PHI Introduction Lecture 4. An Overview of the Two Branches of Logic

Similar documents
Complications for Categorical Syllogisms. PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 27, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

9.1 Intro to Predicate Logic Practice with symbolizations. Today s Lecture 3/30/10

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

Example Arguments ID1050 Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

1.5. Argument Forms: Proving Invalidity

Revisiting the Socrates Example

An Introduction to. Formal Logic. Second edition. Peter Smith, February 27, 2019

Announcements. CS243: Discrete Structures. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Review of Last Lecture. Translating English into First-Order Logic

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

PRACTICE EXAM The state of Israel was in a state of mourning today because of the assassination of Yztzak Rabin.

Workbook Unit 17: Negated Categorical Propositions

Handout 2 Argument Terminology

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Logic: The Science that Evaluates Arguments

Logic: A Brief Introduction. Ronald L. Hall, Stetson University

Introduction to Logic. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. NP-TEL National Programme On Technology Enhanced Learning. Course Title Introduction to Logic

Deduction by Daniel Bonevac. Chapter 1 Basic Concepts of Logic

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

1.6 Validity and Truth

1. True or False: The terms argument and disagreement mean the same thing. 2. True or False: No arguments have more than two premises.

Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms. Unit 5

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

A Primer on Logic Part 1: Preliminaries and Vocabulary. Jason Zarri. 1. An Easy $10.00? a 3 c 2. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv)

Logic, Deductive And Inductive By Carveth Read READ ONLINE

Basic Concepts and Distinctions 1 Logic Keith Burgess-Jackson 14 August 2017

INTERMEDIATE LOGIC Glossary of key terms

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

The Logical Problem of Evil and the Limited God Defense

A. Problem set #3 it has been posted and is due Tuesday, 15 November

2. Refutations can be stronger or weaker.

What is an Argument? Validity vs. Soundess of Arguments

Abstract Abstraction Abundant ontology Abundant theory of universals (or properties) Actualism A-features Agent causal libertarianism

C. Exam #1 comments on difficult spots; if you have questions about this, please let me know. D. Discussion of extra credit opportunities

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

From Necessary Truth to Necessary Existence

Critical Thinking - Wk 3. Instructor: Jason Sheley

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Broad on Theological Arguments. I. The Ontological Argument

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

Transition to Quantified Predicate Logic

Tutorial A02: Validity and Soundness By: Jonathan Chan

!Validity!Soundness. Today s Lecture 1//21/10

Part 2 Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

LOGIC ANTHONY KAPOLKA FYF 101-9/3/2010

Truth At a World for Modal Propositions

In this section you will learn three basic aspects of logic. When you are done, you will understand the following:

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON THIS QUIZ

SECTION 2 BASIC CONCEPTS

Introduction to Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

Announcements. CS311H: Discrete Mathematics. First Order Logic, Rules of Inference. Satisfiability, Validity in FOL. Example.

Introduction Symbolic Logic

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Three Kinds of Arguments

Instructor s Manual 1

Lecture 1: Validity & Soundness

Moore on External Relations

Kripke on the distinctness of the mind from the body

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

A Romp through the Foothills of Logic: Session 2

EXERCISES: (from

Validity & Soundness LECTURE 3! Critical Thinking. Summary: In this week s lectures, we will learn! (1) What it is for an argument to be valid.

Logic Dictionary Keith Burgess-Jackson 12 August 2017

MATH1061/MATH7861 Discrete Mathematics Semester 2, Lecture 5 Valid and Invalid Arguments. Learning Goals

BASIC CONCEPTS OF LOGIC

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

Curtis Solomon What is the difference between a deductive and an inductive argument?

