Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science

Similar documents
QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus

World Religions. These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide.

Honours Programme in Philosophy

Time4Writing Mrs. Gardner, Instructor

Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application A

Social Studies 10-1: The Position Paper

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

INJUSTICE ARGUMENT ESSAY

Syllabus BIB120 - Hermeneutics. By Larry Hovey. BIB120 - Hermeneutics Instructor: Larry Hovey Rochester Bible Institute

History 500 Christianity and Judaism in Greco-Roman Antiquity January Interterm 5-16 January 2015 (M-F 9:00am 12:00pm)

There are a number of writing problems that occur frequently enough to deserve special mention here:

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2014 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

Study Guide: Academic Writing

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

RMPS Assignment. National 5/Higher. Name: Class: Teacher: My Question:

Argument Essay (possible structure organizer)

EBSCO Publishing. Student Success Tools

Critical Thinking. Separating Fact From Fiction

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

SACRAMENTAL THEOLOGY

Explanations. - Provide an explanation of how your evidence supports your point

Is euthanasia morally permissible? What is the relationship between patient autonomy,

SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH IN PHILOSOPHY. Contents

PHILOSOPHY AND THEOLOGY

Course Syllabus. Course Description: Objectives for this course include: PHILOSOPHY 333

3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence.

Writing Essays at Oxford

GCE Religious Studies

Was the French Revolution Worth Its Human Cost?

The EMC Masterpiece Series, Literature and the Language Arts

Argumentative Writing

PHIL 2000: ETHICS 2011/12, TERM 1

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE

Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000)

Feedback Constitutional Law 312 Applied Assignment 2017 Application B

MAIN BUILDING C

History 500 Christianity and Judaism in Greco-Roman Antiquity 2019 Purpose

Philosophy. Aim of the subject

History 500 Christianity and Judaism in Greco-Roman Antiquity 2018 Purpose

Continuum for Opinion/Argument Writing Sixth Grade Updated 10/4/12 Grade 5 (2 points)

Homiletics Workshop Part 1: PREPARING TEACHINGS FROM A BIBLICAL TEXT Introduction

REL Research Paper Guidelines and Assessment Rubric. Guidelines

The Thematic Essay Part II of the Global Regents Exam

Other Recommended Books (on reserve at library):

Course Coordinator Dr Melvin Chen Course Code. CY0002 Course Title. Ethics Pre-requisites. NIL No of AUs 3 Contact Hours

History 500 Christianity and Judaism in Greco-Roman Antiquity Spring 2016

Introduction to Philosophy Crito. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Three Steps to Good Structure

Getting Started Guide

How to Write A Seminar Paper. Part II: Writing Strategies. A Yale Graduate Writing Center Workshop Series

OTTAWA ONLINE PHL Basic Issues in Philosophy

Studies in the Prophetic Books

UNIVERSITY OF MALTA THE MATRICULATION EXAMINATION ADVANCED LEVEL

GMAT ANALYTICAL WRITING ASSESSMENT

Page 2 of 8 Stage 2 Religion Studies Student Response

AS RELIGIOUS STUDIES. Component 1: Philosophy of religion and ethics Report on the Examination June Version: 1.0

Message: Faith & Science - Part 3

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Bronze Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 7)

Step 2: Read Selections from How to Read Literature Like a Professor

Night Argumentative Essay Prompt

POL320 Y1Y Modern Political Thought Summer 2016

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

Ethics. PHIL 181 Spring 2018 SUMMARY OBJECTIVES

Theology and Religion BIBS226/326 Distance Course Outline

BTS-4295/5080 Topics: James and the Sermon on the Mount

Department of Philosophy

A level Religious Studies at Titus Salt

Refutation Paragraphs

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

Ministry 6301: Introduction to Christian Ministry Austin Graduate School of Theology Fall Syllabus

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 1 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 1

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue

Your school is wondering if they should use School Uniforms next year. Should your school have Uniforms?

