In more precise language, we have both conditional statements and bi-conditional statements.

Similar documents
Geometry TEST Review Chapter 2 - Logic

The way we convince people is generally to refer to sufficiently many things that they already know are correct.

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Rosen, Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications, 6th edition Extra Examples

MATH1061/MATH7861 Discrete Mathematics Semester 2, Lecture 5 Valid and Invalid Arguments. Learning Goals

3.5_djj_004_Notes.notebook. November 03, 2009

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

What are Truth-Tables and What Are They For?

Complications for Categorical Syllogisms. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

Perry High School. Geometry: Week 5

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC FOR METAPHYSICIANS

Assignment Assignment for Lesson 3.1

March 09, Logic 2.notebook 25) D 26) D 27) C

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

What could be some limitations to using fingerprints as evidence? Sep 2 12:58 PM

Faith indeed tells what the senses do not tell, but not the contrary of what they see. It is above them and not contrary to them.

Appendix: The Logic Behind the Inferential Test

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

Overview of Today s Lecture

World-Wide Ethics. Chapter Two. Cultural Relativism

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Introduction To Mathematical Logic, Part I [all Published] By Alonzo CHURCH READ ONLINE

Logic -type questions

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

PART III - Symbolic Logic Chapter 7 - Sentential Propositions

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

6.080 / Great Ideas in Theoretical Computer Science Spring 2008

POLS 205 Political Science as a Social Science. Examples of Theory-Building in Political Science

Today s Lecture 1/28/10

Logic: A Brief Introduction

A short introduction to formal logic

The Relationship between the Truth Value of Premises and the Truth Value of Conclusions in Deductive Arguments

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here are some examples of this sort of argument:

Logical Fallacies. Define the following logical fallacies and provide an example for each.

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

Chapter 9- Sentential Proofs

3. Detail Example from Text this is directly is where you provide evidence for your opinion in the topic sentence.

Day 3. Wednesday May 23, Learn the basic building blocks of proofs (specifically, direct proofs)

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

G.CO.C.9: Inverse, Converse, Contrapositive and Conditional Statements 1b

9 Methods of Deduction

Chapter 2. A Little Logic

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

Syllabus Fall 2014 PHIL 2010: Introduction to Philosophy 11:30-12:45 TR, Allgood Hall 257

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori

Criticizing Arguments

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Please visit our website for other great titles:

Also, in Argument #1 (Lecture 11, Slide 11), the inference from steps 2 and 3 to 4 is stated as:

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

Argument Mapping. Table of Contents. By James Wallace Gray 2/13/2012

Informalizing Formal Logic

Geometry 2.3.notebook October 02, 2015

Instructor s Manual 1

In Defense of The Wide-Scope Instrumental Principle. Simon Rippon

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

In his paper Studies of Logical Confirmation, Carl Hempel discusses

In view of the fact that IN CLASS LOGIC EXERCISES

Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000)

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

Aquinas' Third Way Modalized

Suppressed premises in real life. Philosophy and Logic Section 4.3 & Some Exercises

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

Philosophy 220. Truth Functional Properties Expressed in terms of Consistency

then An Introduction to Logic

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

North Carolina Survey Results

Logic for Computer Science - Week 1 Introduction to Informal Logic

Logic. If and only if / Si et seulement si / Genau dann, wenn

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Follow Will of the People. Your leftist h. b. ave often d1sgusted b h

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

The paradox we re discussing today is not a single argument, but a family of arguments. Here s an example of this sort of argument:!

MTH 1825 Intermediate Algebra Online Syllabus Fall 2017

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Thursday, August 16 at 1:00 p.m.

American Election Eve Poll Florida - Latino, African American, AAPI, and White Voters

Illustrating Deduction. A Didactic Sequence for Secondary School

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Lecture Notes on Classical Logic

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons

Transcription:

