The Plurality-with-Elimination Method

Similar documents
The Plurality-with-Elimination Method

The Addition Rule. Lecture 44 Section 9.3. Robb T. Koether. Hampden-Sydney College. Mon, Apr 14, 2014

Hamilton s and Jefferson s Methods

The Pigeonhole Principle

Tests of Homogeneity and Independence

Heap and Merge Sorts

A priori Smith fair extra practice


Hereditary peers by-election, March 2017: result

RELIGION AND THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL VOTE Your Vote Ohio Post Election Poll 1

Chapter 2 - Lecture 4 Conditional Probability

Voters moving against Occupy movement

Rethinking the Worldwide United Methodist Church... Seeking a New Approach

CSC2556 Spring 18 Algorithms for Collective Decision Making

Writing a Research Prospectus and Paper

*GRS91* Religious Studies Paper 9 An Introduction to Philosophy of Religion. Specification. New [GRS91] THURSDAY 16 JUNE, MORNING

An Overview of the Candidacy Process

St. Mary s Pastoral Council Bylaws

The Sea-Fight Tomorrow by Aristotle

Intro: The Power of Positive Thinking written by Norman Vincent Peale I am pleased to profile this book because the principles are life changing.

The American Religious Landscape and the 2004 Presidential Vote: Increased Polarization

The Fifth National Survey of Religion and Politics: A Baseline for the 2008 Presidential Election. John C. Green

FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, JANUARY 23 AT 6 AM

Ahmadinejad wins Iranian presidency

The contents of this document are made using Alan Nguyen s Brain Juices.

Alabama 2018 Gubernatorial Republican Primary Poll

Among the Hidden Study Guide. 1. Reread the first paragraph. What is the mood that is set immediately?

Love & Homosexuality [and he did]

Goodman looks like best Dem alternative

Journal of Activities, September-October 2008

ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FFA Rules for Creed Speaking CDE

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

How would you rate the following individuals?

Toss up in Wisconsin Senate race

Darwinian Morality. Why aren t t all the atheists raping and pillaging? Ron Garret (Erann( Gat) September 2004

Illinois Voters Think State Is Most Corrupt

2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONFERENCE LAY LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM

Written by Kathy Tuesday, 28 January :13 - Last Updated Wednesday, 29 January :18

September: Club Manager s Checklist

THE GEORGE WASHINGTON BATTLEGROUND POLL

IS ACT-UTILITARIANISM SELF-DEFEATING?

Shrewd Management. Jesus said: The sons of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light.

The Hand of God Working in Our Life

Myth for a day. Ancient Greece Speech project. Name: Due: Dear Student,

HuffPost: Hillary Clinton September 13-14, US Adults

Paper Reference(s) 4425/01 London Examinations IGCSE. Friday 4 May 2007 Morning Time: 2 hours

Scholar discusses Joseph Smith's 1844 presidential election campaign

Manchin remains ahead

Who Is The Greatest? Matthew 18:1-5

An Introduction to Parliamentary Debate

BYLAWS CHRISTIAN CHURCH (DISCIPLES OF CHRIST) IN INDIANA

Six Sigma Prof. Dr. T. P. Bagchi Department of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Lecture No. # 18 Acceptance Sampling

Bounded Rationality. Gerhard Riener. Department of Economics University of Mannheim. WiSe2014

Thompson leads Baldwin by only two in WI-Sen.

EXPOSING THE MONSTER: EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION

The Workers in the Vineyard Lesson Aim: To know God is fair and generous.

NPTEL NPTEL ONINE CERTIFICATION COURSE. Introduction to Machine Learning. Lecture-59 Ensemble Methods- Bagging,Committee Machines and Stacking

Writing an Essay. Body Paragraphs and Conclusions

Programming Potpourri Unknown

COURSE SYLLABUS. Course Description

The Moral Behavior of Ethicists and the Role of the Philosopher

All Saints Lutheran Church Council Minutes Jan. 16, 2018 at 6:30 pm

HuffPost: Sexual harassment November 16-17, US Adults

BYLAWS. Church of the Saviour. Wayne, Pennsylvania FINAL REVISION STATUS: Approved by the Elder Council

Valley Bible Church Sermon Transcript

Election Ceremony OA MEMBER A:

St. Bernard Church, North Kingstown, R. I.

