CAS LX 522 Syntax I Fall 2000 November 6, 2000 Paul Hagstrom Week 9: Binding Theory. (8) John likes him.

Similar documents
yes Head of chain in posidon where Case is assigned Head of chain in posidon where theta- role is assigned Foot of chain in posidon no somedmes

Reminder: Yes-no questions

Long-distance anaphora: comparing Mandarin Chinese with Iron Range English 1

The Development of Binding Theory Handout #1

Extra Syntax Exercises 5

WH-Movement. Ling 322 Read Syntax, Ch. 11

Some observations on identity, sameness and comparison

Coreference Resolution Lecture 15: October 30, Reference Resolution

HS01: The Grammar of Anaphora: The Study of Anaphora and Ellipsis An Introduction. Winkler /Konietzko WS06/07

An Introduction to Anaphora

CAS LX 523 Syntax II February 10, 2009 Prep for week 5: The fine structure of the left periphery

Extraposition and Covert Movement

Introduction to Transformational Grammar, LINGUIST 601 December 3, Wh-Movement

Solutions for Assignment 1

ANAPHORIC REFERENCE IN JUSTIN BIEBER S ALBUM BELIEVE ACOUSTIC

Be Bound or Be Disjoint! Andrew Kehler and Daniel Büring. UCSD and UCLA

hates the woman [who rejected him i hates the woman [who rejected Peter i ] is hated by him i ] (Langacker 1969: 169) (2) (3) (4a) (4b) (4) a. S b.

Reference Resolution. Announcements. Last Time. 3/3 first part of the projects Example topics

Anaphora Resolution in Biomedical Literature: A

Discourse Constraints on Anaphora Ling 614 / Phil 615 Sponsored by the Marshall M. Weinberg Fund for Graduate Seminars in Cognitive Science

Quantifiers: Their Semantic Type (Part 3) Heim and Kratzer Chapter 6

On Truth At Jeffrey C. King Rutgers University

Logophors, variable binding and the interpretation of have. *

Reference Resolution. Regina Barzilay. February 23, 2004

A Freezing Approach to the Ish-Construction in English

Syntax II Class #12 Long-Distance Binding: Anaphors and Logophors

Models of Anaphora Processing and the Binding Constraints

WH- MOVEMENT IN PALESTINIAN ARABIC

Pronominal, temporal and descriptive anaphora

Article selection and anaphora in the German relative clause Julian Grove and Emily Hanink University of Chicago

Factivity and Presuppositions David Schueler University of Minnesota, Twin Cities LSA Annual Meeting 2013

Reconsidering Raising and Experiencers in English

ACD in AP? Richard K. Larson. Stony Brook University

Semantics and Pragmatics of NLP DRT: Constructing LFs and Presuppositions

Anaphoricity and Logophoricity*

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION IN MACHINE TRANSLATION

Anaphora Resolution. Nuno Nobre

A unified theory of ((in)definite) descriptions

Hybrid Approach to Pronominal Anaphora Resolution in English Newspaper Text

Presupposition and Rules for Anaphora

08 Anaphora resolution

Topics in Linguistic Theory: Propositional Attitudes

Anaphora Resolution in Hindi Language

Dialogue structure as a preference in anaphora resolution systems

Sloppy Identity in Surface and Deep Anaphora Hajime Hoji University of Southern California

Some Anaphoric/Elliptical Constructions of English

On the Interpretation of Anaphoric Noun Phrases: Towards a Full Understanding of Partial Matches

Competition and Disjoint Reference. Norvin Richards, MIT. appear; Richards 1995). The typical inability of pronouns to be locally bound, on this

Anaphoric Deflationism: Truth and Reference

Consequences of the Pragmatics of De Se 1 ALESSANDRO CAPONE

The role of animacy and definiteness in the clitic-dp nexus

The projection problem of presuppositions

Definiteness, Indefiniteness, and Anaphoric Relations in English. Koichi Nishida, Tohoku University, Japan

