Kazuhisa Todayama (Graduate School of Information Science, Nagoya University, Japan)

Similar documents
Scientific realism and anti-realism

UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA MATHEMATICS AS MAKE-BELIEVE: A CONSTRUCTIVE EMPIRICIST ACCOUNT SARAH HOFFMAN

Realism and the success of science argument. Leplin:

Scientific Realism and Empiricism

Phil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?

145 Philosophy of Science

UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA MATHEMATICS AS MAKE-BELIEVE: A CONSTRUCTIVE EMPIRICIST ACCOUNT SARAH HOFFMAN

Scientific Thought and Common Sense

FINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET. objectivity intersubjectivity ways the peer review system is supposed to improve objectivity

HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science

REALISM/ANTI-REALISM

The Illusion of Scientific Realism: An Argument for Scientific Soft Antirealism

Van Fraassen: Arguments concerning scientific realism

What the History of Science Cannot Teach Us Ioannis Votsis University of Bristol

HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Revision Guide (all topics)

Chapter One. Constructive Empiricism and the Case. Against Scientific Realism

Philosophy of Science PHIL 241, MW 12:00-1:15

We aim to cover in some detail a number of issues currently debated in the philosophy of natural and social science.

Qualified Realism: From Constructive Empiricism to Metaphysical Realism.

NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE

The Positive Argument for Constructive Empiricism and Inference to the Best

M.A. PROSEMINAR, PHIL 5850 PHILOSOPHICAL NATURALISM Fall 2018 Tuesdays 2:35-5:25 p.m. Paterson Hall 3A36

Why Does Laudan s Confutation of Convergent Realism Fail?

Approximate Truth vs. Empirical Adequacy

PHIL 3150 Philosophy of Science Fall 2016 PHIL 6015 Theory of Knowledge

ON CAUSAL AND CONSTRUCTIVE MODELLING OF BELIEF CHANGE

scientific realism 688 2nd edition

Empiricism. Otávio Bueno Department of Philosophy University of Miami Coral Gables, FL

Structural Realism or Modal Empiricism?

SCIENTIFIC REALISM AND EPISTEMOLOGY

Van Fraassen s Appreciated Anti-Realism. Lane DesAutels. I. Introduction

Van Fraassen: Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism

The error statistical philosopher as normative naturalist

The linguistic-cultural nature of scientific truth 1

The past vs. the tiny: historical science and the abductive arguments for realism

7AAN2075 Philosophy of Science Syllabus Academic year 2016/17

6AANA026 Philosophy of Science Syllabus Academic year 2015/16

Howard Sankey Department of History and Philosophy of Science University of Melbourne

Historical Inductions, Unconceived Alternatives, and Unconceived Objections

Are Scientific Theories True?

Psillos s Defense of Scientific Realism

Kitcher, Correspondence, and Success

Philosophy Epistemology. Topic 3 - Skepticism

I. Scientific Realism: Introduction

Epistemology for Naturalists and Non-Naturalists: What s the Difference?

Should the Empiricist be a Constructive Empiricist? Marc Alspector-Kelly. Department of Philosophy. Western Michigan University

Naturalism Fall Winter 2004

A Defense for Scientific Realism:

Critical Scientific Realism

Tuukka Kaidesoja Précis of Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology

Realism and instrumentalism

Teaching Portfolio. 1 Introduction to the Philosophy of Causation. 2 Introduction to Classical Logic. Michael Baumgartner.

also for his help in selecting the material for this volume.

Subject and Object in Scientific Realism. Howard Sankey. University of Melbourne. 1. Introduction: Subject and Object

Introduction to Cognitivism; Motivational Externalism; Naturalist Cognitivism

Causal Realism, Epistemology and Underdetermination. Abstract: It is often charged against realist philosophers of science that because they are

Intro. The need for a philosophical vocabulary

Practical Inadequacy: Bas van Fraassen's Failures of Systematicity. Curtis Forbes

Review of Constructive Empiricism: Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science

Carnap s notion of analyticity and the two wings of analytic philosophy. Christian Damböck Institute Vienna Circle

World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.

Metametaphysics. New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology* Oxford University Press, 2009

The Philosophical Review, Vol. 100, No. 3. (Jul., 1991), pp

A Theory s Predictive Success does not Warrant Belief in the Unobservable Entities it Postulates

Review of Erik J. Wielenberg: Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism

The Realism/Antirealism Debate in the Philosophy of Science

Luck, Rationality, and Explanation: A Reply to Elga s Lucky to Be Rational. Joshua Schechter. Brown University

Do Constructive Empiricists See Paramecia Too?*

KITCHER S MODEST REALISM: THE RECONCEPTUALIZATION OF SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVITY

University of Pittsburgh. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1

PHIL 4800/5800/5801 Fall Core Theoretical Philosophy I and II

UNITY OF KNOWLEDGE (IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH FOR SUSTAINABILITY) Vol. I - Philosophical Holism M.Esfeld

How Not to Defend Metaphysical Realism (Southwestern Philosophical Review, Vol , 19-27)

Unit 3: Philosophy as Theoretical Rationality

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

A Scientific Realism-Based Probabilistic Approach to Popper's Problem of Confirmation

How Successful Is Naturalism?