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 3 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 3

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Hoong Juan Ru. St Joseph s Institution International. Candidate Number Date: April 25, Theory of Knowledge Essay

E X A M I N A T I O N S C O U N C I L REPORT ON CANDIDATES WORK IN THE SECONDARY EDUCATION CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION MAY/JUNE 2004 RELIGIOUS EDUCATION

2005 HSC Notes from the Marking Centre Studies of Religion I and II

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Course Description: Required texts:

Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? People Events Places Time Reason or purpose Means or method

10648NAT Diploma of Ministry (Insert Stream)

Interim Assessment Cover Sheet Teacher: Haines Course: Senior Block Date: Student 1: IA #: 1 Student 2:

Lecture 1. The Science of Economics

Louisiana English Language Arts Content Standards BENCHMARKS FOR 5 8

SEMINAR Reading the Bible Theologically: A Brief Introduction to Theology By Bob Young

Course Assignment Descriptions and Schedule At-A-Glance

Examiners Report June GCE Religious Studies 6RS04 1A

PHILOSOPHY (413) Chairperson: David Braden-Johnson, Ph.D.

MASTER OF ARTS in Theology,

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Silver Level '2002 Correlated to: Oregon Language Arts Content Standards (Grade 8)

Date Morning/Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours

Best Practices For Motions Brief Writing: Part 2

KANTIAN ETHICS (Dan Gaskill)

Skill Realized. Skill Developing. Not Shown. Skill Emerging

Transcription:

Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science 1. Social Science Essays Social sciences encompass a range of disciplines; each discipline uses a range of techniques, styles, and structures of writing. Different instructors may guide you in ways that diverge from these suggestions. Therefore, use this guide as a tool among others. Writers of social science essays discuss theory to explain how the social world works. These writers use evidence that is the product of systematic research to support these arguments. Often these writers evaluate competing arguments; they show awareness of uncertainty and limitations of knowledge regarding the issues they investigate. Social science essays often ask the writer to: Define social science concepts Explain social science theories Apply theory to a context or example from the real world Evaluate or determine how the theory relates to the example Reach a final conclusion regarding the issue 2. Purpose The study of social sciences requires that the writer not simply describe a social problem, but rather, analyse it. The writer uses theory to analyse the problem, in order to understand it better. This process involves argumentation. An argument is statements supported by evidence and/or reasoning which is connected in a logical manner and leads to a supported conclusion. The essay question may ask you to do the following: Discuss: Present the different aspects of a question and problem Compare: Examine the characteristics of objects to demonstrate their similarities and differences Contrast: Examine the characteristics of objects to demonstrate their differences Analyse: Consider the various components of the whole and explain the relationships between them Evaluate: Examine the various sides of a question to reach a plausible conclusion 3. Planning the Essay Steps for writing a social science essay: Copyright 2015 16 @ Literacy in the Disciplines 1

a) Understand the question(s) to be addressed in the essay b) Develop a strategy for answering the questions c) Provide answers to those questions d) Provide arguments to show that your answers are strong e) Provide counter-arguments and refutations to show you ve considered other arguments, but yours is stronger. f) Reply to possible objections to your arguments A first important step is to carefully examine the essay question and develop a strategy for answering it. The order in which you develop your discussion creates the basic design or structure of the essay. If the question has several parts, use those parts as ways to structure your essay. You should explain this strategy to the reader in your introduction, and ensure that the reader can follow this structure throughout the essay. 4. Sections of the Essay Title: This may be the set question or the issue for discussion. Introduction: This tells the reader what the essay is about. Main section: The main section develops the key points of the argument in a logical manner. Theoretical arguments and evidence from research studies are used to support these points. This main section is often divided into various subsections. Headings and subheadings are used to distinguish these sections and guide the reader through the discussion. These sub-sections often include: - Definitions of key terms - Explanation of theory - Arguments regarding questions which are backed by theory and evidence - Refutation to counter-arguments - Other possible arguments, and reasons why they are weaker than your argument. Conclusion: This brings together the arguments presented in the main section, and makes a final statement which answers the question. References: This section, entitled References, lists the sources used in the proper citation style. In the introduction, the approach to discuss the various aspects of the question is stated clearly. In the main section, as various issues are discussed, the writer makes arguments and states them as conclusions regarding that issue. In the conclusion section, these various conclusions are drawn together for the overall evaluations and conclusion regarding the original question. 5. Structure of the Essay: Introduction Copyright 2015 16 @ Literacy in the Disciplines 2

