You submitted this quiz on Mon 14 Oct :41 PM PDT (UTC -0700). You got a score of out of

Similar documents
JUDICIAL OPINION WRITING

Video Reaction. Opening Activity. Journal #16

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

PHILOSOPHIES OF SCIENTIFIC TESTING

On the Origins and Normative Status of the Impartial Spectator

Session 16: To Spread Scriptural Holiness Across the Land

Touching the You A Transformative Approach to Christians and Jews in Dialogue Learning in the Presence of the Other

USF MASTERS OF SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM ASSESSMENT OF FOUNDATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES LAST COMPLETED ON 4/30/17

Stratford School Academy RE year 10 curriculum-belief in God.

The Problem of Evil Chapters 14, 15. B. C. Johnson & John Hick Introduction to Philosophy Professor Doug Olena

1.7 The Spring Arbor University Community Covenant Biblical Principles

NICHOLAS J.J. SMITH. Let s begin with the storage hypothesis, which is introduced as follows: 1

A s a contracts professional, from

Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science

to a very great extent to a great extent to some extent to a minimal extent not at all

THE CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP by Lars Bergström

Bounded Rationality :: Bounded Models

CHAPTER 2. The Classical School

Rationality in Action. By John Searle. Cambridge: MIT Press, pages, ISBN Hardback $35.00.

SYLLABUS. Department Syllabus. Philosophy of Religion

Logic and Artificial Intelligence Lecture 26

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

Is it rational to have faith? Looking for new evidence, Good s Theorem, and Risk Aversion. Lara Buchak UC Berkeley

Rawls s veil of ignorance excludes all knowledge of likelihoods regarding the social

1 Introduction. Cambridge University Press Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice Andrés Perea Excerpt More information

Of Love, Lust and Perjury A case study. soon realized that with friends like Linda, she did not need enemies. Playful rituals in the

Søren Kierkegaard Philosophical Fragments, Concluding Scientific Postscript excerpts 1 PHIL101 Prof. Oakes updated: 10/10/13 12:03 PM

Louisiana English Language Arts Content Standards BENCHMARKS FOR 5 8

Becoming A Blessed Church. Mid Week Instruction Reid Temple AME Church Pastor Washington

CRIMINAL JUSTICE MINISTRY

Oxford Scholarship Online Abstracts and Keywords

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not text, cite appropriate resource(s))

This image cannot currently be displayed. Course Catalog. Foundations for Living Glynlyon, Inc.

Richard Carrier, Ph.D.

EL CAMINO COLLEGE Behavioral & Social Sciences Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy, Summer 2016 Section 2510, MTWTh, 8:00-10:05 a.m.

The Fifth National Survey of Religion and Politics: A Baseline for the 2008 Presidential Election. John C. Green

Rawls, rationality, and responsibility: Why we should not treat our endowments as morally arbitrary

God in Three Persons, Blessed Trinity.

King and Kitchener Packet 3 King and Kitchener: The Reflective Judgment Model

factors in Bentham's hedonic calculus.

Computer Ethics. Normative Ethics and Normative Argumentation. Viola Schiaffonati October 10 th 2017

Building Your Theology

3/20/2017. Fully Equipped. Integrating Apologetics and Discipleship. The Happy Accident

Compromise and Toleration: Some Reflections I. Introduction

defines problem 2. Search for Exhaustive Limited, sequential Demand generation

LDR Church Health Survey Instructions

Hoekema, Anthony. The Bible and the Future. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, pages. $23.60.

Robert Kiely Office Hours: Monday 4:15 6:00; Wednesday 1-3; Thursday 2-3

Resolved: The United States should adopt a no first strike policy for cyber warfare.

