Christianity Is Getting Creamed by Islam Apologetics!

Christianity Is Getting Creamed by Islam Apologetics! Lately I ve been looking up things on Islam and Christianity, and it seems like Christianity is getting creamed by Islam apologetics. I mean, there are websites which show amazing scientific accuracies in the Qur an, like the origin of the universe. They even attack the accuracy of the Bible and talk about the contradictions. I beg you to please help me. I mean, they do make a lot of good cases for Islam. Why shouldn t I believe Islam is the true faith? Scientific accuracy does not necessarily prove a book is divinely inspired. It simply shows it has some accurate facts. There are numerous books that are scientifically accurate but we would not view them as inspired. The Bible also has numerous scientific accuracies. I have read many of the alleged contradictions in the Bible. Most passages cited are out of context, misinterpreted, or the science of textual criticism is misunderstood. The Bible is inspired in its original documents, not the copies. We have accurate copies but the few discrepancies we have do not affect any major doctrines. This is different from the Qur an which claims to be perfect, the copy we have now, they claim, is a perfect reflection of what is in heaven. What is interesting is that there are several errors in the Qur an. Here are a few scientific errors: Sura 86:5-7 states that sperm comes from a man s chest. Sura 23:14 says man was created from a blood clot. There are also several historical errors. Sura 20:85-95 states the Samaritans tricked Moses and the Israelites during the Exodus. The Samaritans did not exist till about 1000 years

later. One big error is that Islam denies the death and resurrection of Jesus which is one of the best documented events in ancient history. On what basis do they deny this? We have too much evidence for this event. These errors put the inspiration of the Qur an in question. For more information please read my articles: Jesus in the Qur an, The Historical Reliability of the Gospels, and The Resurrection: Fact or Fiction?. Patrick Zukeran 2009 Probe Ministries Islam Day in Hawaii Misinterpreting Tolerance May 20, 2009 On May 6, 2009, the Hawaii State Senate overwhelmingly passed a bill by a 22-3 vote to recognize September 24 th, 2009 as Islam Day. The reason for this bill was to recognize the rich religious, scientific, cultural and artistic contributions that Islam and the Islamic world have made. It does not call for any spending or organized celebration of Islam Day. {1} Democrat Senator Will Espero presented his reason for this bill stating, We are a state of tolerance. We understand that people have different beliefs. We may not all agree on every single item and issue out there, but to say and highlight the negativity of the Islamic people is an insult to the majority of believers who are good law-abiding citizens of the world. {4}

How should we approach this issue as believers in Christ? I believe there are two points we should be very concerned about. First, I agree with Sen. Will Espero that the majority of Muslims are peaceful, law-abiding citizens. However, I do not believe Islam is a religion of tolerance and peace. The teachings of Islam s sacred works and its history reveal this to be the case. Throughout the Qur an Muslims are commanded to spread Islam through the use of force. When Muhammad first began preaching his message, he did teach tolerance of Jews and Christians as he attempted to win converts from these religions. Sura 2:256 teaches that there is to be no compulsion in religion. However, as he grew in power and the Jews and Christians rejected his message, these commands were later abrogated by later commands to fight against unbelievers in holy war. Sura 9:5 teaches, But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them, for Allah is oft-forgiving, most merciful. Sura 9:29 states, Fight against those who believe not in Allah, nor in the last day, nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His messenger and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah (tax) with willing submission and feel themselves subdued. The Qur an teaches holy war against unbelievers. Muhammad also represents the perfect model for Muslims to copy. Muslims are called to imitate him in all aspects of life. Islamic scholar John Esposito writes, Muslims look to Muhammad s example for guidance in all aspects of life: how to treat friends as well as enemies, what to eat and drink, how to make love and war.

His impact on Muslim life cannot be overestimated, since he served as both religious and political head of Medina: prophet of God, ruler, military commander, chief judge, lawgiver. Traditions of the Prophet provide guidance for personal hygiene, dress, eating, marriage, treatment of wives, diplomacy, and warfare. {5} What kind of leader and model was Muhammad? He was a warrior. The history of Islam records his raids on caravans, battles, and the merciless killing of those who disagreed with him. The first biography of Muhammad states he fought twenty-seven battles in which thousands were killed.{6} His successors followed in his footsteps, spreading Islam through jihad attacking the countries of Africa, Asia, and Europe. Many of these countries posed no threat to Muslims nor were they aggressive towards Islam. For example, Egypt was not aggressive towards Islam, yet they were attacked and the Muslims killed over four million Egyptians. The nations of Europe posed no threat yet Islam invaded Europe and nearly conquered Europe until Charles Martel repulsed them in 732 A.D. Most Muslims are peaceful but the religion of Islam is not a religion of tolerance and peace. In reading some of the authoritative sources of Islam, the Qur an, the Hadith (sayings and actions of Muhammad), and the earliest biography of Muhammad, one will soon realize this to be the case. Therefore, it is dangerous to tolerate a religion that promotes intolerance and the use of force on unbelievers. Observe the history of Islam when they became the majority and instilled Sharia Law in a country. Once Sharia Law is instituted, they do not tolerate other faiths. In passing this bill, the leaders of Hawaii send the unbalanced message that we will honor this religion and its values, yet ignore the dangers it poses. I believe the leaders of Hawaii do not know what this religion teaches, and its history. It is dangerous then to honor a religion that poses such a threat to our

