Logic Practice Test 1

Similar documents
I. Claim: a concise summary, stated or implied, of an argument s main idea, or point. Many arguments will present multiple claims.

Practice Test Three Spring True or False True = A, False = B

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley

The Toulmin Model in Brief

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

5: Preliminaries to the Argument

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

What should I believe? What should I believe when people disagree with me?

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

Video: How does understanding whether or not an argument is inductive or deductive help me?

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

Richard L. W. Clarke, Notes REASONING

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Let s explore a controversial topic DHMO. (aka Dihydrogen monoxide)

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106

I'd Like to Have an Argument, Please.

Portfolio Project. Phil 251A Logic Fall Due: Friday, December 7

Argumentation. 2. What should we consider when making (or testing) an argument?

1/19/2011. Concept. Analysis

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

CRITICAL THINKING (CT) MODEL PART 1 GENERAL CONCEPTS

PHI 1700: Global Ethics

A Brief Introduction to Key Terms

Introduction Symbolic Logic

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

Inductive Logic. Induction is the process of drawing a general conclusion from incomplete evidence.

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

Book Review. Juho Ritola. Informal Logic, Vol. 28, No. 4 (2008), pp

The Argumentative Essay

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Subjective Logic: Logic as Rational Belief Dynamics. Richard Johns Department of Philosophy, UBC

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

Helpful Hints for doing Philosophy Papers (Spring 2000)

stage 2 Logic & Knowledge

1/6. The Resolution of the Antinomies

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Logic, Truth & Epistemology. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

USING LOGOS WISELY. AP Language and Composition

ISSA Proceedings 1998 Wilson On Circular Arguments

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

Basic Concepts and Skills!

Bellwork Friday November 18th

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

II Plenary discussion of Expertise and the Global Warming debate.

Critical Thinking. The Four Big Steps. First example. I. Recognizing Arguments. The Nature of Basics

This fallacy gets its name from the Latin phrase "post hoc, ergo propter hoc," which translates as "after this, therefore because of this.

CSC290 Communication Skills for Computer Scientists

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

Fallacies in logic. Hasty Generalization. Post Hoc (Faulty cause) Slippery Slope

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

Indian Philosophy Prof. Satya Sundar Sethy Department of Humanities and Social Sciences Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Session Two. The Critical Thinker s Toolkit

Philosophical Arguments

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Take Home Exam #1. PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy Prof. Lauren R. Alpert

So how does Descartes doubt everything?

The Critique (analyzing an essay s argument)

Argument. What is it? How do I make a good one?

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

This online lecture was prepared by Dr. Laura Umphrey in the School of Communication at Northern Arizona University

1.2. What is said: propositions

What s all the fuss about? Jim Skypeck, MA, MLIS

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

IDHEF Chapter 2 Why Should Anyone Believe Anything At All?

Skim the Article to Find its Conclusion and Get a Sense of its Structure

Today s Tasks. 1. Argument 2. Fallacies: a. Ad Hominem b. Straw Man c. Appeal to ignorance d. Begging the Question

MITOCW Lec 2 MIT 6.042J Mathematics for Computer Science, Fall 2010

Convincing People You re Right, With Style. actuality it is not. Writing in this form is simply making use of both critical thought, and

Chapter Five. Persuasive Writing

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

2/4/2012. AP English III; Compiled by J. A. Stanford, Jr.; modified by Erin Graham. All images: Microsoft ClipArt, unless otherwise cited.

DEVELOPING & SUSTAINING YOUR ARGUMENT. GRS Academic Writing Workshop, 12 th March Dr Michael Azariadis

Logical (formal) fallacies

Make sure you are properly registered Course web page : or through Class Notes link from University Page Assignment #1 is due

Objections, Rebuttals and Refutations

Christ-Centered Critical Thinking. Lesson 6: Evaluating Thinking

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Philosophy of Science. Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology

Questions for Critically Reading an Argument

Nested Testimony, Nested Probability, and a Defense of Testimonial Reductionism Benjamin Bayer September 2, 2011

PHILOSOPHY OF KNOWLEDGE & REALITY W E E K 7 : E P I S T E M O L O G Y - K A N T

AICE Thinking Skills Review. How to Master Paper 2

Fallacies Keep in Your Binder

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Kantian Deontology. A2 Ethics Revision Notes Page 1 of 7. Paul Nicholls 13P Religious Studies

Review of Nathan M. Nobis s Truth in Ethics and Epistemology

A Brief History of Thinking about Thinking Thomas Lombardo

There are two common forms of deductively valid conditional argument: modus ponens and modus tollens.

