Chapter 2. Moral Reasoning. Chapter Overview. Learning Objectives. Teaching Suggestions

Similar documents
Full file at

Introduction to Technical Communications 21W.732 Section 2 Ethics in Science and Technology Formal Paper #2

Chapter 2: Reasoning about ethics

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Philosophy Courses Fall 2016

#NLCU. The Ethical Leader: Rules and Tools

1 Hans Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 1-10.

Chapter 2 Reasoning about Ethics

Morality Without God Rev. Amy Russell Unitarian Universalist Community Church of Glen Allen Sunday, February 7, 2016

Philosophical Ethics. The nature of ethical analysis. Discussion based on Johnson, Computer Ethics, Chapter 2.

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

Stem Cell Research on Embryonic Persons is Just

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Introduction xiii. that more good is likely to be realised in the one case than in the other. 4

2 FREE CHOICE The heretical thesis of Hobbes is the orthodox position today. So much is this the case that most of the contemporary literature

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Ethics and Science. Obstacles to search for truth. Ethics: Basic Concepts 1

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

CHAPTER 2 Test Bank MULTIPLE CHOICE

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories

Marriage. Embryonic Stem-Cell Research

Chapter 2 Determining Moral Behavior

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

A Framework for Thinking Ethically

Theme 1: Ethical Thought, AS. divine command as an objective metaphysical foundation for morality.

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES

Christian Discernment

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

Philosophy of Love, Sex, and Friendship WESTON. Arguments General Points. Arguments are sets of reasons in support of a conclusion.

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

Peter Singer, Practical Ethics Discussion Questions/Study Guide Prepared by Prof. Bill Felice

PH 101: Problems of Philosophy. Section 005, Monday & Thursday 11:00 a.m. - 12:20 p.m. Course Description:

Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

The Critical Mind is A Questioning Mind

Video 1: Worldviews: Introduction. [Keith]

Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

Socratic and Platonic Ethics

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

Fallacies. It is particularly easy to slip up and commit a fallacy when you have strong feelings about your. The Writing Center

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

Critical Thinking: Present, Past and Future 5 April, 2015

Truth At a World for Modal Propositions

INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS

Running head: CRITIQUE OF WALTER LIPPMANN S INDISPENSABLE OPPOSITION 1

Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade

What is the "Social" in "Social Coherence?" Commentary on Nelson Tebbe's Religious Freedom in an Egalitarian Age

Do All Roads Lead to God? The Christian Attitude Toward Non-Christian Religions

Text 1: Philosophers and the Pursuit of Wisdom. Topic 5: Ancient Greece Lesson 3: Greek Thinkers, Artists, and Writers

Political Science 103 Fall, 2018 Dr. Edward S. Cohen INTRODUCTION TO POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY

Key Vocab and Concepts. Ethics, Epistemology, Aesthetics, logic, social and political, religious, metaphysics

EPL: Is that even English?

Peacemaking and the Uniting Church

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Q2) The test of an ethical argument lies in the fact that others need to be able to follow it and come to the same result.

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Introduction to Philosophy

-- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.

Rhetoric = The Art of Persuasion. The history of rhetoric and the concepts of ethos, pathos and logos began in Greece.

Topic III: Sexual Morality

Chapter 2--How Should One Live?

An Analysis of the Proofs for the Principality of the Creation of Existence in the Transcendent Philosophy of Mulla Sadra

Disvalue in nature and intervention *

PHILOSOPHY IM 25 SYLLABUS IM SYLLABUS (2019)

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

HAVE WE REASON TO DO AS RATIONALITY REQUIRES? A COMMENT ON RAZ

Fallacies. What this handout is about. Arguments. What are fallacies?

Notes on Moore and Parker, Chapter 12: Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning

Bioethics. PHL283H5S Summer 2014 M, W 2-5pm in NE 160

R. M. Hare (1919 ) SINNOTT- ARMSTRONG. Definition of moral judgments. Prescriptivism

How to Argue Without Being Argumentative

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Psychological and Ethical Egoism

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2014 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

Robot como esclavos modernos

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Introduction to Philosophy Practice Exam Two. True or False A = True, B= False

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW

Omni-benevolent. Omnipotent. Omniscient. Prayer

DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS

Please visit our website for other great titles:

I'd Like to Have an Argument, Please.

