Arkansas Better Chance for School Success Programs Religious Activities Frequently Asked Questions

Similar documents
Arkansas Better Chance Program Proposed Rules Public Comment Matrix

Deck the Hall City Hall That Is

First Amendment Rights -- Defining the Essential Terms

October 3, Humble Independent School District Eastway Village Drive Humble, TX 77338

A Wall of Separation - Agostini v. Felton (1997)

THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE

SANDEL ON RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SQUARE

An Update on Religion and Public Schools. Outline

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

March 25, SENT VIA U.S. MAIL & to

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO. A (079277)

Mitchell v. Helms: Does Government Aid to Religious Schools Violate the First Amendment? An Extensive Analysis of the Decision and Its Repercussions

In The Supreme Court of the United States

How Are Reasonable Children Coerced? The Difficulty of Applying the Establishment Clause to Minors

NYCLU testimony on NYC Council Resolution 1155 (2011)] Testimony of Donna Lieberman. regarding

Perception and Practice: The Wall of Separation in the Public School Classroom. Patricia A. Tinkey Ed.D.

RELIGION IN THE SCHOOLS

MEMORANDUM. First Amendment rights of students to promote and participate in Bring Your Bible to School Day

SPIRITUAL DECEPTION MATTERS LIBRARY LEGAL GUIDELINES. Protecting the Jewish Community from Hebrew-Christians*

Id. at The Court concluded by stating that

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

1-800-TELL-ADF MEMORANDUM. Constitutional Rights of Students, Teachers, and Public Schools to Seasonal Religious Expression

Supreme Court of the United States

March 25, SENT VIA U.S. MAIL & to

Establishment of Religion

90 South Cascade Avenue, Suite 1500, Colorado Springs, Colorado Telephone: Fax:

Division over Diversion: Mitchell v. Helms, 530 U.S. 793 (2000)

RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

New Federal Initiatives Project

As part of their public service mission, many colleges and

December 20, RE: Unconstitutional ban on employee Christmas decorations deemed religious

Florida Constitution Revision Commission The Capitol 400 S. Monroe Street Tallahassee, FL Re: Vote No on Proposals Amending Art.

Constitutional Rights of Students, Teachers, and Public Schools to Seasonal Religious Expression

Supreme Court of the United States

6:13-cv GRA Date Filed 09/11/13 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 25. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Greenville Division

MEMORANDUM ON STUDENT RELIGIOUS SPEECH AT ATHLETIC EVENTS. The Foundation for Moral Law One Dexter Avenue Montgomery, AL (334)

Supreme Court of the United States

Does the Establishment Clause Require Religion to be Confined to the Private Sphere? Kevin Pybas J.D., Ph.D.

TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Sejong Academy Religion Policy Page 1 of 9 RELIGION POLICY I. GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

MEMORANDUM. First Amendment rights of students to promote and participate in the Day of Dialogue

Took a message from the Associated Press in New Orleans about this also. Can imagine all stations will be calling or trying to visit the school.

A FIRST A MENDMENT G UIDE

Religion, Neutrality, and the Public School Curriculum: Equal Treatment or Separation?

Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review

SC COSA Fall Legal Summit August 26, 2016 Thomas K. Barlow, Esq. Childs & Halligan, P.A.

Stanford Law Review Online

EMPLOYEE RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION AT WORK

C. Howard, Chisum, et al. ORGANIZATION bill analysis 4/30/2007 (CSHB 3678 by B. Cook)

CITY OF UMATILLA AGENDA ITEM STAFF REPORT

Supreme Court of the United States

Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. Amos: The Supreme Court and Religious Discrimination by Religious Educational Institutions

Their Own Preposessions: The Establishment Clause

No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

April 3, Via . Woodrow Wilson Elementary School 700 East Chestnut Duncan, OK Duncan Public Schools 1706 West Spruce Duncan, OK 73533

September 24, Jeff James Superintendent N First Street Albemarle, NC RE: Constitutional Violation. Dear Mr.

June 5, Ralph Hobratschk President, Board of Trustees Friendswood ISD 302 Laurel Dr. Friendswood, TX Fax: (281)

RESOLUTION NO

June 13, RE: Unconstitutional Censorship of Moriah Bridges. Dr. Rowe and School Board:

February 3, Lori Simon Executive Director of Academics. RE: Unconstitutional Fieldtrip to Calvary Lutheran Church

BOARD OF EDUCATION V. ALLEN 392 U.S. 236; 20 L. Ed. 2d 1060; 88 S. Ct (1968)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BLUEFIELD DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT

This statement is designed to prevent the abridgement of anyone's freedom of worship.