2017 Philosophy. Higher. Finalised Marking Instructions

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

Transcription:

Logic Practice Test 1 Name True or False 1. Implying is said to be analogous to hearing. 2. Opinions can be mistaken, but knowledge cannot. 3. According to the book, whatever a person thinks is true is true, because he or she thinks it is. 4. Inappropriate attitudes toward ideas and the reasoning process can lead to errors in argument. 5. Correct premises plus valid reasoning equal a sound argument. 6. According to the textbook, the term opinion refers to expressions of judgment rather than to expressions of taste 7. According to the textbook, "I feel" and "I think" are interchangeable terms. 8. According to the book, opinions about moral issues, like other opinions, can be correct or incorrect. 9. According to Dr. Ruggierro, the term opinion refers to expression of judgment rather than to expressions of taste. 10. Evidence is sufficient if one view of the issue has been shown to have the force of probability. 11. An arguer commits the fallacy of equivocation when they use a key word in two or more senses in the same argument and the apparent success of the argument depends on the shift in meaning. 12. Better student papers do not use sources because the use of sources require appeals to authority. 13. You can safely assume that, if a person has a vested interest in an issue, any position that he or she takes on that subject must be false or weakly supported. 14. It is impossible to know something and be wrong. 15. Celebrity testimonies are among the most trustworthy because everybody knows the people giving them. 16. A good way to avoid bias is to rate sources by how favorable they are to your thinking. 17. Tolerance requires that all opinions be considered equally valid. 18. According to the textbook, opinions about moral issues are subjective and personal. Page 1, v2

19. In an argument from analogy, the inference you can draw becomes stronger as the number of relevant similarities increase. 20. According to Dr. Ruggierro mass media tend to encourage emotional and impulsive responses. 21. When a term's meaning gives rise to difficult "borderline" cases, it is said to be vague. 22. Inferences are by definition, unstated. 23. Inferences are conclusions drawn by the receiver. 24. Victor Frankl confirmed Abraham Maslow's thesis (hierarchy of needs) htat self-actualization is the highest human need. 25. One of the three requirements for knowing is that you must be able to prove it to somebody else. 26. An argument is fallacious when the reasons offered fail to warrant acceptance of the conclusion. 27. The words "issue" and "topic" are interchangable. 28. An idea or thought, especially a generalized idea of a thing or of a class of things is called a concept. Multiple Choice 29. When evaluating the purpose, goal, or end in view, which of the following is NOT an important consideration? A. Check periodically to be sure you are still on target B. Identify differing purposes C. Identify non-critical thinking motives D. Choose significant and realistic purposes E. Identify weaknesses in your opponent's reasons 30. If a person has the flu, then they are sick. Joe doesn't have the flu. So, he isn't sick. A. correct reasoning B. incorrect reasoning 31. "Toyota has recalled two million cars for brake repairs." Identify the error: A. loaded language B. misleading terminology C. questionable cause D. vagueness E. no error 32. The function of the is to raise the question which will be answered by the reasoning process. A. conclusion B. issue C. implication D. topic E. inference Page 2, v2

33. Suppose Bernice is a religious person, but discovers that there is no god. Which is NOT an implication of this discovery? A. The existence of God depends on whether or not one believes he exists. B. The Bible isn't true. C. Life has no inherent purpose. D. No one hears her prayers. E. People have no intrinsic value apart from what they give themselves. 34. "She is wearing red shoes. Her favorite color must be red." The assumption is... A. People only wear shoes that are their favorite color. B. Her favorite color must be red. C. She is wearing red shoes. D. No assumption. 35. According to Dr. Ruggiero, saying, I think, or I believe instead of I know... A. should be avoided, because it shows weakness to your opponent. B. indicates caution in your level of certainty. C. shows good sense, restraint, and intellectual honesty. D. proves to everyone that you don t know what you re talking about. E. both b) and c) 36. All birds are animals. Mike the parrot is a bird. Therefore, Mike the bird is an animal. A. correct reasoning B. incorrect reasoning 37. "97% of scientists agree that humans are causing global warming." Identify the error. A. questionable cause B. scientism C. appeal to popularity D. tradition E. no error 38. A broad category of arguments where there is a leap between the reasons and the conclusion that does not follow is called. A. non-sequitur B. ad homimen C. faulty assumption D. an implication 39. A connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition is called: A. an argument B. logic C. a dispute D. rationalism E. empirical evidence Page 3, v2

