Introduction to Apologetics-Part II

Similar documents
Introduction to Apologetics-Part VI

Acts ; Psalm 4; 1 John 3.1-7; Luke 24.36b-48. THE BLIND MEN AND THE ELEPHANT by John Godfrey Saxe

Christ the King of Hope November 20, 2016 The Rev. Sharon K. Gracen

Personal Experience and Connection with God Rev. Ursula Clara Christ. Given at Nora UU Church Jan 11 th Sermon at UU Mankato Aug.

Comunicación y Gerencia. The Challenge. Introduction to The Apologetics Ministry of Calvary Chapel Corona

WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING AT ALL?

The Blind Men And the Elephant

Self-Refuting Statements

The Blind Men and the Elephant John Godfrey Saxe ( )

In the Power of His Might

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?

Worldview Basics. What are the Major Worldviews? WE102 LESSON 01 of 05

Outline. The Resurrection Considered. Edwin Chong. Broader context Theistic arguments The resurrection Counter-arguments Craig-Edwards debate

THE ARGUMENT FROM RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE Dr. Peter Vardy

Are Men and Women to be Equal in the Church? Part 2

SYLLABUS Southern Evangelical Seminary

Trinity Te Deum. The official newsletter for Trinity Lutheran Church. August- September in this third millennium

INTERFAITH WORSHIP: How Should Christians Respond?

Getting Deeper: Discussion and Activities

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

High School / College Sample Questions Reason for Belief Norman L Geisler. (Updated 14 JUL 2016)

CHRIST THE KING SUNDAY (John 18:33-37)

HOW CAN WE KNOW THE CHRISTIAN GOD IS THE ONE TRUE GOD?

Monday 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM Eastern, or Wednesday 9:45-11:15 AM Eastern

THE ELEPHANT IN THE WORLD

Preliminary Apologetics Syllabus Dr. Timothy McGrew, July 2012

507 Advanced Apologetics BEAR VALLEY BIBLE INSTITUTE 3 semester hours Thomas Bart Warren, Instructor

Message: Gifts that do not tarnish (Based on Discover Your God-Given Gifts by Don & Katie Fortune) 1

In 2003, Mikel was ordained as a missionary by the Baptist General Conference and is a current member of the Evangelical Theological Society.

True and Reasonable Faith Theistic Proofs

The Existence of God

Philosophy Can Establish the Foundation of Your Theology

1 of 4 3/15/2013 5:50 PM

Doctrinal Mastery New Testament Teacher Material

History and the Christian Faith Contributed by Michael Gleghorn

Philosophy Can Establish the. Foundation of Your Theology. Defining Truth

History and the Christian Faith

Trinitarianism. Millard Erickson, Christian Theology (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2001), 290. Copyright , Reclaiming the Mind Ministries.

Conclusion. Critical Thinking

What is Truth? Sermon delivered on July 13th, By: Pastor Greg Hocson

Table of x III. Modern Modal Ontological Arguments Norman Malcolm s argument Charles Hartshorne s argument A fly in the ointment? 86

Contents. Introduction: Why We Believe... Anything...ix

FAITH PATH HELPING FRIENDS FIND THEIR WAY TO CHRIST

[JGRChJ 9 (2013) R28-R32] BOOK REVIEW

Week 3 Current Challenges to Christianity

Weekly Bible Study Series, Vol. 14, No. 32: 8 December 2013 FAITH TO WALK BY

Evidences for Christian Beliefs

Absolute truth or relative terms? Apologetics to believe 1

The General Argument for Christianity

Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS

AP601 Introduction to Apologetics Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, Charlotte Summer

CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS Semester 1, 2013:

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

III Knowledge is true belief based on argument. Plato, Theaetetus, 201 c-d Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Edmund Gettier

The Pilgrim s Progress. Chapter 17: Ignorance and Little-Faith, Part 2

Erev Rosh Hashanah Sermonette 5772/2011 Older Family Service Cantor Michael Shochet

Epistemology. Diogenes: Master Cynic. The Ancient Greek Skeptics 4/6/2011. But is it really possible to claim knowledge of anything?

THE FAITHFUL EXTREME. We can close the apparent gap between faith and reason by avoiding two extremes in our thinking and by taking the middle road

The Historical Reliability of the Gospels An Important Apologetic for Christianity

Atheism From the University to Society. Edwin Chong. April 2, 2006

Theme 1: Arguments for the existence of God inductive, AS

COURSE SYLLABUS. Course Description

ED601 APPLYING WORLDVIEW STUDIES TO CHRISTIAN EDUCATION

A Review of Norm Geisler's Prolegomena

Classical Apologetics:

Words and their Meaning

Gary Zacharias: Apologetics For Life Topics Prepared

Topics and Posterior Analytics. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

Notes for Tactical Faith Talk July

PROOF CHRISTIANITY IS TRUE. Download free ebook at

Getting To God. The Basic Evidence For The Truth of Christian Theism. truehorizon.org

THE HISTORIC ALLIANCE OF CHRISTIANITY AND SCIENCE

The theological reality that Christ died for our sins is a fact of history.

