IDEALS SURVEY RESULTS

Similar documents
Utah State University

Texas State University

Navigating Pluralism. How Students Approach Religious Difference and Interfaith Engagement in Their First Year of College

Title: Noah Silverman and Katie Baxter, Interfaith Youth Core (IFYC) Episode: 47 Podcast: Half Hour of Heterodoxy

The Campus Expression Survey A Heterodox Academy Project

What is the University Chaplaincy?

Congregational Survey Results 2016

Introduction Defining the Challenge Snap Shot of Church Culture Intersecting Strategies How to Enter (Relationship) How to Stay (Respect) How to

QUESTIONS AND PREVIOUSLY RELEASED OR HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE

surveying a church s attitude toward and interaction with islam

Beyond Tolerance An Interview on Religious Pluralism with Victor Kazanjian

Where do Conversations about Lived Religion Belong in the Classroom?

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan. Department of Theology. Saint Peter s College. Fall Submitted by Maria Calisi, Ph.D.

The Fifth National Survey of Religion and Politics: A Baseline for the 2008 Presidential Election. John C. Green

Spirituality in the Classroom

Survey of US Voters Opinions on Religious Freedom Report-July 30, 2015

ONWARD ISRAEL ALUMNI BACK HOME: From Engagement to Empowerment

NOTE: QUESTION NUMBERING IS NOT CONTINUOUS BECAUSE SOME ITEMS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY RELEASED OR HELD FOR FUTURE RELEASE

PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES

USM 2007 Campus Climate Survey Responses

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, July, 2014, How Americans Feel About Religious Groups

E Newsletter October 2010 David B. Myers, Executive Director

American Humanist Survey

American Views on Islam. Phone Survey of 1,000 Americans

University System of Georgia Survey on Student Speech and Discussion

CURRICULUM FOR KNOWLEDGE OF CHRISTIANITY, RELIGION, PHILOSOPHIES OF LIFE AND ETHICS

American Views on Religious Freedom. Phone Survey of 1,000 Americans

THE CHANGING RELIGIOUS LANDSCAPE: THE RISE OF THE UNAFFILIATED. Daniel

TH/WM 659: EVANGELICAL THEOLOGY & WORLD RELIGIONS Fall Term 2017 Thursdays, 2:00 5:00 p.m. Dr. John Jefferson Davis, Instructor

CEE Growth & Development. Michælmas 2013

1. speak about comparative theology as a method for learning about religious traditions;

2014 Minnesota 7th District Congressional Voter Guide

RABBI JOSHUA STANTON SHORT HILLS, NJ JEWISH

Attitudes about Change in the Adventist Church

COURSE: APOL 697 (2/24 2/28) COURSE TITLE: APOLOGETICS AND THE RISE OF SECULAR HUMANISM FACULTY: DR. CHAD THORNHILL GUEST LECTURER: ALEX MCFARLAND

CASE STATEMENT. Religion can be a bridge of cooperation rather than a barrier of division. -- Dr. Eboo Patel (Founder/President Interfaith Youth Core)

Early Years. Key Stage 1. Lower Key Stage 2. Upper Key Stage 2

Summary of results Religion and Belief Survey

Mission. "If you continue in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.

Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum

Jacksonville Human Rights Commission Religious Tolerance Survey 2010

Policy For Religious Education

Part B: The Role of Allies Core Lesson/Group Activity

Department of. Religion FALL 2014 COURSE GUIDE

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH

September 19, Dear Members of the Candler Community,

2018 Diversity Campus Climate Survey Summary

Studies of Religion II

Tolerance in French Political Life

The Global Religious Landscape

Religious Diversity in Bulgarian Schools: Between Intolerance and Acceptance

Survey of Catholic High School Religion Teachers

Scriptural Reasoning in the Context of Limited Pluralism: the Unique Challenges of a Roman Catholic Context

Academy of Christian Studies

Studies of Religion I

GUIDELINES FOR ESTABLISHING AN INTERFAITH STUDIES PROGRAM ON A UNIVERSITY OR COLLEGE CAMPUS

Religion and Faith in the Public Square An ARI Cardus Project Final Questionnaire: October 29th, 2018

