Part Four Shalom aleichem, and welcome to this our Twenty-Seventh Annual Passover and Feast of Unleavened Bread commemoration, in the solar year of 6010, here in the beautiful land of Canada, the only country in the whole world where %&%*, the God of the Hebrews, has chosen to place His holy name. I thank and praise %&%* for blessing all of us to be here today. As always, I also thank my Father, %&%*, for giving me the blessed opportunity to share His words of wisdom with you--the chosen of %&%* and, also, by way of the Internet, with the whole world. It is truly my sincere pleasure and great honor to be able to do so. Glory be to %&%* in the highest, and on earth peace, and good will toward all men (Luke 2:14). In that we are living in the Last Day, %&%* has sent His only Begotten Son, %&%* 0v %&%*, to establish His righteous kingdom on earth, and in Him shall all the nations of the earth have an opportunity to be blessed. For %&%* shall bless all nations that bless His Son, %&%* 0v %&%*; but, on the other hand, He shall curse those that curse Him (Numbers 24:9).
America has shot her best shot at trying to make it appear that the Messiah, %&%* 0v %&%*--the One promised to come in the Old Testament--is just a common Man. But we know thousands upon thousands of people are watching our television program every week and that millions are going to our website, and they are hearing and reading the truth for themselves. Every time they come out with mockery against %&%* 0v %&%*, the numbers sharply increase. In spite of all that they do and say, soon and very soon, the whole world--all peoples, nations, and tongues--shall come to know that %&%* 0v %&%* is above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come: And that His Father, %&%*, has put all things under His feet (Ephesians 1:22). No matter what is reported in the media, there is absolutely nothing they can say that will ever separate us from the love of %&%* 0v %&%*. We shall forever remain steadfast, immovable, and unstoppable in doing the will of our God, %&%*. And we shall remain loyal and faithful to His Son, %&%* 0v %&%*, forever more. No matter what some may think about %&%* 0v %&%*, the hour is come and now is, when we all shall hear the voices of ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thousands; saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and 2
glory, and blessing. And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, we shall also hear all of them saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto Him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb, %&%* 0v %&%*, for ever and ever (Revelation 5:11-13). Praise %&%*! Worthy is %&%* 0v %&%*--the Lion of the tribe of Yehuwdah (Judah), the root of David--the only One who has prevailed above all others to not only open the Book but to also loose the seven seals thereof (Revelation 5:5). Blessed be the King of Israel, %&%* 0v %&%*! Welcome to this seminar entitled, And Many False Prophets Shall Rise, and Shall Deceive Many, this is Part 4. Now today, we shall continue where we left off in our last seminar, Part 3. What we discussed last was John 5:43, where it is written that Jesus said that He is come in His Father s name. We read Matthew 1:16, which verified that Joseph was the husband of Mary, the Mother of Jesus, and concluded that since Mary was married to Joseph, then Jesus father s name was Joseph (which is also corroborated in Luke 3:23 and John 1:45). And we concluded that since Jesus father s name was Joseph, then, logically, the over two billion people who believe in Jesus and follow his teachings should be looking for someone to come in the clouds, as taught by the false prophets, with the name 3
Joseph. However, we know that is not the case. Instead, over two billion people are looking for someone to come with the name Jesus, thus fulfilling prophecy as written, if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. Now to continue our subject matter regarding the lies and falsehood of the many false prophets, these are the topics that will serve as the basis for our discussion today: (1) We are going to reveal a subtle message in the title New Testament; (2) we are going to show you how the Bible translators grammatically changed historical verb tenses in the New Testament to make it appear that Jesus fulfilled the Messianic prophecies; (3) we are going to reveal why the name Jesus was written in the New Testament, who Jesus really was, and who his followers are by definition; and (4) we shall show you in the Scriptures where no one with the name Jesus is coming back, as taught by the false prophets. The false prophets teach that Jesus fulfilled all of the Old Testament Messianic prophecies, and one of the sources they have documented this in is The New Strong s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, copyright 1990, under the title, Prophecies of the Messiah Fulfilled in Jesus Christ (located in the back of this book). The truth of the matter is, no one with the name Jesus ever fulfilled the Messianic prophecies at any time in the history of the world. This is one of the biggest lies the popes and their millions of false prophets have made their refuge and the falsehood under which they have hid themselves. 4
