Aristotle ( ) His scientific thinking, his physics.

Similar documents
Aristotle. Aristotle was an ancient Greek Philosopher who made contributions to logic, physics, the

In this painting by Raphael, Plato (holding the Timeus) pointing up, representing the importance of focusing on the eternal Eidos, while Aristotle

Socrates Comprehension Questions 24 Hippocrates Lexile Hippocrates Lexile Hippocrates Lexile Hippocrates Comprehension

Development of Thought. The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek philosophia, which

Wednesday, April 20, 16. Introduction to Philosophy

Greek natural philosophy and the Christian Tradition

McKenzie Study Center, an Institute of Gutenberg College. Handout 5 The Bible and the History of Ideas Teacher: John A. Jack Crabtree.

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

Socrates By Vickie Chao

Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Business Research: Principles and Processes MGMT6791 Workshop 1A: The Nature of Research & Scientific Method

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Making of thewestern Mind Institute for the Study of Western Civilization Week Six: Aristotle

The Sea-Fight Tomorrow by Aristotle

Small Group Assignment 8: Science Replaces Scholasticism

Critical Thinking is:

John Buridan on Essence and Existence

Key Vocab and Concepts. Ethics, Epistemology, Aesthetics, logic, social and political, religious, metaphysics

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

Qué es la filosofía? What is philosophy? Philosophy

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.hist-ph] 17 Sep 2002

APEH Chapter 6.notebook October 19, 2015

The Appeal to Reason. Introductory Logic pt. 1

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?

Text 1: Philosophers and the Pursuit of Wisdom. Topic 5: Ancient Greece Lesson 3: Greek Thinkers, Artists, and Writers

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

Evolution: The Darwinian Revolutions BIOEE 2070 / HIST 2870 / STS 2871

Who was this ancient Greek philosopher, and why should anyone care today?

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

What. A New Way of Thinking...modern consciousness.

APEH ch 14.notebook October 23, 2012

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

Warmup. What is art?

What is a logical argument? What is deductive reasoning? Fundamentals of Academic Writing

Categories and On Interpretation. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Introduction to Philosophy

UNDERGRADUATE STUDIES CERTIFICATE IN PHILOSOPHY (CERTIFICATES)

CONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE

The Development of Laws of Formal Logic of Aristotle

SSWH3: Examine the political, philosophical, & cultural interaction of classical Mediterranean societies from 700 BCE to 400 CE/AD

Philosophical Issues in Physics PHIL/PHYS 30389

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

Ancient Greece Important Men

Courses providing assessment data PHL 202. Semester/Year

Must we have self-evident knowledge if we know anything?

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

THINKING THINGS THROUGH

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

Critical Thinking: Present, Past and Future 5 April, 2015

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER VI CONDITIONS OF IMMEDIATE INFERENCE

Semantic Foundations for Deductive Methods

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Predicate logic. Miguel Palomino Dpto. Sistemas Informáticos y Computación (UCM) Madrid Spain

1.6 Validity and Truth

The Philosopher: An Appreciation of Aristotle

Logic & Philosophy Sample Questions

P. Weingartner, God s existence. Can it be proven? A logical commentary on the five ways of Thomas Aquinas, Ontos, Frankfurt Pp. 116.

The Problem of Major Premise in Buddhist Logic

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2014 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

Introduction to Philosophy: The Big Picture

Philosophy Quiz 01 Introduction

ARISTOTLE ( ) p. Mario Neva

FACULTY OF ARTS B.A. Part II Examination,

Am I free? Freedom vs. Fate

Philosophy Courses-1

DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE

A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo

Remarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays

Introduction to Philosophy

1.5 Deductive and Inductive Arguments

Philosophy Courses-1

Greece Achievements Philosophy Socrates

Lecture 4.2 Aquinas Phil Religion TOPIC: Aquinas Cosmological Arguments for the existence of God. Critiques of Aquinas arguments.

The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God

Ibuanyidanda (Complementary Reflection), African Philosophy and General Issues in Philosophy

Peter L.P. Simpson December, 2012

Aristotelian temporal logic: the sea battle.

A Quick Review of the Scientific Method Transcript

Friendship in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

GROUP A WESTERN PHILOSOPHY (40 marks)

Peter L.P. Simpson January, 2015

[1968. In Encyclopedia of Christianity. Edwin A. Palmer, ed. Wilmington, Delaware: National Foundation for Christian Education.]

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

Sophie s World. Chapter 4 The Natural Philosophers

From Transcendental Logic to Transcendental Deduction

The evolution of the meaning of SCIENCE. SCIENCE came from the latin word SCIENTIA which means knowledge.

To better understand VALIDITY, we now turn to the topic of logical form.

Phil 1103 Review. Also: Scientific realism vs. anti-realism Can philosophers criticise science?

Overview of Today s Lecture

Introduction to Ethics Part 2: History of Ethics. SMSU Spring 2005 Professor Douglas F. Olena

THE FOUNDATIONS OF MODERN SCIENCE IN THE MIDDLE AGES

Transcription:

Aristotle (384-322) His scientific thinking, his physics.

Aristotle: short biography Aristotle was a Greek philosopher, a student of Plato and teacher of Alexander the Great. He wrote on many different subjects, including physics, metaphysics, poetry, theater, logic, rhetoric, politics, government, ethics, biology and zoology. His thinking on physics and science had a profound impact on medieval thought, which lasted until the Renaissance.

