McCollum v. Board of Education (1948) Champaign Board of Education offered voluntary religious education classes for public school students from

Similar documents
This statement is designed to prevent the abridgement of anyone's freedom of worship.

MEMORANDUM. Teacher/Administrator Rights & Responsibilities

An Update on Religion and Public Schools. Outline

March 27, We write to express our concern regarding the teaching of intelligent design

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Where Do You Stand: Critical Conversations about Religion in Public Schools

Establishment of Religion

A study of the religious orientation of public school districts located in the Bible Belt of the United States

First Amendment Religious Freedom Rights and High School Students

Teacher Case Summary Lee v. Weisman (1992) School Graduation Prayer

First Amendment Rights -- Defining the Essential Terms

1/18/2009. Signatories include:

Cedarville University

Forum on Public Policy

BOW YOUR HEADS Purpose: Procedure:

1) What does freedom of religion mean? 2) What could we not do in the name of religion? 3) What is meant by separation of church and state?

SAMPLE. What Is Intelligent Design, and What Does It Have to Do With Men s. Chapter 3

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

October 3, Humble Independent School District Eastway Village Drive Humble, TX 77338

Church, State and the Supreme Court: Current Controversy

DEVELOPMENTS STATE SCHOOL BOARD PRAYER RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL RECENT

Supreme Court of the United States

A RETURN TO THE SCOPES MONKEY TRIAL? A LOOK AT THE APPLICATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE TO THE NEWEST TENNESSEE SCIENCE CURRICULUM LAW

What Everyone Should Know about Evolution and Creationism

September 24, Jeff James Superintendent N First Street Albemarle, NC RE: Constitutional Violation. Dear Mr.

Do We Want Another Bible War?

Edwards v. Aguillard: The Supreme Court's Deconstruction of Louisiana's Creationism Statute

March 25, SENT VIA U.S. MAIL & to

Intelligent Judging Evolution in the Classroom and the Courtroom George J. Annas, J.D., M.P.H.

BOARD OF EDUCATION V. ALLEN 392 U.S. 236; 20 L. Ed. 2d 1060; 88 S. Ct (1968)

March 25, SENT VIA U.S. MAIL & to

Intelligent Design. Kevin delaplante Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies

Religious Freedoms in Public Schools

Engel v. Vitale Preventing an official religion

Edwards v. Aguillard: The Lemon Test Yields Bitter Fruit for Traditional Religious Values, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 613 (1988)

God & Caesar The Ancient Modern Clash

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Evolution and Creation Science in Your School: "The Monkey Business Continues..."

The Scopes Trial: Who Decides What Gets Taught in the Classroom?

Protect Science Education! A Toolkit for Students Who Want to Keep Evolution in Schools

In Brief: Supreme Court Revisits Legislative Prayer in Town of Greece v. Galloway

Survival of the Fittest: An Examination of the Louisiana Science Education Act

Greece v. Galloway: Why We Should Care About Legislative Prayer

Science, Evolution, and Intelligent Design

Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution

Good morning, and welcome to America s Fabric, a radio program to. encourage love of America. I m your host for America s Fabric, John McElroy.

DOES INTELLIGENT DESIGN HAVE A PRAYER? by Nicholas Zambito

TACTICS, STRATEGIES & BATTLES OH MY: PERSERVERANCE OF THE PERPETUAL PROBLEM REGARDING PREACHING TO PUBLIC SHOOL PUPILS & WHY IT PERSISTS

Religion in Public Schools Testing the First Amendment

Still between a Rock and a Hard Place? The Constitutionality of School Board Prayer in the Wake of Town of Greece

MEMORANDUM ON STUDENT RELIGIOUS SPEECH AT ATHLETIC EVENTS. The Foundation for Moral Law One Dexter Avenue Montgomery, AL (334)

America s Christian Heritage by Doug Hamilton

1/15/2015 PRAYER AT MEETINGS

Conscientious Objectors--Religious Training and Belief--New Test [Umted States v'. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965) ]

Tactics, Strategies & Battles Oh My!: Perseverance of the Perpetual Problem Pertaining to Preaching to Public School Pupils & Why it Persists

Joshua Ward Jeffery, A Wall of Separation?: Analyzing Evangelical Attempts to

Navigating Religious Rights of Teachers and Students: Establishment, Accommodation, Neutrality, or Hostility?

Citation: 90 Ky. L.J Provided by: Available Through: David C. Shapiro Memorial Law Library, NIU Colleg

Epperson v. Arkansas (No. 7)

The First Amendment and Licensing Biology Teachers in Creationism

No In The Supreme Court of the United States. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Tactics, Strategies & Battles Oh My!: Perseverance of the Perpetual Problem Regarding Preaching to Public School Pupils & Why it Persists

Nebraska Law Review. Philip Sparr University of Nebraska College of Law. Volume 86 Issue 3 Article 5

CREATIONISM AND INTELLIGENT DESIGN

Creationism and the Theory of Biological Evolution in the North Carolina Standard Course of Study

Science and Ideology

Survey of US Voters Opinions on Religious Freedom Report-July 30, 2015

THE CONSTITUTION IN THE CLASSROOM. TEACHING MODULE: The First Amendment and Freedom of Religion High School Version

Perception and Practice: The Wall of Separation in the Public School Classroom. Patricia A. Tinkey Ed.D.

Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach? Author: Eugenie C. Scott, Director Affiliation: National Center for Science Education

American Values Atlas 2016 January 6, 2016 January 10, 2017 N = 101,438

CHAPTER 19:2 Freedom of Religion

THE RIGHT TO LEARN: INTELLECTUAL HONESTY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT

Toto, I've a Feeling We're Still in Kansas? The Constitutionality of Intelligent Design and the 2005 Kansas Science Education Standards

Resolving the Controversy over "Teaching the Controversy": The Constitutionality of Teaching Intelligent Design in Public Schools

Syria Texas Opioids Cryogenics

TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

September 22, d 15, 92 S. Ct (1972), of the Old Order Amish religion and the Conservative Amish Mennonite Church.

Amendment I: Religion. Jessica C. Eric K. Isaac C. Jennifer Z. Grace K. Nadine H. Per. 5

ENGEL v. VITALE 370 U.S. 421 (1962)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Trevathan ieba0268.tex V2-01/27/ :48 A.M. Page 1

Posting the Ten Commandments as a Historical Document in Public Schools

Religious Expression and Symbolism in the American Constitutional Tradition: Government Neutrality, But Not Indifference

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT A.M., a minor, by her Parent and Next Friend, JOANNE MCKAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.

Why It Mattered to Dover That Intelligent Design Isn't Science

THE LATEST WORD ON PRAYER AT MEETINGS

April 3, Via . Woodrow Wilson Elementary School 700 East Chestnut Duncan, OK Duncan Public Schools 1706 West Spruce Duncan, OK 73533

RUTGERS JOURNAL OF LAW AND RELIGION

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2 HARRISBURG DIVISION

Church, State, and the Crisis in American Secularism

Understanding and acceptance of biological evolution and the nature of science: Studies on university faculty

PCA DIGEST IV. EDUCATION AND PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY. by Roland S. Barnes and Thomas O. Kotouc

*83 FOCUSING TOO MUCH ON THE FOREST MIGHT HIDE THE EVOLVING TREES: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR IRONS

Representative Nino Vitale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

FAITH BEFORE THE COURT: THE AMISH AND EDUCATION. Jacob Koniak

Taking Religion Seriously

Todd Hammond Department of Religious Education

Transcription:

McCollum v. Board of Education (1948) Champaign Board of Education offered voluntary religious education classes for public school students from grades four to nine. Weekly 30- and 45-minute classes were led by clergy or lay teachers in public school classrooms during school hours.

McCollum v. Board of Education (1948) the state's compulsory education system assists the program of religious instruction carried on by separate religious sects. Pupils compelled by law to go to school for secular education are released in part from their legal duty upon the condition that they attend the religious classes.

Engel v. Vitale (1962) NY State Regents adopted prayer for all students: Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our Country.

Abington v. Schemp (1963) Pennsylvania Law required that: [a]t least ten verses from the Holy Bible [be] read, without comment, at the opening of each public school on each school day. The Schempps, Unitarians, testified that religious doctrines purveyed by a literal reading of the Bible "were contrary to the religious beliefs which they held and to their familial teaching"

Abington v. Schemp (1963) The State claimed that the purposes of Bible reading included: the promotion of moral values, the contradiction to the materialistic trends of our times, the perpetuation of our institutions and the teaching of literature. The Court found: even if its purpose is not strictly religious, it is sought to be accomplished through readings, without comment, from the Bible.

Early State Supreme Courts Striking Down Public School Prayer Ohio (1869) Wisconsin (1890) Nebraska (1902) Illinois (1910) Louisiana (1915) Washington State (1918)

Effect of Decisions by Region 1968 Prayer Before Decision Bible Reading Before Decision Either Exercise After Decisions Teachers Ceased Districts Ceased East 83% 62% 11% 87% 93% South 87% 80% 64% 26% 21% Midwest 28% 38% 21% 45% 54% West 14% 14% 5% 64% 62%

Use graph from McGuire paper

Non-compliance vs. Population Density and Evangelicals

Wallace v. Jaffree (1985): 3 Statutes 1978: authorized 1-minute period of silence "for meditation 1981: authorized a period of silence "for meditation or voluntary prayer 1982: authorized teachers to lead "willing students" in prayer to "Almighty God... the Creator and Supreme Judge of the world."

Santa Fe v. Doe (2000) District allowed an elected student chaplain to offer Christian (Baptist) prayers over public address system at home football games. Challenged by Mormon and Catholic parents District court allowed so long as prayers were nonsectarian and non-proselytizing Appellate court upheld District Court order, saying such restrictions were necessary

Edwards v. Aguillard (1987) "Balanced treatment" means "providing whatever information and instruction in both creation and evolution models the classroom teacher determines is necessary and appropriate to provide insight into both theories in view of the textbooks and other instructional materials available for use in his classroom."

Epperson v. Arkansas (1967) Arkansas' law selects from the body of knowledge a particular segment which it proscribes for the sole reason that it is deemed to conflict with a particular religious doctrine; that is, with a particular interpretation of the Book of Genesis by a particular religious group.

Scalia in Edwards "Perhaps what the Louisiana Legislature has done is unconstitutional because there is no such [scientific]evidence [of creation], and the scheme they have established will amount to no more than a presentation of the Book of Genesis. But we cannot say that on the evidence before us in this summary judgment context.

Kitzmiller v. Dover (PA) Area School District (2005) Conservative Republican federal judge found: The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory.

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area S. D. - Standards Because Darwin's Theory is a theory, it is still being tested as new evidence is discovered. The Theory is not a fact. Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence. A theory is defined as a welltested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations. Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin's view.