We shall now move right into our first point of discussion for today, and we are going to reveal a subtle message hidden in the words New Testament that will shed light on the fact that no one with the name Jesus fulfilled the Messianic prophecies. The word new refers explicitly to things that have not existed or have not been known or seen before. Historically, testament from its Latin origin is testamentum, and it means, to bear witness (according to The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, The Unabridged Edition, copyright 1967, on page 1466). In Bartlett s Roget s Thesaurus, copyright 1996, on page 796, bear witness to (reference number 189.21 and 22) means the same as to affirm, stress, announce, and establish. These indisputable facts reveal that the words New and Testament were used insidiously by the Bible translators and Jesuit scholars to subtly affirm, stress, announce, and establish that at the time of the writing of the New Testament, the things written therein had not existed or had not been known or seen before. Essentially, things that had never occurred or happened before. Knowing that most people do not study words and usually internalize things literally, they knew that such a subtle approach would go unnoticed--unless, of course, you have been taught by %&%* 0v %&%*, the Lion of the tribe of Yehuwdah (Judah), the root of David, the only One who has prevailed to open the Book and to loose the seven seals thereof. 5
With that understanding of New Testament, we shall move now to our second point of discussion, and that is how the Bible translators grammatically changed many of the historical verb tenses to make it appear that Jesus had in fact fulfilled the Messianic prophecies. In the New American Standard New Testament Psalms Bible, Text Edition, copyright 1977, on page XXIV (written in English and French and printed in Canada), it reads: Asterisks are used to mark verbs that are historical presents in the Greek which have been translated with an English past tense in order to conform to modern usage. The translators recognized that in some contexts the present tense seems more unexpected and unjustified to the English reader than a past tense would have been. However, the translators felt that it would be wise to change these historical presents to English past tenses. This information bears witness to the fact that the Bible translators changed the historical present tense verbs to past tense verbs. Therefore, it was easy to make it look like the Messianic prophecies in the New Testament had been fulfilled in Jesus two thousand years ago. To corroborate what was just stated, we called upon the expertise of The Princeton Review Grammar Smart Junior, copyright 1995, on page 59, and it confirmed that, Most stories are written in the past tense--it is the easiest and most natural way to tell a story. 6
So now we see clearly why the Bible translators grammatically wrote in the past tense: simply because it was the easiest and most natural way to tell a story. While it may be the easiest and most natural way to tell a story, it can, at the same time, be specious or misleading. Using a literal terminology--new Testament--and changing the historical present tenses to past tenses have attributed greatly to the false prophets being able to persuade over two billion people to believe that Jesus walked the earth in the past, two thousand years ago, and that he fulfilled the Messianic prophecies. Our next item for discussion is in three parts: Why the name Jesus was written in the New Testament, who Jesus was, and who his followers are--by definition. We have chosen Matthew 1:16 and 25 to help answer why the name Jesus was written in the New Testament. Let us read please: [16] And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. [25] And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. The word called is esoteric terminology that must be decoded. Therefore, acquiescing to the respectability of The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, High-School Edition, copyright 1979, on page 190, it can be said that the word call (the present tense of called) means to designate. In the same source, on page 357, designate means appointed but not yet installed in 7
office. However, in Merriam-Webster s 11 th Collegiate Dictionary, copyright 2003, Computer Software), designate is also defined as chosen but not yet installed. And the word install means the same as introduce; or put in (according to The Synonym Finder, by J. I. Rodale, copyright 1978, on page 583). By virtue of these facts, from the word called, we can assert that the name JESUS was written in the New Testament because %&%* 0v %&%*, the One divinely chosen, had not yet been introduced to the office for which He was chosen. Or it can be stated this way: Because %&%* 0v %&%*, the One divinely appointed, had not been put in the office for which He was selected. Returning to The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, High School Edition, on page 357, call is also defined as to give a name to; characterize ; character (on page 226), the derivative of characterize, is synonymous to typical ; type (on page 1388), the root of typical, is defined as a figure or representation of something to come, as an event in the Old Testament that foreshadows another in the New Testament; to prefigure. And the word prefigure implies beforehand ; beforehand is ahead of time. And a figure is described as a person representative of another (according to Merriam-Webster s 11 th Collegiate Dictionary, copyright 2003, Computer Software). Accepting the expert advice of these internationally recognized authorities, we can state factually that the name JESUS was written in the New Testament to 8
