PHIL 155: Introduction. January 9, 2013

Similar documents
Phil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?

Theoretical Virtues in Science

Transition: From A priori To Anselm

Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Outline 1. PHILOSOPHY AND EXPLANATION. 1a. NATURAL PHILOSOPHY 5/4/15

Reading Questions for Phil , Fall 2016 (Daniel)

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Ilija Barukčić Causality. New Statistical Methods. ISBN X Discussion with the reader.

AS-LEVEL Religious Studies

PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT FALL SEMESTER 2009 COURSE OFFERINGS

FINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET. objectivity intersubjectivity ways the peer review system is supposed to improve objectivity

To appear in The Journal of Philosophy.

Van Fraassen: Arguments concerning scientific realism

Introduction to Philosophy

PHIL 103 Introduction to Philosophy

The Question of Why. How do religions view science and how do scientists view religion?

Philosophy 2: Introduction to Philosophy Section 2511, Room SOCS 205, 7:45-9:10am El Camino College Fall, 2014

World without Design: The Ontological Consequences of Natural- ism , by Michael C. Rea.

Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:

Philosophy 5340 Epistemology Topic 4: Skepticism. Part 1: The Scope of Skepticism and Two Main Types of Skeptical Argument

Science and religion: Is it either/or or both/and? Dr. Neil Shenvi Morganton, NC March 4, 2017

Chance, Chaos and the Principle of Sufficient Reason

SUMMARIES AND TEST QUESTIONS UNIT David Hume: The Origin of Our Ideas and Skepticism about Causal Reasoning

Van Fraassen: Arguments Concerning Scientific Realism

SAMPLE ESSAY 1: PHILOSOPHY & SOCIAL SCIENCE (1 ST YEAR)

Scientific Method and Research Ethics

Update on the State of Modern Cosmology can not ever Point 1)

I. Scientific Realism: Introduction

Philosophy 2: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4170 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2015

Philosophy 125 Day 1: Overview

SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS Part III SCIENTIFIC EPISTEMOLOGY? David Tin Win α & Thandee Kywe β. Abstract

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW

Instructor's Manual for Gregg Barak s Integrating Criminologies. Prepared by Paul Leighton (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1997) * CHAPTER 4

Islamic Civilization

Cosmological Argument

Is Adventist Theology Compatible With Evolutionary Theory?

On Quine, Grice and Strawson, and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction. by Christian Green

Putnam: Meaning and Reference

HPS 1653 / PHIL 1610 Introduction to the Philosophy of Science

Review of Who Rules in Science?, by James Robert Brown

Berkeley, Three dialogues between Hylas and Philonous focus on p. 86 (chapter 9) to the end (p. 93).

Naturalism and is Opponents

What Should We Believe?

507 Advanced Apologetics BEAR VALLEY BIBLE INSTITUTE 3 semester hours Thomas Bart Warren, Instructor

Key definitions Action Ad hominem argument Analytic A priori Axiom Bayes s theorem

Which Way Does the Evidence Point? Jeffery Jay Lowder Website: Blog:

The Argument (for rationalism) from Induction. More than observation is needed

THE CRISIS IN SOCIOLOGY

Chapter 2 Test Bank. 1) When one systematically studies being or existence one is dealing with the branch of metaphysics called.

The Nature of Enquiry

List of Courses Taught 2. Possible Course Offerings 3. Evidence of Teaching Quality 4. Teaching Referees 9. Sample Syllabi 10

Intro to Philosophy. Review for Exam 2

George Berkeley. The Principles of Human Knowledge. Review

Simplicity and Why the Universe Exists

Philosophy 101: Introduction to Philosophy Section 4152 Online Course El Camino College Spring, 2017

Popper s Falsificationism. Philosophy of Economics University of Virginia Matthias Brinkmann

Jeu-Jenq Yuann Professor of Philosophy Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University,

1 Why should you care about metametaphysics?

How Can Science Study History? Beth Haven Creation Conference May 13, 2017

PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) Philosophy (PHIL) 1

Department of Philosophy

1 Thessalonians 4; Classical Theism 67 Virtue: The Theological Virtues of Faith and Science - 22

It s time to stop believing scientists about evolution

Intro to Science Studies I

Realism, Approximate Truth, and Philosophical Method

Varieties of Things. Foundations of Contemporary Metaphysics. Cynthia Macdonald

FIL 4600/10/20: KANT S CRITIQUE AND CRITICAL METAPHYSICS

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PHIL 145, FALL 2017

PHIL*2160 Early Modern Philosophy: Reason vs. Experience

SEMINAR IN ETHICS: ETHICS AND EVOLUTION PHIL 848J

New Chapter: Philosophy of Religion

THE GOD OF QUARKS & CROSS. bridging the cultural divide between people of faith and people of science

Milo Schield Professor, Augsburg College Director, W. M. Keck Statistical Literacy Project

Tough Questions: Science and Religion. Dr. Neil Shenvi Sam James Institute April 20, 2015

Overview. Is there a priori knowledge? No: Mill, Quine. Is there synthetic a priori knowledge? Yes: faculty of a priori intuition (Rationalism, Kant)

appearance is often different from reality, and it s reality that counts.