2. How many days are in this month?

UNDERSTANDING THE BIBLE It s Easier than You Think! Bible Reading Plan

** May 21, 2017 ** The Messenger. Blessed to Serve Others Outreach & Servant Events

Jesus Calls His Disciples Lesson Aim: To explore what it means to follow Jesus.

South Asian Canadians

NEWSLETTER OF ST. MATTHEW KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL # Dear Fellow Brother Knights of Columbus.

A Study Guide. Forever His

Titus: The Practice of Grace. Titus 3:1: The Believer and the Government

Late Modern Great Philosophers PHI 314, Winter 12 MWF: 1-2

5 KEYS TO EVANGELISM: HOW TO SHARE YOUR FAITH. Class Outline

Jesus Feeds the 5,000

FINAL EXAM SHORT-ANSWER QUESTIONS PHILOSOPHY 166 SPRING 2006

Syllabus. Our Mission: To Live According to a Biblical Worldview and Serve

Conditional Probability, Hypothesis Testing, and the Monty Hall Problem

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Sunday, November 27 at 8:00 a.m.

Approaches to Bible Study

What kind of overall impact would you say religious and faith communities have had on the development of your community over the years?

DIOCESAN SYNOD REPRESENTATION Bishop s Nominees: For retired clergy For sector ministry For Readers. Lay Members

Interview with Lebanese historian Habib Malik about the future of Christian Minorities in the Middle East

RECTOR SEARCH COMMITTEE PARISH SURVEY RESULTS

CHAPTERlO THE PROBLEM OF WRONG BEING DONE

MITOCW ocw f99-lec18_300k

Wesley United Methodist Church November 20, 2016 Thanksgiving Sunday Text: Philippians 4:4-9 John 6:25-35 Title: An Attitude of Gratitude

ST. MICHAEL LUTHERAN CHURCH STRATEGIC MINISTRY PLAN PRESENTATION 2015

Voters Say Impact of Newspaper Endorsements Limited

Statements, Arguments, Validity. Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2

A Lesson You Can Share Lesson IV: Good Neighbor Evangelism

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Tuesday, January 23 at Noon

North Carolina Survey Results

Buddhism Stations Workbook

Teaching Resource Items for

NLC Life Group Through the Bible Study. Week of January 21, 2017 Sermon: Find Your Place

Transcription:

The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Lecture 10 Section 1.4 Robb T. Koether Hampden-Sydney College Mon, Feb 5, 2018 Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 1 / 18

1 The Plurality-with-Elimination Method 2 Variations 3 A Defect in the Method 4 Coombs Method 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 2 / 18

Outline 1 The Plurality-with-Elimination Method 2 Variations 3 A Defect in the Method 4 Coombs Method 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 3 / 18

The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Definition (The Plurality-with-Elimination Method) By the plurality-with-elimination method (also called instant-runoff voting, or IRV), The voters cast their votes for their first-place choice. If one candidate has a majority of votes, he wins. Otherwise, the candidate with the fewest first-place votes is eliminated and the process repeats with the remaining candidates until there is a winner. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 4 / 18

The Political Science Club Election Example (The Political Science Club Election) 15 11 6 3 1st A B C C 2nd D A D B 3rd C D B A 4th B C A D Who is the winner? Give the complete ranking (in reverse order of elimination). Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 5 / 18

The Political Science Club Election Example (The Political Science Club Election) 15 11 6 3 1st A B B A 2nd D A D B 3rd C D C C 4th B C A D What if there is a tie (C and D each received 0 first-place votes)? Which one do we eliminate? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 6 / 18

The Political Science Club Election Example (The Political Science Club Election) 15 11 6 3 1st A B B A 2nd D A D B 3rd C D C C 4th B C A D What if there is a tie (C and D each received 0 first-place votes)? Which one do we eliminate? Does it matter? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 6 / 18

The Political Science Club Election Example (The Political Science Club Election) 15 11 6 3 1st A B B A 2nd D A D B 3rd C D C C 4th B C A D What if there is a tie (C and D each received 0 first-place votes)? Which one do we eliminate? Does it matter? It could matter. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 6 / 18