give, ahead of time, a name to a figure or representation of something to come--as an event in the Old Testament that would foreshadow another in the New Testament. To put it plainly, the word called was used to let it be known that the name JESUS was given in the New Testament ahead of time to serve as the person representing %&%* 0v %&%*, who was prophesied to come in the Old Testament. Simply put, the word called was put in these Scriptures to verify that Jesus was a substitute name for the true Christ, %&%* 0v %&%*, who had not yet come and been put in the position for which He was divinely selected. And, according to the definitions of call, this is why the name Jesus was written in the New Testament. Now before we advance to our next point of view, let us just pause here a moment and bring out an interesting point of view with respect to the name Jesus. Isaiah 7:14 will serve as our reference. Let us read please: Therefore the Lord, %&%*, Himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. Now here we just read (in the Old Testament) that the Lord, %&%*, Himself said,... and shall call his name Immanuel (with an I ), which means with us (is) God (according to The New Strong s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, in the Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary, copyright 1990, on page 529, reference number 6005). God is a title for the name %&%*. This Old Testament Scripture brings to 9
bear that the name of the One the Lord, %&%*, would bring forth would in fact be %&%* Himself--in other words, %&%* Himself would be with us. this manner: This same Scripture is also written in the New Testament in Matthew 1:23 in Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us. Now in this New Testament Scripture, the spelling of the name changed to Emmanuel (with an E ). However, let us read Matthew 1:21 and see what the Bible translators deliberately changed it to, and it reads in part: And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS Even with these Scriptures being in close proximity (Verses 21 and 23), the Bible translators yet wrote neither of the two names--immanuel nor Emmanuel-- they instead wrote the name JESUS. And to this day, this is the false name that the millions of false prophets have led over two billion people all over the world to believe is the true name of the Christ or Savior, the one whom they claim fulfilled the Messianic prophecies. (The truth of the matter is, there is no letter J in the Hebrew and Greek languages. Plus the letter J in the English language, as of 2007, is only 377 years old, according to The Guinness Book of Records, copyright 1993, on page 387). 10
So why was the name Jesus written in the New Testament? Truthfully, it was written in the New Testament ahead of time to serve as a substitute name to represent %&%* 0v %&%*, the Person prophesied to come in the Old Testament. So with that in mind, it would be an egregious error if we did not stop here and document who Jesus really was and lay this falsehood about him to rest, which is in the Black people s grave yard where it belongs. To get straight to the point, the question is, Who was Jesus? Based on the integrity of Webster s New World Dictionary, Third College Edition, copyright 1994, on page 725, Jesus was the founder of the Christian religion. This definition is characterized by brevity and conciseness of speech, so what part of that definition is not understandable? Jesus was the founder of the Christian religion. That is plain and simple. Now in consultation with another authority, the Random House College Dictionary, Revised Edition, copyright 1984, on page 718, we find that Jesus was born 4? B.C., crucified A.D. 29? In Webster s New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition, copyright 1999, on page 124, B.C. is the abbreviation for before Christ. As referenced in Webster s New World Dictionary & Thesaurus, copyright 1998, Computer Software, A.D. is the abbreviation for after the birth of Christ ; and Christ is described as Jesus of Nazareth, regarded by Christians as the realization of the messianic prophecy. 11
