How To Answer The Big Questions

Similar documents
Pinhas, Psychic Vision & Natural Balance

The Legend that is the Zohar

Israel, The Universal Constant in Cyclical Time Commentary on Parashat Ha azinu

The Heights of Arrogance The Dangers of Spiritual Practices Being Taught To Those Not Properly Prepared To Receive Them

Messianic Speculations

Psychological G-d. Psychic Redemption

An Important Message for Both Christians & Jews

The Kabbalah of Spiritual Contact The Cultivation of Expanded Consciousness and Extra-Sensory Perceptions in the Torah Tradition

Reclaiming Human Spirituality

The Nature of Exile Part 3, Understanding the Kabbalah of Personalities

How to Prove that There Is a God, God Is Real & the Universe Needs a God

Directives for Spiritual Ascent for the Night of Shavuot MaYeT DaK the Five Stages of Spiritual Ascent: (Malkhut, Yesod, Tiferet, Da'at, Keter)

The Image Within By Ariel Bar Tzadok

Secrets of the Ark of the Covenant

For the Lord gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding. Proverbs 2:6

Daily Thoughts Words of Wisdom and Inspiration

Having Courage to Experience G

Secrets of the Open Link to Heaven

The Way of G-d Class #4

John 8 - THE I AM BEFORE ABRAHAM. Introduction

Literal taking words in their usual or most basic sense without metaphor or allegory.

Difference between Science and Religion? - A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding

How Can I Trust Christianity and the Bible Are True With So Many Changes and Translations?

Difference between Science and Religion? A Superficial, yet Tragi-Comic Misunderstanding...

The Laws of Torah Physics What Newton Didn t Know, But Our Rabbis Did

The Secret Kabbalistic Code in Pirkei Avot

Hag HaShavuot Happy Birthday To Torah

things, whether on earth or in heaven, by making peace through the blood of his cross. Reading and Sermon for the 2 nd Sunday Before Lent

Getting To God. The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism. truehorizon.org

3: Studying Logically

Elul 5767, Contemplations 1

God is a Community Part 2: The Meaning of Life

Sounds of Love Series. Mysticism and Reason

Revelation, Reason, and Demonstration Talk for Glenmont, Columbus, Ohio October 18, 2015 Laurance R. Doyle

There is no plan B Picture 1 Picture 2 Picture 3 does

The Goldilocks Enigma Paul Davies

Paul Solomon Reading # L FA JDE, Atlanta, GA 02 /16/73

Devekut The Prophetic / Meditative Traditions (Kabbalah) of Bonding With G-d

Responses to Respondents RESPONSE #1 Why I Reject Exegetical Conservatism

The Unbearable Lightness of Theory of Knowledge:

Copyright 1983 Institute for Creation Research. INSTITUTE for CREATION RESEARCH P.O. Box Dallas, Texas Cover Photo: Ronald Engle

Pathwork Guide Lecture No Edition December 20, 1957 JESUS CHRIST

Solutions to Insanity

Reading a Philosophy Text Philosophy 22 Fall, 2019

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS WEEK 1 THEHILLS.ORG

Session Two. Why the Church Should Support Movement Beyond Belief

OCR YEAR 11 MOCK EXAMS REVISION BOOKLET

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View

ROSH HASHANAH II 5775

Politics & Mysticism in the Weekly Torah Portion Parshat (Portion) Vayera

Genesis Renewal. The Creationist Teaching Ministry of Mark E Abernathy

Rise Up & Possess Look! What Do You See?

KosherTorah School for Spiritual Studies

The Glory of God Is Intelligence : A Note on Maimonides. FARMS Review 19/2 (2007): (print), (online)

There is a gaping hole in modern thinking that may never

Common Questions. Does God exist?

High School / College Sample Questions Reason for Belief Norman L Geisler. (Updated 14 JUL 2016)

LOVE THE BIG PICTURE

Brabourne Church of England Primary School Religious Education Policy Statement July 2017

Does the Bible Conflict with Science?

Hi and welcomed back if you have watched any of the previous videos. My name is Tim Spiess and

Concepts of God: Yielding to Love pages 24-27

Music and the Power in a Name

Are Judaism and Evolution Compatible? Parashat B reishit 5779 October 6, 2018 Rabbi Carl M. Perkins Temple Aliyah, Needham

Postmodernism. Issue Christianity Post-Modernism. Theology Trinitarian Atheism. Philosophy Supernaturalism Anti-Realism

Revelations of Understanding: The Great Return of Essence-Me to Immanent I am

It wasn t that long ago that I thought myself to be a very good preacher. I can

05. Interpreting and Understanding the Texts

Ronald Dworkin, Religion without God, Harvard University Press, 2013, pp. 192, 16.50, ISBN

Presuppositions of Biblical Interpretation

Students will make a quick reference sheet of the inductive Bible study method.