Realism, Approximate Truth, and Philosophical Method

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View

Introduction The Science Wars in Perspective

Naturalized Epistemology. 1. What is naturalized Epistemology? Quine PY4613

In Defense of Mathematical Inferentialism

Philosophers and Scientists Are Social Epistemic Agents. Seungbae Park, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology

Theoretical Virtues in Science

Scientific realism is dead, or so many philosophers believe. Its death was announced when philosophers became

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PHIL 145, FALL 2017

Vol. II, No. 5, Reason, Truth and History, 127. LARS BERGSTRÖM

Realism and Anti-Realism about Science A Pyrrhonian Stance

The Nature of Science: Methods for Seeking Natural Patterns in the Universe Using Rationalism and Empiricism Mike Viney

Quine s Naturalized Epistemology, Epistemic Normativity and the. Gettier Problem

Quests of a Realist. Stathis Psillos, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge, Pp. xxv PB.

Refutation by elimination JOHN TURRI

Science as a Guide to Metaphysics? Katherine Hawley, University of St Andrews, June

Skepticism, Naturalism, and Therapy

On the Rationality of Metaphysical Commitments in Immature Science

Epistemic Normativity for Naturalists

Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus 30 I

The Philosophy of Physics. Physics versus Metaphysics

Class 6 - Scientific Method

Intro to Science Studies I

Transcription:

todayama@info.human.nagoya-u.ac.jp Kazuhisa Todayama (Graduate School of Information Science, Nagoya University, Japan) Philosophical naturalism is made up of two basic claims as follows. () Ontological claim (physicalism); Only 'physical entities and phenomena' and what supervene upon them really exist. () Epistemological claim; There is no 'first philosophy', that is, every method of investigation including philosophy itself must consist of the methods which are regarded as legitimate in empirical sciences. One consequence of the latter claim is called 'naturalization of philosophy of science' which has grown to be a powerful alternative to the traditional philosophy of science such as logical positivism or Bayesianism. The main concern of this paper resides in the question whether a philosophical naturalist could believe in these two claims at the same time. For, if naturalized philosophy of science found, in empirical data from the real history of science, the fact that the ultimate aim of scientific investigation is not to reach the literally true description of the world but to attain some other epistemic values (e.g. to control the nature or to make better predictions), it might undermine the realistic reading of the ontological claim of philosophical naturalism. This possibility is overlooked by virtually all the naturalists, but might pose a serious difficulty on their philosophic research program. In the last section of this paper, I tired to propose a way-out from this predicament for a philosophical naturalist like myself. The proposal consists of these two measures. () to adopt a Hackingean operationist criterion concerning what exists and what not, () to reinterpret scientific theories not as sets of theoreteical sentences but as semantic models. philosophical naturalism, naturalized epistemology, physicalism, scientific realism, manipulability argument cognitive loss () naturalized epistemology Kornblith, 985 first philosophy epistemic norm physicalism Journal of Human Environmental Studies, Volume, Number

() 4 Kuhn, 96 5 Giere, 99 (3) 7 scientific realism 00 (4) 980 empiricism 980 constructive van Fraassen, literally true

Kazuhisa Todayama: On the tension that might exist between two basic claims of philosophical naturalism antirealism (5) convergence empirically adequate inference to the best explanation Boyd, 980 Journal of Human Environmental Studies, Volume, Number

Laudan, 984 (6) T T pessimistic induction epistemic value hypothetical a

Kazuhisa Todayama: On the tension that might exist between two basic claims of philosophical naturalism b manipulability argument Hacking, 983 x x (7) (8) Churchland, 989 semantic conception of theories (9) Journal of Human Environmental Studies, Volume, Number

Papineau, D. (Eds.) 996 The philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press Rosenberg, A. 996 A field guide to recent species of naturalism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 47, -9 Suppe, F. 989 The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press 999 3-9-43 00 9 5-30 003 948 63-9 van Fraassen, B. C. 980 The scientific image. Oxford: Oxford University Press () 003 () 999 Boyd, R. 980 Scientific realism and naturalistic epistemology. PSA 980, vol., 63-6 Boyd, R. 989 Realism, approximate truth and philosophical method. In D. Papineau (Ed.) 996 The philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 5-55 Callebaut, W. 993 Taking the naturalistic turn or how real philosophy of science is done. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press Churchland, P. M. 989 A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press Giere, R. N. 988 Explaining science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press Giere, R. N. (Ed.) 99 Cognitive models of science. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, XV, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press Giere, R. N. 997 Understanding scientific reasoning. 4th ed. Orlando: Harcourt Hacking, I. 983 Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Kornblith, H. (Ed.) 985 Naturalizing epistemology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press Kuhn, T. 96 The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 00 (3) 999 Callebaut 993 Rosenberg 996 Leplin 984 (4) Papineau 996 (5) Boyd 980 989 (6) (7) 003 (8) 999 00 (9) Suppe 989 Giere 988 Giere 997 003 6 3 003 6 7 Laudan, L. 984 Science and values. Los Angeles : University of California Press Leplin, J. (Ed.) 984 Scientific realism. Los Angeles: University of California Press 999