PHILOSOPHY OF MIND (7AAN2061) SYLLABUS: SEMESTER 1

Similar documents
The readings for the course are separated into the following two categories:

Formative Assessment: 2 x 1,500 word essays First essay due 16:00 on Friday 30 October 2015 Second essay due: 16:00 on Friday 11 December 2015

THE NATURE OF MIND Oxford University Press. Table of Contents

Philosophy of Mind (104) Comprehensive Reading List Robert L. Frazier 27/11/2013

WEEK 1: WHAT IS KNOWLEDGE?

BOOK REVIEWS. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 111, No. 4 (October 2002)

The knowledge argument purports to show that there are non-physical facts facts that cannot be expressed in

Philosophy of Logic and Language (108) Comprehensive Reading List Robert L. Frazier 24/10/2009

Chalmers, "Consciousness and Its Place in Nature"

4AANA004 Metaphysics I Syllabus Academic year 2015/16

Experiences Don t Sum

Tony Chadwick Essay Prize 2006 Winner Can we Save Qualia? (Thomas Nagel and the Psychophysical Nexus ) By Eileen Walker

Consciousness, Theories of

Philosophy 370: Problems in Analytic Philosophy

*Please note that tutorial times and venues will be organised independently with your teaching tutor.

Cosmic Hermeneutics vs. Emergence: The Challenge of the Explanatory Gap*

Led by Armstrong (1978, 1983, 1991, 1993), Fred Dretske (1977), and Michael Tooley (1977, 1987

Ph.D. Philosophy, Princeton University 2007 Colgate University 2001, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, High Honors in Philosophy

SCEPTICISM ABOUT OTHER MINDS

Thomas Nagel, "What is it Like to Be a Bat?", The Philosophical Review 83 (1974),

There are two explanatory gaps. Dr Tom McClelland University of Glasgow

Karen Bennett Princeton University not very successful early draft, March 2005

3. Campos de conocimiento en los que podría ser anunciado (máximo dos):

Please remember to sign-in by scanning your badge Department of Psychiatry Grand Rounds

DECONSTRUCTING NEW WAVE MATERIALISM

Session One: Identity Theory And Why It Won t Work Marianne Talbot University of Oxford 26/27th November 2011

History (101) Comprehensive Reading List Robert L. Frazier 24/10/2009

THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MATERIALISM AND ITS SEMANTIC PREMISE

Subjective Character and Reflexive Content

Philosophy of Mind for Honours, Masters, and PhD Students

CHAPTER 11. There is no Exclusion Problem

CAUSAL-RECOGNITIONAL ACCOUNT OF PHENOMENAL CONCEPTS: AN ALTERNATIVE PHYSICALIST ATTEMPT TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF CONSCIOUSNESS

Review of Torin Alter and Sven Walter (eds.) Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge: New Essays on Consciousness and Physicalism

The Zombies Among Us. Eric T. Olson To appear in Nous.

Bertrand Russell and the Problem of Consciousness

Metaphysics I: The Nature of Being

Excluding the Problem: Bennett on Counterfactual Tests and Backtracking

CURRICULUM VITAE. Date and place of birth: 27th December 1945, Liverpool, England

M.A. PROSEMINAR, PHIL 5850 PHILOSOPHICAL NATURALISM Fall 2018 Tuesdays 2:35-5:25 p.m. Paterson Hall 3A36

The knowledge argument

Outline Syllabus for Seminar G9658 on Subjects of Consciousness (Advanced Topics in the Philosophy of Mind)

The modal status of materialism

The Argument for Anomalous Monism, Again Deren Olgun

general information Times Instructor Office hours Course Description Goals Requirements MWF 9:30-11:45, Gilman 17 Tammo Lossau

7AAN2027 Greek Philosophy II: Aristotle Syllabus Academic year 2015/16

Metametaphysics. New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology* Oxford University Press, 2009

Qualia Ain't in the Head Review of Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind by Michael Tye

Powerful qualities, the conceivability argument and the nature of the physical

24.09 Minds and Machines spring an inconsistent tetrad. argument for (1) argument for (2) argument for (3) argument for (4)

Department of Philosophy

Supervenience & Emergentism: A Critical Study in Philosophy of Mind. Rajakishore Nath, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India

Theories of the mind have been celebrating their new-found freedom to study

David Chalmers on Mind and Consciousness Richard Brown Forthcoming in Andrew Bailey (ed) Philosophy of Mind: The Key Thinkers.

