You have worked, as a team, many months on your memorials. Now the time has come for you to present your legal argumentation before a Court.

Similar documents
DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS

Statement. Assertion. Elaboration. Reasoning. Argument Building. Statement / Assertion

2. Public Forum Debate seeks to encourage the development of the following skills in the debaters: d. Reasonable demeanor and style of presentation

b. Use of logic in reasoning; c. Development of cross examination skills; d. Emphasis on reasoning and understanding; e. Moderate rate of delivery;

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

Basic Debating Skills

RULES FOR DISCUSSION STYLE DEBATE

III. RULES OF POLICY (TEAM) DEBATE. A. General

Who will be invited to the service? Where will the service take place? When will the service take place? Who will do the commissioning?

Debate British Parliament -Roles, Rules & Regulation. UQP1331 Basic Communication

Speaker Roles POI. Refutation. Equity and Etiquette

Marc James Asay v. Michael W. Moore

A Manual for the Local Discernment Committee for a Nominee for Ordination to the Diaconate

The Reason for Our Studies in Romans

ASA below 40 and DIS 40 Seminar

55 Things You Should Know About the Philip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition

William Young J Glazebrook J O Regan J Arnold J. P Cranney and S N Meikle for the Appellant A L Martin and K L Orpin-Dowell for the Respondents

Name: Birthday: Address:

Citation for the original published paper (version of record):

EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE ETHOS STATEMENT AND CODE OF CONDUCT

St. Andrew the Apostle Church Sudbury, ON P3A 3V7 PARISH PASTORAL COUNCIL CONSTITUTION

Never raise new material. Respond to the other team s case. You are not a second speaker you have a very defined role.

EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN SOUTHERN AFRICA YOUNG ADULTS LEAGUE

Before: MR JUSTICE LANGSTAFF Between: LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL

WEEK 1 The Lord's Prayer

EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN SOUTHERN AFRICA YOUNG ADULT LEAGUE CONSTITUTION

Staff Role Description. Worship Pastor. Campus. Part-time, 20+ hours per week Role Type: Exempt

Will We Follow? Nehemiah 13

CRUCIAL TOPICS IN THE DEBATE ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF EXTERNAL REASONS

Good evening, Ladies and Gentlemen, Dr Tiplady, and particularly to the young men who have been invited to our All-Round Excellence Awards tonight.

MC/17/20 A New Framework for Local Unity in Mission: Response to Churches Together in England (CTE)

Attachment C-4 Appendix C Manual of Operations. Ending Ministry Well

The Law Society of Alberta Hearing Committee Report

DEBATING - First Speaker Guide. We, the team, believe that this statement is true/false.

Mortification of the mind and the will. St. Vincent de Paul

Synodical Deputy. Report Forms

Parish Pastoral Council 1. Introduction 2. Purpose 3. Scope

Stake Audit Committee

MINNESOTA SWIMMING, INC. BOARD OF REVIEW

September. ~Faith~ Our Daily Prayer for September

THE SPIRITUAL EXERCISES ST. IGNATIUS LOYOLA REFERENCE FORM

Peacemaking Policy. The Elder Board approved this policy on February 24, The Peacemaker s Pledge from Peacemaker Ministry,

The Uniting Congregations of Aotearoa New Zealand (UCANZ)

Altar Serving TABLE OF CONTENTS ST. ROSE OF LIMA CHURCH SIMI VALLEY, CALIFORNIA

1) What is the universal structure of a topicality violation in the 1NC, shell version?

CANON 8 Of Parish Status and Oversight Version Edited 5/23/18

Missional Community Leader Assessment PRE-WORK FORM

4 Elements of Transformational Leadership

MODEL CONSTITUTION FOR LOCAL CHURCHES (FOR LOCAL CHURCHES ORGANISED AS A CIRCUIT)

Your New Life in Christ

CONSTITUTION OF THE NORTHWEST WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST

Coaches Instructions:

Policy: Validation of Ministries

Interpreting Scripture #2: Interpreting & Applying the Bible

GENERAL DEPOSITION GUIDELINES

School Policies and Procedures

CONSTITUTION & BY-LAWS CENTER CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH 474 BROAD STREET MERIDEN, CT

Parent/Guardian Student Handbook

Refutation Paragraphs

UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE Hearing Script

Bishop Montgomery High School Freshmen Religion Class Information Mrs. Joanne Svarda ex 352

Catholic Funeral Mass Template

UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE Hearing Script

Children Desiring God Curriculum SCOPE AND SEQUENCE RATIONALE

United States Court of Appeals

RECTIFICATION. Summary 2

ST CATHERINE S CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL

PART I: THE RIGHT PEOPLE

Constitution Pleasant Ridge Baptist Church

ARMINIANISM VS CALVINISM

Conversion to Jewish Faith

Ask the student why he/she wants to get baptized. This question is a good gauge for his/her motivation and knowledge.

IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY PARISH FRESHMAN BIBLE STUDY

For further information write: The President s Office The Evangelical Free Church of America 901 East 78th Street Minneapolis, MN

Alleged victims: The author and other members of the Union of Free Thinkers. Views under article 5 (4) of the Optional Protocol

PREPARING LAY WITNESSES FOR TRIAL

Draft reflecting proposed amendments as of January 5, 2017 CONSTITUTION OF THE NORTHWEST WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST

BYLAWS FOR WESTHILL CHURCH

In-house transcript of the First Pre-Inquest Review in the 2 nd Inquest touching the death of Jeremiah Duggan

IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY PARISH FRESHMAN BIBLE STUDY

A SPIRITUAL GIFTS INVENTORY FOR INDIVIDUALS AND CONGREGATIONS From Equipped for Every Good Work by Dan R. Dick and Barbara Miller

BYLAWS The Mount 860 Keller Smithfield Road Keller, TX 76248

Sunday Morning. Study 1. Wise Counsel

AGENDA EXHIBIT Meeting of the LWF COUNCIL Geneva, Switzerland June 2015 Page 1

Bar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18. Student Role Guide: Barrister England, Wales and Northern Ireland

TBI. Temple Baptist Institute. Table of Contents. Mission Statement...3. General Guidelines Definitions...4. Attendance...5. Examinations...

A Guide for Pastors. Getting Started. The Preordination License

ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST

Dr Sam Doherty. Counsel A Christian Child. Guidelines to help believing children grow in Christ

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

ROLES OF TEAMS AND SPEAKERS

Research Package #1. Canadian National Style

JOY. grades 3-6. Ministry

2016 PROSPECTUS TRAINING FOR LIFE AND MINISTRY

APPLICATION FOR STUDENT ADMISSIONS

IN THE MATTER OF a Proceeding under the Certified General Accountants of Ontario Act, 1983 and By-Law Four

Guidelines Concerning the Academic Mandatum

Contents. Acknowledgments... ix. Foreword...xix. Introduction...xxi

MALANKARA MAR THOMA SYRIAN CHURCH DELHI DIOCESE

Praise #2 Praise: The Thank You John 4:23

Transcription:

Pleading before the Court You have worked, as a team, many months on your memorials. Now the time has come for you to present your legal argumentation before a Court. You are pleading in front of a Panel of 3 Judges. They have read your memorials and are very interested in hearing your arguments. It is thus very important to keep an eye contact with the Court. You can see immediately when a judge wants to asks you a question, and also it helps you "facing the Court during all your pleading. Our advice is that each agent should know by heart the first 2 minutes of his/her speech to the Court (see below "How to address the Court and "Example ). It allows the agents to place their voice in the courtroom and to have all the attention of the judges. Also, it gives each pleader the necessary confidence to go on with his/her pleading. Please find here some advice regarding your pleading based on the experience of moot court coaches and team members. During each court session where the team of the Applicant meets the team of the Respondent, each team has 40 minutes to plead (Art. X-2(6) Rules of Procedure). As an example, you are Team 31-A (thus representing the Applicant) meeting Team 40-B (representing the Respondent). The whole Team 31 (composed of 4 students) is present at each court session, even if only 2 of its students plead. The same goes for Team 40, and all the other teams. As the Team 31-A, you may split your pleading time of 40 minutes between your Agent and your co-agent for the Applicant, and the rebuttal. Team 40-B will be doing the same (Agent/co-agent/surrebuttal). Team 31-A may thus, for example, split its time in the following way: Agent A1: 17 minutes Agent A2: 20 minutes Rebuttal: 3 minutes And Team 40-B as follows: Agent B1: 18 minutes Agent B2: 19 minutes Surrebuttal: 3 minutes