American University Student Government Annual Internal Diversity Assessment

Many Religions, One Community:

The American Religious Landscape and the 2004 Presidential Vote: Increased Polarization

Monday 2:00 8:30 Nashville, TN Tuesday 8:30-7:30 Wednesday 8:45-4:30 Thursday Friday 8:45-4:30 (Includes Participation in Preaching Workshop)

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin

Washburn University Diversity Climate Survey Results 2013

National Policy on RELIGION AND EDUCATION MINISTER S FOREWORD... 2

Reconciling in Christ Synods a Synod s guide to RIC

Pluralism on the University Campus: Princeton University s Religious Life Council

Heat in the Melting Pot and Cracks in the Mosaic

PHL 170: The Idea of God Credits: 4 Instructor: David Scott Arnold, Ph.D.

FALL 2010 COURSES. Courses Co-Listed with Religion

Religion. Fall 2016 Course Guide

Theology. Mission. Program Goals. Theology Curriculum. Theology 1

Non-Religious Demographics and the Canadian Census Speech delivered at the Centre For Inquiry Ontario April 29, 2011

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

Studying Religion-Associated Variations in Physicians Clinical Decisions: Theoretical Rationale and Methodological Roadmap

THE MINOR IN RELIGIOUS STUDIES (RELI)

Jackson College Introduction to World Religions Philosophy Winter 2016 Syllabus

Interreligious Dialogue, Media and Youth

Americans Views of Spiritual Growth & Maturity February 2010

2014 Alabama 7th District Congressional Voter Guide

ARAB BAROMETER SURVEY PROJECT ALGERIA REPORT

Interfaith Dialogue as a New Approach in Islamic Education

Spring 2017 Diversity Climate Survey: Analysis Report. Office of Institutional Research November 2017 OIR 17-18

National Quali cations

The Reform and Conservative Movements in Israel: A Profile and Attitudes

To discuss how religion and non-religion means many things to different people To distinguish between the top 5 religions in the U.S.

until October 8, 2008 at 11:30 AM EDT CONTACT: Katie Paris or Kristin Williams, Faith in Public Life at

Religion and faith in Canada today: strong belief, ambivalence and rejection define our views

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Pew Research Center, March 2014, U.S. Catholics View Pope Francis as a Change for the Better

Purpose of Ministerial Search Survey

The Value of Religious Education in our Primary Schools Response to the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA) Consultation on a

Illustrating Your Spirituality in Academic Advising

PR 741-HA Preaching Christ in a Multi-Faith World Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary Summer III 2017 July 30 th August 4 th 9:00am-4:00pm

When We Gather at the Table

bridges contemplative living with thomas merton Leader s Guide jonathan montaldo & robert g. toth edited by

Worksheet for Preliminary Self-Review Under WCEA Catholic Identity Standards

InterfaithFamily 2015 User Survey Report

ARAB BAROMETER SURVEY PROJECT YEMEN REPORT

Philosophy of religion

Name Date Block. What is Christianity? 1. Christianity is the world's largest religion. 2. Their higher power is

Christians drop, 'nones' soar in new religion portrait

Transcription:

Office of Institutional Effectiveness IDEALS SURVEY RESULTS Time 2 Administration of the Interfaith Diversity Experiences & Attitudes Longitudinal Survey Presented by Elizabeth Silk, Director of Institutional Research Office of Mission and Ministry Staff Meeting September 5, 2017

Agenda Overview of Project Methodology Definitions Summary results Review specific indicators Discuss implications

Overview of Project The Interfaith Diversity Experiences & Attitudes Longitudinal Survey (IDEALS) is a research project developed by the Interfaith Youth Core (IFYC) to provide institutions with a tool to help them better understand student encounters with religious, spiritual, and worldview diversity while in college.

