Mill s Utilitarian Theory

Similar documents
(naturalistic fallacy)

Kantian Deontology - Part Two

Deontology. Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology

Lecture 12 Deontology. Onora O Neill A Simplified Account of Kant s Ethics

Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 100, Intro to Philosophy

PHIL%13:%Ethics;%Fall%2012% David%O.%Brink;%UCSD% Syllabus% Part%I:%Challenges%to%Moral%Theory 1.%Relativism%and%Tolerance.

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT 6

Kant. Deontological Ethics

Deontological Ethics. Kant. Rules for Kant. Right Action

In-Class Kant Review Dialogue 1

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics

Evaluating actions The principle of utility Strengths Criticisms Act vs. rule

Humanities 4: Lectures Kant s Ethics

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT

24.02 Moral Problems and the Good Life

Chapter 2 Normative Theories of Ethics

Making Decisions on Behalf of Others: Who or What Do I Select as a Guide? A Dilemma: - My boss. - The shareholders. - Other stakeholders

Backward Looking Theories, Kant and Deontology

Suppose... Kant. The Good Will. Kant Three Propositions

Introduction to. Ethics

Tuesday, September 2, Idealism

Ethics Prof. Vineet Sahu Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur

-- did you get a message welcoming you to the cours reflector? If not, please correct what s needed.

Ethics From Moral Intuition To Moral Theory

Kant's Moral Philosophy

Deontology. Marianne Talbot University of Oxford Department for Continuing Education

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Moral Theory. What makes things right or wrong?

FINAL EXAM SHORT-ANSWER QUESTIONS PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004

Ethical Decision-Making Meeting the little angels and little devils on our shoulders

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Duty Based Ethics. Ethics unit 3

The Pleasure Imperative

Ethical Theories. A (Very) Brief Introduction

Moral Philosophy : Utilitarianism

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Fall 2013 Russell Marcus

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

Lecture 6 Workable Ethical Theories I. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Kant s Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals

Duty and Categorical Rules. Immanuel Kant Introduction to Ethics, PHIL 118 Professor Douglas Olena

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

A primer of major ethical theories

24.01: Classics of Western Philosophy

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

A Review on What Is This Thing Called Ethics? by Christopher Bennett * ** 1

Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS

Deontological Ethics

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics Ethical Theories. Viola Schiaffonati October 4 th 2018

Introduction to Philosophy Philosophy 110W Spring 2011 Russell Marcus

Deontology: Duty-Based Ethics IMMANUEL KANT

Altruism. A selfless concern for other people purely for their own sake. Altruism is usually contrasted with selfishness or egoism in ethics.

Definitions: Values and Moral Values

Consequentialism. Mill s Theory of Utility

Download: Two clips from Star Trek. The needs of the many and The needs of the one found in Course Content Kant folder.

Some Ethical Theories

Ethical Theory. Ethical Theory. Consequentialism in practice. How do we get the numbers? Must Choose Best Possible Act

Autonomous Machines Are Ethical

Kant The Grounding of the Metaphysics of Morals (excerpts) 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes. Section IV: What is it worth? Reading IV.2.

Quiz 1. Criticisms of consequentialism and Kant. Consequentialism and Nonconsequentialism. Consequentialism in practice. Must Choose Best Possible Act

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS. by Immanuel Kant

Ethical Theory: an Overview

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies

A Categorical Imperative. An Introduction to Deontological Ethics

Honors Ethics Oral Presentations: Instructions

Hello again. Today we re gonna continue our discussions of Kant s ethics.

Ethical Dilemmas in Life and Society

Ethics. PHIL 181 Spring 2018 SUMMARY OBJECTIVES

CMSI Handout 3 Courtesy of Marcello Antosh

Introduction to Ethics

Ethics (ETHC) JHU-CTY Course Syllabus

16RC1 Cahana. Medical professionalism: Where does it come from? A review of different moral theories. Alex Cahana. Introduction

PHILOSOPHY 214 KANT AND HIS CRITICS TUESDAYS AND THURSDAYS, 2:00 3:20PM PROF. KATE MORAN OFFICE HOURS FRIDAYS, 10AM 12PM

NORTH SOUTH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY DHAKA, BANGLADESH

7/31/2017. Kant and Our Ineradicable Desire to be God

Is euthanasia morally permissible? What is the relationship between patient autonomy,

Psychological Aspects of Social Issues

INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed.

HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE GREATEST GOOD. Bill Rhodes, Ph.D. Christopher Wren Association

Look at this famous painting what s missing? What could YOU deduce about the value of human life from this picture? If there is no God then.