40. Evaluating arguments involves which of the following? A. Determining whether the argument has been persuasively given. C. Determining whether the premises are true or false. E. Determining how the argument makes you feel. 41. Dr. Ruggierro takes the position that... B. Determining whether the reasoning from premises to the conclusion is valid. D. Determining whether the conclusion is widely accepted. A. the mind is passive, a blank slate on which experience writes. B. the mind is active, a vehicle by which we take the initiative and exercise our free will. 42. One's is a dynamic influence on our reasoning, because it can change throughout a day. A. paradigm B. place in history C. truth D. role 43. The study and the method dealing with the structure and principles of reasoning of sound argument is called... A. Logic. B. Empiricism. C. Psychology. D. an argument. E. Philosophy. 44. New drugs are bringing relief to many depressed people. The main error is... A. appeal to popularity B. non-sequitur C. vague D. no error 45. "I don't see the slightest reason to believe Tom. He's a complete fool. Every word he utters sounds like the braying of a mule. He spouts on and on and says nothing. He complains and whines at the slightest provocation. He now wants us to build a little bridge over the river, where it floods in the spring. How crazy can he get? He never runs out of suggestions, and they're all nonsense." There are many errors in this passage. But the main one is... A. ad hominem B. questionable cause C. intimidation D. appeal to authority Page 4, v2

46. Background beliefs, particular facts as well as general theories, that comprise our understanding of reality are referred to as... A. subjectivism. B. personal truth. C. science D. a world view. E. both b) and c). 47. Interpretation means... A. Finding evidence. B. Deciding what the evidence means. C. Reaching a conclusion about the issue. 48. "Groups are more important than individuals." Identify the error: A. invalid argument B. category error C. incorrect implication D. vague generalization E. no error 49. All men have blue eyes. I am a man. Therefore, I have blue eyes. A. correct reasoning B. incorrect reasoning 50. An idea or thought, especially a generalized idea of a thing or of a class of things is called... A. subjectivism B. meaningless C. transcendental D. incorrigible Confucianism. E. a concept 51. An unstated premise that is needed to render an argument valid is called... A. an implication. B. empiricism. C. an issue. D. an assumption. E. an inference. 52. An issue is always stated as: A. A prescription B. A topic C. A question D. A statement of fact 53. We may have good reason to doubt the credibility of a source if... A. the source is not a genuine expert or authority on the topic he or she is discussing. B. the issue is not one that can be settled by expert opinion. C. both a and b D. none of the above Page 5, v2

54. The word "whether" indicates which parts of an argument? A. reason B. conclusion C. issue D. premise E. none of the above 55. If it is raining, then there are clouds. There are clouds. Therefore it is raining. A. valid B. invalid 56. Which of the following does NOT involve the empirical dimension? A. The skid marks at an accident scene. B. The number of times you arrived late to class. C. A knife was found next to the body. D. Twenty-three moons are now known to orbit Jupiter. E. An isosceles triangle is a triangle that has at least two congruent sides. 57. The term multilogical describes situations where... A. the law of the excluded middle becomes void. B. the use of logic becomes impossible, so no claim is true, and reasoning is pointless. C. a number of complex factors must be considered in the reasoning process. D. logical inconsistency reigns E. both a) and c). Page 6, v2

Answer Key for Test COA_Logic_Practic_Test01_S17, 3/3/17 No. in No. on Q-Bank Test Correct Answer 1 137 1 F 17 57 2? 17 51 3 Review the text Chapter 3 17 21 4 T Ch. 7 17 20 5 T Ch. 7 17 8 6 T 17 3 7 F Ch. 2 17 58 8 Review the text 17 55 9 Review the text 17 60 10 T Chapter 6 2 128 11 T 2 162 12 F 2 126 13 F 1 232 14 T 1 15 15 F 17 59 16 F Chapter 6 17 11 17 F 17 9 18 F 2 159 19 T 17 42 20 Review the text Chapter 1 2 116 21 T 1 117 22 F 1 8 23 T 17 43 24 Review the text Chapter 1 17 53 25 Review the text Chapter 4 2 201 26 T 1 211 27 F 1 70 28 T 1 105 29 Identify weaknesses in your opponent's reasons 22 5 30 Incorrect 22 1 31 No error 1 106 32 Issue 1 120 33 The existence of God depends on whether or not one believes he exists. 22 7 34 People only wear shoes that are their favorite color. 1 29 35 E 22 6 36 Correct Page 1, v2

Answer Key for Test COA_Logic_Practic_Test01_S17, 3/3/17 No. in No. on Q-Bank Test Correct Answer 22 10 37 Bppeal to popularity (also called ad populum) 22 8 38 Non-sequitur 1 131 39 A 17 61 40 Eetermining whether the premises are true or false and Determining whether the reasoning from premises to the conclusion is valid. Chapter 7 17 46 41 Review the text Chapter 2 1 111 42 D 1 52 43 Logic 22 11 44 Vague 22 9 45 Ad hominem 1 20 46 D 17 47 47 Review the text Chapter 2 22 2 48 Vague 22 4 49 Correct 1 28 50 E a concept 1 51 51 D 1 129 52 B question 2 145 53 Both a and b 1 107 54 C 22 3 55 Invalid 1 114 56 E 1 19 57 C Page 2, v2