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 1 of 8 What does logic tell us about conditional statements? When I surveyed the class a couple of days ago, many students said that when someone tells you an if.. then statement you just think of it as the two things being related than instead of thinking it had a specific direction to the relationship. And I understand that. In common language, we can usually tell from the context whether there is a direction or not. For example, when you hear If it is raining when I leave home, then I will carry an umbrella, you think of associating raining and carrying an umbrella. Many of us will say that exact statement in dayto-day life, and it is true, and moreover, it is also true that if we are brought an umbrella when we left home, then it was raining, because we only bring out that umbrella when it rains. So many of us mean that to be a two-directional statement, even if we use the if, then words. This makes it confusing to come to a math, science, or social science class where we are supposed to use more precise language. In more precise language, we have both conditional statements and bi-conditional statements. Conditional: If a person is teaching college-level math at a Texas community college, then that person has earned 18 graduate hours in mathematics. Bi-conditional: An undergraduate student at Smith University earns a minor in mathematics if and only if he earns credit in 12 hours of upper-division mathematics. What is the difference between the structure of a conditional statement and a bi-conditional statement? Do you think that the conditional statement above is also true if you swap the two parts? (Answer: It is not.) Do you think the bi-conditional statement above is true if you swap the two parts? (Answer: It is.) Now we re going to spend some time looking at the conditional, which has one specific direction. The main form of a conditional statement is if p, then q. Here p is called the hypothesis and q is called the conclusion. First we will discuss different ways to say this relationship in an English sentence. Then we will discuss other, related, conditional statements and whether they are equivalent to the original conditional statement or not.

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 2 of 8 Common language Rewritten in If.. then Explanation I will go to the movie if you pay for it. G if P G = go to the movie P = you pay for it Mrs. Hernandez* will move to a nursing home only if she becomes unable to walk. M only if U M = move to nursing home U = unable to walk Your paying for it is necessary in order for me to go to the movie. P is necessary for G. G = go to the movie P = you pay for it For Mrs. Hernandez*, her moving to a nursing home is sufficient to tell us that she has become unable to walk. M is sufficient for U M = move to nursing home U = unable to walk I get scared when I go to a horror movie. S when H S = scared H = go to horror movie If you pay for it, then I will go to the movie. If P, then G. If Mrs. Hernandez* moves to a nursing home, then she became unable to walk. If M, then U. If I went to the movie, then you paid for it. If G, then P. For Mrs. Hernandez*, if she moves to a nursing home, then she has become unable to walk. If M, then U. If I go to a horror movie, then I get scared. If H, then S. The hypothesis is what follows the if in the sentence. If tells us what is sufficient for the other thing to happen. Only if in the middle of the sentence gives the opposite direction from if in the middle of the sentence. Since it is necessary, then if the other thing happens, that implies that the necessary thing happens. The necessary thing is the conclusion. Since it is sufficient, if it happens, then the other has to happen. The sufficient thing is the hypothesis. What comes after when is what it takes to make the other thing happen. What comes after when is the hypothesis. * Mrs. Hernandez is a friend of mine who is 89 years old, owns her three-bedroom home, has several family members who help her, and enough money to pay some paid care-givers. But she is fairly large, and one person cannot lift her.

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 3 of 8 Main result: When we have a conditional statement if p, then q then The converse, if q, then p may or may not be true. The statement if p, then q gives us no information about whether the converse is true. The contrapositive, if not q, then not p must be true. This is logically equivalent to the statement if p, then q. The inverse, if not p, then not q is logically equivalent to the converse, so it may or may not be true. I know that our textbook does a lot with truth tables here, but I find that less than satisfactory for several reasons. I think it is good to just think about these and do some examples, until you understand WHY this result is true: A conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive. Exercise: Here is a conditional statement that is true about me. If I ride on a roller coaster, I get dizzy. Write the converse. Write the contrapositive. Write the inverse. Look at the meanings here. Think about the fact that I also get dizzy when I close my eyes and whirl around in a circle several times. Which of those three statements is logically equivalent to the original statement? (Hint: There is only one of these that is equivalent.)

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 4 of 8 Let s think about the bi-conditional statement about math majors at Smith U. We ll break it up into the two conditional statements, and then write the converse, contrapositive, and inverse of each of the two conditional statements. An undergraduate student at Smith University earns a minor in mathematics if and only if he earns credit in 12 hours of upper-division mathematics. M if and only if C. M = earns a minor in math C = earns credit in 12 hours of upper-division math. If an undergraduate student at Smith University earns a minor in mathematics then he earns credit in 12 hours of upperdivision mathematics If M, then C. TRUE If an undergraduate student earns credit in 12 hours of upper-division mathematics then he earns an minor in mathematics. If C, then M. TRUE Converse: If C, then M. Converse: If M, then C. Contrapositive: If not C, then not M. TRUE Contrapositive: If not M, then not C. TRUE Inverse: If not M, then not C. Inverse: If not C, then not M. Each of the statements in bold in that table above must be true, because of what we have learned before. (That the contrapositive of a true statement must also be true.) For a single conditional statement, we know that the converse and the inverse may or may not be true. So those aren t in bold here. HOWEVER, draw some arrows to indicate how each of those is the same statement as one of the statements in bold. When you have finished that, you see that, for a biconditional statement, all of these statements are true. How to mislead people: Make a conditional statement, then treat it as if you made a biconditional statement. A vote for the Green Party means you are concerned about environmental issues. A vote for the Libertarian Party means you are concerned about personal freedom. A vote for the Republican Party means you are concerned about high taxes. A vote for the Democratic Party means you are concerned about preventing racial discrimination. Each of these is If you vote for, then you are concerned about But we can all see discussions sometimes that try to get you to believe If you are concerned about, then you will vote for the party.