DEALING WITH THE ALLEGED CONTRADICTIONS

What s God got to do with it?

IS GOD A SCIENTIFIC GENIUS? QUANTUM PHYSICS CONTAINS GOD S PLAN FOR ABUNDANT LIFE.

Transcendence J. J. Valberg *

Cyclical Time and the Question of Determinism

Michał Heller, Podglądanie Wszechświata, Znak, Kraków 2008, ss. 212.

Matthew 6:9-13. Therefore, you should pray like this: Our Father in. heaven, name. 10

ESOTERIC COMMUNITY BUILDING IN CAMPHILL COMMUNITIES

Zero, One, Two, Three

A HOLISTIC VIEW ON KNOWLEDGE AND VALUES

hij Teacher Resource Bank GCE Religious Studies Teachers Guide: Topic II Perceptions of Ultimate Reality Topic III Religious Experience

A Community of Love and Justice Rev. Susan Frederick-Gray Feb. 5, 2017

Preexistence of Yeshua (Jesus)?

Pathwork on Christmas

Crossing Over. Sermon written and delivered by Rev. Jennifer Youngsun Ryu. Williamsburg Unitarian Universalists. Williamsburg, Virginia

b602 revision guide GCSE RELIGIOUS STUDIES

Judaism and Star Wars sermon 25th December 2015

Abstracts of Powerpoint Talks - newmanlib.ibri.org - Evidence of God. In Cosmos & Conscience Robert C. Newman

BIBLICAL INTEGRATION IN SCIENCE AND MATH. September 29m 2016

THE RISEN CHRIST: OUR TRUE AUTHORITY, OUR TRUE HOPE

God and Creation, Job 38:1-15

Conversation with Prof. David Bohm, Birkbeck College, London, 31 July 1990

THE REVELATION OF JOHN, I. Rev. Robert T. Woodyard First Christian Reformed Church September 14, 2014, 6:00PM. Scripture Texts: Revelation 1:1-8

Relationship of Science to Torah HaRav Moshe Sternbuch, shlita Authorized translation by Daniel Eidensohn

Valley Bible Church Sermon Transcript

A FEW IMPORTANT GUIDELINES FOR BIBLE STUDY

Pesach: Shabbat HaGadol Talmudic Sugya: Tradition and Meaning

The Other Half of Hegel s Halfwayness: A response to Dr. Morelli s Meeting Hegel Halfway. Ben Suriano

Becoming a Dream-Art Scientist

Transcription:

How To Answer The Big Questions By HaRav Ariel Bar Tzadok Many ask the big questions; who or what is G-d and what does G-d want from us? In order to answer the second question, the first must also be answered. What G-d wants from us is integrally bound up with our awareness of who and what G-d is? One with a mistaken view of G-d will by definition only have a mistaken view of what G-d wants. So, before we ask what G-d wants let us seek to answer who is G-d in the first place. Asking about G-d is no small task. There are so many centuries of embellished myths and legends to overcome. Most people today, in one way or another, hold to the rather juvenile belief that G-d is some kind of super/greater human being; an old man with a long white beard sitting on a cloud or a throne with throngs of ministering angels, all with cute little wings, serving before Him. These novel portrayals can be found in the most ancient of literature. Yet, modern people fail to understand that the writers of these accounts were writing using poetic metaphors. They never intended their accounts to be understood literally. Ancient Semitic writers were by no means rationalists by modern standards. The rationalism of ancient Semitic writers was by our modern definition both poetic and mystical. To put it in terms familiar with Torah Judaism, their pshat is not our pshat. How the ancients thought and wrote and what they considered to be simple and straightforward are radically different from how we are today. Their spirituality was far from juvenile; but our understandings or better to say, misunderstandings of what they wrote is what is truly juvenile. When a modern rationalist comes to the metaphorical accounts recorded in Torah, written as it is from an ancient Semitic point of view, they often misinterpret the style of the writing and mistakenly interpret metaphors as literal. This misinterpretation is by no means rational. Therefore one making such a mistake cannot honesty be called a rationalist and certainly not a scholar. There is another term used to describe those who are unable to recognize the true rationale in ancient Semitic literature all the while claiming that theirs is the true understanding. Such individuals are called fundamentalists. There are all different types of fundamentalists. There are secular fundamentalists who look at the ancient Semitic metaphorical accounts recorded in Torah and dismiss them out of hand as outdated nonsense. Then there are the religious fundamentalists who embrace the ancient accounts as literal truths, seemingly oblivious to their original intent. One side rejects the literal account and the other side embraces it; - 1 -

