MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Similar documents
Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

Full file at

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

USING LOGOS WISELY. AP Language and Composition

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

The Argumentative Essay

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Bellwork Friday November 18th

APPENDIX A CRITICAL THINKING MISTAKES

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

3.2: FAULTY REASONING AND PROPAGANDA. Ms. Hargen

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

A man lives on the twelfth floor of an apartment building. Every morning he takes the elevator down to the lobby and leaves the building.

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Purdue OWL Logic in Argumentative Writing

TOK FALLACIES Group 1: Clark Godwin, Kaleigh Rudge, David Fitzgerald, Maren Dorne, Thanh Pham

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Common Logical Fallacies

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 May 30 / June 1

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Quick Write # 11. Create a narrative for the following image

Figures removed due to copyright restrictions.

Chapter 5: Ways of knowing Reason (p. 111)

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

Logic and Nosich s Elements

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

Corporate Team Training Session # 2 June 8 / 10

Everything s an Argument Guided Study Notes, Chapters Chapter 16: What Counts in Evidence

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

A red herring is a dead fish. Dog trainers used to use red herrings to train their tracking dogs and try to get them off the trail.

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

What an argument is not

stage 2 Logic & Knowledge

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade

CRITICAL THINKING. Formal v Informal Fallacies

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Summer Preparation Work

Hello, AP Scholars! Welcome to AP English Language and Composition.

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

1.6 Validity and Truth

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Chapter 6: Relevance Fallacies

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

Reasoning, Part I. Lecture 1, MATH 210G.03, Spring 2016

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Developing Strong Thesis Statements

Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others

Lecture 4 Good and Bad Arguments Jim Pryor Some Good and Bad Forms of Arguments

Reasoning, Part I. Lecture 0, MATH 210G.02, Fall 2016

The importance of persuasion It is impossible to isolate yourself from persuasive messages Politics, education, religion, business you name it!

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Attacking your opponent s character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Logic in Argumentative Writing

Logical (formal) fallacies

Toastmasters International Debate Organizer (Summarized)

Please visit our website for other great titles:

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

Illustrating Deduction. A Didactic Sequence for Secondary School

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

Chapter 1 Why Study Logic? Answers and Comments

Philosophical Arguments

The Problem of Major Premise in Buddhist Logic

Step 3 (Support Your Ideas)

Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy

Transcription:

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic Making and Refuting Arguments Steps of an Argument You make a claim The conclusion of your argument a statement you want your listeners to accept Textbook prices are too high Visual aids make ideas easier to remember You offer evidence The supporting material you use to prove a point As an advocate you have an obligation to support your position with valid arguments You must offer your listeners reasons to accept your conclusion You show how the evidence proves the claim You link the evidence to the claim For example: Statistics may underwrite the claim that there is some X-Trend You qualify the link Probably Certainly Without a doubt 50-50 likelihood Steps of Refuting an Argument State the position/claim your are refuting State your position/claim Support your position/claim Show how your position undermines the opposing argument Types of Argument Argument by Example Inductive form of proof Uses a few specific instances to assert a broader claim Tests of Examples: Are the examples true? Are the examples relevant?

2 Are the examples sufficient? Are the examples representative? Argument by Analogy Links two object or concepts and asserts that what is true of one will be true of the other Appropriate when what you oppose or support has been tried elsewhere (in a way it is like an argument from precedent) Tests of Analogies: Are the similarities between the two cases relevant? Are any of the differences between the two cases relevant? Argument by Cause Connects two elements or events and claims that one is produced by the other Can reason from effect to cause or from cause to effect The difference is chronological Tests of Causal Arguments: Does a causal relationship exist? Could the presumed cause produce the effect? Could the effect result from other causes? Argument by Deduction Moves from a general category to a specific instance Can consist of three elements as a syllogism: Major premise: a claim about a general group of people, events, or conditions (generally, that your audience accepts) Minor premise: places a specific person, event, or condition into a general class Conclusion: argues that what is true of the general class is true of the specific instance or individual Steps: State your major premise Say because, and then state your minor premise Say therefore, and then state your conclusion Tests of Deductive Arguments: Do the premises relate to each other?

3 Is the may premise true? Is the minor premise true? Enthymeme: State your minor premise Because it is raining State your conclusion You better take an umbrella Audience supplies missing Major premise(s) from store of what they already know This is some STRONG persuasion! It seems like (and in fact is) common sense! Argument by Authority Uses testimony from an expert source to prove a speaker s claim Its validity rests on the credibility the authority has for the audience Tests of Argument by Authority: Is the source an expert? Is the source unbiased? Fallacies of Argument Hasty Generalization Faulty form of argument by example Quantity and quality of examples questionable Insufficient and unrepresentative instances False Analogy If the items compared in an analogy differ in critical ways Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc After this, therefore, because of this. A chronological fallacy assumes that because one event followed another event, the first event caused it Slippery Slope Asserts that one action inevitably sets in motion a chain of events or indicates a trend The domino effect Red Herring Can be a faulty argument by deduction

4 An argument makes a claim based on an irrelevant premise The red herring fallacy introduces an irrelevant issue to deflect attention from the subject under discussion Appeal to Tradition Defends the status quo and opposes change by arguing that old ways are always superior to new ways False Dilemma You have more that the two options presented Polarizing False Authority Advocates support their ideas with the testimony of people who have apparent, but not real, expertise I m good a golf. Buy this Buick. Bandwagon Faulty argument by authority It assumes that popular opinion is an accurate measure of truth and wisdom Ad Hominem Arguments that ask listeners to reject an idea because of the allegedly poor character of the person voicing it Most obvious form: name calling Selecting Propositions for Persuasive Speeches Characteristics of Propositions A proposition is a declarative sentence expressing a judgment you want the audience to accept It expresses a judgment that is debatable, and that requires proof Express a judgment States a position you will defend It should be a declarative sentence expressing your position Can be an answer to question Should we stay the course? Proposition: we should stay the course. Debatable The judgment must include some degree of controversy

5 Once we accept a proposition as a fact, it ceases to be an appropriate topic for a persuasive speech Require proof A proposition is an assertion, and assertions are statements that have not yet been proven Your objective as a persuasive speaker is to offer compelling reasons for listeners to accept your proposition Types of Propositions Propositions of fact A proposition of fact focuses on belief You ask the audience to affirm the truth or falsity of a statement Propositions of value Requires a judgment of the worth of an idea or action You ask the audience to determine the goodness or badness of something Propositions of policy Advocate a course of action The statement usually includes the word should Monroe s Motivated Sequence Moves listeners to action by using a progression of motivated steps Particularly appropriate when you discuss a well-known or easily established problem Five steps: Attention Must first command the attention of your listeners Need Establish a need Physiological Safety Belongingness Self-esteem Self-actualization Satisfaction Propose a way to solve, or at least minimize, the problem

Visualization Seek to intensify the listeners desire to implement and adopt the proposed solution Imagine this... Action Request action within the power of the audience to act Call 1-800... Sign this petition Go to the mall 6