FILED AUG Q APPELLANT RODERICK G. FORIEST NO KA-2025 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

FILED AUG IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPCO py APPELLANT MICHAEL BENARD MILLER NO.2007-KA-1994 APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

STATE OF OHIO ERIC SMITH

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRANDY NICOLE WILLIAMS NO KA-1839-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO KA COA APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK BERNARD GILES NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RONNIE AND DIANNE ROBERTSON APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO CA BRIEF OF APPELLANT

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 98-CF-273. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (F )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE JOHNSON, III NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC J.B.PARKER, Appellant, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MEIGS COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO DARREN MONROE

Court of Appeals of Ohio

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

FINAL ORDER AND OPINION REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Appellant, Donald Dale Smith, Jr. ( Smith ), timely appeals the trial court s judgment for

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR CLARK COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 06 CR 1487

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

STATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2011

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008

[Cite as State v. Smith, 2009-Ohio-5692.] Court of Appeals of Ohio. vs. DONNELL SMITH JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED

IN COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED NOTICE. August 19, No STAN SMITH, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

No. 48,126-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

RENDERED: AUGUST 31, 2001; 10:00 a.m. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED NO CA MR WAL-MART STORES, INC. OPINION REVERSING AND REMANDING ** ** ** ** **

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-CA-01763

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3532

In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Center on Wrongful Convictions

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P APPEAL OF: DAVID SANTUCCI No EDA 2014

No. 51,498-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,499 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CLETE ADAM HARGIS, Appellant.

USA v. Glenn Flemming

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

E-Filed Document May :58: KA COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.

Supreme Court of Florida

VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY

No. 48,458-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

Supreme Court of Florida

Case 1:12-cv RJS Document 8 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 8

Marc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore

v. CASE NO CC-00816

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MAINE CHRISTIAN NIELSEN. [ 1] Christian Nielsen appeals from a judgment of conviction entered in the

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. THOMAS C. and PAMELA McINTOSH

JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2010

No. 104,839 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, CASSIDY LEE SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,123 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,

Marshall Lee Gore vs State of Florida

TABLE OF CONTENTS. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii-iii REPLY ARGUMENT... 1 THE BOARD WAS NOT ENTITLED TO JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT.

Page 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,220 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. NATHAN D. SMITH, Appellant, STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee.

State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: v. Case No. 2008CF Motion to Suppress Statements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc). Affirmed.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 12, 2008

COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Plaintiff, Defendant. hearing before the Honorable Daniel C. Moreno, one of

NO KA-1557 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL EARL PAYNE, JR. FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

Trial Roles. Attorney Witness Research Assistant Jury Prepare testimony with witnesses Prepare questions for crossexamination

BEFORE THE FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSION STATE OF FLORIDA AMENDED NOTICE OF FORMAL CHARGES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed November 15, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Robert Hanson,

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT CRITTENDEN COUNTY APPELLEES SECOND MOTION AND BRIEF FOR RECONSIDERATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 13, 2005 Session

United States Court of Appeals

Decided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT SECOND MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON APPEA L

MARION F. EDWARDS CHIEF JUDGE

Warfield Raymond Wike v. State of Florida

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed October 6, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Webster County, Kurt L.

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 114,039 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. HILTON PLASTER COMPANY, INC., Appellee, MEMORANDUM OPINION

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEL YNN DELSHAE PITTMAN

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

INTRODUCTION. The State of Minnesota submits this memorandum of law to address the evidence

Court of Appeals of Ohio

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

Transcription:

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TIlE STATE OF MlS~gp" RODERICK G. FORIEST VS. FILED AUG Q 72008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COUR{ COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2007-KA-2025 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: STEPHANIE B. WOOD SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL MISSISSIPPI BAR NO. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MS 39205-0220 TELEPHONE: (601) 359-3680

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES... ii STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES... 1 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS... 1 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 3 ARGUMENT... 3 CONCLUSION... 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 6

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES STATE CASES McClain v. State, 625 So.2d 774, 781 (Miss.1993)... 3 Pierce v. State, 860 So.2d 855 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003)... 3 Thomas v. State, 754 So.2d 579, 582 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000)... 4 11

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODERICK G. FORIEST APPELLANT VS. NO.2007-KA-2025 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES THE VERDICT WAS NOT AGAINST THE OVERWHELMING WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS On April 10, 2006, two confidential informants were searched, wired, and sent out to buy drugs with State issued marked cash. (Transcript p. 131-135). One of the confidential informants, Joey Boone made contact with Curtis Hart. (Transcript p. 137). Mr. Boone informed Mr. Hart that he was looking for some "white" (slang for powder cocaine). (Transcript p. 137). Mr. Hart responded that he did not have any "white" but only had "hard" (slang for crack cocaine). (Transcript p. 137). Mr. Boone replied that he wanted an eight ball of "white" (approximately 3.5 ounces). (Transcript p. 137). Mr. Hart then asked what Mr. Boone would be willing to pay for an eight ball and Mr. Boone replied $150. (Transcript p. 138). After some additional conversation, Mr. Hart told Mr. Boone to make the block. (Transcript p. 138). I