The American Public on the Islamic World

AN OUTLINE OF CRITICAL THINKING

OPEN Moral Luck Abstract:

Segment Survey Mark 4:1-34

Honey and Mumford. Learning Styles Questionnaire

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View

AP SEMINAR: End- of- Course Exam SAMPLE RESPONSES SECTION I: PART A. The Uncertainty of Science, by Richard Feynman

Testing Fairmindedness

Carnap s Non-Cognitivism as an Alternative to Both Value- Absolutism and Value-Relativism

Azusa Pacific University Department of Religion and Philosophy Syllabus THEO 303 (04) Theology and the Christian Life 3 Units Fall 2007

Spiritual Gifts Assessment Traders Point Christian Church

Critical Reasoning and Moral theory day 3

Building Your Framework everydaydebate.blogspot.com by James M. Kellams

Servant Leadership School 1640 Columbia Rd. N.W. Washington, D.C

Managerial Decision Making

Inference in Cyc. Copyright 2002 Cycorp

Introduction Symbolic Logic

Unification Task Force Survey Results

Lecture 5 Rejecting Analyses I: Virtue Epistemology

Biblical Hermeneutics Basic Methodology of Biblical Interpretation

1. LEADER PREPARATION

ONTOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF PLURALIST RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES

2 John. The elect lady and her children (v. 1). Probably a local church in Asia Minor. Date of Writing: A.D Place of Writing: Ephesus (?

Follow links for Class Use and other Permissions. For more information send to:

The Journey to Discovering Your Spiritual Gifts:

Ref: Exposure Draft IFRS Practice Statement: Application of materiality to Financial Statements

Philosophy 107: Philosophy of Religion El Camino College Summer, 2016 Section 4173, Online Course

YOUR PERSONALITY BLOG PERSONALITY TEST. Total. Total. Total. Total RIVER POINT COMMUNITY CHURCH BLOG PERSONALITY TEST. Compliant.

Social Studies 10-1: The Position Paper

Statement. Assertion. Elaboration. Reasoning. Argument Building. Statement / Assertion

Bible Exposition I: Hermeneutics and Preparation (PRS 6101) Fall 2017 * Tuesdays * 6:00 Central Station Cowboy Church, Midland, NC

DISCOVER YOUR SACRED GIFTS

(i) Morality is a system; and (ii) It is a system comprised of moral rules and principles.

Character and Honor CH 4-4

Division of Ordained Ministry: Outcomes. GBHEM Office of Research and Evaluation Mark McCormack and Joel Cummings February 25, 2015

LEARNING STYLES QUESTIONNAIRE

Module 4: Argument. In ecology and biology, arguments are often used to:

Chapter 3 PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS AND BUSINESS CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After exploring this chapter, you will be able to:

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Intro to Christian Theology

Psalms and Writings Prof. Timothy E. Saleska Concordia Seminary

II Plenary discussion of Expertise and the Global Warming debate.

Scientific Progress, Verisimilitude, and Evidence

Critical Thinking. What is critical thinking? Speaker: Frank Reed

INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS

The following program learning outcomes reflect the intended impact of the Doctor of Ministry Program:

Why Good Science Is Not Value-Free

10648NAT Diploma of Ministry (Insert Stream)

A Statement of Seventh-day Adventist Educational Philosophy

ST507: Contemporary Theology II: From Theology of Hope to Postmodernism

Transcription:

Feedback Week 2 - Quiz Help You submitted this quiz on Mon 14 Oct 2013 3:41 PM PDT (UTC -0700). You got a score of 16.00 out of 16.00. Question 1 Logic of Consequence vs Logic of Appropriateness In questions 1-4, please identify whether each of the following four decision justifications reflects a logic of consequence or a logic of appropriateness approach to decision making. I made my choice after determining that the expected costs were outweighed by the expected benefits. Logic of consequence Logic of appropriateness Question 2 As a member of the military, I did what someone in the military is expected to do. Logic of consequence Logic of appropriateness https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 1/9

Question 3 I choose not to steal because stealing is wrong. Logic of consequence Logic of appropriateness Question 4 I choose not to steal because the value of what I could gain from stealing is not worth the risk of getting caught and put in jail. Logic of consequence Logic of appropriateness Question 5 Which of the following are necessary in order to make fully or ideally rational decisions (select all that apply)? Knowledge of all your possible actions or choices. Knowledge of the consequences associated with each https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 2/9

