How many people will be studied? We expect about 200 people will be in this research study internationally.

Similar documents
What Do Philosophers Believe?

SAMPLING AND DEMOGRAPHICS...

Ethics is subjective.

PHILOSOPHY. Chair: Karánn Durland (Fall 2018) and Mark Hébert (Spring 2019) Emeritus: Roderick Stewart

USM 2007 Campus Climate Survey Responses

Washburn University Diversity Climate Survey Results 2013

What if there is no hard problem with consciousness? Daniel Clement Dennett. Daniele Mario Cassaghi

The Campus Expression Survey A Heterodox Academy Project

Constructing the World

Curriculum Vitae. Joseph Mendola

Scanlon on Double Effect

Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism

Note: Results are reported by total population sampled; and sub-samples. See final page for details.

Faculty Appointment Questionnaire

Laity in Support of Retired Priests

Causation and Free Will

Appendix Demographic summary of sample, by sex

Psychological Egoism, Hedonism and Ethical Egoism

On Quine, Grice and Strawson, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. by Christian Green

CLASS #17: CHALLENGES TO POSITIVISM/BEHAVIORAL APPROACH

Congregational Survey Results 2016

2. During the previous four weeks, how often have you attended worship services at this church?

Is euthanasia morally permissible? What is the relationship between patient autonomy,

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1. PHIL 56. Research Integrity. 1 Unit

Course Syllabus. Course Description: Objectives for this course include: PHILOSOPHY 333

Senior Survey No. of responses = 291. Std. Dev. Mean Median 25 50% 25% On the campus of Andrews University 97.6%

We need your response by January 15, 2018

What America Is Thinking Natural Gas Exports May 2014

Mark Coeckelbergh: Growing Moral Relations. Critique of Moral Status Ascription

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1

New Life Temple Bible College & Leadership Institute APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION

NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE

UNITY OF KNOWLEDGE (IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABILITY) Vol. I - Philosophical Holism M.Esfeld

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.

CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH FINDINGS. Introduction. D.Min. project. A coding was devised in order to assign quantitative values to each of the

SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS GENERAL YEAR 11

Contents. How to Use This Book Preface Acknowledgments

Department of Philosophy. Module descriptions 2017/18. Level C (i.e. normally 1 st Yr.) Modules

All Saints Catholic Academy SMSC in the RE curriculum

David M. Woodruff Associate Professor of Philosophy, Azusa Pacific University

1. Personal and Professional Satisfaction

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1. PHIL HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY Short Title: HIST INTRO TO PHILOSOPHY

Department of Philosophy

Department of Philosophy

Ethical non-naturalism

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) PHIL Courses. Philosophy (PHIL) 1

Purpose of Ministerial Search Survey

Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary

Investing: The Last Liberal Art

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Honours Programme in Philosophy

AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING

SPRING 2014 UNDERGRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS

World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.

WHAT S HAPPENING IN YOUTH CONFIRMATION? High School Students

Legal and Religious Dimension of Morality in Christian Literature

DREW CHASTAIN EDUCATION

Syllabus for THE 470 Philosophy of Religion 3.0 Credit Hours Fall The major goals are to enable the student to do the following:

Summer Holiday research task:

FINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET. objectivity intersubjectivity ways the peer review system is supposed to improve objectivity

Self-Evidence and A Priori Moral Knowledge

Philosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4152 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2017

Review of Erik J. Wielenberg: Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism

Kim Godsoe, Ast. Provost for Academic Affairs, Brandeis University

Introduction to Ethics Summer Session A

Introduction to Philosophy Practice Final Exam Spring 2018

Page 1 BEFORE YOU BEGIN

Development Part III. Moral Reasoning

Curriculum Vitae GEORGE FREDERICK SCHUELER Web Page:

24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI

Of Skepticism with Regard to the Senses. David Hume

Epistemology Naturalized

The Trolley Problem. 1. The Trolley Problem: Consider the following pair of cases:

CURRICULUM VITAE STEPHEN JACOBSON. (Title: What's Wrong With Reliability Theories of Justification?)

Abstract Abstraction Abundant ontology Abundant theory of universals (or properties) Actualism A-features Agent causal libertarianism

Philosophical Ethics. Distinctions and Categories

INTRODUCTORY HANDOUT PHILOSOPHY 13 FALL, 2004 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY---ETHICS Professor: Richard Arneson. TAs: Eric Campbell and Adam Streed.