Take Home Exam #2. PHI 1700: Global Ethics Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

2014 Examination Report 2014 Extended Investigation GA 2: Critical Thinking Test GENERAL COMMENTS

Ethics in a Historical View & A Framework for Ethical Decision Making

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

Moral Objectivism. RUSSELL CORNETT University of Calgary

A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment

Transcription:

Chapter 2 Moral Reasoning Chapter Overview This chapter provides students with the tools necessary for analyzing and constructing moral arguments. It also builds on Chapter 1 by encouraging students to examine their own worldviews and cultural paradigms using critical thinking skills. Learning Objectives In this chapter, students will learn about the three levels of thinking: experience, interpretation, and analysis. the role of moral sensitivity and ontological shock in praxis. the impact of our worldviews and paradigms on moral thinking. how to recognize and break through patterns of resistance that prevent them from analyzing their worldviews. how to construct a moral argument. how to recognize and avoid logical fallacies. how to resolve moral dilemmas. Teaching Suggestions 1. Emphasize the difference between reason and opinion. Reason requires that students be able to back up their positions with well-thought-out arguments. 2. Work through several examples of constructing moral arguments and identifying fallacies, with the class or in small groups. If your students have not had a prior course in philosophy or logic they may have difficulty with some of the exercises. Answers to the exercises on pages 51-52 and 63-64 are found in the following section. Once you are confident that students understand these exercises, have them do the rest on their own. 3. Ask students who have taken logic to be small-group discussion leaders. They may also be willing to serve as tutors for students who are having problems with this chapter. 4. Encourage students to use examples of moral arguments, informal fallacies, and moral dilemmas from their own experience or from newspapers, magazines, or movies. Use these examples as class or small-group exercises. 5. Encourage students to use the skills learned in this chapter throughout the rest of the course. Ask students to identify the conclusion and premises in the selected readings, as well as in their own arguments. Encourage students to point out fallacies when they come across them. Boss: Ethics for Life, 6e IM-2 1

Answers to Selection Exercises Exercise 1 on Pages 51-52. Note: [c] indicates the conclusion, and [p] indicates a premise. Premise and conclusion indicators are bracketed. a. [c] Racism and sexism are wrong, (because) [p] all people deserve equal respect. b. [c] It is immoral to use rabbits in cosmetic experiments, (because) [p] causing pain is immoral and [p] animals such as rabbits are capable of feeling pain. c. [p] People need to pass a driving test to get a license to drive a car. [c] People should also have to take a test and get a license before they can become a parent. (After all), [p] parenting is a greater responsibility and requires more skill than driving. d. [p] Embryos are not persons with moral rights. [p] Furthermore, the embryos used in stem cell research are going to be discarded anyway. [p] (Because) we have a moral obligation to help people suffering from disease and the use of stem cell research has the potential to help many of these people, [c] stem cell research should be legal. e. [p] We have an obligation to become the best person we can. [p] One of the primary purposes of education is to make us better people. (Therefore), [c] colleges should seriously consider having a community service requirement for graduation, (since) [p] community service has been shown to increase students self-esteem and facilitate their moral development. Exercise 1 on Pages 63-64 a. Ignorance b. Begging the questions c. Naturalistic fallacy d. Abusive fallacy e. Hasty generalization f. Irrelevant conclusion g. Equivocation h. Irrelevant conclusion i. Accident Boss: Ethics for Life, 6e IM-2 2

j. Appeal to inappropriate authority k. Appeal to force l. Circumstantial fallacy m. Ignorance Sample Test Questions Multiple Choice Questions Questions 1 24 relate to the text and readings in Chapter 2. The correct answers are preceded by an asterisk. 1. At which level of thinking would one be most likely to hear the statement Euthanasia must be immoral because it is illegal? a. experience *b. interpretation c. analysis d. praxis 2. Opinions are a. the foundation of moral thinking and, therefore, ought to be respected. b. most likely to be found at the level of moral analysis. c. never true. *d. based on feeling rather than on reason. 3. Which of the following groups, according to liberation ethicists, have epistemological privilege in American society? *a. women of color b. White males c. philosophers d. nonhuman animals 4. The pampered daughter of a wealthy businessman and a prominent Boston socialite joins the Peace Corps following college and spends one year working with AIDS orphans in a poverty-struck area of Africa. This experience deeply upsets her and, to her parents dismay, leads her to question her childhood values. What, according to Sheila Mullett, is the daughter experiencing? a. resistance b. paradigm inflexibility *c. ontological shock d. praxis 5. Which of the following is the best example of the use of resistance as a defense mechanism? a. avoiding the use of fallacies b. being an autonomous moral agent. *c. avoiding people who have different views than ours Boss: Ethics for Life, 6e IM-2 3