both sides however are grievously in error in that they view the metaphorical as literal and respond to it according to their own individual agendas. I am sure if the original writers of Torah and later prophetic literature were alive today they would reject the fundamentalists of both sides and explain their Semitic poetic metaphorical writings in ways that the honestly rational of minds would today appreciate and embrace. In order to properly understand G-d and what G-d wants from us, we have to approach the original Torah and prophetic material from the point of view of those who wrote the literature and not from the point of view of modern day fundamentalists, who in very unscholarly ways, misinterpret it. Fundamentalists, both secular and religious, essentially perpetuate a serious crime against religion, spirituality and G-d Himself. By interpreting metaphor as literal and poetry as prose, they have totally confused the true identity and reality of G-d and have served to distance countless numbers from the truths of spiritual reality. In order to properly understand both G-d and Torah one must be rational in the way the term was originally understood by the ancient authors and not how the meaning of the term has been skewered today. Rationalism is an interesting and often misunderstood term. It has been embraced by fundamentalists today who claim that they are the true rationalists. Yet, the true rationalist s views the fundamentalist as being nothing other than a primitive boor. True rationalists are seekers of truth, regardless of where such truth may lead them; they cannot afford to be dogmatic. While they understand the concept of faith, they also understand its parameters. True rationalists seek to understand the universe; they are seekers of natural law and objective truths. They have zero patience for fundamental proclamations that refuse to mature with expanding realities. Centuries ago there arose the great Rabbi Maimonides. Aside from being a world class physician and leading Torah scholar, he was also a scientist and seeker of natural truth. In his day the highest level of scientific accomplishment was expressed through Aristotelian philosophy. Therefore, Maimonides used Aristotle to explain Torah and reality most specifically in his book, Moreh Nebukhim, the Guide for the Perplexed. Maimonides took advantage of the best information available in his day. If he were alive today, he would have definitely looked at modern scientific discovery and like every other scientist today, he would leave Aristotle behind in the distant past. Maimonides today would certainly have been a student of modern Quantum physics, String and M theories, with all their talk of parallel dimensions and alternate realities. He would also have found modern scientific discoveries to fit very comfortably with anciently revealed Torah wisdom, very much unlike Aristotle. Here is where we distinguish between the true rationalist and the fundamentalist. Like Maimonides the true rationalist will expand his definition of what is and is not rational based upon the expanding horizons of reality. Whereas the fundamentalist will only look at the past and never look at the reality of the present. By doing so, - 2 -

they miss the reality of what is and cling to the fantasy and fiction of what was once believed. This difference between true rationalist and fundamentalist is critical to our understanding of the nature of G-d. The fundamentalist still clings to his immature and juvenile ideas and attitudes. The fundamentalist hides his face from reality and discovery. He refuses to accept truth because truth requires change and change is something the fundamentalist is not willing to do. The true rationalist on the other hand seeks to know truth, to grow and mature through education, as discovery leads to greater and deeper understandings of ultimate truth. The one time Aristotelian has graduated to Einstein and from Einstein to the Quantum and from the Quantum to the Stings and the M. From here, who knows where the next step in the great process of discovery will take us. One thing is of course certain, the more and more we learn about science and nature, the closer and closer we come to the actual truth of the reality of the Creator. Who is G-d? The answer depends upon who you ask; the true rationalist or the fundamentalist. What does G-d want of us? This too depends upon who you ask; the true rationalist or the fundamentalist. One will answer you with childlike stubbornness and rigidity. One will answer you with maturity that comes about through discovery and the embrace of deeper understandings of truth. One thing is certain, true science will never ever contradict true Torah. Ultimately the two are one. There is only one objective reality underlying all our subjective perceptions of reality. The spiritual child obviously needs to grow up before it can appreciate the deeper truths of the adult. The fundamentalist too needs to expand his narrow horizons before he can see for himself the true broader horizons that the true rationalist sees ever so clearly. G-d is not a little old man with a white beard warning us to be nice and not naughty. There are no such actual realities as the portrayals our Sages described using physical metaphors. Our Sages used the common vernacular to describe to us abstract spiritual realities. This is the only way to relate these abstract concepts to the infantile fundamentalist mind. Yet, once we mature we must go beyond child s play. The deeper understandings of spiritual truths have always been safeguarded by our Sages. They were called secrets, the Sodot of the Torah. These deeper levels of understanding were kept secret not so much for their own protection but rather to protect the infantile mind from confusion before their ability to mature and integrate greater discovery. Spiritual maturity is therefore necessary for one to become a true rationalist, similar to Maimonides. Mind you, even the fundamentalists in his day condemned Maimonides because they could not fathom the depths of his rationalism. Can we imagine what Maimonides would say today in light of modern science and how much opposition today this would generate? - 3 -