Now up to this point, the facts conclude that Jesus was the founder of the Christian religion; that only Christians regard him as the realization of the messianic prophecy. And, also, that Jesus was born 4? years before Christ and crucified 29? years after the birth of Christ. (Note: the question mark denotes uncertainty.) Do you understand this kind of mathematical verbosity? Logically speaking (not emotionally), if Jesus were the Christ (or the Savior), as taught by the million of false prophets, then how could he be born before Christ and crucified 29 years after the birth of Christ when he was supposed to be Christ himself? Is this logical? Will some brilliant logician help me to figure this out? Can anyone explain this type of dippydeedo? Well, perhaps a decoding of the phrase born before Christ will help clarify this verbal confusion. In accordance with Webster s New World College Dictionary, Fourth Edition, copyright 1999, on page 170, born means brought into being ; and being (on page 132) means existence. The word before (on page 130) means in advance of; earlier than the time that; or rather than. On page 261, Christ is also described as the Messiah whose appearance is prophesied in the Old Testament. So on the basis of these facts, born before Christ corroborates and backs up our previous findings, which is, Jesus, the founder of the Christian religion, was brought into existence in advance of or earlier than the time that the true 12
Christ (or Messiah), or rather than %&%* 0v %&%--the One promised to come in the Old Testament--appeared, to give the appearance that he (Jesus) fulfilled the realization of the Messianic prophecies in the Old Testament. With those facts clearly established, then we have but one more issue to clarify before laying this matter in its final resting place and, that is, since Jesus is the founder of the Christian religion, then who are Christians? Our first source to document who they are is found in Webster s New World College Dictionary, Third College Edition, copyright 1994, on page 249, which describes a Christian as a person professing belief in Jesus as the Christ, or in the religion based on the teachings of Jesus. Christian is also synonymous to gentile (according to Webster s New World Dictionary & Thesaurus, copyright 1998). Who is a gentile? Based on the respectability of Webster s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, copyright 1989 on page 511, a gentile is a Christian as distinguished from a [Hebrew or Israelite]; a heathen, a pagan. And while a heathen (page 560) is an unconverted member of a people or nation that does not acknowledge the God of the Bible ; a pagan (page 846), on the other hand, is characterized as one who has little or no religion and who delights in sensual pleasure and material goods; a hedonistic person. And while hedonism (a form of hedonistic) is the self-indulgent pursuit of pleasure as a way of life; the doctrine that happiness is the sole good in life ; sensual means preoccupied with 13
sexual pleasures; full of lust; deficient in moral or spiritual interests (as documented in Webster s New World Dictionary & Thesaurus and Merriam- Webster s 11 th Collegiate Dictionary). So based on these overwhelming facts, Christians, by definition, are people who profess belief in Jesus, the founder of the Christian religion, as the Christ. However, Christians are quite distinguished (or remarkably different) from the chosen people of the Holy Bible--the Hebrews or Israelites or the children of Israel. They are in fact unconverted members of a nation of people that do not acknowledge %&%*, the God of the Holy Bible. And, too, they have little or no religion; so, subsequently, they are preoccupied in delighting themselves in sexual pleasures. Too, they are full of lust and ever seeking after material goods. And that is not all, but they are also people who indulge themselves in the pursuit of pleasure as a way of life. Plus, they believe in the doctrine that happiness is the sole good in life. And even more than that, they are wholly deficient in moral and true spiritual interests. To put it simply, they are worldly. Now, almost every single adult in this room was a Christian at some point in our lifetime. Therefore, we can testify to all that was just stated. Well, I don t want to be nosy or presumptuous, so, let me ask you this: When you were a Christian, did you consider yourself to be a Hebrew or Israelite? Did you acknowledge (praise or call on) %&%* the God of the Holy Bible? Were you occupied in 14
delighting yourself in sexual pleasures--most of the time? (Of course, for some, all of the time.) Were you full of lust most of the time? Did you seek daily after accumulating plenty of material goods? Did you indulge yourself in the pursuit of pleasure as a way of life? Did you believe in the doctrine that happiness (or being happy) was your sole good or sole purpose in life? And, would you admit that you were in fact deficient in moral or spiritual interests? Would you describe yourself as being worldly? You might as well go on and say, Amen, because we can relate to all of these things? Yes, we can!!!! How many can testify to this truth? Is this not what we pursued when we called ourselves Christians and boldly professed belief in Jesus as our personal lord and savior? When we went to church every Sunday morning? When we double dared anyone to say we were not saved and filled with the Holy Ghost spirit and burning up with fire? Yes! You know we were all straight up and down heathens and pagans--by definition. Every single definition of heathen and pagan--we were it. We were all following the false prophets, who had made a covenant with death, and were in full agreement with hell, which is exactly where we would be if %&%* 0v %&%* had not come to us. Now that we know why the name Jesus was written in the New Testament, who Jesus was, and who Christians are, we are now ready to move on to our next 15
