Section 1: Military leaders Read sources A to D below and answer questions 1 to 4 in the accompanying question paper. The sources and questions relate to case study 1: Genghis Khan (c1200 1227) Leadership: motives and objectives; success in achieving those objectives and importance of Genghis Khan s leadership to Mongol success. Source A Michael Rank, an historian and former journalist, writing in the popular history book History s Greatest Generals: 10 Commanders Who Conquered Empires, Revolutionized Warfare, and Changed History Forever (2013). Even at a young age, Genghis Khan saw that the nomadic Mongol tribes were a weak society due to their endless internal warfare Genghis Khan s strength was in understanding the power of unity. By the age of 20, he used this wisdom to build an army that set out to destroy the divisions between tribes in what was soon to be his massive Mongol Empire. As he conquered, instead of exiling the region s soldiers and killing the survivors, as commonly happened, he absorbed each conquered territory under his personal rule. This strategy helped him to expand the Mongol Empire quickly and efficiently, making use of all the talents, skills and abilities of the people in his newly acquired territories. Genghis Khan had two primary directives: dominance and unity. He promoted army officers based on achievements rather than family ties. His was a system in which success and loyalty were rewarded. Due to his policies, tribal or ethnic divisions did not form in his ranks, ending the feudal alliances that had been so strong in medieval Mongolia. Source B (2007). David Morgan, a professor of history, writing in an academic book, The Mongols The question that had to be faced was: what now? The tribes of Mongolia had a supreme ruler. Chinese policy had failed it had failed to keep the tribes in conflict with each other. But unless something decisive was done with the newly formed military machine, it would go back to its earlier state. This, to my mind, is at least one explanation for the beginnings of the Mongols astonishing career of conquest. A superb army, potentially invincible in the field in thirteenth-century conditions, had been successfully created. But if it was not used against external enemies, it would not remain in existence for long. The only matter that required a decision was in which direction the armies were to advance.
Source C Reuven Amitai-Preiss, a professor of Muslim history at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, writing in the academic book Mongols and Mamluks: The Mamluk Ilkhanid War, 1260 1281 (1995). The belief that it was destiny for the Mongols to rule was not the only, or even main, reason for the ongoing Mongol expansion under Genghis Khan and his successors. Other factors which helped Genghis Khan s rise to power were the particular political relations within the region at this time as well as plain luck. On a more fundamental level, territorial expansion into neighboring areas was essential for nomadic states in the region, motivated as they were by the desire to control the manufactured and agricultural goods which could be found there. Expansion was also a crucial part of the role of the nomadic ruler, and a ruler who did not succeed in this was soon abandoned by his followers. The flexible nature of Turko Mongolian tribal society made possible both the rapid construction of larger tribes and the absorption of foreign nomadic groups, giving the tribal leader the power to launch his campaigns of expansion. The warrior culture and ethos of tribesmen must also have contributed to Turko Mongol ambition. Finally, the archery and riding skills of the tribesmen, along with their endurance, made them excellent soldiers in the conquering armies. Source D Map showing the extent of Mongol conquest by 1260.
Section 1: Military leaders Read sources A to D in the source booklet and answer questions 1 to 4 below. The sources and questions relate to case study 1: Genghis Khan (c1200 1227) Leadership: motives and objectives; success in achieving those objectives and importance of Genghis Khan s leadership to Mongol success. 1. (a) What, according to Source C, were the factors that motivated the Mongol conquests? [3] (b) What is the message conveyed by Source D? [2] 2. With reference to its origin, purpose and content, analyse the value and limitations of Source B for an historian studying the Mongol Empire. [4] 3. Compare and contrast what Sources B and C reveal about the Mongol conquests under Genghis Khan. [6] 4. Using the sources and your own knowledge, evaluate the role of Genghis Khan in the launch and success of the Mongol conquests. [9]
Markscheme 1. (a) What, according to Source C, were the factors that motivated the Mongol conquests? [3] Ideological motives: the expansion was motivated by the belief that it was destiny for the Mongols to rule. Another motive for expansion was the underlying warrior culture and ethos of the tribesmen; There were also economic motives for expansion, including the desire to control manufactured and agricultural goods in neighbouring areas; The consolidation of the leadership necessitated expansion. Expansion added legitimacy to the rule of the tribal leader. The above material is an indication of what candidates may elect to write about in their responses. It is neither prescriptive nor exhaustive and no set answer is required. Award [1] for each relevant point up to a maximum of [3]. (b) What is the message conveyed by Source D? [2] The map highlights the huge geographic area that the Mongol empire covered, showing their ambitious expansion; The map shows that Mongol expansion occurred not only East into Asia, but also West into Europe and the Middle East; The map shows that the Silk Road ran through the centre of the Mongol Empire, highlighting the economic power of the Mongol Empire. The above material is an indication of what candidates may elect to write about in their responses. It is neither prescriptive nor exhaustive and no set answer is required. Award [1] for each relevant point up to a maximum of [2].
