Cataloging Apologetic Systems. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.

Similar documents
Classical Apologetics:

Select Bibliography on Apologetic Systems

Presuppositional Apologetics

WEEK 4: APOLOGETICS AS PROOF

Presuppositional Apologetics

Lecture overview. Christian Apologetics 20/02/2017. Apologetics across history. Class activity 2.1. Apologetics across history

this resource was printed from bethinking.org

Birmingham Theological Seminary 2200 Briarwood Way Birmingham, Alabama COURSE OBJECTIVES COURSE TEXTS

Positions on the Theistic Arguments

Chapter Summaries: Three Types of Religious Philosophy by Clark, Chapter 1

THE APOLOGETICAL VALUE OF THE SELF-WITNESS OF SCRIPTURE

The Existence of God

Faith, Reason, or Both? or Man's Word? God's Word. Presuppositional vs. Classical Apologetics. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.

FIDEISM AND PRESUPPOSITIONALISM

Christian Apologetics PHIL5301 New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Defend 2019

Five Views On Apologetics (Counterpoints: Bible And Theology) PDF

Midway Community Church "Hot Topics" Young Earth Presuppositionalism: Handout 1 1 Richard G. Howe, Ph.D.

A Positive Case for the Primacy of an Evidential Apologetic Method

LIBERTY UNIVERSITY EVIDENTIAL APOLOGETICS: JUST THE FACTS APOLOGETIC METHOD ANALYSIS SUBMITTED TO ADONIS VIDU

A Critique of Reformed Epistemology

Apologetics Defending the Faith

A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena

Classical Presuppositional Apologetics: Re-introducing an Old Theme

Reformation. &",evival. A Quarterly Journal for Church Leadership

The Rationality of Religious Beliefs By Michael Cariño

TH 505 Apologetics - Defending the Faith Summer 2013 Phoenix Seminary

COURSE SYLLABUS. Course Description

Traditional Apologetics. Van Til found seven problems in classical apologetics:

Thaddeus M. Maharaj: Cornelius Van Til The Grandfather of Presuppositional Apologetics

Apologetic Method. Jacob D. Hantla

Birmingham Theological Seminary 2200 Briarwood Way Birmingham, Alabama COURSE PURPOSE COURSE OBJECTIVES COURSE TEXTS

Comunicación y Gerencia. The Challenge. Introduction to The Apologetics Ministry of Calvary Chapel Corona

Cornelius Van Til: An Analysis of his Thought Reviewed by W. Gary Crampton

BETWEEN SCYLLA AND CHARYBDIS: PRESUPPOSITIONALISM, CIRCULAR REASONING, AND THE CHARGE OF FIDEISM. Joseph E. Torres

Theistic Apologetics Dennis McCallum and Gary DeLashmutt

ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION

In Defense of Reason in Religion

Calvin, John. Apologetics of John Calvin.

An Analytical Presentation of Cornelius Van Til s Transcendental Argument from Predication

THCM : Introduction to Christian Apologetics Spring 2019 (Term 193)

Alvin Plantinga An Evaluation of Reformed Epistemology. Jessica Wagner Patrick Henry College

Exploring Approaches to Apologetics

Exploring Approaches to Apologetics

No Dilemma for the Proponent of the Transcendental Argument: A Response to David Reiter

Exams: 60% Project: 30% Class Participation: 10%

Evidence and Transcendence

History of Philosophy and Christian Thought (02ST504) Reformed Theological Seminary Orlando, FL Spring 2019

True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs

NOT CLASSICAL, COVENANTAL

Copyright 2013 Pradeep Tilak

Scholarly Resources from Concordia Seminary. Concordia Seminary - Saint Louis. Kirk Clayton Concordia Seminary, St. Louis,

How to Make a Case for the Inspiration of Scripture in the Current Milieu

This is where apologetics becomes important. Because we know we re not preaching at blank slates.

Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS

The British Empiricism

Thaddeus Maharaj Book Review: Greg L. Bahnsen - Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended

Exploring Approaches to Apologetics

Apologetics 02ST530 Reformed Theological Seminary Orlando, FL Fall 2017

TCA:ICT? Thinking Critically About: "Is Christianity True?"