FREEDOM OF RELIGION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN GERMANY AND IN THE UNITED STATES

Case 3:06-cv Document 22 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 49 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Legal Memorandum on Public Celebration of Religious Holidays

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. THE BRONX HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH, ROBERT HALL, and JACK ROBERTS, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

Genesis and Analysis of "Integrated Auxiliary" Regulation

No In The Supreme Court of the United States. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class

The Law of Public Education

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Conscientious Objectors--Religious Training and Belief--New Test [Umted States v'. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965) ]

ELON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW BILLINGS, EXUM & FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION SPRING 2011 PROBLEM

Citation: 90 Ky. L.J Provided by: Available Through: David C. Shapiro Memorial Law Library, NIU Colleg

MEMORANDUM. Teacher/Administrator Rights & Responsibilities

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin

C. Students Engaging in Religious Activities and Expression at School

Applying the Good News Club Decision in a Manner that Maintains the Separation of Church and State in Our Schools

Religious Freedoms in Public Schools

Edwards v. Aguillard: The Lemon Test Yields Bitter Fruit for Traditional Religious Values, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 613 (1988)

THE 2001 CHIEF JUSTICE JOSEPH WEINTRAUB LECTURE; THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE AND THE SUPREME COURT: RELIGION IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON BIBLE CURRICULUM IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS Post Office Box 9743 Greensboro, NC 27429

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COMPLAINT. I. Preliminary Statement

Protecting Religious Speakers' Access to Public School Facilities: Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches School District

God & Caesar The Ancient Modern Clash

Forbidden Fruit: Governmental Aid to Nonpublic Education and the Primary Effect Test under the Establishment Clause

Church, State and the Supreme Court: Current Controversy

Legal Memorandum on Public Celebration of Religious Holidays

1015 Fifteenth St. N.W. Suite 1100 Washington, DC Telephone: Facsimile:

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No svk. Hon. Susan V. Kelley

SMITH V. CITY OF SALEM, OHIO 378 F.3d 566 (6th Cir. 2004)

John Locke. compelling governmental interest approach to regulate. religious conduct, and I will discuss the law further below.

certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit

Chapter 6: EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM 6106 Section 2: PROGRAMS OF INSTRUCTION. Teaching About Religions

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT. No. SJC-12274

Marriage Law and the Protection of Religious Liberty: Implications for Congregational Policies and Practices

THE RELIGIOUS VIEWPOINT ANTIDISCRIMINATION ACT: USING STUDENTS AS SURROGATES TO SUBJUGATE THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE

Foundation for Moral Law, Inc.

Transcription:

states. 4 Together the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses require governmental neutrality Arkansas Better Chance for School Success Programs Religious Activities Frequently Asked Questions The First Amendment outlines broad principles about religion, but does not provide precise, detailed guidelines about specific questions that you, as providers, might have. The U.S. Supreme Court has acknowledged the complexity of this issue in Comm. for Public Education and Religious Liberty vs. Nyquist, when the justices wrote that cases arising under [the First Amendment] have presented some of the most perplexing questions to come before [the Supreme] Court. 1 Because this is a complicated area, some questions and circumstances will have to be considered as they arise, so the following is initial guidance only. 1. What are the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses? The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution contains two clauses about religion. The Establishment Clause declares that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. 2 The Free Exercise Clause declares that Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. 3 Both the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses apply to the toward religion. 5 Government aid must be allocated on the basis of neutral, secular criteria that neither favor nor disfavor religion and must be made available to both religious and secular beneficiaries on a nondiscriminatory basis. 6 2. Does the Establishment Clause prohibit all government aid to any church or religious organization? No. The U.S. Supreme Court long ago rejected this notion. Government aid must have a non-religious purpose, but that purpose need not be totally non-religious. Government aid crosses the line when the dominant purpose is religious. 7 In 1997 the U.S. Supreme Court held that placing public school teachers in church-operated schools where religion is taught does not 1 Comm. for Pub. Educ. and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756, 760 (1973). 2 U.S. CONST. amend I, 1. 3 Id. 4 See Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, 536 U.S. (2011). 5 Board of Educ. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. Grumet, 512 U.S. 687, 696 (1994). 6 Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203, 231 (1997). 7 Adland v. Russ, 307 F.3d 471, 480 (6th Cir. 2002). 1

