Things engineers might ask for. Things engineers might ask for. Argumentation: two aspects. Argumentation: two aspects

Similar documents
Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Full file at

Persuasive Argument Relies heavily on appeals to emotion, to the subconscious, even to bias and prejudice. Characterized by figurative language,

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

The Argumentative Essay

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

Everything s an Argument Guided Study Notes, Chapters Chapter 16: What Counts in Evidence

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

CHAPTER 13: UNDERSTANDING PERSUASIVE. What is persuasion: process of influencing people s belief, attitude, values or behavior.

Chapter 13: Argument Convincing Others

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

The Toulmin Model in Brief

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

Lemon Bay High School AP Language and Composition ENC 1102 Mr. Hertz

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

ARGUMENT: CONVINCING OTHERS

Logical Fallacies RHETORICAL APPEALS

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

Course Objectives: Upon successful completion of this course, students will have demonstrated

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Critical Thinking Questions

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 7: Logical Fallacies

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

Persuasive Essay. Writing Workshop. writer s road map

Annotated Works Consulted

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

THE ALLYN & BACON GUIDE TO WRITING

2016 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

Chapter Five. Persuasive Writing

Do you really know? Is Knowledge Possible? Skepticism and Fideism. Skepticism sounds like

All About Writing Standard #1: Standard Progression and Research Base

Sociology 475 Classical Sociological Theory. Office: 8103 Social Science Bldng

NEW YORK CITY A STANDARDS-BASED SCOPE & SEQUENCE FOR LEARNING READING By the end of the school year, the students should:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

What an argument is not

Chapter 15. Elements of Argument: Claims and Exceptions

Legacy Ministry: A permanent benefit for God, the Church, and its members

The Roman empire ended, the Mongol empire ended, the Persian empire ended, the British empire ended, all empires end, and none lasts forever.

Step 3 (Support Your Ideas)

Georgia Quality Core Curriculum 9 12 English/Language Arts Course: American Literature/Composition

Philosophy of Love, Sex, and Friendship WESTON. Arguments General Points. Arguments are sets of reasons in support of a conclusion.

Department of Philosophy

Introduction. Strategies

L2. Logic and Reasoning

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

FOURTH GRADE. WE LIVE AS CHRISTIANS ~ Your child recognizes that the Holy Spirit gives us life and that the Holy Spirit gives us gifts.

Logical Appeal (Logos)

Claim Types C L A S S L E C T U R E N O T E S Identifying Types of Claims in Your Papers

New Testament Exegesis Outline Template by Rev. D. E. Norczyk

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

Developing Strong Thesis Statements

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS/BENCHMARKS

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

PHI 300: Introduction to Philosophy

Bellwork Friday November 18th

United States History and Geography: Modern Times

TOK FALLACIES Group 1: Clark Godwin, Kaleigh Rudge, David Fitzgerald, Maren Dorne, Thanh Pham

Purdue OWL Logic in Argumentative Writing

The Persuasive Speech

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Checking Your Arguments

Physics 496 Introduction to Research. Lecture 2.0: Tools for the Scientific Skeptic (Based on a talk by Lance Cooper)

Chapter 1. What is Philosophy? Thinking Philosophically About Life

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 1 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 1

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

3.2: FAULTY REASONING AND PROPAGANDA. Ms. Hargen

COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?

LA Mission College Mark Pursley Fall 2016 Note:

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

Louisiana English Language Arts Content Standards BENCHMARKS FOR 5 8

Ethos, Logos, Pathos: Three Ways to Persuade

Spring 2015 REL 3563 (01ED) AMERICAN CATHOLICISM

Phil 341: Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. CSUN Spring, 2016 Prof. Robin M. Muller. Office: Sierra Tower 506

TEACHING ASSISTANTS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM SCHOOL OF SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING Spring 2015

College Writing: Supporting Your Thesis

OTTAWA ONLINE PHL Basic Issues in Philosophy

OT 3XS3 SAMUEL. Tuesdays 1:30pm 3:20pm

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Fallacies. Definition: The premises of an argument do support a particular conclusion but not the conclusion that the arguer actually draws.