Course Syllabus. Course Description: Objectives for this course include: PHILOSOPHY 333

The Kant vs. Hume debate in Contemporary Ethics : A Different Perspective. Amy Wang Junior Paper Advisor : Hans Lottenbach due Wednesday,1/5/00

An Epistemological Assessment of Moral Worth in Kant s Moral Theory. Immanuel Kant s moral theory outlined in The Grounding for the Metaphysics of

factors in Bentham's hedonic calculus.

Philosophical Ethics. Consequentialism Deontology (Virtue Ethics)

Philosophy 110W: Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2011 Class 26 - April 29 Kantian Ethics. Hamilton College Russell Marcus

Time: 3hrs. Maximum marks: 75. Attempt five questions in all. All questions carry equal marks. The word limit to answer each question is 1000 words.

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories

EUROANESTHESIA 2007 Munich, Germany, 9-12 June 2007

SPS103 LAW AND ETHICS

Lecture 6 Kantianism. Based on slides 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley

Dignity, Contractualism and Consequentialism

Foundations of Bioethics

[Forthcoming in The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, ed. Hugh LaFollette. (Oxford: Blackwell), 2012] Imperatives, Categorical and Hypothetical

Kant, Deontology, & Respect for Persons

ON THE INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN ARISTOTLE S AND KANT S IMPERATIVES TO TREAT A MAN NOT AS A MEANS BUT AS AN END-IN- HIMSELF

Philosophy 610QA: Problems of Knowledge and Evaluation: Fall 2013

PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

GS SCORE ETHICS - A - Z. Notes

Lecture 23 Ethics Review

Transcription:

Normative Ethics

Mill s Utilitarian Theory

John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure. [Utilitarianism, Ch. 2 (1863)] (1806-1873)

Utilitarianism: Basics (1 of 2) Consequentialism: any moral theory in which the rightness of an action depends upon its consequences. Greatest Happiness Principle (GHP): the right action among the alternatives open to us is that action that will result in the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. [Mill s Theory of the Right] Hedonism: the good is pleasure. [Mill s Theory of the Good] Social Hedonism: pleasure has the same value wherever it occurs. [Impartiality principle] Long Term: we are to maximize pleasures over the long run (roughly: as far out as we can reasonably predict).

Utilitarianism: Basics (2 of 2) Act Utilitarianism: the action is the unit of moral evaluation. Contemplated action: Deciding which of two patients to give an available kidney. The GHP says: Give the kidney to A. A s B s Total Give to A +200 +5 +205 Give to B +5 +150 +155 Rule Utilitarianism: the rule is the unit of moral evaluation. Contemplated rule: Seek informed consent from your patients for any major medical procedure. The GHP: Follow the rule. Pleasure Pain Case 1 +15-5 Case 2 +20-1 Case 3 +5-20 Total +40-26

Kant s Deontological Theory

Immanuel Kant, Deontologism Nothing in the world indeed nothing even beyond the world can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will. [Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785)] (1724-1804)

Immanuel Kant, Deontologism Nothing in the world indeed nothing even beyond the world can possibly be conceived which could be called good without qualification except a good will. Kant s Central Ideas (1) The person is the source of value. (2) This value rests in my ability to act freely. (3) My actions have value based on my reasons for acting (and not on the consequences of the action). [Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785)] (1724-1804)

(1) What is morally good without qualification? (A: The good will.) (2) What does it mean to have a good will? (A: To act from duty rather than from inclination.) (3) What does it mean to act from duty? (A: To act from respect for the law to view the law as objectively necessary.) (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? (A: Any law generated by the Categorical Imperative, viz.: act only on that maxim that I can consistently will to become a universal law. ) (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why is it so binding on me?) (A: Because I made the law myself.)

(1) What is morally good without qualification? (2) What does it mean to have a good will? (3) What does it mean to act from duty? (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why is it so binding on me?)

