Draft 11/20/2017 APPENDIX C: TRANSPORTATION PLAN FORECASTS

Similar documents
Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 1069

Building Up the Body of Christ: Parish Planning in the Archdiocese of Baltimore

Presentation Deanery Pastoral Council Diocese of Steubenville, Ohio. Report to Bishop Daniel Conlon

ST. JOAN OF ARC STRATEGIC PLAN. Planning Horizon

Developing Travelshed TAZ Using ArcGIS. Presented by Erich Rentz April 21, 2015

A Comprehensive Study of The Frum Community of Greater Montreal

Determining Meetinghouse Adequacy

Parish Share Scheme 2018

2013 Traffic Count Report

Metropolitan Chicago Synod Part-time Ministry Guidelines

Department of Planning & Development Services

THE ALLEY SHOPS PORTFOLIO SALE

Assessment of Common Fund for 2018, incorporating the former How do we decide?

Renewing the Vision: 10 steps towards Focusing Social Ministry at your Parish

Focusing the It s Time Urban Mission Initiative

Durham Catholic District School Board. St. Luke the Evangelist Catholic School and St. Matthew the Evangelist Catholic School Boundary Report

The contents of this document are made using Alan Nguyen s Brain Juices.

May Parish Life Survey. St. Mary of the Knobs Floyds Knobs, Indiana

Frequently Asked Questions Commuter Rail

This pamphlet was produced by Leadership Ministries.

Heritage Campaign Information

Social Services Estimating Conference: Impact of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

ANNUAL PASTORAL REPORT 2018

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next

PROCEEDINGS OF THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, March 8 th, 2017 East Grand Forks City Hall Training Conference Room

ANNUAL PASTORAL REPORT 2017

Does your church know its neighbours?

Pastor Views on Technology. Survey of Protestant Pastors

Evaluation of potential mergers of the Provo-Orem MSA and the Ogden-Clearfield MSA with the Salt Lake City MSA

PROPOSED TIER 1 TAZ SYSTEM

SECTION II SEGREGATION


Bearing the Mission of Christ to our Transforming Communities: A Pastoral Plan for Fargo, West Fargo, Horace and Kindred

Khirbet Zanuta Profile

Launch team meeting date: How many members? # In Small group: # of leaders:

Presbytery of New Harmony Evaluation & Long Range Planning Committee Update Report to the Stated Meeting of Presbytery May 9, 2017

ATTACHMENT (D) Presbytery of New Harmony Evaluation & Long Range Planning Committee Update Report to the Stated Meeting of Presbytery October 10, 2017

Before completing this Application Form, please read the accompanying Briefing Note, which provides full background information.

PARISH SHARE OPTION 2

Annual Pastor's Report Of the Local Church

Resolution Related to a Comprehensive Urban Ministry Strategic Plan

HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY POLL MEMO RELEASE (UPDATE) 3/2/2016

Laboratory Exercise Saratoga Springs Temple Site Locator

Crossroads Connection Prison Ministries 2010 Annual Report

Jewish Population of Broward County

Aylesham Parish Council (hereby the council) does plea strongly for the number of councillors allocated to the Aylesham Ward remains at two members.

MEMORANDUM. To: Pastors and Parish Staff Members From: Deacon Rick Wells, Chancellor Date: January 3, 2018 Re: 2017 Status Animarum, due March 2, 2018

Joshua Project 2000 Unreached Peoples List

El Monte Community Assessment. A report by Elder Monte Sahlin Center for Creative Ministry August 2011

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

MEMORANDUM. In preparation for September 12th public hearing, below is a status report.