2/4/2012. AP English III; Compiled by J. A. Stanford, Jr.; modified by Erin Graham. All images: Microsoft ClipArt, unless otherwise cited.

Argumentation Paper Honors/AP Language and Composition English 11

Prentice Hall United States History 1850 to the Present Florida Edition, 2013

Logic and Nosich s Elements

Understanding Thesis and Support

Conte. Secretary AIPH Committee for Novelty Protection. October 22, George Franke Essentially derived varieties and the perspective of growers Y

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Epistemic Consequentialism, Truth Fairies and Worse Fairies

Transcription:

Technical Communication Engineering 100.250 Things engineers might ask for Argumentation and Persuasion Proposals Things engineers might ask for Actions Money Argumentation: two aspects Permission Belief Any others? Conviction: showing the truth of a proposition. Persuasion: convincing people to act upon what you have shown. Argumentation: two aspects Conviction: showing the truth of a proposition. What do you first consider in deciding how to persuade? Some call this argumentation. 1

You consider audience. Understanding your audience helps you with Organization Level I always talk a lot about audience. Tone Appeal Some things generally useful to know about an audience How much they know about the issue. The predispositions they may have. Their opinions on the matter. Should we consider their emotional state? Their personalities. What else? Three recognized appeals To Reason To Emotion To Ethics The appeal to reason is simply an appeal to rational argument. They are used in different situations. 2

The appeal to reason is simply an appeal to rational argument. The appeal to emotion tries to whip up feelings in favor of something, but without much rationality. It supposes, of course, that your audience is rational. https://www.ispot.tv/ad/7dg0/geico-gecko-outtakes The ethical appeal involves moral arguments. So, there are three different appeals. Where do you see them? In engineering, two appeals predominate Appeal to reason Appeal to ethics The bases of an argument Claim Support 3

Claims The United States is a republic The Earth is a sphere The 1987 Ford Mustang weighs 2756 lbs Babe Didrickson was the greatest athlete of the 20 th Century How do these claims differ? Claims Who was the greatest athlete of the 20 th century? The United States is a republic The Earth is a sphere The 1987 Ford Mustang weighs 2756 lbs Babe Didrickson was the greatest athlete of the 20 th Century Requires a criterion-based (or non-sense) argument. Babe Didriksen Zaharias http://www.realclearsports.com/lists/best_athlete_golfers/babe_didrikson_zaharias.html?state=stop Babe Didriksen was the greatest athlete of the 20 th century, she won two gold medals and one silver for track and field events in the 1932 Olympics was an excellent baseball player was an excellent tennis player was an all-american basketball player was the leading female professional golfer in the 1940s and 1950s The Didriksen argument: convincing or not? Anything missing? Yes! There is a missing term or piece to the argument. But what is it? 4

Missing terms? All-around athletes are better than athletes that specialize. The best all-around athlete is therefore the best athlete. Are these statements true? All-around athletes are better than athletes that specialize. The best all-around athlete is therefore the best athlete. You would agree that they need to be accepted by the audience! Work on that as part of the argument. The Toulmin model: a new way of looking at arguments Toulmin Model: The Toulmin approach sees an argument as a progression from accepted facts or evidence (data) to a conclusion (claim) by way of a statement (warrant), which establishes a reasonable relationship between them. Adapted from Hodges, John, et al. (1990).Harbrace College Handbook, Eleventh Edition. Orlando: Harcourt Brace. Example of argument as Toulmin Model Example of argument as Toulmin Model Data Seabiscuit is a horse Claim (therefore) Seabiscuit has four legs Data Last night Jones drove through the city at 145 mph Claim (therefore) Jones drove recklessly last night Warrant (because) All horses have four legs Warrant Driving at an extremely high rate of speed is a form of reckless driving. 5