General Philosophy. Stephen Wright. Office: XVI.3, Jesus College. Michaelmas Overview 2. 2 Course Website 2. 3 Readings 2. 4 Study Questions 3

PHIL 4800/5800/5801 Fall Core Theoretical Philosophy I and II

Philosophy 1760 Philosophy of Language

DO TROPES RESOLVE THE PROBLEM OF MENTAL CAUSATION?

BRIE GERTLER RESEARCH

DUALISM VS. MATERIALISM I

Property Dualism and the Knowledge Argument: Are Qualia Really a Problem for Physicalism? Ronald Planer Rutgers Univerity

7AAN2027 Greek Philosophy II: Aristotle Syllabus Academic year 2012/3

A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge

Introduction to Philosophical Methods

7AAN2027 Greek Philosophy II: Aristotle Syllabus Academic year 2013/4

NB: Presentations will be assigned on the second week. Suggested essay topics will be distributed in May.

4AANB007 - Epistemology I Syllabus Academic year 2014/15

Machine Consciousness, Mind & Consciousness

COULD WE EXPERIENCE THE PASSAGE OF TIME? Simon Prosser

CLASS PARTICIPATION IS A REQUIREMENT

A Two-Factor Theory of Perceptual Justification. Abstract: By examining the role perceptual experience plays in the justification of our

WEEK 1: CARTESIAN SCEPTICISM AND THE COGITO

5AANB002 Greek Philosophy II: Aristotle Syllabus Academic year 2016/17

The origins of qualia 1

Review of Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind

BRIE GERTLER. RESEARCH INTERESTS Philosophy of Mind especially self-knowledge, mental content, and consciousness.

Higher-Order Approaches to Consciousness and the Regress Problem

Chapter 11 CHALMERS' THEORY OF CONSCIOUSNESS. and yet non-reductive approach to consciousness. First, we will present the hard problem

What is consciousness? Although it is possible to offer

(1982a). Other Bodies, in Woodfield (1982). (1982b). Two Thought Experiments Reviewed, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 23: Burge, T.

The Reality of Appearances

Philosophy of Mind (MIND) CTY Course Syllabus

THE TROUBLE WITH MARY

What, Then, is Consciousness?

IN THIS PAPER I will examine and criticize the arguments David

Realism and instrumentalism

Purple Haze: The Puzzle of Consciousness

Skepticism and Internalism

The Hard Problem of Consciousness & The Progressivism of Scientific Explanation

PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT

PHILOSOPHY 203: Introduction to Metaphysics and Epistemology, Fall Professor G. Rosen Hall (609)

Test 3. Minds and Bodies Review

Philosophical Zombies Don t Share Our Epistemic Situation. John Curtis Wright

Lecture 8 Property Dualism. Frank Jackson Epiphenomenal Qualia and What Mary Didn t Know

Advanced Topics in Metaphysics (L6/7) Alex Grzankowski Autumn 2016

Professor David-Hillel Ruben, Professor of Philosophy, Birkbeck, University of London

24.09 Minds and Machines Fall 11 HASS-D CI

Test 3. Minds and Bodies Review

Life, Automata and the Mind-Body Problem

Epiphenomenalism. Sven Walter. Institute of Cognitive Science. University of Osnabrueck, Germany.

PH 1000 Introduction to Philosophy, or PH 1001 Practical Reasoning

Transcription:

PHILOSOPHY OF MIND (7AAN2061) SYLLABUS: 2016-17 SEMESTER 1 Tutor: Prof Matthew Soteriou Office: 604 Email: matthew.soteriou@kcl.ac.uk Consultations Hours: Tuesdays 11am to 12pm, and Thursdays 3-4pm. Lecture Hours: Thursday 9-10am COURSE DESCRIPTION This course focuses on questions in the philosophy of mind. We will approach this topic by thinking through some problems that arise from reflecting on the metaphysics and epistemology of the mind. What is the mind? How does the mind relate to the brain? What is consciousness? How do we know about our own thoughts, feelings, and desires and how do we know about those of other people? In addressing these questions, we will cover topics central to contemporary philosophical discussions of the mind, including physicalism, consciousness, mental causation, and self-knowledge. READING The readings for the course are separated into the following two categories: reading that everyone who wants proper coverage of the subject must read. additional readings to help further develop your views on a particular subject. Many of the readings for the course can be found either online or in the following collection of essays: D. Chalmers (ed.): Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Another useful collection is: David Rosenthal (ed.): The Nature of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. The following are good introductory texts: T. Crane: The Elements of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. J. Kim: Philosophy of Mind (3rd edition). Boulder: Westview Press. J. Heil: Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction

SCHEDULE Week 1: Type Identity Physicalism D. Lewis, An Argument for the Identity Theory, Journal of Philosophy 1966, (available on JSTOR), repr. in his Philosophical Papers Volume I Putnam, H. 1979. The Nature of Mental States, in Mind Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, Vol.2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Lycan ed. Mind and Cognition. (Also in Chalmers ed.) Heil, J. Philosophy of Mind: A Contemporary Introduction Ch. 5: The Identity Theory Further reading: Lewis, D. 1994. Reduction of Mind, in S. Guttenplan, ed., A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Reprinted in D. Lewis. Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Armstrong, D.M. 1977. The Causal Theory of Mind. Reprinted in Rosenhtal ed. The Nature of Mind (Also in Chalmers ed.) Place, U. T. 1956. Is consciousness a brain process? British Journal of Psychology 47:44-50. Reprinted in (W. Lycan, ed) Mind and Cognition (Blackwell, 1990). Also in Chalmers ed. Smart, J. J. C. 1959. Sensations and brain processes. Philosophical Review 68:141-56. (Also in Chalmers ed.) Alyssa Ney (2008). Physicalism as an Attitude. Philosophical Studies 138 (1):1-15. Week 2: Anomalous Monism Mental Events, by Davidson, in his Essays on Actions and Events. Also in Chalmers ed. Evnine, S. 1991. Donald Davidson. Cambridge: Polity. Ch.4. Philosophy as Psychology, by Davidson, in his Essays on Actions and Events Anomalous Monism and the Irreducability of the Mental, by McLaughlin, in Lepore and McLaughlin ed. Actions and Events Psychophysical Laws, by Kim, in Lepore and McLaughlin ed. Julie Yoo (2009). Anomalous Monism. In Brian P. McLaughlin, Ansgar Beckermann & Sven Walter (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. OUP Oxford Louise M. Antony (1989). Anomalous Monism and the Problem of Explanatory Force. Philosophical Review 98 (April):153-87.

Week 3: Functionalism Core Reading H. Putnam: 'The Nature of Mental States', in Chalmers. D. Lewis: 'Psycho-physical and Theoretical Identifications', in Chalmers. N. Block: 'Troubles with Functionalism', in his Readings in Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 1. London: Methuen. Excerpt reprinted in Chalmers. S. Shoemaker, Some Varieties of Functionalism, and Functionalism and Qualia in his Identity, Cause and Mind Further reading R. Van Gulick: 'Functionalism', in B. McLaughlin, et. al., (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. H. Putnam: 'Philosophy and Our Mental Life', in his Mind, Language and Reality, Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. J. McDowell: 'Functionalism and Anomalous Monism', in his Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Week 4: Mental Causation Core Reading T. Crane: 'The Mental Causation Debate', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Suppl. Vol., 69 (1995): 211-36. K. Bennett: 'Mental Causation', Philosophy Compass, 2, no. 2 (2007): 316-37. J. Kim: 'The Many Problems of Mental Causation (Excerpt)', in Chalmers. S. Yablo: 'Mental Causation', in Chalmers. Further reading J. Campbell: 'Intelligible Causation', in J. Bridges, et. al., (eds.), The Possibility of Philosophical Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. J. Kim: 'Mental Causation', in B. McLaughlin, et. al., (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. B Loewer: 'Mental Causation, or Something near Enough', in B. McLaughlin and J. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell. S. Shoemaker: 'Realization and Mental Causation', in C. Gillett and B. Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Week 5: Consciousness Core Reading T. Crane: The Elements of Mind, Chapter 3. N. Block: 'On a Confusion about the Concept of Consciousness', in Chalmers. T. Nagel: 'What it is Like to Be a Bat?' in Chalmers. F. Jackson: 'Epiphenomenal Qualia', in Chalmers. D. Lewis: 'What Experience Teaches', in Chalmers. Further reading Jackson, F. 1986. What Mary didn t Know, Journal of Philosophy 83: 291-5. Reprinted in Rosenthal ed., The Nature of Mind D. Chalmers: 'Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness', Journal of Consciousness Studies, vol. 2, no 3 (1995). D. Chalmers: The Conscious Mind, Chapter 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. D. Dennett: 'Quining Qualia', in Chalmers. D. Rosenthal: 'Two Concepts of Consciousness', in Rosenthal. S. Shoemaker: 'Qualia and Consciousness', Mind, 100 (1991): 507-524. Week 6: Modal Arguments for Dualism Kripke, S. Naming and Necessity, Lecture 3, repr. In Rosenthal ed. The Nature of Mind. (Also in Chalmers ed.) Hill, C. Imaginability, Conceivability, Possibility and the Mind-Body Problem, Philosophical Studies 1997 (Also in Chalmers ed.) Chalmers, D. J. 2002. Does conceivability entail possibility? In (T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne, eds) Conceivability and Possibility. (See also, Chalmers, Natrualistic Dualism in his The Conscious Mind) Gendler and Hawthrone, Introduction., Conceivability and Possibility Yablo, S. Is Conceivability a Guide to Possibility, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1993 Week 7: Self-Knowledge and the Metaphysics of Mind

