Dusko Pavlovic. University of Twente. November Logics of Authentication, Lieing and Obscurity. Dusko Pavlovic. Question.

Similar documents
An Introduction to Language Faculty Science Some Quotations plus alpha

Beyond Symbolic Logic

The Development of Knowledge and Claims of Truth in the Autobiography In Code. When preparing her project to enter the Esat Young Scientist

Church-Turing Thesis

Now you know what a hypothesis is, and you also know that daddy-long-legs are not poisonous.

Karl Popper & The Philosophy of Science. What Makes a Theory Scientific?

Cartesian Rationalism

Can a Machine Think? Christopher Evans (1979) Intro to Philosophy Professor Douglas Olena

Aquinas, The Five Ways

Cartesian Rationalism

Welcome back to WHAP! Monday, January 29, 2018

Lecture 6. Realism and Anti-realism Kuhn s Philosophy of Science

Learning from Mistakes Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn

Gödel's incompleteness theorems

Computing Machinery and Intelligence. The Imitation Game. Criticisms of the Game. The Imitation Game. Machines Concerned in the Game

3 The Problem of Absolute Reality

INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS

Machine and Animal Minds

APEH ch 14.notebook October 23, 2012

DO YOU KNOW THAT THE DIGITS HAVE AN END? Mohamed Ababou. Translated by: Nafissa Atlagh

Scientific Knowledge and Faith

Ch01. Knowledge. What does it mean to know something? and how can science help us know things? version 1.5

Ima Emotivist (EM) X is good means Hurrah for X! Moral judgments aren t true or false. We can t reason about basic moral principles.

Lars Johan Erkell. Intelligent Design

Question Answering. CS486 / 686 University of Waterloo Lecture 23: April 1 st, CS486/686 Slides (c) 2014 P. Poupart 1

Case 9:08-cv KAM Document Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2015 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Programming Language Research

356 THE MONIST all Cretans were liars. It can be put more simply in the form: if a man makes the statement I am lying, is he lying or not? If he is, t

UCB CS61C : Machine Structures

The Universe Exists. We Exist. What conclusions can we draw?

1. Does God Exist? 2. If So, What Kind of God Is He? 3. Is The Bible Reliable? 4. When Was Creation? 5. How Long Did Creation Take?

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

What did we just learn? Let s Review

Principles of Distributed Computing. Burcu Canakci. Lorenzo Alvisi Cornell University. Natacha Crooks. Cong Ding

Is Negative Corpus Really a Corpse? John W. Reis, of Smith Moore Leatherwood P: E:

The Truth of Science: How Scientists View the Scientific

APEH Chapter 6.notebook October 19, 2015

Handout 2 Argument Terminology

WHERE DOES LOVE COME FROM?

Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2018 Test 3: Answers

Mistaking Category Mistakes: A Response to Gilbert Ryle. Evan E. May

Science and the Christian Faith. Brent Royuk June 11, 2006

Inimitable Human Intelligence and The Truth on Morality. to life, such as 3D projectors and flying cars. In fairy tales, magical spells are cast to

Clare Shares her insights on Mark Virkler's, 4 Keys to Hearing God Part 2 August 20, 2015

Van Fraassen: Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism

Lecture 9. A summary of scientific methods Realism and Anti-realism

INTRODUCTION TO HYPOTHESIS TESTING. Unit 4A - Statistical Inference Part 1

PUT ASUNDER. by Craig Allan Pospisil

What is a distributed system? A first course in Distributed Computing... A first course in Distributed Computing... Principle of Distributed Computing

What is Debate? Debating vs. Arguing. Formal Debate vs. Informal Debate

Jesus and Apologetics

Scholasticism In the 1100s, scholars and monks rediscovered the ancient Greek texts that had been lost for so long. Scholasticism was a revival of

Doctor Faustus and the Universal Machine

PAGLORY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

THE ETHICS OF STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: WINTER 2009

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

The Problem of Induction and Popper s Deductivism

Small Group Assignment 8: Science Replaces Scholasticism

This Point in Time. Order the complete book from. Booklocker.com.

THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS C H A P T E R 3

Interim Assessment Cover Sheet Teacher: Haines Course: Senior Block Date: Student 1: IA #: 1 Student 2:

CSC290 Communication Skills for Computer Scientists

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

Can machines think? Machines, who think. Are we machines? If so, then machines can think too. We compute since 1651.

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER VI CONDITIONS OF IMMEDIATE INFERENCE

Revelation Last Days Living

Classroom notes for: Radiation and Life Professor: Thomas M. Regan Pinanski 206 ext 3283

Computational Learning Theory: Agnostic Learning

Knowledge and Authority

Heilbroner. Who Cares If Humans Survive?