nation and civilization. Second, there is a misunderstanding of tolerance. Senators state tolerance as a reason to honor Islam. However, true tolerance has moral guidelines and limits. A tolerant society should not tolerate pedophiles or the abuse of women or racial discrimination. Tolerance does not mean all religions and values are equal and true, and therefore should be allowed to permeate a culture. However, this appears to be the definition the leaders of Hawaii are going by. True tolerance has its limits; it does not tolerate all beliefs. Should we tolerate racism and groups like the KKK that promote this belief? Would we in the name of tolerance have a KKK day? What about Nazism? What about the Taliban? If we are to tolerate all beliefs as equally valid and true and worthy of recognition, we will end up allowing groups like these to permeate our culture. Philosopher Karl Popper states, If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. {7} Unlimited tolerance with no moral guidelines will eventually lead to the downfall of our civilization as we allow false ideologies to destroy the moral foundations of our nation. I ask the leaders of Hawaii to study the religion of Islam and its history from its beginning to what is occurring now in Europe. I believe Islam represents one of the great threats to western civilization and if we do not stand against its ideas, we may soon succumb to its tyranny. For more information please see Probe s articles on Islam and the author s Web site at www.evidenceandanswers.org. Notes 1. Hawaii Lawmakers Pass Bill to Create Islam Day' Fox News.Com, 6 May 2009,

www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/06/hawaii-lawmakers-pass-crea te-islam-day/. 2. Ibid. 3. Ibid. 4. Ibid. 5. John Esposito, Islam: The Straight Path (New York: Oxford Press, 1988), 13-14. 6. Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad, trans. A. Guillaume (Karachi, Pakistan: Oxford University Press, 1955), 659-60. 7. Brad Stetson & Joseph Conti, The Truth About Tolerance (Downers Grove, IL.: InterVarsity Press, 2005), 144. 2009 Patrick Zukeran Cross Cultural Apologetics in Uganda For any speaker, cross-cultural teaching is challenging. So when Pat Zukeran and I were asked to participate in two pastors training conferences in Uganda, Africa, my prayer life took on a new urgency. Although the official language of Uganda is English, most of its citizens use one of twenty-nine other languages. Uganda is mostly an agricultural society and is somewhat isolated from the Western media. A majority of the pastors had received only a limited education, and would be fortunate to own a Bible much less have books for a theological library. Pat and I realized we would have to adjust the way we normally present our lessons to incorporate word pictures and stories to help the Ugandan translators effectively communicate our messages with this specialized audience.

However, a more central question was whether or not these pastors felt a need for the kind of apologetics information that Probe usually provides. Did they care about arguments for the authority of Scripture or the deity of Christ? Was maintaining a Christian worldview something they would understand or even be interested in? Would defenses against religious pluralism, Mormonism, and Islam be wanted or deemed unnecessary? I fervently prayed for wisdom and discernment as we made our preparations. Thankfully when it came time to go, I experienced a peace as I stepped out in faith. The Lord was sending us and I was eager to see how He would accomplish His plan for the Ugandan pastors! Our time in Uganda was split into two one-week conferences. The first conference was near the town of Jinja, not far from the country s eastern border with Kenya. This town is on the shores of Lake Victoria, near the headwaters of the Nile River. Our actual conference location was a 30 minute van ride to what we later discovered was the first church in Uganda, built in the 1880s by the Anglicans. Most of the attendees were lay pastors in area churches along with a few priests. We later discovered that the Anglican priests were responsible for as many as twenty churches and spent most of their time marrying, baptizing, and burying members. Much of the work of evangelizing and mentoring new believers fell upon the lay workers. As a result, this group of 125 workers was essential to energizing and equipping the Anglican movement in the region. Pat opened the conference with a great session on the biblical mandate to be ready to give a reason for the hope that we have in Christ. Some of the pastors admitted that they had never really thought about having to defend what they believe. They would share with their neighbors that they believed about Jesus, but they didn t even think about defending the faith if questions or objections arose. We later discovered that Jinja was the center of Mormon activities in Uganda. The pastors

