Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic The Structure of Arguments

Similar documents
Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic The Structure of Arguments

Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic Logic Exercise: Diagramming, Level I

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic Test 1: The Structure of Arguments

Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

National Quali cations

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

Logic I, Fall 2009 Final Exam

Handout 2 Argument Terminology

13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

As noted, a deductive argument is intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. We have certainty with deductive arguments in

Introducing Our New Faculty

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

Theory of Knowledge. 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree?

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1.1 Deductive and Plausible Reasoning Strong Syllogism

Sounds of Love. Intuition and Reason

Basic Concepts and Skills!

C. Problem set #1 due today, now, on the desk. B. More of an art than a science the key things are: 4.

Study Guide: Academic Writing

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic Logic Exercise: Diagramming, Level III

Statements, Arguments, Validity. Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2

In his paper Studies of Logical Confirmation, Carl Hempel discusses

PAGLORY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Time, Self and Mind (ATS1835) Introduc;on to Philosophy B Semester 2, Dr Ron Gallagher Week 5: Can Machines Think?

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

1. True or False: The terms argument and disagreement mean the same thing. 2. True or False: No arguments have more than two premises.

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

Introduction to Philosophy

5.3 The Four Kinds of Categorical Propositions

1.6 Validity and Truth

Logic, reasoning and fallacies. Example 0: valid reasoning. Decide how to make a random choice. Valid reasoning. Random choice of X, Y, Z, n

INHISINTERESTINGCOMMENTS on my paper "Induction and Other Minds" 1

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS UNDERSTANDING OF PROOF: WHAT IF THE TRUTH SET OF AN OPEN SENTENCE IS BROADER THAN THAT COVERED BY THE PROOF?

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Logic and Reasoning QRII. Introduction

2.3. Failed proofs and counterexamples

6: DEDUCTIVE LOGIC. Chapter 17: Deductive validity and invalidity Ben Bayer Drafted April 25, 2010 Revised August 23, 2010

The problems of induction in scientific inquiry: Challenges and solutions. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Defining induction...

PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

APEH ch 14.notebook October 23, 2012

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Logic. A Primer with Addendum

Writing Your Doctoral Thesis with Word This document is an example of what you can do with the POLITO Template

The Gift of the Holy Spirit. 1 Thessalonians 5:23. Sermon Transcript by Rev. Ernest O'Neill

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

Geometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015

A Framework for Thinking Ethically

A. Problem set #3 it has been posted and is due Tuesday, 15 November

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Instructor s Manual 1

Learning from Mistakes Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn

Chapter 2 Human Nature

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview

Functions of the Mind and Soul

PHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1

BOOK REVIEWS PHILOSOPHIE DER WERTE. Grundziige einer Weltanschauung. Von Hugo Minsterberg. Leipzig: J. A. Barth, Pp. viii, 481.

Philosophy 103: Introduction to Logic Logic Exercise Answers: Deduction and Induction

Worksheet Exercise 1.1. Logic Questions

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE

Inductive Reasoning.

A romp through the foothills of logic Session 3

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

14 ( )

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Philosophical Arguments

JUSTIFICATION INTRODUCTION

Theory of Knowledge Series

! Introduction to the Class! Some Introductory Concepts. Today s Lecture 1/19/10

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

Rationalism. A. He, like others at the time, was obsessed with questions of truth and doubt

A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building.