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

PHLA10 Reason and Truth Exercise 1

APOLOGETICS The Mind s Journey to Heaven

Scientific Realism and Empiricism

9 Knowledge-Based Systems

Philosophy 203 History of Modern Western Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Spring 2015

Soul Rising. Beth Lynch. The Spiritual Science of Living! For Passion Publishing Company, LLC Bellingham, WA

Thomas Aquinas The Existence of God can be proved in five ways.

Saying too Little and Saying too Much. Critical notice of Lying, Misleading, and What is Said, by Jennifer Saul

A History Of Knowledge

Saying too Little and Saying too Much Critical notice of Lying, Misleading, and What is Said, by Jennifer Saul

I thought I should expand this population approach somewhat: P t = P0e is the equation which describes population growth.

someone who was willing to question even what seemed to be the most basic ideas in a

Chapter 2 Science as a Way of Knowing: Critical Thinking about the Environment

Comments on "Lying with Conditionals" by Roy Sorensen

Bertrand Russell Proper Names, Adjectives and Verbs 1

With Reference to Two Areas of Knowledge Discuss the Way in which Shared Knowledge can Shape Personal Knowledge.

Foundationalism Vs. Skepticism: The Greater Philosophical Ideology

Homily for the 4 th Sunday of Ordinary Time Year C The Story of Your Life - Week 5 Page 1

Critical Thinking and Faith in God; Heb 11.1; 04224; Page 1 of 10

EXTRACTING (I.E. ANALYZING) ARGUMENTS. Dona Warren UW Stevens Point

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

Life and ConsCiousness in the universe Geshe Jangchup Choeden

A study OF the armor of GOD

God. D o e s. God. D o e s. Exist?

Muslim Achievements Stations activity

Muslim Achievements Stations activity

Chalmers says Too Hard ; Dennett says Too Easy

By J. Alexander Rutherford. Part one sets the roles, relationships, and begins the discussion with a consideration

Transcription:

, and, and University of Twente November 2012

, and Can a lie be recognized by its grammatical form?

Online banking protocol, and

Neolithic authentication (Uruq 3700 BC), and

An even older security protocol, and

, and

, and Observable = Unobservable

Example: Self-authentication, and

Example: Self-authentication, and René to himself: "I think, therefore I exist."

Example: Cryptographic authentication, and

Example: Cryptographic authentication, and Bob to Alice: "You decrypt, therefore you exist."

Channel is like Newton s cradle, and Unobservable action Observable reaction

Example: Turing Test, and Alan Turing: Is being human testable? Design a test to distinguish a human from a computer (communicating by messages, e.g. emails).

Turing Machine, and

Turing Test, and

Turing Test on the Web, and

Man-in-the-Middle Attack, and

advances through channels, and Figure: is a quest for channels to observe nature

Richard Feynman on science Lectures on the Character of Physical Law, and If we have a definite theory, from which we can compute the consequences which can be compared with experiment, then in principle we can prove that theory wrong.

Richard Feynman on science Lectures on the Character of Physical Law, and... But notice that we can never prove it right. Suppose that you invent a theory, calculate the consequences, and discover every time that the consequences agree with the experiment. The theory is then right? No, it is simply not proved wrong. In the future you could compute a wider range of consequences, there could be a wider range of experiments, and you might then discover that the thing is wrong.

Richard Feynman on science Lectures on the Character of Physical Law, and That is why laws like Newton s laws for motion of planets last such a long time. He guessed the law of gravitation, and it took several hundred years before the slight error in the motion of Mercury was observed. During all that time, the theory had not been proven wrong, and could be taken temporarily to be right.

Richard Feynman on science Lectures on the Character of Physical Law, and We never are definitely right; we can only be sure when we are wrong.

The best kept secret of, and never proves the true laws of nature (never even makes any definite assertions of truth) only disproves some false hypotheses (detects lies)

Religion, Art, and, and Religion says: This is the truth about the world. You can rely upon it.

Religion, Art, and, and Religion says: Art says: This is the truth about the world. You can rely upon it. This is a story about the world. You can relax and play with it.

Religion, Art, and, and Religion says: Art says: This is the truth about the world. You can rely upon it. This is a story about the world. You can relax and play with it. says: This a theory about the world. You shouldn t rely upon it too much. You shouldn t relax, but work to improve it.

Richard Feynman on science Lectures on the Character of Physical Law, and Another thing that I must point out is that you cannot prove vague theory wrong.

Another secret of, and gets stuck at obscurity.

, and bustles with untestable theories: many-worlds interpretation (parallel universes) string theory intelligent design universe before the Big Bang...

Web 1.0, and

Web 2.0, and Reputation as a fixed point (PageRank, HITS)

Concepts are communities, and

End of Lying, and A lie cannot be recognized by its grammatical form A liar can be recognized by his social context

End of Lying, and A lie cannot be recognized by its grammatical form Fregean logic: Truth through formalism A liar can be recognized by his social context Nietzschean logic: Who speaks?

Social context, and

Targeted advertising, and

vs Lying, and

vs Lying, and

, and

Ik heb gezegd, and