Introduction to Christian Apologetics June 1 st and 8 th

David L. Allen, Dean of the School of Theology, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary

SYLLABUS Southern Evangelical Seminary

Mixed Apologetic Approaches: How to be an MMA Witness for Christ. 1 Corinthians 9:

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO APOLOGETICS

Apologetics. by Johan D. Tangelder

IS KIERKEGAARD S RADICAL FAITH A DEFENSIBLE JUSTIFICATION FOR RELIGIOUS BELIEF? Peter Gn

In 2003, Mikel was ordained as a missionary by the Baptist General Conference and is a current member of the Evangelical Theological Society.

APOLOGIA PRAKTIKOS (PRAGMATIC APOLOGETICS): TOWARD A PRACTICAL-PASTORAL THEOLOGY FOR CONTEMPORARY APOLOGETICS TRAINING IN THE LOCAL CHURCH

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?

Miracles: A Philosophy, Theology, and Apologetic

Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS

Contemporary Theology II: From Theology of Hope to Postmodernism. Introduction: Review and Preview. ST507 LESSON 01 of 24

Religious Epistemology

Module 1-4: Spirituality and Rationality

Cornelius Van Til John W. Robbins. The Mythological Van Til

The Necessity of Gordon Clark by B.K. Campbell

Epistemology. PH654 Bethel Seminary Winter To be able to better understand and evaluate the sources, methods, and limits of human knowing,

A Presuppositional Response to the Problem of Evil

Van Til and Transcendental Argument Revisited 1

TYPES OF APOLOGETICS. Psalms 19; Romans 1

PH 501 Introduction to Philosophy of Religion

Paradox And Truth. Ralph A. Smith. Rethinking Van Til On the Trinity by comparing Van Til, Plantinga, and Kuyper. Mo s c ow, Ida h o

PURITAN REFORMED THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CHAPTER SUMMARY AND EVALUATION OF REASON FOR THE HOPE WITHIN SUBMITTED TO DR. JAMES GRIER

THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE

Common Misunderstandings of Van Til s Apologetics. by Dr. Richard L. Pratt, Jr. Part 2 of 2

Has Modernity Shown All Arguments for the Existence of God to be Wrong?

PH 501 Philosophy of Christian Religion

A Proposal on the Occasion and the Method of Presenting Evidence within a Van Tillian Framework

Who Has the Burden of Proof? Must the Christian Provide Adequate Reasons for Christian Beliefs?

Trinitarianism. Millard Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 290. Copyright , Reclaiming the Mind Ministries.

The following paper was originally presented at the Southwest Regional Evangelical

Preliminary Apologetics Syllabus Dr. Timothy McGrew, July 2012

Review of Apologetics to the Glory of God: An Introduction, by John M. Frame, (Phillipsburg: P & R Publishing Co., 1994) $14.99, paper. 265 pages.

Apologetics. (Part 1 of 2) What is it? What are a couple of the different types? Is one type better than the other?

Jesus and the Inspiration of Scripture

Contemporary Theology I: Hegel to Death of God Theologies

The problem of common ground in Christian apologetics: towards an integral approach Joongjae Lee

A Presuppositional Rejection of Enlightenment Evidentialism

ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY

Transcription:

Cataloging Apologetic Systems Richard G. Howe, Ph.D. Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 1

According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy Systems Stressing Natural Theology Systems Stressing Revelation According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy Systems Stressing Natural Theology Systems Stressing Revelation 2

Blaise Pascal 1623-1662 Søren Kierkegaard 1813-1855 Emil Brunner 1889-1966 Characteristics of Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy stress upon the inward and subjective experience of the gospel a marked hostility towards traditional philosophy and a sympathy for an existential philosophy 3

Characteristics of Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy emphasis upon the supra-rational or paradoxical character of Christian teaching rejection of natural theology and theistic proof Characteristics of Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy emphasis on the transcendence or hiddenness of God strong doctrine of the blinding effects of sin the apologetic of one's own personal testimony 4