Cassam, Q. (1984), Self-Knowledge, Introduction. Oxford University Press. Gertler, Brie. (2008) Self-Knowledge (Sections 1-2). SEP online: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/self-knowledge/ Moran, R., (2001), Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge, Ch. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Ryle, G. (1949). Self-Knowledge, in Concept of Mind (Ch. VI), and reprinted in Cassam ed. Armstrong, D. (1963). Is introspective knowledge incorrigible? Philosophical Review 62: 417-32. M. Boyle: 'Two Kinds of Self-Knowledge', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2009). Williamson, T., (2000). Knowledge and Its Limits, Ch. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press. OR Cognitive homelessness, The Journal of Philosophy 93, 11 (1996): 554-573. Week 8: Introspection and First-Person Authority Alston, W., (1971), Varieties of Privileged Access, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8: 223-241. Byrne, A., (2005). Introspection, Philosophical Topics. Dretske, F., (1994), Introspection, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94: 263-278., (1999), The Mind's Awareness of Itself, Philosophical Studies 95: 103-24. J. Heal: 'On First-Person Authority', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (102): 1-21. Shomaker, S. (1994), Self-Knowledge and Inner Sense, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 249-314. Heil, J., 1988, Privileged Access, Mind 97: 238-251. Shoemaker, S. (1989). First-Person Access, in Tomberlin, ed., Philosophy of Mind and Action Theory. Philosophical Perspectives 3. Atascadero, Calif.: Ridgeview. Reprinted in his First Person Perspective and Other Essays. Shoemaker, S. (1987). Knowing One s Own Mind, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 60: 441-58. Reprinted in Cassam ed.

Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. J. McDowell., ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. See pp.205-233, reprinted in Cassam ed. Week 9: Other Minds and the Metaphysics of Mind Avramides, A., (2001), Other Minds, Overview. London: Routledge. Nagel, T. (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ch.II. McGinn, C.,1984 What is the Problem of Other Minds? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary vol. 58: 119 37. Putnam, H. (1979). Other Minds, reprinted in Putnam, H. Mind, Language & Reality. Kripke, S.A., 1982, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Postscript. Oxford: Blackwell. Week 10: The Epistemological Problem of Other Minds Ayer, A.J. (1954). The Problem of Other Minds, in Philosophical Essays. London: Macmillan. Hyslop, A., (1976) Other Minds as Theoretical Entities, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 54: 158-161. Melnyk, A., (1994), Inference to the Best Explanation and Other Minds, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72:482-91. McDowell,J., (1982), Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge, Proceedings of the British Academy, 68: 455-79. Reprinted in McDowell, J. Meaning, Knowledge and Reality. Hyslop, A and Jackson, F. C., 1972, The Analogical Inference to Other Minds, American Philosophical Quarterly, 9: 168 176. J. L. Austin: 'Other Minds', Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 20: 122-197. R. Pargetter: 'The Scientific Inference to Other Minds', Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62 (1984). F. Dretske: 'Perception and Other Minds', Nous 7(1973): 33-44.

SUGGESTED TITLES FOR FORMATIVE ESSAYS Are all mental states multiply realisable? If so, should this lead us to reject type identity physicalist theories? Are there any good reasons for thinking that there can be no strict psycho-physical laws? Is Davidson s anomalous monism an objectionable form of epiphenomenalism? Explain what you take to be the best version of an identity theory, justifying your choice against competitors. Are functionalist theories improvements on identity theories, and if so why? What are the most powerful objections to Functionalist accounts of the mental? Are there any adequate responses to them? Can functionalism account for the qualitative character of mental states, and if not does this mean that we should reject functionalism? Is the fact that mental states are causally efficacious a good reason to think that they must be identical to physical states? Critically assess what you take to be the best argument for property dualism. The fact that our conscious experiences and sensations have phenomenal properties should lead us to reject all physicalist accounts of the mental. Discuss. Critically assess Kripke s argument against type-identity physicalist theories. Do we have privileged access to our own states of mind? If so, what explains this? Can we acquire perceptual knowledge of what another person is thinking or feeling?

Is our knowledge of other minds best understood as involving inference to the best explanation? What is the conceptual problem of other minds, and what is the best solution to it?