Brief Biography: Aristotle was born in Stageira, Chalcidice, in 384 BC. His father was the personal physician to King Amyntas of Macedon. At about the age of eighteen, he went to Athens to continue his education at Plato's Academy. Aristotle remained at the academy for nearly twenty years, not leaving until after Plato's death in 347 BC. He then traveled to Asia Minor. While in Asia, Aristotle married Hermias' daughter Pythias. She bore him a daughter. Aristotle was then invited by Philip of Macedon to become tutor to Alexander the Great. After spending several years tutoring the young Alexander, Aristotle returned to Athens. By 335 BC, he established his own school there, known as the Lyceum. He conducted courses at the school for the next twelve years. While in Athens, his wife Pythias died, and Aristotle married Herpyllis of Stageira, who bore him a son whom he named after his father, Nicomachus.

Biography \ After Alexander's death, anti-macedonian sentiment in Athens once again flared. Aristotle was now denounced for not holding the gods in honor. Aristotle fled the city to his mother's family estate in Chalcis, explaining, I will not allow the Athenians to sin twice against philosophy."

Summary of Aristotle s Scientific Thinking The central idea of his scientific thinking: It is not enough to know what a scientific fact is, you must also know why it is a scientific fact.

Summary of Aristotle s Scientific Thinking Central requirement of scientific explanation: Only deductive reasoning (similar to Euclid s geometric reasoning) is valid. I. There are First Principles of all scientific reasoning. II. There are First Principles of Physics that can be discovered (but are not scientifically knowable). III. These principles can be discovered by observation and intuition. IV. Only terrestrial phenomena are amenable in scientific investigation. V. There are necessary, universal facts that can be deduced from these principles.

Summary First Principles of thought (all reasoning): The Principle of Identity (A is A, or: A cannot be both A and not A) The Principle of Non-Contradiction (A cannot be B and not B) The Principle of the Excluded Middle (A is either B or not B)

Summary The First Principles of Physics: All motion is either natural or violent. All natural motion is toward a natural place Violent motion is caused by the continuing Action of an agent. A vacuum is impossible.

Summary Universal Propositions for Physics: Light travels in a straight line. All heavy objects fall toward the center of the earth. All opaque objects cast a shadow. Predicates proper to physics: Position, speed, resistance.

Summary An example of scientific reasoning: 1. Why is there a round shadow on the moon? 2. Because a round shadow is produced when a round opaque body (the earth) is in the path of sun s light that travels to the moon in straight lines. 3. Oh, I see. The sun s light, traveling toward the moon, is intercepted by the earth just now, and that is why there is a shadow on the moon.

Aristotle s Scientific Reasoning Conceptual, ideal, logical base First Principles of all reasoning First Principles of Physics Universal Propositions of Physics Intuitive, imaginative, inductive reasoning Scientific Claim Logical, deductive reasoning Rules of inference, based on syllogistic logic Empirical, experiencial, observational base By induction, to the principles (laws), and by deduction, to the reasoned scientific fact

There were two kinds of terrestrial motions: natural and violent. Aristotle s physics of motion Aristotle s physics of motion Aristotle thought that a cart will come to rest when the horse stops pulling it When objects fall they fall through a medium, such as air or water. He saw a world where there was always resistance offered to motion.

The physics of motion between Aristotle and Galileo ORESME BURIDAN

Aristotle in the middle ages The medieval Italian poet Dante says of Aristotle in his Inferno: I saw the Master there of those who know, Amid the philosophic family, by all admired, and by all reverenced; There Plato too I saw, and Socrates, Who stood beside him closer than the rest.

Tribute to Aristotle Not until Galileo s kinematics (around 1600) and Kepler s laws of planetary motion (around 1620), was Aristotle s physics of motion and his cosmology discredited. But we must remember: Aristotle s view was the dominant, indeed, virtually the only view of the physical sciences for almost two thousand years. Every new way of looking at the world had either to effect a reconciliation with it, or mount sufficient reason to reject it. The scholastics attempt to fuse Aristotle s views with Christian theology, culminating in Thomas Aquinas s works, nearly stopped all efforts to develop alternative approaches to the study of nature.

Aristotle, the logician: Outlined the rules of syllogistic logic, illustrating deductive reasoning. In his work Prior Analytics, he defines syllogism as "a discourse in which, certain things having been supposed, something different from the things supposed results of necessity because these things are so."

Aristotle If it rains, then the sidewalks will be wet. The sidewalks will be wet. Therefore, it rained. (This is deductively incorrect) However: If it rains, then the sidewalks will be wet. The sidewalks were not wet. Therefore, it did not rain. (This is deductively correct)

Major premise: All humans are mortal. Minor premise: Socrates is human. Conclusion: Socrates is mortal. ------------------------------------------------ If it rains, then the sidewalks will be wet. It is raining. Therefore, the sidewalks will be wet. (This is deductively correct)

If it rains, then the sidewalks will be wet. The sidewalks will be wet. Therefore, it rained. (This is deductively incorrect) However: If it rains, then the sidewalks will be wet. The sidewalks were not wet. Therefore, it did not rain. (This is deductively correct)