were shocked to hear what Mormons believe concerning the nature of God and specifically the person of Christ. They also responded positively to arguments against religious pluralism acknowledging that they were hearing them for the first time. For the next leg of the trip, we headed out to Fort Portal to partner with ALARM Ministries on the western border of Uganda next to the Congo. We had received an e-mail from both the Ugandan government and our state department warning us about the ongoing conflict in the Congo. Fortunately, the fighting had not spilled over into Uganda. Other than refugees entering into the country we did not notice any problems. It turns out that the group of pastors in Fort Portal was especially passionate about the apologetics material Pat and I covered during the six hours each day. They were experiencing a direct challenge from Islam and had little information with which to respond. Many of them felt the burden to defend their faith from the rising influx of money and mosques from Libya. Libya s ruler Muammar Kaddafi has taken an interest in Uganda. In Fort Portal he has built a large, gold-domed mosque and a mansion for the local fifteen-year-old tribal king. Local Muslims have been targeting pastors and their sons by offering money and even cars to those who would convert to Islam. Sadly, some have done so. In response, Pat and I decided to change our scheduled topics to make the last day entirely focused on Islam. I did a

session on the history of the religion and its basic beliefs while Pat covered apologetic strategies to use when talking with a Muslim. At the end, one pastor jumped to his feet and began shouting in the local dialect. We wondered what we might have said to upset him and looked to the translator. Translated he said, For years the Muslims have challenged us and we ve never been able to answer their challenges. Today, our teachers have provided answers and addressed the issues they bring up. Now for the first time I feel we are equipped to answer them when they come for their crusades here in Fort Portal! Another pastor agreed with him and stood up to say, For too long we have given bad answers or just beat around the bush. Now we can provide solid answers! Then a third pastor exclaimed, After receiving my new Bible (given to them by the mission trip funds) and hearing the teaching today, I love God s Word more than ever! With that, they began celebrating by raising their new Bibles above their heads, dancing and singing a song titled, Heaven and earth will pass away but God s Word will endure forever. It was a very moving for us to see the joy in their hearts

because of our teaching. Our other material also connected as well. I spoke about temptations all Christians experience when life becomes difficult. We in the U.S. tend to trust in our wealth, technology, and entertainment when we should be turning to God for strength and endurance. In Africa, the tendency is to revert to the traditional African religions that include local witch doctors and ancestor worship. We had a number of good discussions about trusting only in God and the truth revealed in Scripture rather than in other belief systems and unbiblical practices. Our time in Uganda reconfirmed the need for apologetics regardless of location and culture. Although the challenges may be different, Christians everywhere need to have confidence in the gospel message if they are going to take it into the world. It is our prayer that we left our brothers and sisters in Uganda with tools that will equip them to be more effective ambassadors for Christ. 2008 Probe Ministries It s Unfair for God to Put Children in Muslim Families If salvation is free for anyone who receives Jesus Christ as his personal saviour, then how about a child who is born into a Muslim family. He or she will not have a chance to receive salvation because of the traditional faith from their parents. So it is not fair for God to put this child in the Muslim family.

The timing of your question is one of those God things that make me smile. I was ready to reply with what I know to be true, that God is bigger than and not limited by the circumstances of someone s birth, when I had the pleasure of sitting down to talk with a man who grew up in Iran, the son of devout Muslim parents, but who became a Christian. Let me tell you his story. Ibrahim (not his real name) was very depressed, assaulted by what he calls evil thoughts pushing suicide as his solution. One night he lay in his bed, looking at the ceiling and said to God, What have I done to You? I ve lost my wife, my children, my business, my fortune. I ve lost everything. What did I ever do to You to deserve this mistreatment? Immediately, he heard God s voice inside his head: Don t you see? I rescued you from that woman. She was trying to take your life. (And indeed, he found out later that this same woman, before taking him to the cleaners, had poisoned her first husband.) Ibrahim knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that he had heard from God, and he sat bolt upright in bed, swinging his legs onto the floor. At that moment, a single drop of sweat trickled from the back of his neck down his spine, and as it traveled down his back he felt all the energy and power drain out of him. He was a limp dish rag, unable to stand, much less walk or do anything else. He was suddenly aware that he was physically as powerless and needy as he was spiritually. He prayed, I need help! Send me angels! Within days, as an answer to his prayer, he met a Christian woman who befriended him and shared her faith with him. She basically tutored him in Christianity, explaining that Jesus is the Son of God who died on the cross for Ibrahim s sins and was raised from the dead three days later. One night, he had a dream. He was standing in a room with