d. the use of premise and conclusion indicators in an argument 6. According to Buddhists, this path can guide us to right thinking and moral wisdom. a. the Path of Least Resistance b. the Lotus Garden Path *c. the Noble Eightfold Path d. the Straight and Narrow Path 7. Marlene often gets angry and storms off in a snit when people question her views on the morality of abortion. Marlene is in all likelihood using a. doublethink to avoid interpreting her worldviews. b. analysis to avoid experiencing her worldviews. *c. resistance to avoid analyzing her worldviews d. interpretation to avoid resisting her worldviews. 8. Which of the following is most often used as an immature defense mechanism? a. tolerance of ambiguity b. suppression of harmful emotional responses *c. conformity d. empathy 9. Which of the following expressions would you be most likely to hear from someone who is engaged in doublethink? *a. I agree with both sides of the argument. b. The ends justify the means. c. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. d. I ll have to rethink this now that you ve brought up a new point. 10. What is the conclusion in the following argument? The United States is a democracy. Therefore, more gun control laws should be enacted in the United States because most people favor stricter gun control laws. a. The United States is a democracy. *b....more gun control laws should be enacted in the United States... c....most people favor stricter gun control laws. d. Therefore and because 11. What is the premise indicator in the following argument? Discrimination violates the principle of justice. Therefore, affirmative action is wrong because it involves reverse discrimination. a. principle of justice b. Therefore *c. because d. involves 12. The primary purpose of rhetoric is to a. discover moral truths. b. resolve moral dilemmas. c. construct a logical moral argument. *d. win an argument through persuasive speech. Boss: Ethics for Life, 6e IM-2 4

13. In constructing moral arguments, we should begin by a. coming up with a conclusion. b. checking for fallacies. *c. compiling a list of premises. d. engaging in rhetoric. 14. People are most likely to use fallacies when a. they are analyzing a controversial moral issue. *b. they are unable to rationally defend their worldviews. c. they are using the Socratic method. d. they are operating at the level of experience. 15. In resolving a moral dilemma, we should first a. come up with a possible solution. b. make a list of the moral duties and values involved. *c. get our facts straight. d. make a list of all the alternative courses of action. 16 22. Identify the fallacies in the following arguments. 16. It is morally acceptable for parents to conceive a child in order to obtain blood or an organ tissue transplant to save the life of another of their children because parents have the right to make their own decision about whether or not to conceive one child in order to save another child s life. a. accident b. hasty generalization c. appeal to authority *d. begging the question 17. I fail to see why hunting should be considered cruel when it gives pleasure to so many people. a. abusive b. popular appeal *c. irrelevant conclusion d. hasty generalization 18. In defense of his position that Black people are innately inferior intellectually, to White people, biologist Arthur R. Jensen writes, No one has yet produced any evidence based on a properly controlled study to show that representative samples of Negro and white children can be equalized in intellectual ability through statistical control of environment and education. *a. ignorance b. popular appeal c. hasty generalization d. appeal to inappropriate authority 19. I don t support the Obama administrations policy on the non-use of nuclear weapons if we are attacked by another nation. As far as I m concerned it has no validity since they re just a bunch of naïve and spineless wimps. Boss: Ethics for Life, 6e IM-2 5

a. circumstantial fallacy *b. abusive fallacy c. appeal to tradition d. equivocation 20. Of course private ownership of property is morally acceptable. It s been fundamental to our American way of life since this country s inception. a. naturalistic fallacy b. appeal to inappropriate authority c. fallacy of accident *d. appeal to tradition 21. I believe in the Golden Rule. Therefore, I have an inherent duty to do unto others as I would have them do unto me. If I were puzzled by a question on an examination, I would want the person sitting next to me to help me. So it was my duty, professor, to let my friend sitting next to me copy answers from my test. You surely aren t going to fail me simply for obeying the Golden Rule? a. appeal to force *b. accident c. begging the question d. ignorance 22 24. Identify the person who said each of the following. 22. There is one thing a professor can be absolutely certain of: almost every student entering the university believes, or says she believes, that truth is relative. a. George Orwell b. Aristotle *c. Allan Bloom d. Buddha 23. This shift in consciousness includes a search for the collective actions that can transform the existing unjust social structures... a. Thomas Jefferson b. Stanley Milgram *c. Paulo Freire d. George Orwell 24. Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. a. A. J. Ayer b. Sheila Mullett c. Mary Midgley *d. Stanley Milgram Essay Questions The following exercise questions in this chapter are suggested for use, with modification in some cases, as essay questions: Page 36-37, #2 (choose one example from options a-e); p. 44, #2; p. 64, #2; p. 69, #2 (selection on example from options a-e). Boss: Ethics for Life, 6e IM-2 6