What if There is a Tie? Example (What if There is a Tie?) 10 8 8 8 1st A B C D 2nd B C D B 3rd C D B C 4th D A A A Eliminate B. Who wins? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 7 / 18

What if There is a Tie? Example (What if There is a Tie?) 10 8 8 8 1st A B C D 2nd B C D B 3rd C D B C 4th D A A A Eliminate B. Who wins? Eliminate C. Who wins? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 7 / 18

What if There is a Tie? Example (What if There is a Tie?) 10 8 8 8 1st A B C D 2nd B C D B 3rd C D B C 4th D A A A Eliminate B. Who wins? Eliminate C. Who wins? Eliminate D. Who wins? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 7 / 18

What if There is a Tie? Example (What if There is a Tie?) 10 8 8 8 1st A B C D 2nd B C D B 3rd C D B C 4th D A A A Eliminate B. Who wins? Eliminate C. Who wins? Eliminate D. Who wins? Let s not worry about that. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 7 / 18

Outline 1 The Plurality-with-Elimination Method 2 Variations 3 A Defect in the Method 4 Coombs Method 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 8 / 18

Faster Elimination Rather than eliminate the candidates one per round, we could eliminate Two per round (or three, or four, etc.) All but two in the first round. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 9 / 18

Example Example Suppose that there are 5 candidates: A, B, C, D, E. The following table summarizes the voters preferences. Preferences No. of voters 6 4 4 4 3 1 1 1st B B D E A C C 2nd A A A C D B D 3rd C D E D C A A 4th D E C B B D B 5th E C B A E E E Use the elimination method, 2 at a time, to find the winner. Would the result be the same if we eliminated them one at a time? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 10 / 18

Outline 1 The Plurality-with-Elimination Method 2 Variations 3 A Defect in the Method 4 Coombs Method 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 11 / 18

A Defect 7 8 10 4 1st A B C A 2nd B C A C 3rd C A B B What could possibly go wrong with this method? Who is the winner? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 12 / 18

A Defect 7 8 10 4 1st A B C A 2nd B C A C 3rd C A B B What could possibly go wrong with this method? Who is the winner? What if the 4 voters who preferred A over C (in the last column) changed their minds and preferred C over A. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 12 / 18

A Defect 7 8 10 4 1st A B C C 2nd B C A A 3rd C A B B What could possibly go wrong with this method? Who is the winner? What if the 4 voters who preferred A over C (in the last column) changed their minds and preferred C over A. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 13 / 18

A Defect 7 8 10 4 1st A B C C 2nd B C A A 3rd C A B B What could possibly go wrong with this method? Who is the winner? What if the 4 voters who preferred A over C (in the last column) changed their minds and preferred C over A. That could only help C, right? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 13 / 18

A Defect 7 8 10 4 1st A B C C 2nd B C A A 3rd C A B B What could possibly go wrong with this method? Who is the winner? What if the 4 voters who preferred A over C (in the last column) changed their minds and preferred C over A. That could only help C, right? Wrong! Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 13 / 18

Outline 1 The Plurality-with-Elimination Method 2 Variations 3 A Defect in the Method 4 Coombs Method 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 14 / 18

Coombs Method Definition (Coombs Method) Coombs method is a variation of the plurality-with-elimination method. The voters cast their votes for their last-place choice. The candidate with the most last-place votes is eliminated and the process repeats with the remaining candidates until there is a winner. Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 15 / 18

The Political Science Club Election Example (The Political Science Club Election) 15 11 6 3 1st A B C C 2nd D A D B 3rd C D B A 4th B C A D Who is the winner? Give the complete ranking. How do the results compare to the plurality-with-elimination method? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 16 / 18

Outline 1 The Plurality-with-Elimination Method 2 Variations 3 A Defect in the Method 4 Coombs Method 5 Assignment Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 17 / 18

Assignment Assignment Chapter 1 Exercises 31, 32, 33, 35, 37, 38, 69a. Rework 31, 32, and 33 using Coombs method. Were the results the same as with the Plurality-with-Elimination Method? Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) The Plurality-with-Elimination Method Mon, Feb 5, 2018 18 / 18