several other people when Jesus walked in and stood about 12 feet away from him, radiating strength and love and acceptance. Ibrahim was so excited! He said, Jesus! What are You doing here? and Jesus said, I came to talk to you. All Ibrahim could think about in his dream was that he wanted Jesus to hug him. So he asked Jesus if he could hold Him and hug Him, but Jesus disappeared... and Ibrahim woke up. The moment he awakened, he knew he was washed. He opened his heart to Jesus and became a Christian. He told all his friends of his experience, and they laughed derisively at him. But the reality that he had met Jesus and had become a new man a new, joyful man, he told me was so much stronger than his friends ridicule that it truly didn t matter to him. Ibrahim delighted to tell me the differences between Christianity and Islam, how Islam is a religion of the sword, full of force and fear, but Christianity is a religion of relationship, of receiving and returning God s love and delight. He loves the freedom that we have as Christians, freedom to make choices that are absent in Islam. He loves how Jesus has changed his heart, enabling him to forgive the people who hurt him deeply and love the people God brings across his path. This is an illustration of how and why a child who grows up in a Muslim home is not hopeless. God tells us in Ecclesiastes 3:11 that He has planted eternity in our hearts, and in Romans 1:19-20 He tells us that men are without excuse because He has given us clear evidence of Himself, both within ourselves (per Ecclesiastes) and in His creation. So people are aware that there is a God to whom we are all accountable, and that God reveals Himself to people directly, through His children, and through His word. In the Muslim world, we re hearing more and more stories of people coming to faith in Jesus through dreams and visions.

Praise God! Sue Bohlin 2008 Probe Ministries Can Western-style Education Transform the Middle East? Dear Probe reader, A highlight of my recent tour of Jordan a land teeming with biblical history was visiting King s Academy. Jordan s new prep school emphasizes critical thinking over rote learning, teaching students not what to think but how to think. Could it become a model to train a new generation of Middle Eastern leaders to shake hands with each other and the West? As you analyze your world through biblical lenses, it s important to be aware of significant global developments. King s Academy has garnered considerable attention among US and international media: Rather revolutionary (TIME) What could be more important in the Middle East than educating open-minded future leaders? (The Sunday Times [London] op-ed) Bringing the best of western education to the Middle East. (NPR) There is a crisis in Arab education. This school [is] about the future trying to pull an education system into the 21 st

Century to build bridges between clashing cultures. (CBS-TV News) Biblical worldview, of course, promotes careful, critical thinking. Many westerners are unaware of how lack of critical thinking permeates Middle Eastern education and, hence, influences international relations. This piece aims to expand readers geopolitical understanding. And, alas, too many western readers lack critical thinking themselves, so this uses current news to help focus attention on that biblical value, a crucial one if we are to communicate cross culturally. As are most of my shorter articles on the Probe Ministries website, this is an op-ed written for secular newspapers. I m honored that you might read it and hope you find it useful. Warm regards, Rusty Wright If you only learn to repeat what you ve been taught and not to think for yourself you may be ill prepared to vote. That s the lesson the Jerusalem-born librarian conveyed as we sat in her office in a brand new boarding school near Madaba, Jordan. When Afaf Kazimi moved to Jordan many years ago and could vote for the first time, she simply cast her ballot on another s recommendation without knowing much about the candidate. I voted for the wrong person, she concluded in hindsight. Much of her early school education had involved rote memorization learning facts for tests, as is common in the Middle East and had lacked training in critical thinking, skills she developed later. Now she s excited to be part of a new experiment that blends Western analytical emphases with

traditional Arab culture, helping students avoid the educational path she and others had to take. Arab Preppies Jordan s King s Academy opened in 2007 with goals of helping students from many nations and different religious backgrounds learn not what to think but how to think. Patterned after Deerfield Academy in Massachusetts, King Abdullah s alma mater, King s looks much like a New England prep school. Think Dead Poets Society or The Emperors Club, coed and transplanted to a desert oasis. Students wear preppie blue blazers and ties, khaki trousers. Many live in dormitories, with faculty house parents. They have service responsibilities in the dining hall and community. Sports aim to cultivate teamwork and discipline. An honor code is being developed. Course offerings involve the humanities, social sciences and hard sciences and include studies in Islam, Christianity, world religions, communication, rhetoric and ethics. Financial aid aims for socioeconomic diversity. Courses are taught in English and Arabic. King Abdulla s Deerfield experience was formative in his young life. It developed lasting relationships. He s a friend of the West. Jordan has led efforts to renounce religious extremism and help religions coexist peacefully. King s Academy hopes its multinational faculty will train future leaders for the Middle East and beyond. Critical Thinking Since I attended Choate, Deerfield s peer (and, my classmates would want me to emphasize, chief rival), I m especially interested in this Jordanian experiment. I m grateful that I learned early to think critically and to ask lots of

questions. King s appears eager to cultivate inquisitive minds. A poster of William Shakespeare hung in the King s library along with promotion for J.R.R. Tolkien and the International Herald Tribune. Broad reading especially of writers with whom you disagree can facilitate learning and enhance communication. Intelligent people are always ready to learn, affirms an ancient proverb. Their ears are open for knowledge (Proverbs 18:15 NLT). How much better to get wisdom than gold, and good judgment than silver! claims another (Proverbs 16:16 NLT). Logical, analytical thinking is, of course, crucial for healthy societies. Sloppy logic can be amusing or devastating: All fish swim. I swim. Therefore, I am a fish. Somewhat similar illogic appears in numerous aberrations: Muslim extremists threaten Western society. Omar is a Muslim. So Omar is a threat to me. Or, American foreign policy undermines my country. You re an American. Thus, you re my enemy. Shallow thinkers can turn illogic into dogma and breed fanaticism. Of course, no school will produce perfect students. George W. Bush s critics might sometimes wonder if his Andover education taught him to think clearly. And if Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had attended Andover, would he and Bush get along? Well, maybe. But please, dont expect miracles. King Abdullah s promising educational venture deserves close scrutiny. Could it become a model to train a new generation of Middle Eastern leaders to shake hands with each other and the West? Copyright 2007 Rusty Wright