Warrants Warrants Generally accepted views or opinions Generally accepted views or opinions Justify the conclusion drawn from the data Justify the conclusion drawn from the data Are often assumed or left unexpressed. Are often assumed or left unexpressed. But this can be very dangerous if the warrant is not obvious to your audience. Find a warrant Find a warrant Claim: The ipad 2 computer is portable. Data: The ipad 2 weighs 1.33 lbs (601g) Warrant? Claim: The Generac GP 3250 electric generator is portable. Data: The Generac GP 3250 weighs 115 lbs (52.16 kilos). Warrant? ipad2 http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file%3aipad2.jpeg Warrants may be thought of as belonging to three classes Authoritative Motivational Authoritative warrants Depend on the general assertion that a qualified authority would support the conclusion based upon the evidence. Substantive After W. Brockriede and D. Ehninger (1960); C. Kock (2006). 6

Motivational warrants Depend on an appeal to the audience s values. Substantive warrants Resemble more conventional forms of argumentation Fall into one of six categories Cause and effect Sign Parallel case Analogy Generalization Classification What warrant would work here? Claim: Roderick is cold Data: Roderick is shivering Which type of warrant is this? Claim: Roderick is cold Data: Roderick is shivering Warrant: shivering often indicates that a person is cold. Which type of warrant is this? Claim: Roderick is sick. Data: Roderick is shivering. What warrant would work here? Claim: Janet will live to be at least 90 years old. Data: All of Janet s parents and grandparents lived to be over 90 years old. Warrant: shivering often indicates that a person is suffering from a fever. 7

Which type of warrant is this? Claim: Janet will live to be at least 90 years old. Data: All of Janet s parents and grandparents lived to be over 90 years old. Warrant: People can expect to live as long as their immediate ancestors. Substantive. Which? Perhaps generalization, perhaps analogy. Which type of warrant is this? Claim: eating oranges will help prevent colds Data: oranges are a good source of vitamin C Warrant: Linus Pauling states that vitamin C is effective in preventing colds Authoritative Which warrant? Claim: Graduate engineering student Robert Smith plagiarized his doctoral thesis at State University. Data: Over the last two years, the engineering college of State University has found nine of its graduate students guilty of plagiarism on their doctoral theses. Persuasion in action The vacuum cleaner salesman Warrant? Substantive: generalization The salesman s three goals Establishing goodwill (or trust) Showing a problem Suggesting a solution The classical argument 1. Problem/Introduction 2. Credentials 3. Position/Solution 4. Background of Problem 5. Argument for Position or Solution 6. Conclusion SOURCE: Olsen, L. & Huckin, T. (1991). Technical Writing and Professional Communication, 2nd. Ed. McGraw-Hill 8

Faulty Reasoning: some examples Begging the question Tax money should be spent on useful enterprises, such as giving primary school students laptop computers. Ascending and Descending by M.C. Escher http://www.artwallpapers.net/art/mc_escher/02/mc_escher02.jpg Black and White Fallacy (also known as False Dilemma or Either/Or) This presents the listener with only two alternatives, when in fact there are more. Black and White Fallacy (also known as False Dilemma or Either/Or) Example: Either you support the Supreme Court s most recent decisions or you are opposed to the Constitution of the United States. Hasty generalization A survey of 200 people living in Florida shows that 70 percent of Americans play golf at least twice a week. Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc Bob Phillips was elected mayor of Treeville, and three months later the city s crime rate had risen 20%. This shows how bad Mayor Phillips has been for the city. 9

Undistributed middle All ipods are electronic devices, and all televisions are electronic devices. Therefore, all ipods are televisions. Irrelevant appeal John Lear, son of the developer of the Lear Jet, is a retired airline pilot with countless hours of flying time and numerous awards to his credit. During his career he worked for 28 different airlines and successfully tested 150 different experimental aircraft. He asserts that the United States Government has been conducting secret mining operations on the moon since the 1960s. Non Sequitur Professor Ertegun is known for his scrupulous honesty; he will certainly make great progress in the application of carbon nanotube technology. Equivocation Only man is rational. No woman is a man, therefore no woman is rational. A persuasive document Proposals Makes a claim and Furnishes support for a claim 10