violate the Establishment Clause if: 1) the publicly employed teachers do not attempt to teach or impress religion; 2) the government aid is made available to both religious and non-religious beneficiaries on a nondiscriminatory basis; and 3) the government aid is available to all eligible children regardless of their religious beliefs or where they attend school. 8 cases: Under this line of bus transportation, textbooks, and tax exemptions all gave aid [to churchsponsored activities] in the sense that religious bodies would otherwise have been forced to find other sources from which to finance these services. Yet all of these forms of governmental assistance have been upheld. 9 3. What is prohibited? Governments may not directly support religious activities or use government funds to support religious programming. Courts have applied this principle to hold that government funds may not be used to: 1) Buy computers that will be used to advance a parochial school s religious mission; 10 2) Build, maintain, or repair religious schools; 11 3) Provide funds to a religious prison program when the funds are used in part for telephone, mailing, computer, copying, and other office costs that ultimately support religious indoctrination; 12 or 4) Provide a government building to a Christian nonprofit organization for use as a homeless shelter that provides religious services. 13 Accordingly, Arkansas Better Chance for School Success ( ABC ) Program funds may be used for all of the purposes listed in the proposed addition to the Arkansas Department of Education Rules Governing the Arkansas better Chance Program ( proposed rule ), but not for religious services, religious rituals, or religious instruction provided or carried out as a part of or during an ABC program. That includes buying computers that are used to advance religion, building, maintaining, or repairing a facility used for religious services or instruction, or paying 8 Agostini, 521 U.S. at 231. 9 Tilton, 403 U.S. at 697. 10 Nyquist at 762-3, 774. 11 Tilton at 683. 12 Ams. United for Separation of Church & State v. Prison Fellowship Ministries, 509 F.3d 406, 418-19, 424-25 (8th Cir. 2007). 13 Cmty. House, Inc. v. City of Boise, 490 F.3d 1041, 1056-59 (9th Cir. 2007). 2

for telephone, mailing, computer, copying, and other office costs that support religious indoctrination. 4. Does this mean that children cannot pray or sing religious songs while at a facility that receives ABC funds? Under the Establishment Clause, religious activities or instruction including prayer or singing religious songs organized or sponsored by an ABC provider may not occur during any part of the ABC day. 14 Under the Free Exercise Clause, children may pray or sing religious songs during the ABC day if acting on their own and not under the provider s instruction or sponsorship. 5. What about organized prayer or bible study during the ABC day? Religious activities occurring during a government-funded program would amount to government endorsement of religion in violation of the Establishment Clause. 15 As a result, religious activities may not occur during the ABC day. 6. May I extend the ABC day beyond 7 hours to make time for bible study or prayer during the day? ABC program standards apply to everything that happens during the 7-hour ABC day, 16 including recess, lunch, and rest, and therefore apply to any religious activities that take place during the day. Even if that was not the case, any religious activity would have to be arranged in a way that could not directly or indirectly pressure a child to participate. A policy allowing a child to opt out of a religious activity does not solve the problem, because a child who decided not to participate in prayer time would be conspicuous (especially if there are no other scheduled events) and would be subject to both adult and peer pressures. [T]he First Amendment prohibits the government from putting children in this difficult position. 17 14 The proposed rule defines ABC Day as the seven hours beginning with the first ABC activity of the day [including] all activities described in 13 of the ABC Program Standards. 15 See Board of Educ. of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226, 250 (1990). 16 See 13 of the ABC PROGRAM RULES. 17 Berger v. Rensselaer Cent. School Corp., 982 F.2d 1160, 1170 (7th Cir. 1993). 3

The Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses protect the private (that is, not supported by public funds) practice of religion, and therefore, protect the right to engage in religious activities before or after the ABC day. 18 7. May ABC providers display religious material on the walls? Yes. Government aid must be available to both religious and non-religious beneficiaries on a nondiscriminatory basis, 19 and the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses forbid conditioning the receipt of public aid on the removal of religious materials from private premises. In practice, this means that government programs exist in churches where the display of religious materials is the norm. However, the Establishment Clause prohibits using such religious material or symbols for religious instruction or observance during as a part of any government-funded program, including ABC. 8. How will the Division of Child Care and Early Childhood Education Enforce the Constitution? a. Complaints: The Division of Child Care and Early Childhood Education ( DCCECE ) will use existing complaint response procedures to investigate complaints that an ABC provider is conducting religious activities during an ABC day. b. Monitoring Visits: DCCECE will review Establishment and Free Exercise Clause compliance during regular monitoring visits. c. Determination of Violation: If the licensing specialist concludes that a violation exists, the specialist will inform the provider before leaving the facility. If the specialist is uncertain about a potential violation, the specialist will contact the Department of Human Services Office of Chief Counsel for guidance in making a compliance decision and communicating compliance status to the provider. d. Correction: If DCCECE concludes that a violation exists, the provider will be informed and asked for a plan to correct the violation within 30 days. If the violation is not corrected within that time, DCCECE will initiate a formal enforcement action to discontinue public funds for the noncompliant program. 18 Id. 19 Agostini, 521 U.S. at 231. 4

e. Enforcement Actions: Any enforcement action will have a single purpose: assuring the lawful use of public funds. No enforcement activity can seek to limit anyone s right to practice religion, or any parent s right to choose a child care provider that offers religious instruction and activities. 5