Islam in the Modern World: A Christian Perspective When contrasted with the biblical worldview of Christianity, Islam presents a radically different view of God and mankind. Kerby Anderson highlights some of the radical differences between the Christianity of the Bible and the Islam of the Koran. Islam and the Clash of Civilizations Islam is a seventh century religion. For a moment, think about that statement. I doubt anyone would consider Christianity a first century religion. You might acknowledge that it began in the first century, but you wouldn t probably describe it as a religion of the first century because the timeless principles of the gospel have adapted to the times in which they are communicated. In many ways, Islam has remained stuck in the century in which it developed. One of the great questions of the twenty-first century is whether it will adapt to the modern era. Certainly many Muslims have done so, but radical Muslims have not. Perhaps the leading scholar on Islam in this country is the emeritus professor from Princeton University, Bernard Lewis. This is what he had to say about Islam and the modern world: Islam has brought comfort and peace of mind to countless millions of men and women. It has given dignity and meaning to drab and impoverished lives. It has taught people of different races to live in brotherhood and people of different creeds to live side by side in reasonable tolerance. It inspired a great civilization in which others besides Muslims lived creative and useful lives and which, by its achievement, enriched the whole world. But Islam, like

other religions, has also known periods when it inspired in some of its followers a mood of hatred and violence. It is our misfortune that part, though by no means all or even most, of the Muslim world is now going through such a period, and that much, though again not all, of that hatred is directed against us.{1} This certainly does not mean that all Muslims want to engage in jihad warfare against America and the West. But it does mean that there is a growing clash of civilizations.{2} Bernard Lewis continues: In the classical Islamic view, to which many Muslims are beginning to return, the world and all mankind are divided into two: the House of Islam, where the Muslim law and faith prevail, and the rest, known as the House of Unbelief or the House of War, which it is the duty of Muslims ultimately to bring to Islam. It should by now be clear that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is no less than a clash of civilizations the perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo- Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both. It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against the rival.{3} This is the challenge for the twenty-first century. Will Islam adapt to the modern world, or will there continue to be a clash of civilizations?

Muslim Intelligentsia Not everyone accepts the clash of civilizations analysis. William Tucker, writing in the American Spectator, believes that the actual conflict results from what he calls the Muslim Intelligentsia. He says that we are not facing a clash of civilizations so much as a conflict with an educated segment of a civilization that produces some very weird, sexually disoriented men. Poverty has nothing to do with it. It is stunning to meet the al Qaeda roster one highly accomplished scholar after another with advanced degrees in chemistry, biology, medicine, engineering, a large percentage of them educated in the United States. {4} This analysis is contrary to the many statements that have been made in the past that poverty breeds terrorism. While it is certainly true that many recruits for jihad come from impoverished situations, it is also true that the leadership comes from those who are well-educated and highly accomplished. William Tucker believes that those who wish to engage in jihad warfare against the U.S. and the West bear a striking resemblance to the student revolutionaries during the 1960s on American universities. He calls them overprivileged children who he believes need to prove themselves (and their manhood) in the world. He also believes that this is confounded by a polygamous society where fathers are often distant from their sons and where men and women barely encounter each other as young adults. Tucker says that our current conflict with Islam is not a war against a whole civilization. He point out that the jihad warriors are despised as much in their own countries as they are in the West. Egyptians are sick to death of the Muslim Brotherhood and its casual slaughter. The war between

Fundamentalists and secular authorities in Algeria cost 100,000 lives. {5} He concludes that we are effectively at war with a Muslim intelligentsia. These are essentially the same people who brought us the horrors of the French Revolution and 20th century Communism. With their obsession for moral purity and their rational hatred that goes beyond all irrationality, these warrior-intellectuals are wreaking the same havoc in the Middle East as they did in Jacobin France and Mao Tse-tung s China. Certainly we are facing a clash of civilizations between Islam and the West. But it is helpful to understand Tucker s analysis. In any war it is important to know who you are fighting and what their motives might be. This understanding is one more important piece of the puzzle in the war on terrorism. Extent of the Radical Muslim Threat What is the extent of the threat from radical Muslims? This is hard to guess, but there are some commentators who have tried to provide a reasonable estimate. Dennis Prager provides an overview of the extent of the threat: Anyone else sees the contemporary reality the genocidal Islamic regime in Sudan; the widespread Muslim theological and emotional support for the killing of a Muslim who converts to another religion; the absence of freedom in Muslim-majority countries; the widespread support for Palestinians who randomly murder Israelis; the primitive state in which women are kept in many Muslim countries; the celebration of death; the honor killings of daughters, and so much else that is terrible in significant parts of the Muslim world knows that civilized humanity has a new evil to fight.{6}