NB: Of course, these are examples, the team can split the 40 minutes as follows: 17/17/6 minutes or 18/18/4 minutes, etc. Please keep in mind that you may not use more than 10 minutes for the rebuttal or surrebuttal (Art. X 2(6)). Also, neither the Agent, or his/her co-agent, may speak more than 25 minutes (Art. X 2(7)). Do pay attention to the Time-Keeper. He/She has noted the way you did split your time. 5 minutes before the end of the announced time, he/she will show you a green card with the number "5 on it; then 2 minutes before the end, a yellow card with the number "2 on it. When your time is up, he/she will hold a red card and will ring a bell at the same time. How to address the Court Mister/Madam President, your Honourable Members of the Court. The judges will interrupt you to ask you questions. As soon as the judges ask you a question, stop your pleading at once. Do listen carefully to the questions of the judges. Take your time to formulate your answer, and then answer to the Panel. When you are finished answering the question and that the Judge says that you may proceed, then say: "Thank you, Mr/Madam President and go on with your argument. When you have answered a question and you do not see a reaction from the Bench (such as another question, or you see that the judge seems satisfied with the way you answered the question), then say: "May I proceed, Mr/Madam President? If you have made a mistake during your pleading, such as mentioning the name of Loe when you wanted to say Western Kingdom, then simply re-start your pleading saying "Pardon me. In case you hear the ring, meaning your time is up, do ask the President of the Court if you can be granted some more time to wrap up your argument: "May I have time to wrap up my argument, Mr/Madam President? If you were granted more time and, suppose questions from the Bench were added, you can say when you answered that last question: "Since my time is already up, I would now like to summarize the last claim/wrap up my last argument.

The following is an example on how the pleading could be organised (the way the time is split is an example based on the 40 minutes-rule). Arcadia (Applicant): First Counsel: (Agent A1) Introduction "Mr/Madam President, Honourable Members of the Court, my name is (...), agent for the Applicant, I have the honour to argue on behalf of Arcadia. May I introduce my co-agent, Mr/Ms (...). Your Honours, I would like to reserve 17 minutes of our time for my argument, 20 minutes for my co-agent, and a total of 3 minutes for our rebuttal. Within the scope of Arcadia s first claim, I will show that (...). I will proceed to show that (...) and I will explain (...). My co-agent will proceed by showing also that (...) and that (...). " Base yourselves on the claims you defend before the Court. When you announce the order of your claims/submissions, it helps the Court to follow the logic of your pleading. It also helps you to present a clear argumentation before the Panel and to build your argumentation until the end of your pleading. In this way, when you are asked questions from the Bench, once you are done with the question, you can easily go back to your pleading. Once you announced the "outline of your pleading in such a way, you may add: "If it may please the Court, I would like to start with our first claim. Argument Now, you can start with your pleading, starting of course with your first claim... You are now done with your first submission and would like to move on to your second claim/submission. You could do the following: "Mr/Madam President, if there are no more questions, I will now then move to the second submission. Firstly, I will..., Secondly I will... Then move to your second submission.

Closing your Argument You are now done with your pleading. Here is a possible way to end it: "I would like to thank you for your attention and I now turn over to my co-agent. Thank you very much for your kind attention. Second Counsel: (Agent A-2) -My name is (...) -I would like to continue the argument of Arcadia: First (...) I will then turn to the second and third submission of Arcadia. When you are done with your pleading, you can conclude with the following: "If there are no further questions, I would like now to close my pleading and thank you for your attention. The President now calls for the Respondent to present their arguments. Utopia (Respondent) First Counsel: (Agent B-1) Mr./ Madame President, Honourable members of the Court, my name is [...], and I represent Utopia in the case before this Court. May I introduce my co-agent, Mr./Ms. [...] Yours Honours, I would like to reserve 19 minutes for my argument, 18 minutes for my co-agent and a total of 3 minutes for our surrebuttal. Within the scope of Utopia s first claim, I will show that the application by Arcadia must be dismissed (etc.) I will proceed to show that Utopia. has not violated international law (etc.) My co-agent will proceed by showing also that the Nationality Decree of 5 August 2004 is in accordance (etc.) My co-agent will also explain that was SC Resolution 2345 is not in conformity with international law (etc.)

If it may please the Court, I would like to start with our first claim. Second Council (Agent B2): Mr./ Madame President, Honourable members of the Court, my name is [...], and I represent Utopia in the case before this Court. May I introduce my co-agent, Mr./Ms. [...] Yours Honours, I would like to reserve 19 minutes for my argument, 18 minutes for my co-agent and a total of 3 minutes for our surrebuttal. Within the scope of Utopia s first claim, I will show that the application by Arcadia must be dismissed (etc.) I will proceed to show that Utopia. has not violated international law (etc.) My co-agent will proceed by showing also that the Nationality Decree of 5 August 2004 is in accordance (etc.) My co-agent will also explain that was SC Resolution 2345 is not in conformity with international law (etc.) If it may please the Court, I would like to start with our first claim. Second Council (Agent B2): "Mr/Madam President, Honourable Members of the Court, my name is (...), agent for the Applicant, I have the honour to argue on behalf of Arcadia. May I introduce my co-agent, Mr/Ms (...). Your Honours, I would like to reserve 17 minutes of our time for my argument, 20 minutes for my co-agent, and a total of 3 minutes for our rebuttal. Within the scope of Arcadia s first claim, I will show that (...). I will proceed to show that (...) and I will explain (...). My co-agent will proceed by showing also that (...) and that (...). " Base yourselves on the claims you defend before the Court. When you announce the order of your claims/submissions, it helps the Court to follow the logic of your pleading. It also helps you to present a clear argumentation before the Panel and to build your argumentation until the end of your pleading.