Introduction Section 1. Introduce topic and context 2. Provide brief background information 3. State the aim of the essay 4. Give outline Get reader s attention with a dramatic statement or illustration Set the context and scope of the essay State the question that you will answer Explain how you will answer the question, e.g. the order in which various topics will be discussed (a) Introduction Example In this seminar, John Stuart Mill s harm principle was criticized with reference to the case of animal abuse, stating that Mill omits the question of animals interests. This essay aims to have a further discussion of the criticism of the harm principle from this perspective. This essay will be mainly divided into two sections. In the first part, the harm principle and the related criticism will again be introduced, while in the second part, the two questions raised by Dr. Chan will be discussed. The first question is whether animals have moral status, and the second question is whether legal protection is necessary due to moral considerations. After answering those two questions, the validity of this criticism will be examined. 6. Structure of the essay: Main Section The main section includes several subsections, which are planned according to the requirements of the essay question. (a) Main Section Background Information: Typically the first section includes important background information. Whether each of these steps is included depends, of course, on the essay question. Each of these sections should include a heading followed by a paragraph of at least three sentences. Copyright 2015 16 @ Literacy in the Disciplines 3

Main Section First section: Background information and context 1. Definition of terms Clearly define the important concepts of the essay, with references 2. Explanation of theory Summarise and explain the theory to be discussed, with references 3. Overview of issue or context Explain the issue or context that you will explore in the essay (b) Main Section Development of your Argument In this section, you develop your argument, which means discussing your questions in depth to arrive at the answer(s) to the question(s) posed in your introduction. Each section will probably have several paragraphs, and have sub-headings to organize the parts of the section. If you have two or more issues/examples, then the main section will probably include several sections and sub-sections. Main Section Main Section: Discussion of Issue/Example 1. Transition Introduce the issue/example, state the aim of this section, and outline the section 2. Discussion of application of theory to the issue/example, which arrives at a conclusion regarding that question Develop an argument regarding this issue backed by theory and/or evidence, with references Most important, state your position regarding this issue Strong essays will include counter-arguments and refutations. Or, you may present other arguments and reasons, and then show how your argument is stronger. Copyright 2015 16 @ Literacy in the Disciplines 4

(c) Conclusion Bring together your final answer Conclusion Conclusion: 1. Draw final conclusion Bring together conclusions reached in the main section; state your overall conclusion (the answer to your question) 2. Final word on the issue Highlight the implications or wider context of your issue 7. Example Essay Structure Note that social science essays often discuss more than one theory, and more than one issue/example. The structure above should be adapted to fit your question. An example is shown below. In this essay, theories from two philosophers are applied to two real-world examples. Heading / Sub-heading name Should we try to stop others who plan to commit suicide? Introduction Definition of Suicide John Stuart Mill s On Liberty and the Harm Principle Immanuel Kant s Moral Theory and the Formula of Universal Law Case Study on the suicide of Leslie Cheung The Harm Principle and On Liberty (subheading) The Formula of Universal Law and the Moral Step and Title Introduction Definition of key term Explanation of Mill s theories Explanation of Kant s theories Introduce the issue/example, state the aim of this section, and outline the section (*) Discuss how Mill s theories relate to the Leslie Cheung example. Arrive at a conclusion regarding Discuss how Kant s theories relate to the Leslie Copyright 2015 16 @ Literacy in the Disciplines 5

Theory (sub-heading) Case Study of the September 11 th Terrorist Attack in 2001 The Harm Principle and On Liberty (subheading) The Formula of Universal Law and the Moral Theory (sub-heading) Conclusion Cheung example. Arrive at a conclusion regarding Introduce the issue/example, state the aim of this section, and outline the section (*) Discuss how Mill s theories relate to the Terrorist Attack example. Arrive at a conclusion regarding Discuss how Kant s theories relate to the Terrorist Attack example. Arrive at a conclusion regarding Restate four conclusions drawn in the main section; state final answer to the question. 8. Common Errors Avoid overstating or overgeneralising. Look for words like all, always, everyone, none, never. If you use them, be sure that you can justify them. These are very strong words. Consider the difference between stealing is always morally wrong, or stealing is wrong in most circumstances. Common mistakes in social science essay writing include: 1. Failure to answer the question. Be sure you understand the question and develop a plan to answer it completely. 2. Failure to provide an effective structure. This is important as it helps the reader to understand your ideas. Unconnected discussions are likely to confuse the reader. 3. Failure to write in your own words and reference sources. Writing in your own words is crucial as it demonstrates that you understand the topic and can communicate your argument clearly. Accurate referencing of scholars ideas and words is also important. Copyright 2015 16 @ Literacy in the Disciplines 6