Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Similar documents
Introduction to Philosophy Crito. Instructor: Jason Sheley

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

ELEMENTS OF LOGIC. 1.1 What is Logic? Arguments and Propositions

Introduction to Philosophy. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

Logic Practice Test 1

Introduction to Philosophy

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

The Power of Critical Thinking Why it matters How it works

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Comments on Van Inwagen s Inside and Outside the Ontology Room. Trenton Merricks

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Logical (formal) fallacies

Phil Aristotle. Instructor: Jason Sheley

A CRITIQUE OF THE FREE WILL DEFENSE. A Paper. Presented to. Dr. Douglas Blount. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. In Partial Fulfillment

Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000)

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Prisoners' Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem

Time by J. M. E. McTaggart. Chapter 33 of The Nature of Existence

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 2. Background Material for the Exercise on Inference Indicators

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

6: DEDUCTIVE LOGIC. Chapter 17: Deductive validity and invalidity Ben Bayer Drafted April 25, 2010 Revised August 23, 2010

SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE PHILOSOPHY AND ETHICS GENERAL YEAR 11

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Free will & divine foreknowledge

EXERCISES, QUESTIONS, AND ACTIVITIES My Answers

Some Logical Paradoxes from Jean Buridan

History and the Christian Faith Contributed by Michael Gleghorn

Formal Logic. Mind your Ps and Qs!

Philosophy Courses Fall 2011

Philosophy 220. Truth Functional Properties Expressed in terms of Consistency

THE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik

Answers to Practice Problems 6.5

History and the Christian Faith

Critical Thinking is:

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 1b Knowledge

Merricks on the existence of human organisms

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

Criticizing Arguments

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13


Inductive Reasoning.

Study Guide: Academic Writing

Why There s Nothing You Can Say to Change My Mind: The Principle of Non-Contradiction in Aristotle s Metaphysics

Undergraduate Calendar Content

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Think by Simon Blackburn. Chapter 3e Free Will

Why Plato's Cave? Ancient Greek Philosophy. Instructor: Jason Sheley

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

Realism and the success of science argument. Leplin:

OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan. Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Part-Whole Relations

Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason

LOGIC: An INTRODUCTION to the FORMAL STUDY of REASONING. JOHN L. POLLOCK University of Arizona

Course Objectives: Upon successful completion of this course, students will have demonstrated

Introduction to Philosophy Phil 101C

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Philosophy 1100 Introduction to Ethics

PPL 399, Philosophical Perspectives on Liberty. Office Phone: Spring 2007 SYLLABUS

Introduction to Philosophy

Has Nagel uncovered a form of idealism?

Evaluating Arguments

A Note on Straight-Thinking

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106

Welcome back to week 2 of this edition of 5pm Church Together.

Three Kinds of Arguments

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

PHI World Religions Instructor: David Makinster SPRING 2018

Statements, Arguments, Validity. Philosophy and Logic Unit 1, Sections 1.1, 1.2

LA Mission College Mark Pursley Spring 2018 Note:

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

CHAPTER 2 THE LARGER LOGICAL LANDSCAPE NOVEMBER 2017

SAMPLE COURSE OUTLINE RELIGION AND LIFE ATAR YEAR 11

Lord, may the words of my mouth and the meditation of every heart be acceptable to You, our rock and our redeemer. Amen.

Philosophy 1100 Honors Introduction to Ethics

Logic and Thought Experiments. 9th September Carnegie Mellon University. Introduction to Philosophy. Evaluating Arguments. Thought Experiments

LA Mission College Mark Pursley Fall 2016 Note:

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

Theories of propositions

The Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year B)

1. True or False: The terms argument and disagreement mean the same thing. 2. True or False: No arguments have more than two premises.

A Short Course in Logic Example 3

THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science

Philosophy. The unexamined life is not worth living. Plato. O More College of Design Mission Statement

SPRING 2014 UNDERGRADUATE COURSE OFFERINGS

Academic Writing and Logical Thinking

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

Praying Spontaneously

Knowledge in Plato. And couple of pages later:

Moore on External Relations

Transcription:

Introduction to Logic Instructor: Jason Sheley

Opening week Welcome to the class! My first goal this week is to show you what the class is all about so that you can make an informed decision as to whether you want to take it or not. My second goal is to help ease us into studying logic so that it seems not so intimidating.

On What Logic is Getting Over the Fear of Logic The Plan for the semester

What is logic? Who cares? Why should we study it? What do you think?

What s the correct approach? I think it s this: We care about logic because we have questions we want to answer. Logic helps us do this

My favorite definition Logic is the art of moving from what we know to what we don t know (or, from what is established to what would like to establish.) (This idea is credited to the philosopher C.S. Pierce, although I can t seem to find the exact quotation.)