2. With reference to its origin, purpose and content, analyse the value and limitations of Source B for an historian studying the Mongol Empire. [4] Value: The extract is from an academic book specifically on the Mongol Empire, so detailed analysis can be expected; The academic background of the author it was written by a professor of history; The book was published in 2007, so the author was able to look at the Mongol Empire in hindsight. Limitations: This is a secondary source that offers a particular/single perspective; Being written in 2007 it was written almost 800 years after the events it described, so it may have been more difficult to find primary source material while researching the book than it would for more recent events; The author may have been influenced by the image of Genghis Khan as an iconic leader, perhaps reflected in his use of language such as astonishing and superb. The focus of the question is on the value and limitations of the source. If only value or limitations are discussed, award a maximum of [2]. Origin, purpose and content should be used as supporting evidence to make relevant comments on the value and limitations. For [4] there must be at least one reference to each of them in either the value or the limitations.
3. Compare and contrast what Sources B and C reveal about the Mongol conquests under Genghis Khan. [6] Marks Level descriptor 5 6 The response includes clear and valid points of comparison and of contrast. The response includes some valid points of comparison and/or of contrast, 3 4 although these points may lack clarity. The response consists of description of the content of the source(s), and/or 1 2 general comments about the source(s), rather than valid points of comparison or of contrast. The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors 0 above. Apply the markbands that provide the best fit to the responses given by candidates and award credit wherever it is possible to do so. The following material is an indication of what candidates may elect to write about in their responses. It is neither prescriptive nor exhaustive and no set answer is required. Indicative content Comparison: Both sources refer to the military capabilities of the tribes and their experience, and thus the success of the conquests. Source C points out the archery and riding skills of the tribesmen along with their endurance, which made them excellent soldiers in the conquering armies. Similarly, Source B refers to a superb army, potentially invincible in the field in 13th-century conditions. Both sources highlight the relation between expansion and the consolidation and preservation of the power of the ruler. Source C states that expansion was also a crucial part of the role of the nomadic ruler and Source B likewise states that unless something decisive was done with the newly formed military machine, it would go back to its earlier state. Contrast: Source B particularly highlights the role of Genghis Khan and his individual leadership, referring to him as a supreme ruler. Source C highlights other factors that helped the rise of Genghis Khan, rather than focusing on his leadership. Source C discusses wider economic and social factors such as the flexible nature of the tribes and how this nature allowed for the creation of larger tribes and absorption of foreign nomadic groups, both of which supported the leader and gave him the power to launch the conquests. Source B in contrast focuses on the military factors. Source C suggests that plain luck was one factor in explaining the success of the Mongols conquests, whereas Source B suggests that the success was far more the result of deliberate and intentional decisions.
4. Using the sources and your own knowledge, evaluate the role of Genghis Khan in the launch and success of the Mongol conquests. [9] Level descriptors Marks Focus Use of sources Own knowledge 7 9 The response is focused on the question. Clear references are made to the sources, and these references are used effectively as evidence to support the analysis. Accurate and relevant own knowledge is demonstrated. There is effective synthesis of own knowledge and source material. 4 6 The response is generally focused on the question. 1 3 The response lacks focus on the question. 0 The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors above. References are made to the sources, and these references are used as evidence to support the analysis. References to the sources are made, but at this level these references are likely to consist of descriptions of the content of the sources rather than the sources being used as evidence to support the analysis. The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors above. Where own knowledge is demonstrated, this lacks relevance or accuracy. There is little or no attempt to synthesize own knowledge and source material. No own knowledge is demonstrated or, where it is demonstrated, it is inaccurate or irrelevant. The response does not reach a standard described by the descriptors above. Apply the markbands that provide the best fit to the responses given by candidates and award credit wherever it is possible to do so. The following material is an indication of what candidates may elect to write about in their responses. It is neither prescriptive nor exhaustive and no set answer is required. While it is expected that there will be coverage of at least two of the sources, candidates are not required to refer to all four sources in their responses.
Indicative content Source A: Genghis Khan identified the damage done by endless internal warfare. He understood the power of unity. He built an army that tried to destroy divisions rather than create/exacerbate them. He expanded the empire quickly and efficiently. Source B: Genghis Khan is referred to as the supreme ruler, showing his power. Source C: There were other reasons for the success of the Mongol conquests, including plain luck and the political relations within the region at the time. The success of the conquests was also helped by the archery and riding skills of the tribesmen. Source D: Shows that the empire continued successfully after Genghis Khan, as the map shows the region in 1260, showing the impact of Genghis Khan s launch of the conquests. Own knowledge: Genghis Khan captured Western Xia in 1209, and in 1215 he captured the Jin capital of Zhongdu (Beijing). The name Genghis Khan is often interpreted as meaning universal ruler, showing his power. Own knowledge: Genghis Khan has a controversial reputation as a leader. Some emphasize the cruelty and destruction that occurred during his leadership. Others view him as an innovative leader who integrated rival tribes, improved economic stability and was tolerant of religious diversity.