English Reflexive Logophors

Four Proposals for German Clause Structure

Presupposition Projection and Anaphora in Quantified Sentences

Table of Contents 1-30

Exercise Sets. KS Philosophical Logic: Modality, Conditionals Vagueness. Dirk Kindermann University of Graz July 2014

Category Mistakes in M&E

The structure of this lecture. 1. Introduction (coordination vs. subordination) 2. Types of subordinate clauses 3. Functions of subordinate clauses

Outline of today s lecture

Properties as anaphors

ANAPHORA AND TYPE LOGICAL GRAMMAR

What would count as Ibn Sīnā (11th century Persia) having first order logic?

An Analysis of Reference in J.K. Rowling s Novel: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Identifying Anaphoric and Non- Anaphoric Noun Phrases to Improve Coreference Resolution

Comments on Saul Kripke s Philosophical Troubles

On the interaction of adjectival modifiers and relative clauses

Psych Nouns and Predication. David Adger and Gillian Ramchand. Queen Mary, University of London and University of Tromsø

ING 204 Academic English II Can GÜR (2017)

GENERAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING

By the Time Viewing relative progress or completion

Subject Anaphors: Exempt or Not Exempt?

ANAPHORA RESOLUTION IN HINDI LANGUAGE USING GAZETTEER METHOD

Conditions on Propositional Anaphora

Semantics of DP islands

Automatic Evaluation for Anaphora Resolution in SUPAR system 1

German Free Datives and Knight Move Binding *

Index. B Backgrounding, 305, 311 Bohairic, 208 Burgundian, 208, 209 Burgundy, 12

Exercises Introduction to morphosyntax

Pronoun-Antecedent Agreement

Introduction to Koiné Greek

For what does the scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness." (NRS)

Structured Discourse Reference to Propositions

ASL is non-indo-european Sign languages are natural, have native speakers Phonology and processes (e.g. assimilation) Morphology Syntax

Note: NEW = teachers should expect the grammar point to be new to most students at that level who have followed the ELI curriculum.

PASSIVES IN SOME SOUTH ASIAN LANGUAGES: A COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION

A Metonymical Approach to Anaphora in English Texts

LGCS 199DR: Independent Study in Pragmatics

807 - TEXT ANALYTICS. Anaphora resolution: the problem

Anaphor Binding Domain

INFORMATION EXTRACTION AND AD HOC ANAPHORA ANALYSIS

The Interpretation of Complement Anaphora: The Case of The Others

NP-Anaphora in Modern Greek

The structure of this lecture. 1. Introduction (coordination vs. subordination) 2. Types of subordinate clauses 3. Functions of subordinate clauses

Toward a Feature-Movement Theory. of Long-Distance Anaphora. Norvin Richards MIT April A number of recent versions of binding theory have been

GRAMMAR IV HIGH INTERMEDIATE

Sri Lanka International Buddhist Academy (SIBA) Department of Buddhist Studies Diploma in Pali

ROB VAN DER SANDT R V D S A N D H I L.K U N.N L

Coordination Problems

Transcription:

CAS LX 522 Syntax I Fall 2000 November 6, 2000 Paul Hagstrom Week 9: Binding Theory Binding Theory (1) John thinks that he will win the prize. (2) John wants Mary to like him. Co-indexation and co-reference: (8) John likes him. (9) * John i likes him i. (10) John i likes him j. (11) John likes himself. (12) John i likes himself i. (1) * John i likes himself j. () John i thinks that he i will win the prize. (4) John i thinks that he j will win the prize. (5) John i wants Mary k to like him i. (6) John i wants Mary k to like him j. (7) * John i wants Mary k to like him k. Binding Theory: (14) John i likes himself i. (15) * John i likes himself j. (16) * Himself i left. Anaphors: Conditions on indexation. himself, herself, each other, Anaphors depend on another noun phrase (an antecedent) for their reference. Conditions on anaphors: An anaphor needs an antecedent. (17) * Mary j likes himself j. (18) Mary j likes herself j. (19) * The men i like himself i. (20) The men i like themselves i. (21) * I i like himself i. (22) I i like myself i. Conditions on anaphors: An anaphor needs an antecedent. An anaphor and antecedent must agree in person, number, & gender. (2) John i likes himself i. (24) * John i believes that Mary j likes himself i. (25) John i believes that Mary j likes herself j. (26) * John i believes that himself i will win. Conditions on anaphors: An anaphor needs an agreeing antecedent in the same clause. (27) John i likes himself i. (28) * Himself i likes John i. (29) [John and Mary] i like [each other] i. (0) * [Each other] i like [John and Mary] i.

Conditions on anaphors: An anaphor needs an agreeing antecedent earlier in the same clause. (1) [A friend of my father i ] j saw himself j. (2) * [A friend of my father i ] j saw himself i. () IP qp DP j I D qg I VP D NP a N t V N PP V DP friend P saw α P DP i of # my father Binding. α binds β iff i) α c-commands β ii) α and β are coindexed. Condition on anaphors: An anaphor must be bound in the same clause. (4) * [John i and Mary j ] k liked himself i. (5) * [John i and Mary j ] k liked herself j. (6) [John i and Mary j ] k liked themselves k. (7) [John i and Mary j ] k liked each other k. (8) IP qp DP k I rgu DP i and DP j I VP D D D D V α John Mary Anaphors: R-expressions: Pronominals: him, she, I, them, Mary, the students, them, him, her, (9) John i believes that Mary j likes him i. (40) John i believes that Bill j likes him i. (41) * John i believes that Bill j likes him j. (42) Mary i likes him j. (4) * [A friend of my father i ] j saw him j. (44) [A friend of my father i ] j saw him i. Condition on anaphors: An anaphor must be bound in the same clause. Condition on pronouns: A pronoun must not be bound in the same clause. Anaphors and pronouns are in complementary distribution. (45) John i saw [ DP Bill j s picture of him i ]. (46) * John i saw [ DP Bill j s picture of him j ]. (47) * John i saw [ DP Bill j s picture himself i ]. (48) John i saw [ DP Bill j s picture himself j ]. Binding Theory Condition A: An anaphor must be bound in its binding domain. Condition B: A pronoun must not be bound in its binding domain. Binding domain: Its clause (so far). (49) Ed i saw [ DP Bill j s picture of him i ]. (50) * Ed i saw [ DP Bill j s picture of him j ]. (51) * Ed i saw [ DP Bill j s picture of himself i ]. (52) Ed i saw [ DP Bill j s picture of himself j ].

Binding domain for α: The smallest IP or DP which contains α. (5) * Ed i saw [ DP a picture of him i ]. (54) Ed i saw [ DP a picture of him j ]. (55) Ed i saw [ DP a picture of himself i ]. (56) * Ed i saw [ DP a picture of himself j ]. Binding domain for α: and a subject. (57) * Ed i expects [ IP Bill j to like himself i ] (58) Ed i expects [ IP Bill j to like himself j ]. (59) Ed i believes [ IP himself i to be a genius]. (60) * Ed i believes [ IP him i to be a genius]. Binding domain for α: and a subject distinct from α. (61) * Ed i believes [that himself i is a genius]. (62) Ed i believes [that he i is a genius]. (6) * Al i wants [ CP for him i to be elected]. (64) Al i wants [ CP for himself i to be elected]. (65) Ed believes [that I am a genius]. (66) Ed believes [me to be a genius]. (67) Al wants [for me to be elected]. Binding domain for α: and either (a) a subject distinct from α, (68) IP 1 Ed i believes that he i is a genius. DP I Ed I[FIN] VP t V V CP believe 1 C C IP 2 that α I qg I[FIN]... (71)... CP C C IP that DP I Shiela I[FIN] VP t V V α saw (72) Mary i believes herself i to be a genius. (7) * Mary i believes her i to be a genius. (69) Mary j believes that Shiela i saw herself i. (70) * Mary j believes that Shiela i saw herself j.