According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy Systems Stressing Natural Theology Systems Stressing Revelation Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274 Joseph Butler 1692-1752 F. R. Tennant 1866-1957 5

Characteristics of Systems Stressing Natural Theology a robust faith in the rational powers of the mind to find the truth about religion an effort to ground faith in the empirical foundations Characteristics of Systems Stressing Natural Theology a belief that the imago Dei (image of God in man) was weakened but not seriously damaged by the Fall and sin religious propositions enjoy the same kind of verification that scientific assertions do 6

According to Bernard Ramm Varieties of Christian Apologetics Systems Stressing Subjective Immediacy Systems Stressing Natural Theology Systems Stressing Revelation Augustine AD 354-AD 430 John Calvin 1509-1564 Abraham Kuyper 1837-1920 7

Characteristics of Systems Stressing Revelation conviction that faith precedes understanding once we do believe, we are to seek understanding as comprehensively as we can Characteristics of Systems Stressing Revelation the personal experience of the gospel is anchored in the objective work of Christ, the objective justification of God, and the objective word of God a special act of the Spirit is indispensable for Christian faith and enlightenment 8

Characteristics of Systems Stressing Revelation human depravity has made human reason as it functions within a depraved soul untrustworthy truth in religion must suffer no dilution Gordon R. Lewis 1926-2016 9

According to Gordon Lewis: Testing Christianity's Truth Claims Pure Empiricism Rational Empiricism Rationalism Biblical Authoritarianism Mysticism Verificational Approach According to Gordon Lewis: Testing Christianity's Truth Claims Pure Empiricism Rational Empiricism Rationalism Biblical Authoritarianism Mysticism Verificational Approach 10

J. Oliver Buswell 1895-1977 Characteristics of Pure Empiricism examines observable evidence mind is a blank tablet (tabula rasa) uses induction no claim is shown to be true beyond a high degree of probability 11

According to Gordon Lewis: Testing Christianity's Truth Claims Pure Empiricism Rational Empiricism Rationalism Biblical Authoritarianism Mysticism Verificational Approach Stuart Hackett 1925-2012 12

Characteristics of Rational Empiricism truth of Christianity can be conclusively proven mind brings with it to the investigation certain "built-in" principles which make valid conclusions certain Characteristics of Rational Empiricism with these principles the mind systematizes its experiences and draws necessary conclusions a true conclusion coheres with the mind's categories and the facts of experience 13

According to Gordon Lewis: Testing Christianity's Truth Claims Pure Empiricism Rational Empiricism Rationalism Biblical Authoritarianism Mysticism Verificational Approach Gordon H. Clark 1902-1985 14

Characteristics of Rationalism agrees with Hackett that the mind has principles of reasoning "programmed in" disagrees with Hackett that the starting point of thought is objective experience Characteristics of Rationalism "Any attempt to discover objective facts without an interpretative principle is press to the logical extreme of skepticism."* scientific knowledge about reality is not possible *[Gordon R. Lewis, Testing Christianity's Truth Claims (Chicago: Moody Press, 1976), 37] 15

Characteristics of Rationalism Rather, the interpretive system that gives the most consistent system is true. Everyone comes to the evidence with presuppositions. Characteristics of Rationalism Existence of God and the truth of the Bible are fundamental axioms necessary to all thought about Christianity. Starting with these, one can deduce a consistent system of philosophy with the certainty of logical syllogisms. 16

According to Gordon Lewis: Testing Christianity's Truth Claims Pure Empiricism Rational Empiricism Rationalism Biblical Authoritarianism Mysticism Verificational Approach Cornelius Van Til 1902-1985 17

Characteristics of Biblical Authoritarianism Begins with the presupposition of the triune God and the truth of Scripture. They are not justified by their consistency or confirmation by facts. Characteristics of Biblical Authoritarianism Only by starting with these presuppositions can one interpret facts according to their true meaning. In principle there is no epistemological common ground with those who start thinking from non-christian assumptions. 18