SERMON SERIES ON WHAT WE BELIEVE - We Believe That The Bible Is The Only Inspired, Infallible, And Authoritative Word Of God.

Many cite internet videos, forums, blogs, etc. as a major reason*

COURSE SYLLABUS. Course Description

PHIL5301 Christian Apologetics New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Theological and Historical Studies Division Defend Conference, Jan.

A Case for Christianity

Christian Apologetics PHIL5301 New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary Defend 2019

Hume s Critique of Miracles

Syllabus. Primary Sources, 2 edition. Hackett, Various supplementary handouts, available in class and on the course website.

Evidence Matters. Why We Believe What We Believe and Why Does It Matter?

Birmingham Theological Seminary 2200 Briarwood Way Birmingham, Alabama COURSE OBJECTIVES COURSE TEXTS

Logic: Deductive and Inductive by Carveth Read M.A. CHAPTER IX CHAPTER IX FORMAL CONDITIONS OF MEDIATE INFERENCE

Experience God in 3D. John 14: Series: Believe Week 1. God. The Rev. Dr. Douglas C. Hoglund. The Woodside Church September 25, 2016

GROUNDED IN HISTORY, DIVINE REVELATION, AND HOLY SCRIPTURE

Which God/god? The Existence of God part 7. Acts 17:23

Hume. Hume the Empiricist. Judgments about the World. Impressions as Content of the Mind. The Problem of Induction & Knowledge of the External World

2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1

Philosophy of Ethics Philosophy of Aesthetics. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Realism and anti-realism. University of London Philosophy B.A. Intercollegiate Lectures Logic and Metaphysics José Zalabardo Autumn 2009

Preface. amalgam of "invented and imagined events", but as "the story" which is. narrative of Luke's Gospel has made of it. The emphasis is on the

Was Jesus Really Born of a Virgin? Contributed by Michael Gleghorn

ONE-MINUTE ANSWERS TO SKEPTICS

Are Miracles Identifiable?

Faith and Reason in a Postmodern World

Healing of Two Blind Men and Demoniac. Matthew 9:27-34

- We might, now, wonder whether the resulting concept of justification is sufficiently strong. According to BonJour, apparent rational insight is

The Elephant. Raghavan Iyer The Jewel in the Lotus. In the ancient Hindu scripture, Udana, is a tale called The Blind Men and the Elephant.

A Christian Philosophy of Education

Transcription:

Introduction to Apologetics-Part II Course modeled after Frank Turek and Norman Geisler s I Don t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist curriculum, with additional materials from William Lane Craig, J.P. Moreland, Hugh Ross, Stephen Meyers, John Lennox, Douglas Groothuis, N.T. Wright, Ravi Zacharias, Andy Bannister, Paul Copan, and Rodney Stark. Course Outline: I. The Four Questions Everybody Needs to Ask of Their Belief System II. Can You Handle the Truth? III. The Big Bang of Science and Theology IV. Watchmaker, Watchmaker, Make Me a Watch V. The Herd and the Gut VI. All We Need is a Miracle VII. Can Somebody Give Me a Testimony? VIII. Books of Myth or Books of Truth? IX. Who is This Jesus Guy? X. The One Answer to the Four Questions Can You Handle the Truth? 1. Truth about reality is knowable. 2. The opposite of true is false. 3. It is true that the theistic God exists. 4. If God exists, then miracles are possible. 5. Miracles can be used to confirm a message from God. 6. The New Testament is historically reliable. 7. The New Testament says Jesus claimed to be God. 8. Jesus claim to be God was miraculously confirmed by His fulfillment of prophecies, His sinless life and miraculous deeds, and His prediction and accomplishment of His resurrection. 9. Therefore, Jesus is God. 10. Whatever Jesus (who is God) teaches is true. 11. Jesus taught that the Bible is the Word of God. 12. Therefore, it is true that the Bible is the Word of God (and anything opposed to it is false). Everything in this 12-step argument is built on knowable truth. One of the primary tactics employed today by skeptics is the manipulation of the definition of truth. By utilizing the Southern Evangelical Seminary s Road Runner technique, you will be able quickly to erode the flimsy foundation on which the skeptic s argument is based. The point of utilizing this technique is not to diminish the person, but to put the topic being discussed on a firm and equal foundation so as to discern the real truth.