Knowledge of the consequences associated with each possible action or choice. Knowledge of your preferences. In other words, you need a way of ranking possible consequences in terms of their desirability. More time, information, and attention than most people possess in most situations. Total / Question 6 Bounded Rationality vs Full Rationality Which of the following statements about boundedly-rational (or satisficing) and fully-rational decision-makers are true (select all that apply)? Unlike a fully rational decision-maker who always considers every possible alternative, a boundedly-rational decisionmaker starts by considering a subset of alternatives. Unlike a fully rational decision-maker who selects the best possible alternative, a boundedly-rational decision-maker selects the first alternative he or she encounters that is good enough. Unlike a fully rational decision-maker, a boundedly-rational decision-maker does not employ logic or systematic thinking. Bounded-rationality is a more accurate description than full rationality of how people usually make decisions. https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 3/9

rationality of how people usually make decisions. Total / Question 7 Logic of Consequence and Logic of Appropriateness True or false: According to the logic of appropriateness, individuals attempt to match rules and identities to situations in order to determine a course of action. True Question 8 Logic of Consequence and Logic of Appropriateness True or false: Employing a logic of appropriateness rather than a logic of consequence simplifies decision-making by reducing the amount of ambiguity and uncertainty one faces. True Question Explanation https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 4/9

: While a logic of appropriateness may mean less ambiguity and uncertainty about consequences and preferences, one may still face a great deal of ambiguity and uncertainty attempting to identify situations, identities, and rules. Question 9 Logic of Consequence and Logic of Appropriateness True or false: The logic of appropriateness focuses on rules, traditions, and standard operating procedures, as opposed to means-end rationality or cost-benefit analysis. True Question 10 Logic of Consequence and Logic of Appropriateness True or false: The logic of appropriateness and the logic of consequences are equally concerned with the expected consequences of a particular action. True Question Explanation As the name suggests, the logic of consequences places great emphasis on outcomes. The logic of appropriateness, however, often demands behavior with little or no regard for its https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 5/9

consequences. Question 11 Rational Actor Model Which of the following are associated with the Rational Actor Model as opposed to the Organizational Process Model (select all that apply)? The assumption that actions are taken by intentional actors for the achievement of known goals or purposes A focus on organizational routines The evaluation of options and their consequences The use of standard operating procedures Tradition and heuristics The use of power, coalition building, and compromise Total / Question 12 The Bureaucratic Politics Model Which of the following are characteristic of the Bureaucratic Politics Model (select all that apply)? The assumption of a unified actor without competing objectives Coalitions formed through political processes https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 6/9

Negotiation among organization members The use of power and points of leverage in bargaining processes that determine coalitions and organizational action Total / Question 13 Rational Actor, Organizational Process, and Bureaucratic Politics Models Which of the following statements are true (select all that apply)? The Rational Actor, Organizational Process, and Bureaucratic Politics models can all help us better understand an organization s behavior, but they all have their limitations as well. The Rational Actor Model is best for understanding how an organization reacts to a crisis. The Organizational Process Model is best for understanding how an organization plans for a crisis. The Bureaucratic Politics Model is best for understanding how an organization changes a tentative decision it has already reached. There is some concern that the Rational Actor Model may exaggerate an individual's or an organization's agency. The Rational Actor, Organizational Process, and Bureaucratic Politics models can be combined and synthesized to achieve a more thorough and nuanced understanding of organizational behavior. Total / https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 7/9

Question 14 Chicago Public Schools True or false: The first reform effort was characterized by an anti-bureaucratic philosophy, decentralization of power, and Democratic leadership. True Question 15 Chicago Public Schools True or : The second reform effort was characterized by an emphasis on accountability, centralization of power, and Republican leadership. True Question 16 https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 8/9

True or false: Following a crisis, reform efforts in organizations will often attempt to centralize power and control. True https://class.coursera.org/organalysis-002/quiz/feedback?submission_id=365435 9/9