He argues that just as previous generations had to fight the Nazis and the communists, so this generation has to confront militant Islam. But he also notes something is dramatically different about the present Muslim threat. He says: Far fewer people believed in Nazism or in communism than believe in Islam generally or in authoritarian Islam specifically. There are one billion Muslims in the world. If just 10 percent believe in the Islam of Hamas, the Taliban, the Sudanese regime, Saudi Arabia, Wahhabism, bin Laden, Islamic Jihad, the Finley Park Mosque in London or Hizbollah and it is inconceivable that only one of 10 Muslims supports any of these groups ideologies that means a true believing enemy of at least 100 million people.{7} This very large number of people poses a threat that is unprecedented. Never has civilization has to confront such large numbers of those would wish to destroy civilization. So what is the threat in the United States? Columnist Douglas MacKinnon has some chilling statistics. While he recognizes that most Muslims in the U.S. are peace-loving, he begins to break down the percentages. He says: [I]f we accept the estimate that there are 6 million Muslim- Americans in our country, and 99% of them are law abiding citizens who are loyal to our nation, then that means that there may be may be 1% who might put a twisted version of Islamic extremism before the wellbeing of their fellow Americans. When you stop to think that 1% of 6 million is 60,000 individuals, that then seems like a very intimidating one percent. Let s go to the good side of extreme and say that 99.9 percent of all Muslim-Americans would never turn on their own government. That would still leave a questionable 1/10th one percent or 6,000 potential terrorist sympathizers.{8}

You can see that even the most conservative estimate of possible jihad warriors in this country results in a scary scenario for the future. Women in Islam One of the areas where Islam has had difficulty in adapting to the modern world has been in its treatment of women. While some Muslim leaders actually claim that Islam actually liberates women, contemporary examples prove otherwise. Women who lived under Taliban rule in Afghanistan or who live under Sharia law in many Muslim countries today do not enjoy equal rights. While it is true that many Muslims do respect and honor women, it is not true that those ideas can be found in the Qur an. Here are just a few passages that illustrate the way women are to be treated. According to the Qur an, women are considered inferior to men: Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other (Sura 4:34). The Qur an also restricts a woman s testimony in court. According to Sura 2:282, her testimony is worth half as much as that of a man. Polygamy is sanctioned in Islam, and practiced in many Muslim countries. Sura 4:3 says, If we fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if we fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with them, then only one, or a captive that your hand possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice. Women in many Muslim countries cover their faces. The justification for that can be found in the Qur an that teaches that women must lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what must ordinarily appear thereof: that they should draw

their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers (Sura 24:31). Women in many Muslim countries cannot leave their house alone. Again, this is part of Islamic law. It states that a husband may forbid his wife to leave the home. {9} It also places other requirements. For example, a woman may not leave the city without her husband or a member of her unmarriageable kin accompanying her, unless the journey is obligatory, like the hajj. It is unlawful for her to travel otherwise, and unlawful for her husband to allow her to. {10} Not only was this practiced in Afghanistan under the Taliban, it is found in countries like Saudi Arabia. In that country, women cannot drive nor can they leave their home without being accompanied by a male family member. Amnesty International reports that women in Saudi Arabia who walk unaccompanied, or are in the company of a man who is neither their husband nor close relative, are at risk of arrest on suspicion of prostitution or other moral offenses.{11} Church and State in Islam Islam and the West differ on many fundamental issues, but one of the most significant is whether the institutions of church and state should be separated. Hundreds of years of Western tradition have demonstrated the wisdom of keeping these institutions separated and the danger that ensues when the ecclesiastical and civil institutions are melded into one. Bernard Lewis explains that no such separation exists in Islam: In [the Islamic] world, religion embraces far more than it does in the Christian or post-christian world. We are accustomed to talking of church and state and a whole series of pairs of words that go with them lay and ecclesiastical, secular and religious, spiritual and temporal, and so on.