point of discussion today, and that is, Jesus is coming back, as taught by the false prophets. It is written in the Scriptures that Jesus was born, arrested, crucified, tried, died, was buried, and rose from the dead on the third day. We have seen many movies depicting this and celebrated holidays commemorating such. Question: Did Jesus die again after his resurrection on the third day? Is it written anywhere in the Holy Bible that Jesus died after he arose from the dead? If Jesus had been the Savior and had fulfilled the Messianic prophecies as claimed, then he should have also fulfilled Romans 6:9-10. Let us read that in part please: [9] Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him. [10] For in that he died, he died unto sin once:. Now you just read with your own two eyes that Christ being raised from the dead dies no more. That death has no more dominion over him. For in that he died, he died unto sin how many times? ONCE! With that being true, is it logical to conclude that his supposed death on the cross constituted that ONCE? So why have the popes and their millions of false prophets been teaching the people that there is a Second Coming? There is no second coming of anyone with the name Jesus, simply because there was never a first coming of anyone with the name Jesus two thousand years ago. 16
The source we mentioned earlier claimed that Jesus fulfilled the Messianic prophecies. If that were true, then there should be no reason for him to return to fulfill them a second time. Plus, there should be recognizable evidence of all the prophecies he supposedly fulfilled. Now just recently, it was reported that some Jesuit equivocators had found the bones of Jesus in a casket in a two thousand- year-old tomb in Jerusalem. Now if Jesus died and rose on the third day as taught by the false prophets--and according to Mark 16:19 and Acts 7:55, he is sitting on the right hand of God the Father Almighty--then how would there be a casket in a grave with his bones when he was supposed to have resurrected from the dead and was taken up into heaven (Acts 1:11)? Needless to say, we can count this as another one of the many lies the popes and their millions of false prophets have made their refuge and the falsehood under which they have hid themselves. This is why it is so important to understand 1 John 4:1-3, which reads: [1] Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God, %&%*: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. [2] Hereby know ye the Spirit of God, %&%*: Every spirit that confesseth that [%&%* 0v %&%*] is come in the flesh is of God, %&%*: [3] And every spirit that confesseth not that [%&%* 0v %&%*] is come in the flesh is not of God, %&%*: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 17
Neither the millions of false prophets nor the over two billion people who follow the teachings of Jesus confess that Jesus Christ IS COME (or IS HERE ON EARTH) in the FLESH today. They teach that Jesus is a spirit. The overwhelming facts support the conclusion that the false prophets and all who profess belief in and follow the teachings of Jesus as Christ are unequivocally spirits of the antichrist. However, we--the Hebrew Israelites, the chosen of God, %&%*, who profess belief in and follow the teachings of His Son, %&%* 0v %&%*--are the only people on earth boldly confessing and widely proclaiming that %&%* 0v %&%*, the Messiah-- the Lion of the tribe of Yehuwdah, the root of David-- IS COME in the FLESH. He is on earth in a human body: flesh and blood, not a spirit. And the whole world shall soon see Him coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. %&%* 0v %&%* is the only name under heaven given whereby you can be saved. Receiving %&%* 0v %&%* and this truth is the only means by which you can be set free from the many lies of the false prophets and the falsehood under which they have hid themselves. This information is quite shocking but, nevertheless, it is true. And in order to be saved, you must accept the fact that you, being in the whole world, have been deceived, as written in Revelation 12:9, by the popes and their millions of 18