What is truth? Truth can be defined as or. Five truths about truth 1. Truth is discovered, not invented. It exists independent of anyone s knowledge of it. 2. Truth is transcultural; if something is true, it is true for all people, in all people, at all times. 3. Truth is unchanging even though our beliefs about truth change. 4. Beliefs cannot change a fact. 5. All truth is absolute. The Road Runner Tactic The Road Runner Tactic is so named because of the famous cartoon shorts featuring Wile E. Coyote doing everything he can to outsmart and catch the Road Runner. Inevitably, he ends up a victim of his own design and device, and crashes down to earth when he realizes that he is foiled. The truth relativist can fall victim to their own claims, similar to Wile E. Coyote. Remember what Ravi Zacharias said about the importance of questioning the questioner? Here is a great opportunity to do so. And the best way to learn how to do it is to do it! Turn the statement back on itself with the Road Runner Tactic: 1. All truth is relative. 2. There is no absolute truth. 3. Truth cannot be known. 4. All religions are the same. 5. It may be true to you, but not to me. 6. You shouldn t judge me. What we have done utilizing the Road Runner Tactic is to expose the statement s logical fallacy; or, better yet, its violation of the Law of Non-Contradiction. The Law of Non-Contradiction states that contradictory claims cannot both be true at the same time in the same sense. Making a claim that violates the Law on Non-Contradiction is to make a claim that is self-refuting and self-defeating. Two philosophers whose philosophies can t handle the truth 1. David Hume has had an enormous impact on the rise of skepticism in this country. His work, Of Miracles (1749), which denies the existence of miracles, is still referenced by skeptics today.

Hume makes the claim that truth propositions are only meaningful if, and only if, they meet the two following conditions: A. The truth claim is abstract reasoning such as a mathematical equation or definition; or B. The truth claim can be verified empirically through one or more of the five senses. Utilizing the Road Runner Tactic, demonstrate the self-defeating claim Hume makes. 2. Immanuel Kant also continues to have tremendous influence on how our society engages in philosophy. His claim is that no one can know the truth of the real world, it is simply unknowable. Your mind through the senses simply interprets what it experiences; it does not grasp the full knowability of an object or idea. Utilizing the Road Runner Tactic, demonstrate the self-defeating claim Kant makes. Remember: The four questions everyone needs to ask of their belief system Every worldview must give answers to these four questions: 1. Where did we come from (origin)? 2. Why are we here (purpose)? 3. How should we live (morality)? 4. What happens when we die (destiny)? Why would someone reject the truth if it was shown that a particular worldview could substantively and comprehensively answer all four questions? Terms you need to know Define these terms: 1. Tolerance (old and new definitions) 2. Pluralism

3. Law of the Excluded Middle 4. Inductive Reasoning 5. Deductive Reasoning How does Christianity differ from other religions truth claims? 1. Jesus_ 2. Salvation 3. Creation 4. Sin But I feel like It is essential to curb the use of the verb to feel when expressing your thoughts on a topic. In our current cultural climate, I feel is employed when I think or It seems to me would be a much better option. I feel is very relativist and denotes it may not be true for you because I m going by my emotions connotation. Give stronger versions to the following statements: 1. I feel like Christianity is true. 2. I feel that everyone else is wrong about that issue. 3. I feel like this country is losing its direction. Perception is not reality. Reality is reality. It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so. -Mark Twain

Let your yes be yes, and your no be no. When dealing with the hard truths of Christianity don t beat around the bush and change the truth to relativism. Is it true that Christians believe that Christ is the only way to heaven? Yes. Is it true that God only loves those who believe in Him? No. Blind men and the elephant There is an old parable that is continually expressed by relativist as their demonstration of multiple paths to God. Blind Men and the Elephant poem by John Godfrey Saxe (1816 1887) It was six men of Indostan To learning much inclined, Who went to see the Elephant(Though all of them were blind), That each by observation Might satisfy his mind The First approached the Elephant, And happening to fall Against his broad and sturdy side, At once began to bawl: God bless me! but the Elephant Is very like a wall! The Second, feeling of the tusk, Cried, Ho! what have we here So very round and smooth and sharp? To me tis mighty clear This wonder of an Elephant Is very like a spear! The Third approached the animal, And happening to take The squirming trunk within his hands, Thus boldly up and spake: I see, quoth he, the Elephant Is very like a snake! The Fourth reached out an eager hand, And felt about the knee. What most this wondrous beast is like Is mighty plain, quoth he; Tis clear enough the Elephant Is very like a tree! The Fifth, who chanced to touch the ear, Said: E en the blindest man Can tell what this resembles most; Deny the fact who can This marvel of an Elephant Is very like a fan! The Sixth no sooner had begun About the beast to grope, Than, seizing on the swinging tail That fell within his scope, I see, quoth he, the Elephant Is very like a rope!

And so these men of Indostan Disputed loud and long, Each in his own opinion Exceeding stiff and strong, Though each was partly in the right, And all were in the wrong! Moral So oft in theologic wars, The disputants, I ween, Rail on in utter ignorance Of what each other mean, And prate about an Elephant Not one of them has seen! How would you refute the moral of the poem (use the Road Runner Tactic)? Amazing grace! How sweet the sound That saved a wretch like me. I once was lost, but now am found, Was blind but now I see.