(1) What is morally good without qualification? The Good Will (2) How What we value does X: it mean to have a good will? (3) What final (to does value it mean X for to its act own from sake) duty? (4) What instrumental is the law (to value according X for to the which sake of I am something to act? else) (5) The And source why of should X s value: I act from respect for this law? (Why is it intrinsic so binding (X s on value me?) comes from within) extrinsic (X s value comes from something else)

But what is the will? (1) What is morally good without qualification? The Good Will (2) How What we value does X: it mean to have a good will? (3) What final (to does value it mean X for to its act own from sake) duty? (4) What instrumental is the law (to value according X for to the which sake of I am something to act? else) (5) The And source why of should X s value: I act from respect for this law? (Why is it intrinsic so binding (X s on value me?) comes from within) extrinsic (X s value comes from something else)

But what is the will? (1) What is morally good without qualification? The Good Will (2) How What we value does X: it mean to have a good will? Everything in nature works (3) What final (to does value it mean X for to its act according own from sake) duty? to law. (4) What instrumental is the law (to value according Only X a for rational to the which sake being of I am something has to the act? else) capacity of acting according to (5) The And source why of should X s value: I the act concept from respect of laws, for that this is, law? (Why is it intrinsic so binding (X s on value me?) according comes from to within) principles. extrinsic (X s value This comes capacity from something is the will. else)

In this way does my neighbor differ from my cow. (1) What is morally good without qualification? The Good Will (2) How What we value does X: it mean to have a good will? (3) What final (to does value it mean X for to its act own from sake) duty? (4) What instrumental is the law (to value according X for to the which sake of I am something to act? else) (5) The And source why of should X s value: I act from respect for this law? (Why is it intrinsic so binding (X s on value me?) comes from within) extrinsic (X s value comes from something else)

In this way does my neighbor differ from my cow. The cow simply follows its inclinations; (1) What is morally that s good all without can qualification? do. (2) What My does neighbor it mean might to have follow a good his inclinations, will? but How we value X: he also has the ability to act contrary to his (3) What final (to does value it mean X for to its act own from sake) duty? inclinations by following a self-imposed (4) What instrumental is the law (to value according principle X for to the or which law. sake of I am something to act? else) The Good Will (5) The And source why of should X s value: I act from respect for this law? (Why is it intrinsic so binding (X s on value me?) comes from within) extrinsic (X s value comes from something else)

(1) What is morally good without qualification? (2) What does it mean to have a good will? (3) What does it mean to act from duty? (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why is it so binding on me?)

(1) What is morally good without qualification? (2) What does it mean to have a good will? To act from duty rather Motivations for doing A: than from inclination. (3) What does it mean to act from duty? (1) Inclination: (following the appetites) (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? (a) indirect: desiring a consequence of A. (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why is (b) direct: desiring A for its own sake. it so binding on me?) (2) Duty (following reason) My actions must conform with duty ( Doing the right thing ) and be motivated by duty ( for the right reason )

Conforming with / Motivated by Actions in conformity with duty but motivated by indirect inclination. Being honest because you like the consequences. in conformity with duty but motivated by direct inclination. Being honest because you like being honest (it makes you feel good, etc.). in conformity with duty and motivated by duty. Being honest because you see that it is your duty to be honest.

(1) What is morally good without qualification? (2) What does it mean to have a good will? (3) What does it mean to act from duty? (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why is it so binding on me?)

(1) What is morally good without qualification? (2) What does it mean to have a good will? (3) What does it mean to act from duty? To act from respect for the law as objectively (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? Imperatives: necessary. (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why (1) Hypothetical: If you want P, then do A! is it so binding on me?) (2) Categorical: Do A! Categorical imperatives bind our moral conduct in the same fashion that physical laws control our physical conduct, i.e., as objectively necessary.

(1) What is morally good without qualification? (2) What does it mean to have a good will? (3) What does it mean to act from duty? (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why is it so binding on me?)

There is one Categorical Imperative, with three formulations: (1) Universal Law: Act only on that maxim that you can consistently will to become a universal law. (2) End-in-Itself: Treat persons always as ends, never merely (1) as What means. is morally good without qualification? (3) Autonomy: Act so that the will may regard itself as laying (2) down What its does own it universal mean to laws. have a good will? (3) What does it mean to act from duty? (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? (5) And why should I act from respect for Any this law law? generated (Why by is it so binding on me?) the Categorical Imperative.

(1) What is morally good without qualification? (2) What does it mean to have a good will? (3) What does it mean to act from duty? (4) What is the law according to which I am to act? (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why is it so binding on me?)

(1) What is morally good without qualification? This (2) What marks does Kant s it mean emphasis to have a good on the will? autonomy of both reason and the individual human being (3) (1) What is does morally it mean good to act without from qualification? duty? (4) (2) What does the is the it law mean two great according to have foundations to a good which will? of the I am to act? (5) (3) What And why does should it mean I to act act from from respect duty? for this law? democracies. (4) What (Why is is the it so law binding according on me?) to which I am to act? (5) And why should I act from respect for this law? (Why is it so binding on me?) Enlightenment and the rise of western liberal Because I made the law myself.