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 5 of 8 In real-world language, sometimes people do mean if and only if when they say if, then. But I caution you to avoid that and be clear when you mean that the implication goes both ways. Consider Section 3, number 46. Must you read the first sentence in problem 46 as if and only if even though it doesn t say that? Answer: No. It is possible that someone might say that sentence when they mean if and only if, but, then again, they might mean exactly what they say a one-directional conditional. Consider the following example. Example: On the registration site for my math conference, which is Nov. 7-11, it says Jul 1-Oct. 15, registration fee: $320. Oct. 16 Nov. 10: registration fee: $320 + $40 late fee = $360. So here are statements. a. If you pay after Oct. 31, you must pay the late fee. b. If you pay after Sept. 1, you must pay the late fee. c. If you pay after Oct. 20, you must pay the late fee. d. If you pay after Oct. 15, you must pay the late fee. e. You must pay the late fee if and only if you register after Oct. 15. Write True or False, as appropriate, for each of these statements a. e. (Write it beside each statement.) Which one of these statements (a through e) is the most useful statement for a person registering for the math conference? Which of the other statements is one that might be made instead of the most useful statement? Suppose my school won t approve my travel request until Oct. 20. Which of these statements is the most relevant to me?

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 6 of 8 Section 4. It is not necessary for you to use the exact language that the book uses for their identification of arguments. It IS necessary for you to be able to identify which of the arguments is being used, by some name or description, and whether it is valid or invalid. Valid Arguments and Invalid Arguments Read the four forms of valid arguments and the two forms of invalid arguments on page 74. Take notes that will help you remember what these mean. (Either copy the symbols or make up an example, or both.) Valid: Law of Detachment Valid: Law of Contrapositive Valid: Law of Syllogism (Chain) Valid: Disjoint Syllogism (Meaning of or ) INVALID: Fallacy of the Converse INVALID: Fallacy of the Inverse

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 7 of 8 Are these the only forms of arguments? No. For one thing, some arguments are more complex and have three lines of premises instead of only two. There are some arguments with only two lines of premises that we don t discuss in this book. But the six arguments discussed here are the most common types of arguments. How to logicians decide if a new type of argument is valid? They make a truth table for it. In our textbook, Example 1 proves the Law of Contraposition using a truth table and Example 2 shows the Fallacy of the Inverse using a truth table. What are some of the difficulties in using logic in real-life situations? Difficulty 1. Sometimes people don t distinguish between the truth or falsity of the individual statements and the validity of the argument. Logic problems in math classes: Sometimes some problems are inserted with clearly incorrect simple statements, but in a valid argument form. So you must be able to identify it as a valid argument form. It is also OK to comment on whether an simple statement is true or false. But when you say that an simple statement is true or false, that DOES NOT address the question about whether the argument form is valid. Difficulty 2. Sometimes there is other information besides the information given in the argument that seems relevant to you. Logic problems in math classes: Here we are practicing analyzing arguments and you are expected to not bring in additional information, but only use what is given in the problem. We math teachers hope that, in real life, you will be able to use these tools to decide which parts of your new information can be brought in in ways that enable you to use logic with that information as well. Of course, in real life, when you are making decisions, it is always possible that some relevant information cannot be brought in in this way. So then you may need to decide whether your situation is or is not appropriate for using pure logical arguments to arrive at a conclusion. Difficulty 3. A statement could reasonably correspond to different logical structures (for example, a conditional or a bi-conditional.) In this case, you should recognize that those will lead to somewhat different logical conclusions. So do one of these: Don t trust the statement. Ask for more information. If you re the one writing it, then clarify it. If you re reading it, and can t get more information, then state clearly how you are interpreting the statement before using the statement to reach a conclusion. (Employers will be very impressed with this!)

MATD 0385. Day 5. Feb. 3, 2010 Last updated Feb. 3, 2010 Logic. Sections 3-4, part 2, page 8 of 8 From the text: Section 3: pages 68-70 Class: 32, 28, 46, 48 HW: 27, 29, 31, 33, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59 Section 4: pages 76-79 Class: 8, 10 HW: 17-23 all odd-numbered problems. Quiz: Pages 68-70. 50, 56, 60. Pages 76-79: 12, 16, 18