These pairs of words simply do not exist in classical Islamic terminology because the dichotomy that these words express is unknown.{12} Since the words (and the concepts) do not exist in Islam, it becomes difficult to see how to form democracies in the Muslim world. Essential to the functioning of these governments is a belief in the separation of powers. This would not only include a horizontal separation of powers (executive, legislative, and judicial), but a religious separations of powers (ecclesiastical and civil). Chuck Colson says that Islam is a theocratic belief system. It believes in not just a state church, but a church state. And so, it doesn t advance like Christianity does. These are radically different views of reality. {13} This leads to another fundamental difference between Islam and Christianity. As we have discussed in previous articles,{14} Islam historically has advanced by force or compulsion. Chuck Colson puts it this way: Christianity advances by love, it advances by winning people over, it advances by the grace of God; radical Islam advances by force. {15} Even within Muslim countries, Islam advances by compulsion. But it is important to point out that the Qur an (2:256) says there is no compulsion in religion. But that really depends upon your definition of compulsion. A closer look at Islamic law demonstrates a veiled threat that many believe is tantamount to compulsion. For example, Muhammad instructed his followers to invite non-muslims to accept Islam before waging war against them. If they refused, warfare would follow or second class status. They would be inferiors in the Muslim social order and pay a special tax. This tax (known as the jizya) is required in Sura 9:29. If they pay it, they may live, but if they refuse to pay it, warfare will ensue.

While those of us in the West would consider this compulsion, the traditional Muslim interpretation of this would be that this would fit into the category of no compulsion. Notes 1. Bernard Lewis, The Roots of Muslim Rage, Atlantic Monthly, September 1990, www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/199009/muslim-rage. 2. See my The Clash of Civilizations, Probe Ministries, 2002, www.probe.org/the-clash-of-civilizations/. 3. Lewis, The Roots of Muslim Rage. 4. William Tucker, Overprivileged Children, American Spectator, 12 Sept. 2006, www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10342. 5. Ibid. 6. Dennis Prager, The Islamic Threat is Greater than German and Soviets Threats Were, 29 May 2006, http://tinyurl.com/yy7jcg. 7. Ibid. 8. Douglas MacKinnon, Home grown terrorists, 25 Aug. 2006, http://tinyurl.com/t77qf. 9. Umdat al-salik, (manual of Islamic law), m 10.4 >10. Ibid., m 10.3 11. Amnesty International, Saudi Arabia: End Secrecy End Suffering: Women, www.amnesty.org/ailib/intcam/saudi/briefing/4.html. 12. Bernard Lewis, Window on Islam, Dallas Morning News, 9 July 2006, 4P.

13. Interview with Chuck Colson, Worldviews in Conflict: Christianity & Islam, Intercessors for America Newsletter, September 2006, Vol. 33, No. 9. >14. See Don Closson, Islam and the Sword, Probe Ministries, 2002. www.probe.org/islam-and-the-sword/. 15. Colson, Worldviews. 2007 Probe Ministries What About All the Violence and Conquering in the Name of the Christian God? Just read your answer to email on the Pope s inflammatory remarks about Islam, and I had a question about this statement: Muslims certainly cannot deny that Mohammed admonished Muslims to pick up their swords for Allahs cause (see my essay Islam and the Sword at Probe.org). They also cannot ignore the fact that Islam conquered both the Persian and Byzantine Empires via warfare. While both statements are or may in fact be true, one we Christians cannot deny that as much violence and conquering has been done in the name of God. One should be careful about removing the speck from a brother s eye before taking the log

out of his own. Actually, I believe Christian war preceded Islamic war. I am not discounting the evil done in the name of Christ, and of course there were Christians fighting before there were Muslims since Christianity preceded Islam by six centuries. My point is about their very nature as belief systems. When one compares the actions of Christ with the actions of Mohammed, the lives of the apostles with the lives of Mohammeds companions, and the teaching found in the New Testament with what is taught in the Quran, one finds a distinct difference in the role that violence plays. Even when we compare the early history of the two religions we find that Christianity went through a three hundred year period of persecution while Islam conquered a region stretching from Spain to India, experienced three civil wars, and had three of its first four caliphs assassinated by other Muslims. There is also the distinction to be made between individuals committing violence and vengeful acts, and the responsibility of governments or kings to uphold justice and protect their people from harm. There has been a 1,400 year conflict going on between the civilization that has constituted Europe after the Roman Empire fell and the Islamic world. For most of that time Europe was on the defensive side of things. Not until the late 17th century did the Islamic threat diminish after their failure to take Vienna and the Ottoman Empire was forced to sign the treaty of Karlowitz in 1699. One also has to remember that Islam is both a religion and a political system; it does not recognize a separation between church and state. When a western nation acts against a Muslim one it is not Christianity vs. Islam, it is a political entity, democratic or otherwise, deciding to act against a religious/political entity. All of this to say that while we can point to atrocities done in the name of Christ, they have no support in the New