In this way, when you are asked questions from the Bench, once you are done with the question, you can easily go back to your pleading. Once you announced the "outline of your pleading in such a way, you may add: "If it may please the Court, I would like to start with our first claim. Argument Now, you can start with your pleading, starting of course with your first claim... You are now done with your first submission and would like to move on to your second claim/submission. You could do the following: "Mr/Madam President, if there are no more questions, I will now then move to the second submission. Firstly, I will..., Secondly I will... Then move to your second submission. Closing your Argument You are now done with your pleading. Here is a possible way to end it: "I would like to thank you for your attention and I now turn over to my co-agent. Thank you very much for your kind attention. Second Counsel: (Agent A-2) -My name is (...) -I would like to continue the argument of Arcadia: First (...) I will then turn to the second and third submission of Arcadia. When you are done with your pleading, you can conclude with the following: "If there are no further questions, I would like now to close my pleading and thank you for your attention. The President now calls for the Respondent to present their arguments. Utopia (Respondent) First Counsel: (Agent B-1): Mr./ Madame President, Honourable members of the Court, my name is [...], and I represent Utopia in the case before this Court.

May I introduce my co-agent, Mr./Ms. [...] Yours Honours, I would like to reserve 19 minutes for my argument, 18 minutes for my co-agent and a total of 3 minutes for our surrebuttal. Within the scope of Utopia s first claim, I will show that the application by Arcadia must be dismissed (etc.) I will proceed to show that Utopia. has not violated international law (etc.) My co-agent will proceed by showing also that the Nationality Decree of 5 August 2004 is in accordance (etc.) My co-agent will also explain that was SC Resolution 2345 is not in conformity with international law (etc.) If it may please the Court, I would like to start with our first claim. Second Council: Agent B2: Mr. President, honourables members of the Court my name is [...] and I would like to continue the argument for Utopia. I will first show that the Nationality Decree (etc.) I will then turn to my second submission and show that S.C. Resolution 2345 is not in conformity with international law (etc.) If it may please the Court, I will start with our third claim (etc.) When you are done with your pleading, you can conclude with the following: "If there are no further questions, I would like now to close my pleading and thank you for your attention. The second Agent for Utopia (in our example Team 40-B) has now finished his pleading. The President of the Court thanks him/her and calls for one Agent of the Applicant to present his/her rebuttal. Rebuttal: Using our example, Team 31-A comes back before the Court. It is more practical if only one agent (Agent A1 or A2) does this last part of the pleading for the Applicant.

During the rebuttal, keep in mind that only issues raised in the initial arguments may be pinpointed. It is possible that the Court asks the Agent for the Applicant, questions during the rebuttal. The Time-Keeper will also inform you of the time you have left using the same card system (5-2-0 minutes left) as during the first part of your pleading. You can close your rebuttal the same way you closed your pleading. Surrebuttal: Finally, it is time for Team 40-B to proceed with their surrebuttal. Please note that the Court expects from the Respondent Agent (either Agent B1 or B2) to rebut solely to the issues/arguments raised during the rebuttal. The team for the Respondent has thus to listen very carefully to the pleading of the Agent for the Applicant during his/her rebuttal. For example, if during the rebuttal, only 2 arguments were raised, the Agent for the Respondent is expected to respond only to these very 2 arguments. Once the Agent is done, he/she asks permission to the Court to close his/her pleading, and thanks the Court for its attention. It is then that the President of the Court declares the session closed. The Court consequently leaves the Court room to deliberate. The following are helping tools you can use during your pleading, to help you making your pleading more fluent. This list is of course not exhaustive! -I would like to emphasise that... -If I may draw your attention to the fact that... -My Government submits that... -As my co-agent already pointed out... -If you compare with... -As a consequence... -Indeed... -Let me quote the words of... -It is a rule that... -With your permission, I doubt that States would accept...

-I would like to explain why... -With your permission, I quote... -The principles we invoke, etc.