CHRISTIANITY AND THE NATURE OF SCIENCE J.P. MORELAND

We need your response by October 24

Year: 2017 SYNOD COMMITTEE ON REPRESENTATION Representation Functions Report Form

Human Nature & Human Diversity: Sex, Love & Parenting; Morality, Religion & Race. Course Description

Wittgenstein on the Fallacy of the Argument from Pretence. Abstract

Explanatory Indispensability and Deliberative Indispensability: Against Enoch s Analogy Alex Worsnip University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Philosophy (PHILOS) Courses. Philosophy (PHILOS) 1

Christian Spiritual Formation Certificate Application Packet

Areas of Competence: Epistemology, Logic (introductory to intermediate), Philosophy of Language, Philosophy of Mind, Political Philosophy

Intro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2

PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE

FAITH STATEMENT STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS

Areas of Specialization and Competence Philosophy of Language, History of Analytic Philosophy

Philosophy & Religion

APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT (Part 2)

Common Sense: A Contemporary Defense By Noah Lemos Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xvi

Theology Revision Lists Year 12 Year 13 Paper 1 Paper 3 Philosophy- Ethics- Philosophy Ethics- Atheism- Defining it, and agnosticism.

Autonomous Machines Are Ethical

Darwinist Arguments Against Intelligent Design Illogical and Misleading

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES

Epistemology for Naturalists and Non-Naturalists: What s the Difference?

Philosophy Department 698 Oakland Ave #4 Saint Paul College St Paul, MN Marshall Ave

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 3b Free Will

Transcription:

Consent Form Title of research study: Personality and Belief Investigator: Nick Byrd What should I know about a research study? This research study will be explained to you. Whether or not you take part is up to you. You can choose not to take part. You can agree to take part and later change your mind. Your decision will not be held against you. Who can I talk to? If you have questions, concerns, or complaints, or think the research has hurt you, talk to the research team at www.byrdnick.com/contact This research has been reviewed and approved by an Institutional Review Board ( IRB ). You may talk to them at (303) 735-3702 or irbadmin@colorado.edu if: Your questions, concerns, or complaints are not being answered by the research team. You cannot reach the research team. You want to talk to someone besides the research team. You have questions about your rights as a research subject. You want to get information or provide input about this research. How long will the research last? We expect that you will be in this research study for up to 10 minutes. How many people will be studied? We expect about 200 people will be in this research study internationally. What happens if I say yes, I want to be in this research? You will complete one web-based survey. The survey will involve demographic information, up to 10 questions about your personality, up to 3 math questions, and up to 20 questions about your beliefs. What happens if I do not want to be in this research? You can leave the research at any time and it will not be held against you. What happens if I say yes, but I change my mind later? Again, you can leave the research at any time it will not be held against you. 28 January 2014 IRB Approval Date IRB Document Revision Date: April 8, 2013 HRP-502: TEMPLATE Consent Document v2

Any data collected from you will not be used in the study. You can explain your reasons for withdrawing, but you are not required to do so. Will being in this study hurt me in any way? There are not foreseen risks in participating in this study. Will being in this study help me any way? We cannot promise any benefits to you or others from your taking part in this research. However, possible benefits include improved self-awareness of personality and improved self-awareness of one s philosophical beliefs. What happens to the information collected for the research? No identifying information will be collected, so data will not include information like name or contact information. The researchers are interested only in answers to the survey questions. We cannot promise complete secrecy about these answers. Organizations that may inspect and copy your information include the IRB and other representatives of this organization. Can I be removed from the research without my OK? The person in charge of the research study or the sponsor can remove you from the research study without your approval. Possible reasons for removal include incomplete surveys or failures to give sufficient thought to survey questions (e.g., if you complete the entire survey in less than 60 seconds). What else do I need to know? This research is being funded in part by the Institute for Cognitive Science at the University of Colorado. All participants will have the option to subscribe to updates about the study at the end of the survey. After you click "submit" below, you will continue to the survey. If you do not click Submit again at the end of the survey, then none of your answers will be saved and they will not be viewed by the researchers. by checking this box, you are indicating that you consent to participate in this study according to the terms above. [Continue to survey (Button)]

Country of Citizenship: Ethnicity: Asian or Pacific Islander Black/Non Hispanic Caribbean Caucasian Latino/Hispanic Native American or Alaskan Native Multiethnic Biological sex: male female intersex Gender man woman other: Country of Residence: Survey Do you have or are you a candidate for a PhD in philosophy? yes no (if no, continue to survey for non-philosophers) How many years have you been studying philosophy? Research Profile: Areas of specialization: Areas of Competence: Of the following, with which philosophical traditions do you most identify? (Check all that apply) Analytic Continental Eastern Western

History With which time period(s) is most of your work directly concerned? Ancient Medieval Renaissance Modern 20th Century Contemporary Affiliation (check and clarify all that apply): I am a graduate student I am a postdoctoral researcher/teacher I am non-tenure-track faculty member I am a tenure-track faculty member I am an emeritus faculty member I have published in a peer-reviewed philosophy journal I currently teach philosophy at a college/university I know or am acquainted with the researcher(s) conducting this study.

