather then blanket acceptance of traditional ideas or those dictated by authority.

Fallacies Argument that may seem to be correct (sound) but which proves, upon examination, not to be so. Attempt to evoke attitudes that are likely to accept conclusions instead of offering reasons for it. Formal fallacy is when your argument has a logical flaw, breaking some rule of validity with respect to the form of the argument. Informal is when the means of persuasion are flawed or appeal to something other than reason. They are mistakes that arise from carelessness with respect to the relevance of ideas or to the clarity and consistency of language. our

Informal Fallacies Fallacies of Relevance *Rely on an appeal to evidence which is irrelevant or does not logically support the conclusion or point at issue. *At times the premises may seem to be relevant to the conclusion but in fact are not and therefore cannot possibly establish its truth.

Fallacies of Relevance TYPES Appeal to Force: might is right - employs threat, intimidation, pressure, etc., as tools of persuasion. Appeal to Pity: when facts are disregarded and pity is aroused. Appeal to Emotion: Arouse emotion based on almost nothing, often using loaded words. Appeal to Authority: Stating fact based on the opinion or statements of someone a) who is not an authority on the subject b) there is not consensus among the experts in the area c) authorities are not specified d) the authority s views are outdated Appeal to Ignorance: Something is true because it has not been proven false Appeal to Popularity: a.k.a. bandwagon argument. Appealing to what is accepted by the masses.

Fallacies of Relevance TYPES (con t) Irrelevant Conclusion: The premise is not relevant to the conclusion. Red Herring: Changing the issue or topic. Straw Man: Misrepresentation of another s argument. Attack on the Person (ad hominem): Implying a person s argument is flawed based on their personal characteristics or credibility. In other words, attacking the person, not the argument. Guilt by Association: Indirect attack on a person by associating him/her with a discredited group. Faulty/weak analogy: If the analogy is misleading, not representative or just weak. Analogies can also be used is a descriptive to be confused with argumentative.

Informal Fallacies Fallacies of Presumption *Occur when a mistaken argument/statement arises from reliance upon some proposition that is assumed to be true, but it is in fact false, or dubious, or without support. *The proponent's argument is thereby flawed.

Fallacies of Presumption TYPES Accident: Using a general rule in a particular case whose accidental circumstances render the rule inapplicable. Converse Accident/Over Generalizing: Deriving a general rule from a specific case. False Cause: When the two events are given a causal relationship and no causal relationship is or has been appropriately established. Circular Reasoning: When the truth of the conclusion is assumed by the premises, often simply being a restatement of one of the premises. Slippery Slope: Assuming that one step in a direction will continue with many more and result in disastrous