According to Gordon Lewis: Testing Christianity's Truth Claims Pure Empiricism Rational Empiricism Rationalism Biblical Authoritarianism Mysticism Verificational Approach not Earl E. Barrett 19

not Earl E. Barrett Earl E. Barrett 20

Characteristics of Mysticism "The case for Christianity is more significant from internal and immediate experience of God Himself.* "No argument is considered convincing until a person has a unique, personal encounter with God."* *[Lewis, Testing, p. 37, 38] According to Gordon Lewis: Testing Christianity's Truth Claims Pure Empiricism Rational Empiricism Rationalism Biblical Authoritarianism Mysticism Verificational Approach 21

Edward John Carnell 1919-1967 Characteristics of the Vericational Approach Treats Christianity's truth-claims as scientific hypothesis to be verified by man's total experience "The hypothesis that can consistently account for both internal and external data with the fewest difficulties is true."* *[Lewis, Testing p. 38] 22

Norman L. Geisler According to Norman Geisler: Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics Classical Evidential Experiential Historical Presuppositional 23

According to Norman Geisler: Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics Classical Evidential Experiential Historical Presuppositional Anselm 1033-1109 Thomas Aquinas 1225-1274 John Locke 1632-1704 William Paley 1743-1805 B. B. Warfield 1851-1921 C. S. Lewis 1898-1963 Norman Geisler John Gerstner 1914-1996 Stuart Hackett 1925-2012 R. C. Sproul Peter Kreeft Winfried Corduan William Lane Craig J. P. Moreland 24

Characteristics of Classical Apologetics two basic steps supporting truth of Christianity: theistic arguments, evidential arguments theistic arguments establish the truth of theism apart from special revelation logical inference drawn from the existence of God to the possibility of miracles Characteristics of Classical Apologetics argument from miracles essential to the second step also historical evidences are amassed to substantiate the New Testament New Testament is used to show who Jesus is 25

According to Norman Geisler: Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics Classical Evidential Experiential Historical Presuppositional Bernard Ramm 1916-1992 Josh McDowell 26

Characteristics of Evidential Apologetics overlaps with Classical approach in the use of evidences less stress on the logical priority of theism to other evidences sometimes uses evidence of miracles as evidence of God According to Norman Geisler: Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics Classical Evidential Experiential Historical Presuppositional 27

Meister Eckhart 1260-1328 Friedrich Schleiermacher 1768-1834 Søren Kierkegaard 1813-1855 Rudolph Bultmann 1884-1976 Karl Barth 1886-1968 Paul Tillich 1886-1965 Characteristics of Experiential Apologetics appeals primarily if not exclusively to experience as evidence for the Christian faith experiences can range from religious experience in general to mystical experience 28

According to Norman Geisler: Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics Classical Evidential Experiential Historical Presuppositional Justin Martyr AD 100-AD 165 Clement of Alexandria AD 150-AD 215 Tertullian AD 160-AD 220 Origen AD 185-AD 254 John Warwick Montgomery Gary Habermas 29

Characteristics of Historical Apologetics generally focuses on historical evidence more of a logical order of the evidence than one finds in evidentialism (viz., claims from Scripture establishing theism; Bible is the Word of God; Christ is the unique Son of God) According to Norman Geisler: Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics Classical Evidential Experiential Historical Presuppositional 30

Revelational Presuppositionalism Cornelius Van Til 1895-1987 John Frame Greg Bahnsen 1948-1995 31

Characteristics of Revelational Presuppositionalism one must posit the Triune God and Scripture before any sense can be made of anything else referred to as a transcendental argument Rational Presuppositionalism 32

Gordon H. Clark 1902-1985 Carl F. H. Henry 1913-2003 Characteristics of Rational Presuppositionalism also begins with God and the Scriptures but the test is the logical law of noncontradiction 33

Systematic Consistency Presuppositionalism Edward John Carnell 1919-1967 Gordon Lewis 1926-2016 34

Characteristics of Systematic Consistency Presuppositionalism a true system must be rationally consistent "It must comprehensively take into account all facts."* *[Norman L. Geisler, Baker Encyclopedia of Christian Apologetics (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1999), s.v., "Apologetics, Types of," 41-44] Practical Presuppositionalism 35

Francis Schaeffer 1912-1984 Characteristics of Practical Presuppositionalism false systems are unlivable only Christianity is livable 36