PhilPapers Survey (with modified questions for non-philosophers) This is a survey about some central philosophical questions. The questions will be asked to you one at a time, in no particular order. The questions are phrased in a minimal way, in part because further clarification would usually be tendentious and would call for still further clarification in turn. Of course any philosopher can find ambiguity or other problems in such a question, so a number of "other" options are available. Nevertheless, we strongly encourage you to adopt the most natural interpretation of each question and to report an acceptance or a leaning toward one side or the other wherever possible. Question 1 Mind: anti-physicalism or physicalism? Accept: anti-physicalism Lean toward: anti-physicalism Accept: physicalism Lean toward: physicalism Question 1 Do you think the mind is entirely physical or not? Accept: it s entirely physical Lean toward: it s entirely physical Accept: it s not entirely physical Lean toward: it s not entirely physical Question 2 Mental content: externalism or internalism? Accept: externalism Lean toward: externalism Accept: internalism Lean toward: internalism Question 2 Do you think the contents of the mind are entirely internal or do the contents of the mind depend on things outside the mind? Accept: entirely internal Lean toward: entirely internal

Accept: depends on the contents of the world Lean toward: depends on the contents of the world Question 3 Language: Russellianism or Fregeanism? Accept: Russellianism Lean toward: Russellianism Accept: Fregeanism Lean toward: Fregeanism Question 3 Do you think that uttering the words Santa Claus implies that Santa Claus actually exists or or does it merely imply that an idea of Santa Claus exists? Accept: refer directly to things / implies that Santa Claus actually exists Lean toward: refer directly to things / implies that Santa Claus actually exists Accept: refers to just to an idea of things / merely implies that an idea of Santa Claus exists Lean toward: refers to just an idea of things / merely implies that an idea of Santa Claus exists Question 4 Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no? Accept: yes Lean toward: yes Accept: no Lean toward: no Question 4 Do you think there is an important difference between statements that are true depending on how they describe the world and statements that are true by definition? Accept: yes Lean toward: yes Accept: no Lean toward: no

Question 5 Time: B-theory or A-theory? Accept: B-theory Lean toward: B-theory Accept: A-theory Lean toward: A-theory Question 5 Do you think that our experience of time's passage represents an objective passage of time in the world, or do you think that our experience of time's passage is illusory? Accept: it represents an objective passage of time Lean toward: it represents an objective passage of time Accept: it s illusory Lean toward: it s illusory Question 6 Laws of nature: Humeanism or non-humeanism? Accept: Humeanism Lean toward: Humeanism Accept: non-humeanism Lean toward: non-humeanism Question 6 Do you think natural laws are just descriptions of observed regularities or are they lawlike features that truly govern events such in such a way that observable regularities occur? Accept: just descriptions Lean toward: just descriptions Accept: law-like features Lean toward: law-like features

Question 7 Justification: externalism or internalism? Accept: externalism Lean toward: externalism Accept: internalism Lean toward: internalism Question 7 Do you think someone s beliefs and actions should be justified by factors that are external (e.g., objective truth or consequences) or internal to the person (e.g., motivation, intention, awareness)? Accept: external Lean toward: external Accept: internal Lean toward: internal Question 8 Free will: incompatibilism or compatibilism? Accept: incompatibilism Lean toward: incompatibilism Accept: compatibilism Lean toward: compatibilism Question 8 If every event in the universe is determined, do you think it is possible that there could be free will? Accept: no Lean toward: no Accept: yes Lean toward: yes Question 9 God: theism or atheism? Accept: theism

Lean toward: theism Accept: atheism Lean toward: atheism Question 9 Do you think that a God exists? Accept: yes Lean toward: yes Accept: no Lean toward: no Question 10 Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism? Accept: moral realism Lean toward: moral realism Accept: moral anti-realism Lean toward: moral anti-realism Question 10 Is anything objectively or truly morally right or wrong? Accept: yes Lean toward: yes Accept: no Lean toward: no Question 11 Moral judgment: externalism or internalism? Accept: externalism Lean toward: externalism Accept: internalism Lean toward: internalism Question 11