false prophets, euphemistically called Satan and his angels. Until the coming of %&%* 0v %&%*, there was absolutely no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of %&%*-- the true God, the God of the Holy Bible, the God of the Hebrews--in the land (Hosea 4:1). You have had an opportunity to hear the truth: you can either receive it or reject it; however, there are serious consequences for the latter. Now what we are getting ready to read is going to bring this whole matter to a shocking conclusion and, at the same time, further reveal the refuge of lies of the millions of false prophets and the falsehood under which they have hid themselves. The information you are about to read is found in The Holy Bible, Red Letter Edition, Master Reference, between pages 846-847. This reading appears on the back of the picture of the Last Supper. Let us all read what is written on the screen. Read: THE LAST SUPPER This is a replica of Leonardo da Vinci s painting of The Last Supper. This famous masterpiece took over seven years to paint. The interesting story behind the painting is this: da Vinci felt that he should use living persons as models since this was to be such an important picture. He started with the painting of Christ. Hundreds of young men were studied to find a man whose face portrayed innocence and beauty. After a long search he found a man whom he felt could portray Christ. The painting of Christ took six months. (stop) Remember this: He studied hundreds of young men whose faces, in his opinion, portrayed innocence and beauty. The man he painted as Christ (Jesus) was a 19
model. (Why use a model when, in the Holy Bible [Revelation 1:14-15] the true Christ is described as having hair like wool and His feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace? Why did he not paint him according to that description?) Nevertheless, let us continue: When Christ was completed, da Vinci worked for six years painting the disciples until all were completed but one. That one was Judas. To find someone, whom da Vinci thought looked like Judas, was a problem. After a long, discouraging search, da Vinci heard of a man in prison at Rome who was sentenced to die for his brutal crimes. (stop) Note: He had a problem finding someone he thought should look like Judas. He had to not only do a long search, but also a discouraging search. Finally, the man he chose to paint as Judas had been sentenced to die for some brutal crimes he had committed. Continue: Leonardo went to Rome. As the prisoner was brought before him, he saw a man with an ugly, vicious face, scarred and full of hate. He knew immediately that this was the man he wanted to represent Judas the Saviour s betrayer. By special permission from the King,. (stop) Now we read that he had not only committed some brutal crimes, but he was also ugly, had a vicious face, was all scarred up, and was full of hate. He was such a notorious criminal that he had to get special permission. Continue: the prisoner was brought to Milan to pose for da Vinci. For six months he sat for da Vinci at appointed hours each day. 20
So he was brought in so he could pose. Although he was ugly, for six months he posed for da Vinci at the time he appointed. Can you imagine having to look at somebody who looked like him for six months? Continue: Finally the gifted artist finished his painting. As the guards were taking the prisoner away, he broke loose. Rushing to Leonardo s side, he gasped, Look at me. Do you not know who I am? With his sharp, piercing eyes, da Vinci looked at the man and said, No, I do not know you. I never saw you until you were brought before me in Rome. Then the prisoner lifted his head toward Heaven and cried, Oh, God, have I fallen so low? Then he turned to da Vinci and said, Leonardo da Vinci, look at me again. I am the same man you painted only seven years ago as the figure of Christ. Shocking? Leonardo da Vinci, one of the greatest painters of all times, had painted this same man only seven years earlier as Jesus the Christ. This man had lived such an immoral and wicked life that he had gone from being one of the most innocent and beautiful men in Rome to the ugliest, most vicious looking, scarred up, and hateful man in Rome, so much so that da Vinci did not recognize him-- even after painting him for hours each day for six months. The moral of the story is this, on the picture of the Last Supper, the man painted as Jesus is the same man that was painted as Judas, who was sentenced to die for some brutal crimes he had committed. This answers why all the pictures you see of Jesus have different faces: They were either models or paintings, which were the figment of the painters imagination. 21
This is most shocking, but yet this is true and typical of what you will find if you take the time to study and diligently research the facts about the man called Jesus, whom the millions of false prophets have led over two billion people to believe that he fulfilled the Messianic prophecies. All of what we discussed today is an accumulation of the many lies these false prophets have made their refuge and the falsehood under which they have hid themselves. This brings us to the conclusion of this seminar. And I thank our Father, %&%*, for sacrificing His only begotten Son, %&%* 0v %&%*, that we might come into the knowledge of these truths. For without %&%* 0v %&%*, we would still be like the over two billion people who are caught up in the refuge of lies of the false prophets and the falsehood under which they have hid themselves. If you are thankful for and enjoyed this bit of information, then give glory to %&%*. Give glory to His suffering Servant and Son, %&%* 0v %&%*, for calling us out of darkness into His marvelous light. For worthy is the Lamb, %&%* 0v %&%*, that is being slain to receive all the promises of His Father. Give glory to %&%* and to %&%* 0v %&%* forever and ever! Let everything that has breath, Praise %&%*! Shalom Aleichem. 22