Methodology It is a longitudinal survey project that follows a cohort of students at three points in time: Time 1: Initial Survey Incoming Freshmen Fall 2015 Time 2: Follow-Up Survey Fall 2016 Time 3: Final Survey Spring 2019 Currently being administered at 122 campuses nationwide that vary by size, sector and religious affiliation.

Methodology Response Rates Dominican Peer Group National Number of Institutions: 1 27 122 Time 1 Sample 482 Responses 101 3,776 20,436 Response Rate 21.0% Time 2 Sample 101 3,776 20,436 Responses 54 1,726 8,782 Response Rate 53.5% 45.7% 43.0%

Definitions: Key Terms Worldview describes a guiding life philosophy, which may be based on a particular religious tradition, spiritual orientation, non-religious perspective, or some combination of these. Worldview Majority: Protestant, Orthodox or Roman Catholic Christians Worldview Minority: Identify with a faith tradition that is a numerical minority in the U.S. Non-Religious: Agnostic, Atheist, Non-Religious, Secular Humanist, None Another Worldview: Not listed in the survey

Definitions: Key Terms Pluralism involves actively engaging with diversity; moving from tolerance to acceptance of others. The term pluralistic orientation represents the extent to which students are accepting of people from worldviews that differ from their own. Interfaith depicts the engagement of people from diverse traditions, such as Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, Secular Humanism, Judaism, atheist, agnostic, and all other religious, non-religious, and philosophical traditions. In particular, it refers to intentional experiences, both formal and informal, that facilitate meaningful interaction across worldview difference.

IDEALS Outcome Measures (see handout for definitions) Self-Authored Worldview Commitment Appreciative Attitudes Appreciative Knowledge of Different Worldviews Global Citizenship Goodwill toward Others of Different Worldviews Appreciation of Worldview Commonalities and Differences Commitment to Interfaith Leadership and Service Overall Pluralism Orientation

Self Authored Worldview Commitment measures degree to which students reflect upon and considered other worldviews prior to committing to their own. 60% 50% 40% 30% 51% 53% 53% 30% 28% 29% No change from Time 1 to Time 2 No significant difference from Peer or National Group 20% 19% 18% 18% 10% 0% Low Medium High DU Peer National

Appreciative Attitudes: measures how positively students view people with different worldviews and social identities % High Level (Positive) Attitudes % change T1 to T2 Atheists 66% 9.5% Buddhists 70% 8.2% Evangelical Christians 69% 8.4% Hindus 72% 10.8% Jews 74% 9.1% Mormons 68% 12.4% Significan t Diff w Peers Significan t Diff w National Muslims 72% 10.7% + (pos.) + (pos.)

Appreciative Attitudes measures how positively students view people with different worldviews and social identities % High Level (Positive) Attitudes % change T1 to T2 Significant Diff w Peers Political Liberals 77% 9.9% + (pos.) Significant Diff w National Political Conservative 65% 12.6% + (pos.) Gay, Lesbian Bisexual 72% 6.8% Transgender 72% 8.8% Different Race 82% 5.2% Different Country 82% 4.3% Appreciative Knowledge* N/A 0.0% - (neg.) - (neg.) * Measures student religious literacy and factual knowledge about other religious and philosophical traditions.

Appreciative Knowledge Items: DU % Correct Peer % Correct Natl % Correct The foundational sacred text in the Jewish tradition is: 66% 78% 82% + Which of the following statements correctly distinguishes atheists and agnostics? In the Muslim tradition, this spiritual practice takes place from dawn until dusk during the month of Ramadan: 62% 83% + 82% + 79% 82% 84% In the Christian tradition, the gospel refers to: 45% 53% 55% The notion of Nirvana in the Buddhist tradition refers to: 60% 70% 74% + The Latter Day Saint movement, or Mormonism, was founded by: 26% 52% ++ Name the religious identity of Mahatma Gandhi: 45% 57% 62% + The social activist who is Catholic is: 15% 14% 16% 54% ++

Overall Pluralism Orientation extent students are accepting of other with different worldviews, believe worldviews share many common values, consider it important to understand differences between world religions, and believe it possible to have strong relationships with diverse others and still hold own worldview 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 31% 28% 29% 72% 69% 70% 1.46% change from Time 1 to Time 2 No significant difference from Peer or National Group 20% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% Low Medium High DU Peer National

Pluralism Sub-Scales: % High Level (Positive) % change T1 to T2 Global Citizenship 47% -0.95% Goodwill toward others of different worldviews Appreciation of interreligious commonalities and differences 87% 2.02% 77% 0.36% Commitment to interfaith leadership 74% 2.48% Significant Diff w Peers Significant Diff w National

Campus Environment Sub-Scales Measure students perceptions of and experiences on campus.