Philosophical Arguments

Aquinas' Third Way Modalized

Logic I, Fall 2009 Final Exam

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC FOR METAPHYSICIANS

SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2014 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

Definite Descriptions, Naming, and Problems for Identity. 1. Russel s Definite Descriptions: Here are three things we ve been assuming all along:

Philosophy 57 Day 10

Argumentation Module: Philosophy Lesson 7 What do we mean by argument? (Two meanings for the word.) A quarrel or a dispute, expressing a difference

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

1/19/2011. Concept. Analysis

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

LOGIC LECTURE #3: DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION. Source: A Concise Introduction to Logic, 11 th Ed. (Patrick Hurley, 2012)

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

Comments on Truth at A World for Modal Propositions

Transcription:

PHI 103 - Introduction Lecture 4 An Overview of the wo Branches of Logic

he wo Branches of Logic Argument - at least two statements where one provides logical support for the other. I. Deduction - a conclusion follows necessarily from the premise(s) A. Categorical (Aristotelian) Logic - the logical relationships between categorical propositions B. Propositional (Sentential) Logic - the logical relationships between bivalent propositions C. Predicate Logic - the logical relationship between quantifiable variables ( existential and universal ) D. Modal Logic - the logical relationship between modally modified propositions ( contingent and necessary )

he wo Branches of Logic II. Induction - a conclusion follows with a degree of probability from the premise(s) A. Arguments by Analogy B. Arguments from Authority C. Arguments about Causation D. Arguments about Probability E. Arguments about Generalization/Statistical Evidence F. Arguments from Hypotheses G. Arguments from Signs/Symbols

he wo Branches of Logic III. Evaluating Arguments - what makes arguments good or bad? A. Deductive Arguments - a conclusion follows necessarily from the premise(s) 1. Valid - the form of the argument is correct (if the premises are assumed to be true, then the conclusion cannot be false)

Valid Arguments P1) All mammals have lungs. P2) All dogs are mammals. C) herefore, all dogs have lungs. he conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. If P1 and P2 are true, then C must be true (i.e., the conjunction of P1 and P2 is sufficient to bring about C).

Lunged hings Mammals Dogs

Valid Arguments P1) All tailed animals have wings. P2) All dogs have tails. C)? F F Does anything follow from false premises??? Suppose we assume the premises were true.

Valid Arguments P1) All tailed animals have wings. P2) All dogs have tails. () C) herefore, all dogs have wings. () he conclusion would follow necessarily, if we assume the premises are true.

Winged hings ailed hings Dogs

Valid Arguments P1) All dogs are mammals. P2) All cats are mammals. C) herefore, all dogs are cats. F his conclusion does not follow necessarily, even though the premises are true.

Mammals Dogs Cats

Special Note: We know that a deductive argument is invalid under only one circumstance: when the premises are true and the conclusion is false. Premises Conclusion Validity F F F F? INVALID??

he wo Branches of Logic III. Evaluating Arguments - what makes arguments good or bad? A. Deductive Arguments - a conclusion follows necessarily from the premise(s) 1. Valid - the form of the argument is correct (if the premises are assumed to be true, then the conclusion cannot be false) 2. Sound - the form is correct and the premises are true B. Inductive Arguments - a conclusion follows with a degree of probability from the premise(s) 1. Strong - the premises are sufficient and relevant to make the conclusion more likely than not

Strong Arguments P1) Dogs are cute domestic mammals and make good pets. P2) Cats are cute domestic mammals and make good pets. P3) Pigs are cute domestic mammals and make good pets. C) herefore, domestic mammals make good pets. his conclusion follows with a reasonable degree of probability from the premises.

Strong Arguments P1) Kangaroos are cute marsupials. P2) Opossums are cute marsupials. P3) Koalas are cute marsupials. C) herefore, marsupials make good pets. his conclusion does not follow with a degree of probability from the premises. (he fact that marsupials are cute does not establish a connection with good-pet-ness.)

he wo Branches of Logic III. Evaluating Arguments - what makes arguments good or bad? A. Deductive Arguments (a conclusion follows necessarily from the premise(s)) 1. Valid - the form of the argument is correct (if the premises are assumed to be true, then the conclusion cannot be false) 2. Sound - the form is correct and the premises are true B. Inductive Arguments (a conclusion follows with a degree of probability from the premise(s)) 1. Strong - the premises are sufficient and relevant to make the conclusion more likely than not 2. Cogent - the premises are sufficient and relevant to make the conclusion likely and the premises are true

Sound Valid Deductive Unsound Invalid Argument Weak Inductive Uncogent Strong Cogent