NATURALISED JURISPRUDENCE

Philosophy of Science PHIL 241, MW 12:00-1:15

PHIL 370: Medieval Philosophy [semester], Coastal Carolina University Class meeting times: [date, time, location]

Chapter 18 David Hume: Theory of Knowledge

The Role of Science in God s world

Philosophy Epistemology Topic 5 The Justification of Induction 1. Hume s Skeptical Challenge to Induction

Brad Weslake, Department of Philosophy. Darwin Day, 12 February 2012

Reading Questions for Phil , Fall 2012 (Daniel)

REVIEW: James R. Brown, The Laboratory of the Mind

Empiricism. Otávio Bueno Department of Philosophy University of Miami Coral Gables, FL

Intelligent Design. Kevin delaplante Dept. of Philosophy & Religious Studies

Postmodal Metaphysics

Huston Smith. Point of Departure

Science and Ideology

Are Miracles Identifiable?

Introduction: Paradigms, Theism, and the Parity Thesis

A Defense for Scientific Realism:

A Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript

The Illusion of Scientific Realism: An Argument for Scientific Soft Antirealism

! Jumping ahead 2000 years:! Consider the theory of the self.! What am I? What certain knowledge do I have?! Key figure: René Descartes.

Sydenham College of Commerce & Economics. * Dr. Sunil S. Shete. * Associate Professor

Genesis Rewritten: A History of Natural History and the Life Sciences Spring, 2017

Introduction to Philosophy Levels 1 and 2

Can I Believe in the book of Genesis and Science? Texts: Genesis 2:1-9,15; Genesis 1:1-27 Occasion: Ask, series Themes: Science, creationism,

KANT, MORAL DUTY AND THE DEMANDS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON. The law is reason unaffected by desire.

Transcription:

PHIL 155: Introduction January 9, 2013

Outline 1 What is the Philosophy of Science? 2 What s So Great About Science?

What is the Philosophy of Science? General vs. Applied philosophy of science General philosophy of science addresses questions about what the methodology of science is whether/how/what it allows us to know things about the world what the scientific enterprise presupposes about reality what the scientific enterprise reveals about reality Applied philosophy of science asks questions about the content of particular scientific theories or a methodology unique to a particular science, e.g., Interpretations of quantum mechanics Presentism and special relativity Statistical methodology In this course, we will focus on general philosophy of science.

What is the Philosophy of Science? Metaphysics versus Epistemology Metaphysics asks questions about what kind of things exist and how they exist. A metaphysics is the most general theory about the nature of reality. Epistemology asks questions about how we can come to know things about the world, or how our beliefs about the world are justified. In both general and applied philosophy of science, we should distinguish questions of metaphysics from questions of epistemology. In this course, we will begin, in the first half of the semester, by asking questions about the epistemology of science. In the second half of the semester, we will ask questions about the metaphysics presupposed and revealed by scientific enquiry.

The Problem of Demarcation The Problem of Demarcation is the problem of demarcating scientific enquiries from non-scientific or pseudo-scientific enquires. Many people think that there is a difference between the following two sets of enquiries: Physics Chemistry Biology Cosmology Astrology Phrenology Creationism Marxism What s the difference? Popular answer: it has something to do with the methodology of the different enquiries. The first group of enquirers form their beliefs using scientific methods; whereas the second group forms their beliefs using non-scientific or pseudo-scientific methods.

What s So Great About Science? What, then, is the scientific method of enquiry? And how is it different from non-scientific or pseudo-scientific methodologies? And what makes the scientific methodology so great? Not every method of forming beliefs that s based on the outcomes of experiments is a good method of forming beliefs one that leads to justified beliefs or knowledge. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqaf4yxcxsc These questions are related: certain conceptions of the scientific method make it clear how it could produce knowledge; other conceptions of the scientific method make it less clear how it could produce knowledge.

What s So Great About Science? Over the entrance to Michigan s Museum of Natural History is the quote from Louis Agassiz, Go to Nature, take the facts into your own hands, look and see for yourself

What s So Great About Science? On this way of understanding science, it is very clear how science can deliver knowledge. Looking and seeing for yourself is a paradigm way of coming to know something. But does just looking tell us that the universe began with a big bang? Can we just take the fact that temporal duration is dependent upon our reference frame into our hands? As we move to a more realistic understanding of what goes on in science, skeptical challenges to science s ability to deliver knowledge of the unobserved and the unobservable begin to emerge. In the first part of this course, we will be considering what the scientific methodology is and considering various skeptical challenges to that methodology and its ability to produce knowledge or justified belief.