When Mr. Boone returned there was another person in the truck with Mr. Hart, the Defendant, Roderick Foriest. (Transcript p. 140). Mr. Hart then informed Mr. Boone that he could get the "white." (Transcript p. 171). The two began negotiating the price. (Transcript p. 171). During these negotiations, Foriest told Mr. Hart what to say and told him the price. (Transcript p. 164, 181, and 185). Mr. Boone was told to make the block and meet up at the Amoco Station across from Builder's Mart. (Transcript p. 171). The Amoco Station is less than 1500 feet from Tylertown Methodist Church. (Transcript p. 144). After Mr. Boone arrived at the Amoco Station, Mr. Hart asked him to look under the hood of his truck. (Transcript p. 175). He did and found a small box under the hood with the cocaine inside. (Transcript p. 175). Mr. Boone gave him $150. (Transcript p. 175). After the sale, the confidential informants returned to the preestablished meeting place to be searched and to tum over the wire and cocaine. (Transcript p. 149 - ISO). It was later determined that Mr. Boone purchased approximately 3.1 ounces of cocaine. (Transcript p. 201). At trial, Billy Warner ofthe Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics testified to the following: It was on August the 14th. We were in this courtroom on another matter. 1 was present, and Mr. Foriest was present on other matters. And we began to leave the courtroom area to go through the chambers into the law library, and Mr. Foriest asked me if! had a drug case on him. And 1 answered to him that 1 might have one, you know,just in conversation, and he said, "I know when it was." He said, "It was that white boy that day, 3.5 grams." And 1 said, "Yeah," 1 said, "it might be. That might be when it was." And he continued to talk with me as we were walking out, and he said, "I'll take a plea to that." He said, "I'll take a plea to that to do about three years." And 1 said, "Well, we'll just see." And we kind of kept on walking and going on through the law library around towards the elevator, and he said, "Yeah, I'll take a plea to that ifol'curtdon't hold up for it." And got on the elevator, and 1 went on up to the courtroom, left the court house... Yeah, he said that - - he said if somebody told him they had a drug case on him, he said nine out of ten they'd be right. 2

(Transcript p. 159). Gary McBeth testified that he overheard this same conversation. (Transcript p. 193-196). Foriest was convicted of the sale of cocaine within 1500 feet of a church and conspiracy to sell cocaine. He was sentenced as a habitual offender to life in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT The trial court properly denied Foriest's motion for new trial as the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. ARGUMENT Foriest argues that "the trial court erred in denying [his] motion for a new trial because the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence." (Appellant's Brief p. 5). The appellate standard of review for claims that a conviction is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence is as follows: [This court] must accept as true the evidence which supports the verdict and will reverse only when convinced that the circuit court has abused its discretion in failing to grant a new trial. A new trial will not be ordered unless the verdict is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence that to allow it to stand would sanction an "unconscionable injustice." Pierce v. State, 860 So.2d 855 (Miss. Ct. App. 2003) (quoting Smith v. State, 802 So.2d 82, 85-86 (Miss. 200 I )). On review, the Court must accept as true all evidence favorable to the State. McClain v. State, 625 So.2d 774,781 (Miss. 1993). The evidence at trial clearly established Foriest sold cocaine within 1500 feet ofa church and conspired to sell cocaine. First, both the confidential informant, Mr. Boone, and Officer Warner testified to Foriest's involvement in the sale and in conspiring to sell cocaine. For example, both testified that Foriest told Mr. Hart what to say during the price negotiations. (Transcript p. 164 and 181). Also both testified that the "white" only became available after Foriest entered the picture. 3

(Transcript p. 165 and 180). Additionally, Officer Warner testified as follows regarding Foriest's involvement: As I said, they - - upon pulling back up beside the vehicle, they go right back through the same conversation they initially had. And every time Mr. Hart would look over to the informant, the informant states something, then Mr. Foriest, he would be looking at him while he's saying it, and then when he finishes talking he'll turn and put his hand by his mouth, say something to Mr. Hart. Mr. Hart will turn and speak back to the informant. (Transcript p. 143). Moreover, Mr. Hart testified that Foriest gave him the cocaine to sell and that he gave the $150 to Foriest after the sale. (Transcript p. 184, 186, and 187). He also testified that while Foriest was in the truck, he told Mr. Hart the price of the cocaine and instructed him regarding how to make the sale. (Transcript p. 185). In fact, Mr. Hart specifically testified that he sold the cocaine for Foriest. (Transcript p. 191). Nonetheless, Foriest argues that "the testimony of Curtis [Hart] is the only evidence that Foriest was involved in the sale of cocaine" and that "no reasonable jury could put any faith into his testimony." (Appellant's Briefp. 6). However, as set forth above, there is ample evidence outside Mr. Hart's testimony which links Foriest to the crimes. Furthermore, it is well-established Mississippi law that "the jury is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the witnesses." Thomas v. State, 754 So.2d 579, 582 (Miss. Ct. App. 2000)(citing Miller v. State, 634 So.2d 127, 129 (Miss. 1994)). Accordingly, the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and the trial court properly denied Foriest's motion for new trial. 4

CONCLUSION The State of Mississippi respectfully requests that this Honorable Court affirm the conviction and sentence of Roderick Foriest as the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Respectfully submitted, JIM HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MS 39205-0220 TELEPHONE: (601) 359-3680 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Stephanie B. Wood, Special Assistant Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, do hereby certify that I have this day mailed, postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE to the following: Honorable Michael M. Taylor Circuit Court Judge P. O. Drawer 1350 Brookhaven, MS 39602 Honorable DeWitt (Dee) Bates, Jr. District Attorney 284 E. Bay Street Magnolia, MS 39652 Benjamin A. Suber, Esquire Attorney At Law Mississippi Office ofindigent Appeals 301 North Lamar Street, Suite 210 Jackson, Mississippi 39201 This the 7th day of August, 2008. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL POST OFFICE BOX 220 JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205-0220 TELEPHONE: (601) 359-3680 ~hcml1fjoo STEPHANIE B. WOOD SPECIAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 6