Testament. However, atrocities done in the name of Islam have explicit models in the life of Mohammed and can find justification and support in the Quran. None of this discussion discounts our obligation as ambassadors for Christ to love and reach out to individual Muslims in humility and with compassion. Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Don Closson 2007 Probe Ministries The Pope s Inflammatory Remarks about Islam How would you access Pope Benedict XVI remarks in his lecture on Faith, Reason and the University: Memories and Reflections? and Islamic reaction? What was the essence of his lecture that infuriated the Islamic World? Thank you for your question regarding the Pope s comments on Islam and the resulting violent response from the Muslim world. Not being a Roman Catholic, I do not usually read the Pope s speeches. However, given the worldwide outrage by Muslims, I thought it important to understand what has caused such an intense reaction to his lecture at the University of Regensburg. The speech was rather academic and mostly focused on the relationship between faith and reason in the Christian

tradition. In it, the Pope gave quotes from the Byzantine Emperor Manuel II to a Persian Muslim during the siege of Constantinople in the late 14th century. The exact quote of the Emperor is Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached. The Emperor went on to argue that spreading any religion by the sword is by nature unreasonable. The irony of the situation we find ourselves in today is amazing. We now have Muslims burning churches, threatening to kill the Pope, and destroy the west, because he implied that Mohammed advocated the use of the sword to spread and protect the Muslim faith. It is equivalent to punching someone in the face because they called you pugilistic. Muslims certainly cannot deny that Mohammed admonished Muslims to pick up their swords for Allah s cause (see my essay Islam and the Sword at Probe.org). They also cannot ignore the fact that Islam conquered both the Persian and Byzantine Empires via warfare. Had it not been for the victory at Tours by Charles Martel, all of Europe would have fallen to the Islamic invaders. When anyone in the west speaks against violence done in the name of Allah, Muslims are quick to equate the written word with aggression against Islam which then justifies all sorts of violent acts in defense of Islam and its Prophet. I can only hope that the media and our politicians will wake up to the double standard that occurs when words or ideas are equated with violent acts. Don Closson 2006 Probe Ministries

Islam and Political Correctness Muhammad and Islam Nearly everyone can remember what they were doing on September 11, 2001. That fateful day affected all of us and certainly increased our desire to know more about Islam. In the years following, we have all learned more about the world s second largest religion. But sometimes, political correctness has clouded clear thinking about Islam. We hear that Islam is a religion of peace. Some even say, The God of Islam is the same God as the God of the Jews and the Christians. So what is the truth about these statements about Islam? I want to look at some of these statements and provide a biblically-based response. We need to know the facts about Islam and this current war on terror. The first statement we will address is often heard in religion classes on college campuses. That is that Muhammad is like every other religious founder. This simply is not the case. For example, nearly every major religion in the world teaches a variation of the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Islam does not have a Golden Rule. Instead, it makes very definite distinctions in the way Muslims are to treat believers and unbelievers. The latter are called infidels and are often treated harshly or killed. This religious perspective is very different from other religions.

For a moment, let s compare Jesus and Muhammad. Muslims believe that Muhammad is the final prophet from Allah. He is referred to as the seal of the prophets (Sura 33:40). But while he is revered as the greatest of the prophets, most do not teach that he was sinless. The Qur an does not make the claim that he was sinless, and there are passages that teach that Muhammad was a man like us (Sura 18:110) and that Allah told Muhammad that he must repent of his sins (Sura 40:55). By contrast, Jesus claimed to be God and claimed to have the powers and authority that only God could possess. The New Testament provides eyewitness accounts or records of eyewitness accounts of the claims that Jesus made and the miracles he performed. Moreover, the New Testament teaches that Jesus Christ lived a perfect and sinless life (2 Cor. 5:21). Muhammad s every action is to be imitated by Muslims. His life is a model for these believers. Some Muslims even avoid eating food that Muhammad avoided or never was able to eat. In fact, Muhammad is so revered by Muslims that no perceived criticism upon him or even his likeness (e.g., through a cartoon) may be allowed. Muhammad also taught that Muslims are to fight in the cause of Allah (Sura 4:76) and fight against the unbelievers (Sura 9:123). By contrast, Jesus taught that Christians are to love their enemies (Matt. 5:44) and turn the other cheek (Matt. 5:39). In conclusion, we can see that the life of Muhammad is different from many of the other founders of religion. Moreover, the life of Muhammad and the life of Jesus Christ are very different.

Islam: A Religion of Peace? One politically correct phrase that is often repeated is that Islam is a religion of peace. While it is true that many Muslims are peace-loving, is it also true that Islam is a religion of peace? To answer that question, it is important to understand the meaning of jihad. The word jihad is actually the noun of the Arabic verb jahidi, which means to strive hard. This verse is an example: O Prophet! Strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell, and evil refuge indeed (Sura 9:73). Although some Muslims understand this striving to be merely intellectual and philosophical, the usual translation of jihad involves a holy war. That has been the traditional interpretation since the time of Muhammad. Jihad was to be waged on the battlefield. Sura 47:4 says, When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield, strike off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly. Sura 9:5 says, Fight and slay the pagans wherever you find them, and seize them, beleager them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem. Consider some of these other passages concerning jihad. Faithful Muslims wage jihad against unbelievers: O ye who believe! Fight the unbelievers who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you; and know that Allah is with those who fear Him (Sura 9:123). Muslims are also to wage jihad not only against unbelievers but against those who have strayed from the faith: Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: and evil fate (Sura 9:73). Another way to understand the term jihad is to look at the