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Saint Raphael. The Raiders Club Before and After School Program. A Safe and Fun Place for Our Children As described in our ministries booklet, The

Taiwan Church Growth Report Prepared for the 150 th Anniversary of Protestant Missionaries Coming to the Island

Summary of Registration Changes

Mission and Ministry in West Bingham Deanery

Evaluation of Parishioners Knowledge of the Franciscan Collaborative Ministries. Fall 2007

[MJTM 13 ( )] BOOK REVIEW

Parish Share Scheme 2017 A NEW DIRECTION FOR A NEW DIOCESE

Transformation 2.0: Baseline Survey Summary Report

Church Profile. Prepared by the Polk Grove Settled Minister Search Committee 2017 POLK GROVE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST

RECONCILING ESTIMATES OF RELIGIOUS GIVING. November Melissa S. Brown. Joseph Claude Harris. Patrick M. Rooney, Ph.D.

Welcome to the 2009 Citizen s Academy! Volusia County Division of Corrections 1. Volusia County Division of Corrections MISSION STATEMENT

Where are we? How long will the journey be?

Pontiac Correctional Center: Inmate Survey Results from JHA s Monitoring Visit Conducted March 13 th 2018

DIOCESE OF TRENTON FAITH IN OUR FUTURE

POLICIES FOR LAUNCHING A MULTI-SITE FAITH COMMUNITY

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Lexington, Massachusetts. Prepared for the Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC 20591

Welcome to the Narberth 2040

Vestry Orientation. Church Leadership Conference. February 20, Donald V. Romanik, ECF President and Brendon J. Hunter, Leadership Resources

Survey Report New Hope Church: Attitudes and Opinions of the People in the Pews

APPENDIX C DOING A SELF-STUDY OF YOUR CONGREGATION'S LIFE, MINISTRY AND MISSION

3722 Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs)

Secretary's Statistical Report Annual

INTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING. Unit 4A - Statistical Inference Part 1

January Parish Life Survey. Saint Paul Parish Macomb, Illinois

Immaculate Conception Church Wilmington, North Carolina

USER S MANUAL For Pastors and International Ministry Mobilizers

ACCOMACK- NORTHAMPTON 2015 COMMUNITY SURVEY

PROCEEDINGS OF THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Wednesday, August 9 th, 2017 East Grand Forks City Hall Training Conference Room

CHAPTER 2 TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

A New Focus for Church of Our Saviour Mill Valley, California 2015 Narrative Budget

A Pastorate Meeting for Saint Mary Saint Francis Holy Family November 30, 2016

4D E F 58.07

2014 Revision Principles and Processes For The Presbytery of Lake Erie When Churches Seek to Separate From the Presbytery

ST. ANN'S CHURCH $1,450, S LEAVITT STREET CHICAGO, IL SVN CHICAGO COMMERCIAL 940 WEST ADAMS STREET, SUITE 200, CHICAGO, IL 60607

PROFITS THROUGH PRESERVATION

Topological Distance Between Nonplanar Transportation Networks

THE PASTORAL PLAN FOR PARISH RENEWAL AND RESTRUCTURING

University System of Georgia Survey on Student Speech and Discussion

OFFERING MEMORANDUM UTAH EYE ASSOCIATES BUILDING

Misleading and false claims regarding precedent events in Woodley Park

Committee Meeting ASSEMBLY TRANSPORTATION, PUBLIC WORKS AND INDEPENDENT AUTHORITIES COMMITTEE

Nitsa (Kaliner) Kasir

DIAMOND COURT REPORTERS (916) MR. HILL: All right. I guess we are ready to go and I

Pastor Plans for Super Bowl Sunday Activities. Survey of Protestant Pastors in Churches Typically Conducting Sunday Night Activities

MLLunsford, Spring Activity: Conditional Probability and The Law of Total Probability

Congregational Survey Results 2016

occasions (2) occasions (5.5) occasions (10) occasions (15.5) occasions (22) occasions (28)

St. Mary Help of Christians Catholic Church Long Range Planning Committee Long Range Plan November 2005

Transcription:

APPENDIX C: TRANSPORTATION PLAN FORECASTS To determine future roadway capacity needs, year 2040 traffic forecasts were prepared using the Metropolitan Council travel demand model. The model was refined for application specifically for Arden Hills. The 2040 projections were compared against the assumed 2040 roadway network to see where roadway segment capacity deficiencies may result. The 2040 roadway network assumed capacity improvements to I-35W (managed lane) and I-694 east of Lexington Avenue to I-35E as identified in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan. While the travel demand model is a valuable tool for identifying future traffic based on the proposed land use impacts, it is not meant for use in detailed traffic operations studies. For a more accurate representation of the transportation impacts from specific developments, detailed traffic studies should be conducted to determine the operational impacts on adjacent roadways and intersections. A central concept of travel demand forecasting is the use of Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs). Each forecast study area, in this case the City of Arden Hills, is divided into a series of TAZs. Each TAZ has land use data which indicates trip generation and trip attraction including population, household, and employment data. Figure C.1 displays Metropolitan Council TAZs within Arden Hills. The results of the Arden Hills modeling process are summarized on Figure C.2, which displays 2040 projected average daily traffic volumes compared to the existing (2014) traffic volumes. Table C.1 provides the population, household, and employment allocations by TAZ assumed in the Metropolitan Council model. Although not used in the forecasted traffic volumes analysis, Table C.2 provides the population, household, and employment allocations by TAZ based on the Arden Hills Land Use Plan. These revisions incorporate the population, household, and employment assumptions used in the TCAAP AUAR minimum development scenario, which has been utilized by the City and Ramsey County throughout the planning and implementation of the TCAAP development area. The values provided in Table C.2 can be used by the Metropolitan Council to assist in allocating socio-economic data for future updates to the regional travel demand model. Table C.3 provides a summary of changes between Table C.1 and Table C.2. C-1

Figure C.1 TAZs within City of Arden Hills C-2

Figure C.2 Existing and Forecasted Traffic Volumes C-3

Table C.1 Metropolitan Council Current TAZ Data - City of Arden Hills (Raw Data - Unadjusted) 2010 Census 2020 Forecast 2030 Forecast 2040 Forecast TAZ Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Population Households Employment 1698 0 0 36 159 66 94 220 93 98 194 79 91 1699 0 0 0 148 61 22 205 86 57 181 73 99 1700 0 0 64 15 6 152 21 9 181 19 8 167 1708 0 0 0 197 82 23 903 390 170 1721 730 510 1709 0 0 21 199 83 96 612 264 121 924 390 82 1710 757 265 5402 697 273 4906 736 297 5229 753 295 5504 1711 1377 579 54 1237 545 199 1325 607 327 1372 614 443 1712 866 356 902 707 318 895 801 362 967 864 373 1030 1732* 802 320 20 743 318 57 779 348 77 784 345 96 1733* 481 189 482 483 206 847 596 265 1062 688 301 1215 1734* 57 29 80 67 29 60 74 33 103 76 33 140 1735 1065 407 19 1199 405 23 1250 434 29 1264 427 33 1736 561 189 67 439 188 116 463 206 160 467 204 202 1737 581 218 339 505 199 349 561 230 406 597 239 456 1738 1965 62 1152 2083 64 1093 2279 83 1104 2409 94 1107 1739 256 0 2695 360 53 4849 379 58 4859 387 58 4854 1740* 774 338 1069 751 300 1218 785 330 1350 787 332 1471 1857* 10 5 0 11 4 0 11 5 0 13 5 0 Totals 9,552 2,957 12,402 10,000 3,200 15,000 12,000 4,100 16,300 13,500 4,600 17,500 *Portion of TAZ boundaries extend beyond Arden Hills. Values only reflect estimates for area within the City of Arden Hills per Metropolitan Council data. This data was used in the forecasted traffic volumes analysis reflected in Figure C.2. Source: Metropolitan Council C-4

