Some Transition Words and Phrases

Similar documents
Sentence Starters from They Say, I Say

Index of Templates from They Say, I Say by Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein. Introducing What They Say. Introducing Standard Views

Templates for Research Paper

Templates for Writing about Ideas and Research

ACADEMIC SKILLS PROGRAM STUDENT SERVICES AND DEVELOPMENT

THEY SAY: Discussing what the sources are saying

Templates for Introducing Standard Views (what everybody thinks) Templates for Making what they say something you Say

BASIC SENTENCE PATTERNS

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Writing the Persuasive Essay

Halliday and Hasan in Cohesion in English (1976) see text connectedness realized by:

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

Study Guide: Academic Writing

What God Could Have Made

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

Thesis Statements. (and their purposes)

AND YET. IF GOOD ACADEMIC writing involves putting yourself into dialogue with others, it DETERMINE WHO IS SAYING WHAT IN THE TEXTS YOU READ

Multi-Paragraph Essay

5 A Modal Version of the

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Ayer and Quine on the a priori

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW

The Kripkenstein Paradox and the Private World. In his paper, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Languages, Kripke expands upon a conclusion

Language Supports for Argument Writing

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.

Three Ways to Respond

The Qualiafications (or Lack Thereof) of Epiphenomenal Qualia

! Prep Writing Persuasive Essay

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Marcel Sarot Utrecht University Utrecht, The Netherlands NL-3508 TC. Introduction

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature

David O Connor. Hume on Religion H. O. Mounce Hume Studies Volume XXVIII, Number 2 (November, 2002)

In Search of the Ontological Argument. Richard Oxenberg

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence.

By J. Alexander Rutherford. Part one sets the roles, relationships, and begins the discussion with a consideration

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Aquinas' Third Way Modalized

Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide)

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

The Argumentative Essay

Mistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle. Evan E. May

TWO VERSIONS OF HUME S LAW

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Please visit our website for other great titles:

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Fr. Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell: The Famous 1948 BBC Radio Debate on the Existence of God

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Common Logical Fallacies

WHAT IS HUME S FORK? Certainty does not exist in science.

Logical (formal) fallacies

But we may go further: not only Jones, but no actual man, enters into my statement. This becomes obvious when the statement is false, since then

Note: This is the penultimate draft of an article the final and definitive version of which is

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

Introduction. I. Proof of the Minor Premise ( All reality is completely intelligible )

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

Critique of Cosmological Argument

The Question of Metaphysics

Rationalist-Irrationalist Dialectic in Buddhism:

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others

Does Deduction really rest on a more secure epistemological footing than Induction?

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

Spinoza, Ethics 1 of 85 THE ETHICS. by Benedict de Spinoza (Ethica Ordine Geometrico Demonstrata) Translated from the Latin by R. H. M.

Searle vs. Chalmers Debate, 8/2005 with Death Monkey (Kevin Dolan)

An Alternate Possibility for the Compatibility of Divine. Foreknowledge and Free Will. Alex Cavender. Ringstad Paper Junior/Senior Division

10 CERTAINTY G.E. MOORE: SELECTED WRITINGS

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Putnam: Meaning and Reference

HUME'S THEORY. THE question which I am about to discuss is this. Under what circumstances

Baha i Proofs for the Existence of God

Sufficient Reason and Infinite Regress: Causal Consistency in Descartes and Spinoza. Ryan Steed

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Leibniz, Principles, and Truth 1

Direct Realism and the Brain-in-a-Vat Argument by Michael Huemer (2000)

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism

Wolfgang Spohn Fachbereich Philosophie Universität Konstanz D Konstanz

Is the Existence of the Best Possible World Logically Impossible?

Ask Yourself: Which points have the best supporting information? For which points can I make the best case? In which points am I most interested?

A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment

Theory of Knowledge. 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree?

Transcription:

Some Transition Words and Phrases Addition Time Capturing Authorial Action Contrast Frequency additionally again along with also among other things and, and then another after afterwards and then as soon as at length at that time before by and by acknowledges adds admits agrees allows analyzes answers argues emphasizes endorses express find grants identifies illustrates implies after all although and yet anyhow but conversely despite commonly consistently frequently often now and then sometimes Concession by the same token directly asserts insists even though admittedly besides earlier believes interprets for all that granted equally important eventually celebrates maintains however I agree that charges notes in contrast Although it is true that first of all henceforth claims objects instead (of) of course further immediately comments observes just the same there is no question that furthermore in the meantime compares offers on the contrary to be sure in addition later (on) complains points out on the other hand without doubt in like manner meanwhile concedes proposes nevertheless even though in the first place next confirms questions nonetheless undoubtedly in the same way now contends reasons otherwise I concede that lastly presently criticizes refutes still occasionaly likewise shortly declares rejects whereas moreover since demonstrates reminds us yet Elaboration next soon deplores reports though not only but also subsequently describes responds in spite of actually similarly thereafter denies shows while by extension then too whereupon discuss states in short disputes stresses that is does not deny suggests in other words thinks to put it another way urges to put it bluntly writes to put it succinctly ultimately Intensity Examples Order Place Repetition certainly in any event in fact indeed most of all naturally of course the point is to be sure truly while keeping in mind a case in point for example consider the following for instance to cite a case to illustrate as an illustration for instance specifically consequently first in conclusion in the first place more importantly next second (secondly) then to begin with above adjacent below beside beyond contiguous here next to on the right opposite to the right nearby again as above as mentioned as noted in other words that is then too to be sure let me repeat I repeat that is to say while keeping in mind Latin ad absurdum to the point of absurdity - ad hominem-- appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect; attacking an opponent's character rather than answer contention. ad infinitum without limit or end a fortiori with more convincing force, more convincingly, similar to undoubtedly i.e. that is, in other words. e.g. for example qua-as Useful words for argumentation, theorization predicate operationalize perennial antagonisms trivialize contemporaneous simultaneously inscribe popularization intersection transcend elusive constituent predisposed restore reinvent constellation denaturalize situated located displace destabilize intensification

- non sequitur-- a statement that does not follow logically from or is not clearly related to anything previously said par excellence the best of its kind; preeminent sin qua non something essential per se in itself, as such - a priori formed or conceived beforehand; deductive; reasoning derived by self-evidence; presumptive - a posteriori from the latter; inductive; reasoning from observed facts - ad hoc--for a particular end or case at hand without wider consideration de facto-in reality; actually; from the fact ergo-therefore - mutatis mutandis with the respective differences having been considered; with necessary changes having been made - vis a vis face to face; in relation to; as compared to contradictio in adiecto contradiction in terms (oxymoran deafening silence) accordingly all in all altogether as a result clearly consequently it follows that for this reason hence namely then therefore thereupon thus indicative of representative of tensions paradoxes, contradictions refurbish premise penetration intelligibility logic intensify prevaricate exaggerate, hyperbole, embellishment, misrepresents, falsehood politicize received wisdom essentialize contingent normalize reductive coterminous pivotal Result Summary Comparison Purpose in brief for this end in short for this purpose in sum in order that on the whole in order to to summarize to this end to sum up with this in mind therefore with this object as correspondingly in like manner in the same way just as likewise similarly with regard to incidentally argumentation towards a methodology dialectic two extreme views as unity definitional creating terms creating a dialogue arguable claims: - issues of definition (of an object, event, person) - issues of causation - issues of evaluation - issues of recommendation - reason, authority, emotion avoid logical fallacies (errors in reasoning) - false premises o overreaching to make point o generalizations - irrelevance o red herring (beside the point) o ad hominem attacks - ambiguity o begging the question o strawman o weak analogy - bandwagon (ad populum) suggesting agreement because it is popular - begging the question using circular reasoning to prove a conclusion - red herring saying something that distracts from the issue - slippery slope suggesting that one event will automatically lead to a chain of events - post hoc arguing that one even caused another when they are unrelated - tu quoque improperly turning an accusation back on the accuser Critiques reductionism positivism naïve empiricism mechanistic reification economism Introducing quotations Explaining Quotations Adding Metacommentary

- X states - As the prominent philosopher x puts it - According to X - X himself writes - In her book,, X maintains that... - Writing in the journal X complains that - In X s view - X agrees when she writes - X disagrees when he writes - X complicates matter further when he writes - Basically, X is saying - In other words, X believes - In making this comment, X urges us to - X is corroborating the age-old adage that - X s point is that - The essence of X s argument is that - In other words, - What really means by this is - Ultimately, my goal is to demonstrate - My point is not, but - To put it another way - In sum, then, - My conclusion, then, is that - In short, - Incidentally - By the way, - Chapter 2 explores, while Chapter 3 examines - Having just argued that, let us not turn our attention to - Although some readers may object that, I should answer that Introducing what they say (adapted from Graff) - A number of have recently suggested that - It has become common today to dismiss - In their recent work, Y and Z have offered harsh critiques of for _ Making what they say something you say - I ve always believed that _ - When I was a child, I used to think that _ - Although I should know better by now, I cannot help thinking that _ - At the same time that I believe, I also believe _ Introducing standard views - Americans today tend to believe that _ - Conventional wisdom has it that _ - Common sense seems to dictate that _ - The standard way of thinking about topic X has it that _ - It is often said _ - My whole life I have heard it said that _ - Many people assume that _ Introducing something implied or assumed - Although none of them have ever said so directly, my teachers have often given me the impression that _ - One implication of X s treatment of is that _ - Although X does not say so directly, she apparently assumes that _ - While they rarely admit as much, often take for granted that_ Introducing an ongoing debate - In discussion of X, one controversial issue has been_ On the one hand, argues_ On the other had, contends_ Others even maintain _ My own view is _ - When it come to the topic of, most of us will readily agree that _ Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of _ Whereas some are convinced that, others maintain that _ - In conclusion, then, as I suggested earlier, defenders of can t have it both ways. Their assertion that is contradicted by their claim that _ Disagreeing, with reasons - I think X is mistaken because she overlooks - X s claim that rests upon the questionable assumption that - I disagree with X s view that because, as recent research has shown - X contradicts herself when she argues that - X can t have it both ways. On the one hand, she argues On the other hand, she also says - By focusing on X overlooks the deeper problem of - This side of the argument escapes X s attention Agreeing with a difference - I agree that because my experience confirms it. - X surely is right about because, as she may not be aware, recent studies have shown that - X s theory of is extremely useful because is sheds insight on the difficult problem of - Those unfamiliar with this school of thought may be interested to know that it basically boils down to - I agree that, a point that needs emphasizing so many people believe - If group X is right that, as I think they are, then we need to reassess the popular assumption that