The Star of the Show

Logic has two dimensions: Courageous we want to build new ideas, prove new things, make new discoveries Cautious we want to make sure that our new idea really works, that the proof is successful, that we really have made a discovery

As I mentioned last time, (in a sense) we already know how to do this. Let s look at some examples...

(In a parking lot...) 1) You can either go right or go left. 2) The path to the right is blocked. Therefore,.

1) All Snakes should be killed 2) Socrates is a snake Therefore, (?)

Let s go back to the syllabus and look at the topics we will cover...

Puzzle The Ship of Theseus...

Let's apply the structure...

The question: what does the identity of an object consist in? The answer(s):??? Reasons:... Critique?

Another version...

What does it mean to think critically? What role does logic play in criticism?

Puzzle: Can a monkey take a selfie?

There are a couple lessons we can take from this: 1) Learning logic isn t enough 2) We need to develop good habits in addition to learning the rules

Arguments, premises, and conclusions

Logic and arguments Logic: the organized body of knowledge, or science, that evaluates arguments. Argument: A group of statements, one or more of which (the premises) are claimed to provide support for, or reasons to believe, one of the others (the conclusion)

Logic and arguments Premises: Premise 1, Premise 2, Premise 3... Claimed evidence Conclusion What is claimed to follow from the evidence

statements The premises and the conclusion must be in the form of statements. But what is a statement? A statement is something that is either true or false. 1. Broccoli is a good source of vitamin A. 2. Argentina is located in North America. 3. Rembrandt was a painter and Shelley was a poet.

Not Statements 1. What is the atomic weight of carbon? 2. Let s go to the park today. 3. We suggest that you travel by bus. 4. Turn to the left at the next corner. 5. All right! Why aren t these statements?

Not Statements 1. What is the atomic weight of carbon? (question) 2. Let s go to the park today. (suggestion) 3. We suggest that you travel by bus. (suggestion) 4. Turn to the left at the next corner. (command) 5. All right! (exclamation) Why aren t these statements?

more on statements All statements have truth-values. Truth and falsity are called the two possible truthvalues of a statement. Only statements can have truth-values. Note: Arguments do not have truth-values.

Premises and conclusions How can we tell the difference All film stars are celebrities. Halle Berry is a film star. between a premise and a conclusion? Therefore, Halle Berry is a celebrity.

Conclusion indicators Therefore.. Thus... Conseque ntly... We may infer... Accordingl y... We may conclude... It must be that... For this reason... So... This entails that... Hence... It follows that... This implies that... As a result... Ergo... QED

Examples conclusion of indicators Tortured prisoners will say anything just to relieve the pain. Consequently, torture is not a reliable method of interrogation. An agreement cannot bind unless both parties to the agreement know what they are doing and freely choose to do it. This implies that the seller who intends to enter a contract with a customer has a duty to disclose exactly what the customer is buying and what the terms of the sale are.

Premise indicators Since... As indicated by... Because... For... In that... May be inferred from... As... Given that... Seeing that... For the reason that... Owing to... Is evidenced by...

Example of a Premise Expectant indicator mothers should never use recreational The use of recreational drugs can jeopardize the development of the fetus. drugs, since the use of these drugs can jeopardize the development of the fetus. Expectant mothers should never use recreational drugs.

Example of a Premise indicator The fact that there was never a land bridge between Australia and mainland Asia is evidenced by the fact that the animal species in the two areas are very different. Asian placental mammals and Australian marsupial mammals have not been in contact in the last several million years. The animal species in Australia and Asia are very different. Asian placental mammals and Australian marsupial mammals have not been in contact in the last several million years. There was never a land bridge between Australia and mainland Asia.

Examples: Argument or No Argument? On January 26, asteroid 2004 BL86 safely flew right past us, making its closest approach around 11:19 a.m. EST at a distance of about 1.2 million kilometers -- that s only about three times the distance between us and our moon. And it turns out, the asteroid has its own little moon. Nine cases of measles have so far been recorded in an outbreak in California and Utah, and the number is expected to rise. It is thought that many of the infections were transmitted at Disneyland. Predictably, most of those who have become sick were not vaccinated. Infuriatingly, two of them were children who were too young to get the measles shots, rather than being the children of vaccine opponents. Unlike Ebola, measles is highly contagious. When its airborne, a single person can potentially infect many others by coughing or sneezing, particularly if they spend a day in a crowded place like Disneyland. If you spend long enough with someone who has measles and you either have not had it before or been vaccinated, you have a 90% chance of coming down with the disease. - (Source: iflscience.com)

Argument or No Argument?

Arguments without indicators What single statement is claimed to follow from the others? What is the arguer trying to prove? What is the main point of the passage? Use these questions to try and find the conclusion.

Opening puzzle: The Experience Machine

Would you plug into the machine? Why or why not?

Let's talk about essays