Campus Environment Sub-Scales Dominican Mean Peer Mean National Mean Campus Worldview (religious) Diversity (max=20) 16.8 15.8 15.7 (+) Divisiveness on Campus (max=20) 9.3 9.4 9.6 Space for Support and Spiritual Expression (max=20) 17.3 16.7 16.5 Welcoming Campus (max=70) 63.8 59.8 (+) 58.5 (++) Insensitivity on Campus (max=35) 11.3 10.8 11.1 Coercion on Campus (max=20) 6.9 8.0 8.4 (+) Provocative Encounters w Worldview Diversity (max=30) 17.9 16.1 16.5 Negative Worldview Engagement (max=20) 6.4 7.0 7.35 (+)

Campus Environment Sub-Scales: Engagement Dominican Mean Peer Mean National Mean General Religious/Spiritual Engagement (max=5) 1.3 1.1 1.1 Informal Interfaith Engagement (max=4) 2.7 3.0 3.1 (+) Formal Interfaith Engagement (max=15) 3.8 2.7 (+) 2.7 (+) Other Civic and Diversity Engagement (max=4) 1.8 1.6 1.7 Curricular Religious and Spiritual Engagement (max=18) 6.4 4.4 (++) 4.2 (++)

Welcoming Campus: Items Significantly More Positive than Peer and/or National Group Item This campus is a welcoming place for people of different religious and nonreligious perspectives. People on this campus interact most often with others of their same worldview Peer Group National Group This campus is a welcoming place for Muslims + + This campus is a welcoming place for political conservatives + This campus is a welcoming place for gays, lesbians and bisexuals + This campus is a welcoming place for people of diff. socioeconomic backgrounds + + +

Curricular Interfaith Engagement: Items Significantly More Positive than Peer and/or National Group Item Had course that was designed to enhance your knowledge of different religious traditions Peer Group National Group ++ ++ Discussed your worldview/other students perspectives in class + + Visited a religious space off campus as part of class +++ +++ Participated in contemplative practices in the classroom + + Discussed religious topics with faculty + ++ Developed a deeper skill set to interact with people of diverse religious and nonreligious perspectives +

Formal Interfaith Engagement: Items Significantly More Positive than Peer and/or National Group Item Peer Group National Group Attended religious services for a religious tradition other than your own + + Participated in an interfaith dialogue on campus + + Attended a lecture discussing religious diversity or interfaith cooperation + + Participated in interfaith or religious diversity training on campus + + Attended an off-campus event designed to promote interfaith cooperation + +

Provocative Encounters: Items Significantly Higher than Peer and/or National Group Item Had class discussions that challenged assumptions about your worldview Heard critical comments from others about your worldview that made you question your worldview Had a discussion with someone that made you feel like you did not know enough about your worldview Peer Group + National Group + + +

Dominican Challenges: Items Significantly Less Positive than Peer and/or National Group Item Participated in a student organization that is affiliated with your religion or worldview Peer Group National Group Dined with someone of a different religious or nonreligious perspective + + + Socialized with someone of a different religious or nonreligious perspective Lower scores on items related to knowledge of other worldviews/religious traditions + + + +

Major Conclusions Curricular infusion of interfaith concepts is high, but knowledge of different religious practices is low. Can more be done in this area? Informal Interactions had lower scores. What are the possible reasons? What can DU do to improve this indicator?

Discussion What themes and data points resonated most with the work you do in Mission and Ministry?