A proposal does two things It makes a claim: You need job X done I can do job X What might your claims be in this situation? It furnishes support for a claim: Here is the proof that I can do job X Is a proposal purely persuasive? I propose microprocessor-based toy that What would constitute proofs that you can do the job you propose? Can be built by a team of four Can be built by our team of four Can be completed in six weeks Will be educational Can be economically produced Is marketable Knowledge Experience Sufficient time Sufficient personnel Anything else? So, you are basically saying Here is work you need done I can do the work Here s why my team can do the work All of which tends to breakdown into these sections Background Details of proposed work Explanation of evaluation of proposed work Material, personnel and equipment requirements Explanation of expertise Budget (not applicable in this case) 11

Background Information needed by the audience to understand the details of the proposal A detailed description of a microprocessorbased educational toy is not It will work just like Angry Birds, but it will use the Alterra microprocessor. What might this be in this case? Erwin Schrödinger 1887 to 1961 Perhaps a detailed description of the game? http://ru.laser.ru/gallery/minta/index.html Arguments that your product fulfills LTB s requirements Educational Marketable Novel And anything else you think matters. And don t forget any necessary warrants. Details of proposed work: specific tasks Explanation of how the work meets the proposed objectives How work will be completed When work will be completed What might this be in this case? Explanation of evaluation Telling the reader how to judge whether the work has been successful Material, personnel and equipment requirements Examples in this case might be the hardware and software required What might this be in this case? 12

Explanation of expertise Here you tell the reader why you (or your team) can do the work Don t forget your warrant! Simplified proposal structure Overview: informational abstract Simple introduction including scope of proposed work Background: information needed by the reader to understand the proposal Details of proposed work: clear description of the tasks needed to accomplish the proposed work and a statement of how long it will take to accomplish them. Explanation of how the work will be judged to be successfully completed. Simplified proposal structure, cont d Material, personnel and equipment requirements for proposed work Explanation of the proposer's expertise Statement of the qualifications of those who propose to do the work Conclusion: statement of the main recommendations of the proposed work and statement of how it meets the requirements established by the proposer or the client Abstracts: brief summaries of reports Two types Informational Descriptive Purpose of an abstract: The abstract enables prospective readers to determine whether the report will be useful and whether they need to read all of it or only parts of it. Descriptive abstracts Describe what the report is about Are often like a table of contents in paragraph form Hodges, J. C. (1990). Harbrace College Handbook. 11 th Edition. Chicago: Harcourt Brace. 13

Informative abstracts Are the report in miniature State all the essential points Give the reader all essential information Are generally longer than descriptive abstracts Descriptive abstracts Tell what the topic of the report is Do not summarize a report s content Informational abstracts... Gives the gist, or essence, of a piece of writing; it includes the most significant material in the writing. It is the report in miniature. Mills, G. and Walter, J. (1978). New York: Holt, Rinehart Abstract We propose to create a device that distorts the human voice when users speak on the telephone. The device would allow users to sound like one of six celebrities (Adele, Mickey Mouse, Darth Vader, Jim Carrey, Katherine Hepburn and Sandra Bullock) whose vocal characteristics will be programmed into the device. We believe the device would be a popular novelty item, and our team could produce a prototype of this device in six weeks at a cost of $5,200. (Informational ) Abstract This is a proposal for a novelty item, a vocal distortion device for use with telephones. It gives background explaining what it is and how it would work, how it could be marketed, a schedule for its development, an explanation of the expertise of the team proposing to develop the device, a detailed budget for its development, and an explanation of how the prototype may be judged a success. About the proposal assignment We will use an informational abstract as an overview We will not use a cover page We will not use a table of contents (Descriptive) 14

Summation Argumentation involves conviction and persuasion Toulmin model explains arguments as claims supported by data by means of a warrant Toulmin warrants are of three sorts: authoritative, motivational and substantive Arguments of fact precede arguments of policy Summation, cont d Proposals are persuasive documents The sections work together to support the claim that the proposer can do work that the client needs Abstracts are of two kinds: Descriptive Informational 15