APEH Chapter 6.notebook October 19, 2015

In Reference and Definite Descriptions, Keith Donnellan makes a

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Ch01. Knowledge. What does it mean to know something? and how can science help us know things? version 1.5

PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

Chapter 4: Pleasure Palette

Minds and Machines spring The explanatory gap and Kripke s argument revisited spring 03

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

Transcription:

Phil. 103: Introduction to Logic The Structure of Arguments Spring 2008 c 2008 GFDL 1 Diagramming Arguments Directions: First, indicate whether each problem below is an arguments. If a passage is not an argument, explain why it is not. Second, if the passage is an argument, diagram the structure of the argument by referring to the numbered statements and by using conventional diagramming symbols. Third, state whether the argument is deductive or inductive. (40 points) 1. (1) Looking up at a painting is different from simply looking at a painting, (2) for there is an element of awe in the experience of looking at what is above us, particularly when it is at considerable height. 2. (1) Microbes can acclimatize themselves to such substances as sulphonamides and antibiotics if they encounter them in small doses. (2) Therefore, when using these drugs in practice, it is important to give as massive a dose as the patient will tolerate right at the start. 3. (1) John didn t get much sleep last night. (2) He has dark circles under his eyes, and (3) he looks tired.

1 DIAGRAMMING ARGUMENTS 4. (1) Questionable research practices are far more common than previously believed (2) since the Acadia Institute found that 44 percent of students and 50 percent of faculty from universities were aware of cases of plagiarism, falsifying data, or racial discrimination. 5. (1) [D]ay could not be called the cause of night, (2) because it would not be followed by night if the earth s rotation were to cease. 6. (1) No one has directly observed a chemical bond, (2) so scientists who try to envision such bonds must rely on experimental clues and their own imaginations. 7. (1) Since reduction of sodium may prevent the development of hypertension in some people and (2) since a high-salt diet is almost certainly not beneficial, (3) reduced salting of food and reduced consumption of salty snack foods is probably a good idea. 8. (1) If we are open to our experience, (2) then doing what feels right proves to be a competent and trustworthy guide to behavior which is truly satisfying. 2

2 STATEMENTS 9. (1) People say that a dog knows its name (2) because it comes when it is called, and (3) that it remembers its master, (4) because it looks sad in his absence, but (5) wags its tail and barks when he returns. 10. (1) That no sensation is ever completely public, results from differences of point of view. (2) Two people looking at the same table do not get the same sensation, (3) because of perspective and the way the light falls. 2 Statements Directions: Study the following sentences. Answer whether or not the sentence is a statement. If a sentence is not a statement, explain why it is not a statement. (20 points) 1. What is so rare as a day in June? (Lowell, The Vision of Sir Launfal) 2. Consider the choices of your avocation carefully. 3. Mental activity is exhibited whenever electrical activity is present in neural pathways. 4. Not all mathematical statements can be reduced to set theory. 5. Be careful of what you pretend to be, for that you surely could become. 6. Tomorrow it will rain. 7. Open the door please. 8. Whales are reptiles. 9. My birthday was an awesome day! 10. If you study consistently, your grade in logic will improve. 3

3 Validity and Soundness 4 ARGUMENT INDICATORS Directions: Carefully study statements 1-10. Decide whether each statement is true or false, and write in the spaces provided the word true or the word false in accordance with your decision. (10 points) 1. A sound argument is a valid deductive argument with true premisses. 2. All valid deductive arguments are arguments with true premisses. 3. A deductive argument cannot be both invalid and sound. 4. An invalid deductive argument could have all true statements in it. 5. In a valid deductive argument, the conclusion is always true. 6. A deductive argument could have one false premiss and still be sound. 7. If a deductive argument is sound, then the conclusion must always be true. 8. When the premisses of a deductive argument are true, the conclusion must be true as well. 9. When the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, the argument is always sound. 10. A deductive argument can be either valid or invalid and still have true premisses. 4 Argument Indicators Directions: Assume that each word or phrase given below appears before a statement. Is the statement that follows most probably a reason, a conclusion, or neither? Put a check in the appropriate column. (20 points) 4

5 SHORT ESSAY Word Reason Conclusion Neither 1. hence 2. because 3. but 4. thus 5. for 6. accordingly 7. for 8. therefore 9. since 10. however 5 Short Essay Directions: Define the terms in the following exercises and give an specific example of each term. (10 points) 1. statement and sentence which is not a statement 2. inductive and deductive argument name 5