Steven B. Cowan Steven B. Cowan 37

According to Steven B. Cowan: Five Views on Apologetics Classical Method Evidential Method Cumulative Case Method Presuppositional Method Reformed Epistemological Method According to Steven B. Cowan: Five Views on Apologetics Classical Method Evidential Method Cumulative Case Method Presuppositional Method Reformed Epistemological Method 38

Richard Swinburne R. C. Sproul Stephen T. Davis Norman Geisler William Lane Craig Characteristics of the Classical Method 9uses natural theology to establish theism 9moves to a presentation of the historical evidences for the deity of Christ, the trustworthiness of Scripture, etc. to show that Christianity "is the best version of theism, as opposed to Judaism and Islam."* *[Steven B. Cowan, ed. Five Views on Apologetics (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2000), 15] 39

According to Steven B. Cowan: Five Views on Apologetics Classical Method Evidential Method Cumulative Case Method Presuppositional Method Reformed Epistemological Method Wolfhart Pannenberg 1928-2014 Clark Pinnock 1937-2010 John Warwick Montgomery Gary Habermas 40

Characteristics of the Evidential Method characterized as the "one-step" approach admits to the legitimacy of the miracles-to- God argument tends to focus chiefly on the "legitimacy of accumulating various historical and other inductive arguments for the truth of Christianity."* *[Cowan, ed. Five Views, p. 16] According to Steven B. Cowan: Five Views on Apologetics Classical Method Evidential Method Cumulative Case Method Presuppositional Method Reformed Epistemological Method 41

C. S. Lewis 1989-1963 Basil Mitchell 1917-2011 Paul Feinberg 1938-2004 C. Stephen Evans Characteristics of the Cumulative Case Method "does not conform to the ordinary pattern of deductive or inductive reasoning."* seeks to supplement the primarily historical approach of Evidentialism with additional evidence *[Cowan, ed. Five Views, quoting Basil Mitchell, The Justification of Religious Belief (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981), p. 18]] 42

Characteristics of the Cumulative Case Method maintains that evidentialists will not object to the supplementations that the Cumulative Case approach makes. According to Steven B. Cowan: Five Views on Apologetics Classical Method Evidential Method Cumulative Case Method Presuppositional Method Reformed Epistemological Method 43

Cornelius Van Til 1895-1987 Gordon H. Clark 1902-1985 Francis Schaeffer 1912-1984 John Frame Greg Bahnsen 1948-1995 Characteristics of the Presuppositional Method "Due to the noetic effects of sin, presuppositionalists usually hold that there is not enough common ground between believers and unbelievers that would allow followers of the [other] methods to accomplish their goals."* *[Cowan, ed. Five Views, p. 18]] 44

Characteristics of the Presuppositional Method Apologetics must start with the truth of Christianity. Unless the truth of Christianity (triune God, authority of Scripture) is presupposed, nothing can be known at all. Characteristics of the Presuppositional Method Christianity makes proving and knowing possible. Christianity is transcendentally necessary. 45

According to Steven B. Cowan: Five Views on Apologetics Classical Method Evidential Method Cumulative Case Method Presuppositional Method Reformed Epistemological Method William Alston 1921-2009 George Mavrodes Nicholas Wolterstorff Alvin Plantinga Kelly James Clark 46

Characteristics of the Reformed Epistemological Method Rejects the widespread assumption that all our beliefs must be subjected to the criticism of reason. Rejects that widespread assumption that if a belief is unsupported by evidence of some kind, that belief is irrational. Characteristics of the Reformed Epistemological Method Thus, the approach challenges the "evidentialist" assumptions. Opts rather for the notion that one can be justified in believing certain things for which there is no evidence. 47

Kenneth D. Boa Robert M. Bowman 48

Kenneth D. Boa Robert M. Bowman According to Kenneth Boa/Bowman Faith Has Its Reasons Classical (rationalistic) = Apologetics as Proof Evidential (empirical) = Apologetics as Defense Reformed (authoritarian) = Apologetics as Offense Fideism = Apologetics as Persuasion 49