Agreeing and disagreeing simultaneously - Although I agree with X up to a point, I cannot accept his overall conclusion that - Although I disagree with much that X says, I fully endorse his final conclusion that - Though I concede that, I still insist that - Whereas X provides ample evidence that, Y and Z s research on and convinces me that instead. - X is right that, but she seems on more dubious ground when she claims that - While X is probably wrong when she claims that, she is right that - I m of two minds about X s claim that On the one hand, I agree that On the other hand, I m not sure if - My feelings on the issue are mixed. I do support X s position that, but I find Y s argument about and Z s research on to be equally persuasive. Embedding Voice Markers - X overlooks what I consider an important point about - My own view is that what X insists is a is in fact a - I wholeheartedly endorse what X calls - These conclusions, which X discusses in, add weight to the argument that Naming Your Naysayers - Here many feminist would probably object - But social Darwinist would certainly take issue with the argument that - Biologists, of course, may want to question whether - Nevertheless, both followers and critics of Malcolm X will probably argue that - Although not all Christians think alike, some of them will probably dispute my claim that - Non-native English speakers are so diverse in their views that it s hard to generalize about them, but some are likely to object on the grounds that Making Concession While Still Standing Your Ground - Although I grant that, I still maintain that - Proponents of X are right to argue that But they exaggerate when they claim that - While it is true that, it does not necessarily follow that - On the one hand, I agree with X that But on the other hand, I still insist that Signaling Who is Saying What - According to both X and Y - Politicians, X argues, should - Most athletes will tell you - My own view, however, is that - I agree, as X may not realize, that - But are real and arguably, the most significant factor in - But X is wrong that - However, it is simply not true that - Indeed, it is highly likely that - X s assertion that does not fit the facts. - X is right that - X is wrong that - X is both right and wrong that - Yet a sober analysis of the matter reveals - Nevertheless, new research shows - Anyone familiar with should agree that Entertaining Objections - At this point I would like to raise some objections inspired by the skeptic in me. She feels that I have been ignoring, she says to me, - Yet some readers may challenge the view that - Of course, many will disagree with this assertion that Introducing Objections Informally - But is my proposal realistic? What are the chances of its actually being adopted? - Yet is it always true that? Is it always the case, as I have been suggesting, that? - However, does the evidence I ve cited prove conclusively that? - Impossible, some will say. You must be reading the research selectively. Indicating Who Cares - used to thing But recently [or within the past few decades] suggests that - These findings challenge the work of earlier researchers, who tended to assume that - Recent studies like these shed new light on, which previous studies had not addressed. - Researchers have long assumed that For instance, one eminent scholar of cell biology, assumed in, her seminal work on cell structures and functions, that fat cells As herself put it,. Another leading scientist,, argued that fat cells. Ultimately, when it came to the nature of fat, the basic assumption was that But a new body of research shows that fat cells are far more complex and that - If sports enthusiasts stopped to think about it, many of them might simply assume that the most successful athletes However, new research shows - These findings challenge neoliberals commons assumptions that - At first glance, teenagers appear to But upon closer

inspection Establishing Why Your Claims Matter - X matters/is important because - Although X may seem trivial, it is in fact crucial in terms of today s concern over - Ultimately, what is at stake here is - These findings have important consequences for the broader domain of - My discussion of X is in fact addressing the larger matter of - These conclusions/this discovery will have significant applications in as well as in - Although X may seem of concern to only a small group of, it should in fact concern anyone who cares about Comparing Two or More Studies Findings - Our data support/confirm/verify the work of X by showing that - By demonstrating, X s work extends the finding of Y. - The results of X contradict/refute Y s conclusion that - X s findings call into question the widely accepted theory that - Our data are consistent with X s hypothesis that Explaining an Experimental Result - One explanation for X s findings of is that An alternative explanation is - The difference between and is probably due to Introducing Gaps in the Existing Research - Studies of X have indicated. It is not clear, however, that this conclusion applies to - often take for granted that Few have investigated this assumption, however. - X s work tells us a great deal about Can this work be generalized to?