So, who is G-d? What has science and discovery revealed to us about the true nature of reality? The secular atheist will loudly proclaim that science teaches absolutely nothing about a Creator. Yet, we recognize that even the secular atheist is in his own way a fundamentalist who refuses to accept uncomfortable truths. Modern science clearly reveals the wondrous Hand underlying our universe and how profound reality truly is. Modern science has discovered the Big Bang origin of our universe. They now know for sure that Aristotle was wrong and that our universe had a beginning. Logic necessarily dictates that if there is a beginning, then there must too be a beginner that initiated the process. Call it Intelligent Design. Therefore, call G-d the Intelligent Designer. He is not a little old man; he is not human at all. Indeed, He is not even a He. In spite of Torah and religious vernacular it is more accurate to refer to G-d as an It, a reality that transcends everything human. G-d therefore is the Intelligence of the universe, the Universal Mind and the Consciousness of Creation. Centuries ago, many of our Sages used Hebrew terms that describe these very concepts. G-d was called the Sekhel HaPoal, the Active Intelligence. Indeed even the Torah itself expresses this concept. G-d s Name in Hebrew, spelled Yod Kay Vav Kay is derived from the Hebrew root for the verb to be. The verb Hovey means being. When adding the prefix Hebrew letter Yod, we take the base form of the root verb and transform it grammatically from the passive to the active tense. Thus Yod-Hovey would translate as Active Being, or Being in Action. This is no little old man or any other kind of super-human. This is a reality so transcendent and different that we cannot possibly imagine it or in any way ascribe to it any type of form. This is the underlying reasoning to the Second (of the Ten) Commandments, not to portray G-d with any image or form. We have such a profound truth and such a profound Torah that expresses that truth. We do serious injustice to both the Creator and His Torah by viewing them with fundamental immaturity. What then does the Intelligent Designer wants of us? I would say that It wants from us is to be intelligent as It Itself is. To be intelligent as is the Intelligent Designer requires of us that we embrace reality. Yet, in order to embrace reality, we must first know what it is. If we do not explore then we will never discover. Therefore, only when one outgrows the fundamentalist mentality can one begin to walk the proper path. G-d wants us to be what we are, intelligent creatures created in His Image. As the Intelligent Designer has revealed Its profundity through the nature of the universe He/It designed, so too must we, created in His/Its image equally express our own profundity and thus become what we truly are: human beings created in the image of the Creator. Only in this, our enlightened form, can we ever come to study and understand Torah properly. Only a mature adult can ever fulfill Torah Law properly. Today s religious fundamentalists are nothing more than spiritual adolescents. In spite of however religious they are on the outside, they are usually rather spiritually empty on the inside. Many of our Sages throughout the centuries have recognized this each - 4 -

in their own communities and have warned against it. Fundamentalism is a dangerous condition. It can only be overcome by those who spiritually grow up, mature and embrace the greater and fuller depths that our Torah has to offer. Only a true rationalist can be rational and not succumb to fundamentalist narrow-mindedness. Only such a one can properly know G-d and thus serve Him. In the end, the big questions remain ultimately unanswered. We can gather glimpses of truth from time to time as we pursue paths of study and discovery. Yet, will we ever evolve to the point when we will know everything? This is another good question, one to add to the original two. We say that the Creator is all knowing and that we are created in His/Its Image. Maybe this means that we too can eventually rise to the level of knowing all. Prophecy states during the Messianic era all humanity will achieve a level of higher knowledge. Other prophecies state that even prior to the Messianic era the process of expanding knowledge would begin. We are now in this period. Knowledge is definitely expanding. Our understanding of the greater universe is expanding as well. We must not allow our understand of Torah to fall behind the times. We must never allow our Torah knowledge to remain juvenile and fundamental. We must delve deeper and deeper in Torah to discover whatever lies hidden under its surface. Only as we learn, grow and mature will we ever come closer to being able to answer the big questions. Maybe G-d is waiting for us to do just this and only then will He send Mashiah to seal it all. - 5 -