Table C.2 City of Arden Hills 2040 Land Use Plan Allocation of Forecasts by TAZ - TCAAP AUAR Minimum Development Scenario* 2010 Census 2020 Forecast 2030 Forecast 2040 Forecast TAZ Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Population Households Employment Population Households Employment 1698 0 0 36 159 66 94 220 93 98 194 79 91 1699 0 0 0 148 61 22 205 86 57 181 73 99 1700 0 0 64 0 0 344 0 0 2163 0 0 2862 1708 0 0 0 299 115 269 2244 863 2018 2990 1150 2691 1709 0 0 21 80 31 102 605 233 627 805 310 829 1710 757 265 5402 697 273 4906 736 297 5229 753 295 5504 1711 1377 579 54 1237 545 199 1325 607 327 1372 614 443 1712 866 356 902 707 318 895 801 362 967 864 373 1030 1732** 802 320 20 743 318 57 779 348 77 784 345 96 1733** 481 189 482 483 206 847 596 265 1062 688 301 1215 1734** 57 29 80 67 29 60 74 33 103 76 33 140 1735 1065 407 19 1199 405 23 1250 434 29 1264 427 33 1736 561 189 67 439 188 116 463 206 160 467 204 202 1737 581 218 339 505 199 349 561 230 406 597 239 456 1738 1965 62 1152 2083 64 1093 2279 83 1104 2409 94 1107 1739 256 0 2695 360 53 4849 379 58 4859 387 58 4854 1740** 774 338 1069 751 300 1218 785 330 1350 787 332 1471 1857** 10 5 0 11 4 0 11 5 0 13 5 0 2040 Land Use Plan Totals Metropolitan Council Forecasts 9,552 2,957 12,402 9,968 3,175 15,444 13,313 4,533 20,636 14,631 4,932 23,123 9,552 2,957 12,402 10,000 3,200 15,000 12,000 4,100 16,300 13,500 4,600 17,500 *Light-orange shaded cells highlight growth adjustments made per TCAAP AUAR minimum development scenario. All other numbers shown are from Metropolitan Council. This data was not used in the forecasted traffic volumes analysis reflected in Figure C.2. **Values only reflect estimates for area within the City of Arden Hills per Metropolitan Council data. C-5

Table C.3 Summary of TAZ Adjustments by Forecast Year 2020 Growth Adjustments 2030 Growth Adjustments 2040 Growth Adjustments TAZ 1700: Added 280 employment TAZ 1700: Added 1,819 employment TAZ 1700: Added 699 employment TAZ 1708: Added 115 households TAZ 1708: Added 748 households TAZ 1708: Added 287 households TAZ 1708: Added 299 population TAZ 1708: Added 2,416 population TAZ 1708: Added 746 population TAZ 1708: Added 269 employment TAZ 1708: Added 1,749 employment TAZ 1708: Added 673 employment TAZ 1709: Added 31 households TAZ 1709: Added 202 households TAZ 1709: Added 77 households TAZ 1709: Added 80 population TAZ 1709: Added 525 population TAZ 1709: Added 200 population TAZ 1709: Added 81 employment TAZ 1709: Added 525 employment TAZ 1709: Added 202 employment C-6

1. 2040 FUTURE ROADWAY CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT NEEDS To identify the need for potential future capacity improvements, Metropolitan Council 2040 forecasts were compared to planning-level roadway capacities for Principal and A- Minor Arterial Roadways. Planning-level roadway capacities used for this analysis are illustrated in Table C.4 below. Based on this comparison, I-35W and I-694 are expected to continue experiencing congestion based on the forecasted Metropolitan Council 2040 travel demands. Recent and programmed improvements on these roadways will ease but not alleviate congestion levels over the 20-year planning horizon due to regional population growth. Table C.4 Planning-Level Roadway Capacity Daily Two-Way Volume Facility Type Lower Threshold Higher Threshold Arterials Two-lane undivided 10,000 12,000 Two-lane divided or three-lane undivided 15,000 17,000 Four-lane undivided 18,000 22,000 Four-lane divided or five-lane undivided 28,000 32,000 Freeways Four-lane freeway 60,000 80,000 Six-lane freeway 90,000 120,000 Eight-lane freeway or higher Calculated on a segment by segment basis C-7