Do you think that moral judgments are justified only by external criteria (e.g., whether or not someone is known to be a good person), or by only factors internal to the person (e.g., whether or not the person was motivated by good intentions)? Accept: external Lean toward: external Accept: internal Lean toward: internal Question 12 Normative ethics: consequentialism, deontology or virtue ethics? Accept: consequentialism Lean toward: consequentialism Accept: deontology Lean toward: deontology Accept: virtue ethics Lean toward: virtue ethics Question 12 Which of the following do you think makes an action right or wrong? (a) The consequences of the action. (b) The definition of the action. (c) Whether or not the person who did the action was a good person. Accept: (a) Lean toward: (a) Accept: (b) Lean toward: (b) Accept: virtue (c) Lean toward: (c) Question 13 Politics: libertarianism or egalitarianism? Accept: libertarianism Lean toward: libertarianism Accept: egalitarianism Lean toward: egalitarianism

Question 13 What is more important in a good society: ensuring liberty or ensuring equality? Accept: liberty Lean toward: liberty Accept: equality Lean toward: equaity Question 14 Science: scientific anti-realism or scientific realism? Accept: scientific anti-realism Lean toward: scientific anti-realism Accept: scientific realism Lean toward: scientific realism Question 14 Do you think that science can describe the fundamental nature of the world, or can it only produce useful predictions and technology? Accept: produce useful predictions and technology Lean toward: produce useful predictions and technology Accept: describe the fundamental nature of the world Lean toward: describe the fundamental nature of the world Question 15 Abstract objects: nominalism or Platonism? Accept: nominalism Lean toward: nominalism Accept: Platonism Lean toward: Platonism Question 15 Do you think abstract entities like numbers really exist, or do things like numbers only exist as descriptions of quantities (for example 3 apples)? Accept: descriptions Lean toward: descriptions Accept: entities that really exist Lean toward: entities that really exist

Lean toward: Question 16 Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? Accept: empiricism Lean toward: empiricism Accept: rationalism Lean toward: rationalism Question 16 Do you think we have to see how the world works to have knowledge or can we know things by just thinking about them? Accept: we have to see how the world works Lean toward: we have to see how the world works Accept: we can just think about them Lean toward: we can just think about them Question 17 Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism? Accept: naturalism Lean toward: naturalism Accept: non-naturalism Lean toward: non-naturalism Question 17 Do you think that there are supernatural forces, causes, or beings? Accept: no Lean toward: no Accept: yes Lean toward: yes

(not using question 18_ Question 19 Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching): straight or turn? Accept: straight Lean toward: straight Accept: turn Lean toward: turn Question 19 You see a train racing down its track towards five people. You happen to be standing near the switch that would divert the train down a sidetrack toward one person. If you pull the switch the train will surely kill 1 person. If you do not pull the switch the train will surely kill five persons. Do you pull the switch? Accept: no Lean toward: no Accept: yes Lean toward: yes Question 20 Personal identity: physical view or psychological view? Accept: physical view Lean toward: physical view Accept: psychological view Lean toward: psychological view Question 20 Do you think that your brain and body have to continue to exist for you to continue to exist, or could you continue to exist so long as your mental states continue to exist? Accept: brain and body have to continue to exist Lean toward: brain and body have to continue to exist Accept: only mental states have to continue to exist Lean toward: only mental states have to continue to exist

Below are a series of math questions of varying difficulty. Please answer as many as you can. 1. A notebook and a pencil cost $1.10 in total. The notebook costs $1.00 more than the pencil. How much does the pencil cost? cents 2. If it takes 5 machines 5 minutes to make 5 widgets, how long would it take 100 machines to make 100 widgets? minutes 3. In a lake, there is a patch of lily pads. Every day, the patch doubles in size. If it takes 48 days for the patch to cover the entire lake, how long would it take for the patch to cover half of the lake? days 4. Are you familiar with these questions? 5. Are you familiar with the answers to these questions? [end survey] You have successfully submitted your answers to the survey. Thank you for completing the study Why was I invited to take part in a research study? You were invited to take part in a research study because you are an academic philosopher. Why is this research being done? This study is designed to determine whether and how certain psychological and cognitive features correlate with, interact with, and predict self-reported philosophical beliefs.

Questions, Concerns, & Suggestions If you have any questions, comments, or other suggestions, then you are welcome to leave them in the space below (The researchers will contact you to answer your questions only if you include your email address with your question. This will not be linked to your answers to survey questions but will confirm you as a participant.) If you would like to be kept up to date on this research or if you would like to participate in future studies related to this research, then you can sign up below. To sign up, write your emaill address in the box below and click sign-up. Your email address will not be stored with or connected with the data, you can provide your email address and keep your survey answers anonymous. Email: [sign-up]