(74) IP Mary I I VP [FIN] V V IP believes α I I VP to # be a genius (75) John i thinks [that [ [pictures of himself i ] will sell like hotcakes] ]. Binding domain for α: (final version) and either (a) a subject distinct from α that does not contain α, Anaphors, pronominals, and r-expressions. (76) She i saw John j. (77) * He i saw John i. (78) He j saw John i. (79) [John i s mother] j saw him i. (80) [His i mother] j saw John i. (81) He i said that Ed j thinks Al k is a genius. (82) * He j said that Ed j thinks Al k is a genius. (8) * He k said that Ed j thinks Al k is a genius. An r-expression must not be bound. Free Not bound. An r-expression must be free. Binding Theory: Principle A: Principle B: Principle C: An anaphor must be bound in its binding domain. A pronominal must be free in its binding domain. An r-expression must be free. Binding domain for α: (final version) and either (a) a subject distinct from α that does not contain α, (84) Ed i persuaded Ted j [ IP to recuse himself j ]. (85) Ted i promised Ed j [ IP to recuse himself i ]. (86) Ed persuaded Ted to leave. (87) Ed promised Ted to leave. (88) Ed i persuaded Ted j [PRO j to leave]. (89) Ed i promised Ted j [PRO i to leave]. (90) Ed i persuaded Ted j [ IP PRO j to recuse himself j ]. (91) Ted i promised Ed j [ IP PRO i to recuse himself i ]. (92) To teach oneself i linguistics is fun. (9) [PRO i to teach oneself i ling.] is fun

Who and everyone can t have a θ-role assigned to them by the time the θ-criterion is checked. Remember that wh-movement leaves a trace which can have a θ-role assigned to it. (94) Who i does John like t i? (95) * Who i does he i like t i? (who i likes himself i?) What s wrong? Why can t a θ-role be assigned to a wh-phrase? Why is it possible to assign a θ-role to its trace? It must be an R-expression. Principle C says R-expressions must be free. (96) * Who i did he i tell Mary that John likes t i? (=who i told Mary that John likes him i?) NOTE NOTE NOTE NOTE Binding Theory is about binding from A-positions. (97) Who i t i ate lunch? (98) What i did J tell M that B said he ate t i? Strong Crossover (99) * Who i does he i like t i? (who i likes himself i?) Principle C: An r-expression must be free. (100)* Who i did [his i boss] see t i? Weak Crossover. Crossover. A variable cannot be coindexed with a pronoun on its left. (101) Everyone i said that he i saw Mary. (102)* He i saw everyone i. (=Everyone i saw himself i ). (10)* [His i boss] saw everyone i. (=Everyone i s boss saw him i ). A-movement: (passives, raising ) (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) John thinks that he is right John expects me to help him. John wants him to resign. He wants John to resign. PRO to help John would be a mistake. (104) John i seems [ t i to speak Mandarin]. (105)* John i seems [ t i speaks Mandarin]. Tensed S constraint (106) A train i arrived t i. (107) There arrived a train. (108) A train i seems [ t i to have arrived t i ]. (109)* A train i seems [that there arrived t i ]. Specified subject condition Tasks: Find the binding domain for the second. Can the two underlined phrases be co-referent (coindexed)? Binding domain for α: (final version) and either (a) a subject distinct from α that does not contain α, Traces of A-movement are anaphors.

(110)* [John i s mother] j congratulated himself i. (111) [John i s mother] j congratulated herself j. (112) IP qp DP k I qg DPi! D I VP John s i D NP t V [GEN] # mother V DP congratulated α