Explanation and Proof in Mathematics: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives

Similar documents
JOHN MUMMA California State University of San Bernardino

Proof in mathematics education: research, learning and teaching

The researcher epistemology: a deadlock for educational research on proof

Proof as a cluster concept in mathematical practice. Keith Weber Rutgers University

Ayer s linguistic theory of the a priori

Foundations of the Formal Sciences VIII: History and Philosophy of Infinity

History and philosophy of infinity

24.01 Classics of Western Philosophy

Rethinking Knowledge: The Heuristic View

John J. Callanan. Curriculum Vitae

On the epistemological status of mathematical objects in Plato s philosophical system

Grade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics

Al-Sijistani s and Maimonides s Double Negation Theology Explained by Constructive Logic

Neurophilosophy and free will VI

Ayer and the Vienna Circle

THE ROLE AND FUNCTION OF PROOF WITH SKETCHPAD * Michael de Villiers, University of Durban-Westville

ASPECTS OF PROOF IN MATHEMATICS RESEARCH

145 Philosophy of Science

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

1 Little Newnham Corpus Christi College. United Kingdom

Immanuel Kant, Analytic and Synthetic. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics Preface and Preamble

Squeezing arguments. Peter Smith. May 9, 2010

On the hard problem of consciousness: Why is physics not enough?

Philosophy Courses-1

Absolutism. The absolutist believes mathematics is:

ABSOLUTISM. The absolutist believes mathematics is:

Theory of Knowledge. 5. That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. (Christopher Hitchens). Do you agree?

Philosophy Courses-1

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY FALL 2013 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

Kant s Transcendental Exposition of Space and Time in the Transcendental Aesthetic : A Critique

SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM AS A PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS: RADICAL CONSTRUCTIVISM REHABILITATED? Paul Ernest University of Exeter

Cambridge University Press Defending Einstein: Hans Reichenbach s Writings on Space, Time, and Motion Edited by Steven Gimbel and Anke Wa

Grade 7 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home 132 lessons

Recent developments in the philosophy of category theory

Department of Philosophy

REVIEW. Hilary Putnam, Representation and Reality. Cambridge, Nass.: NIT Press, 1988.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF SCIENTIFIC IDEAS

Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy

Mathematical knowledge: a case study in empirical philosophy of mathematics

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 1 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 1

Understanding irrational numbers by means of their representation as non-repeating decimals

WITTGENSTEIN S TRACTATUS

Remarks on the philosophy of mathematics (1969) Paul Bernays

Saint Bartholomew School Third Grade Curriculum Guide. Language Arts. Writing

INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE

LOGIC, EPISTEMOLOGY, AND THE UNITY OF SCIENCE

Alison Deborah Laywine Department of Philosophy McGill University

Demarcation of Science

A Judgmental Formulation of Modal Logic

In Alexandria mathematicians first began to develop algebra independent from geometry.

Philosophy of Mathematics Kant

KANT S PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS

The Vicissitudes of Mathematical Reason in the 20th Century

Intuitive evidence and formal evidence in proof-formation

1/8. The Schematism. schema of empirical concepts, the schema of sensible concepts and the

In The California Undergraduate Philosophy Review, vol. 1, pp Fresno, CA: California State University, Fresno.

Predicate logic. Miguel Palomino Dpto. Sistemas Informáticos y Computación (UCM) Madrid Spain

Although the idea of emphasizing them is relatively new, and there

Brief Remarks on Putnam and Realism in Mathematics * Charles Parsons. Hilary Putnam has through much of his philosophical life meditated on

1/7. The Postulates of Empirical Thought

Illustrating Deduction. A Didactic Sequence for Secondary School

Hanti Lin. Contact Information Phone: +1 (412) Academic Positions

WHY IS THERE PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS AT ALL?

Course Description and Objectives:

Proofs, intuitions and diagrams. Kant and the mathematical method of proof

Alan W. Richardson s Carnap s Construction of the World

Basic Considerations on Epistemology (1937) Paul Bernays

Obeying a rule Ludwig Wittgenstein and the foundations of Set Theory

Figure 1 Figure 2 U S S. non-p P P

Hume s Missing Shade of Blue as a Possible Key. to Certainty in Geometry

Negative Introspection Is Mysterious

Curriculum Guide for Pre-Algebra

Descartes and Foundationalism

Reductio ad Absurdum, Modulation, and Logical Forms. Miguel López-Astorga 1

Class #9: Kant Our in class discussion of these notes will be lamentably abbreviated, focused on the first three sections.

It Ain t What You Prove, It s the Way That You Prove It. a play by Chris Binge

Defending the Axioms

The Appeal to Reason. Introductory Logic pt. 1

Exercise Sets. KS Philosophical Logic: Modality, Conditionals Vagueness. Dirk Kindermann University of Graz July 2014

Class #5: Modern Rationalism I, Descartes and Leibniz

Philosophy 427 Intuitions and Philosophy. Russell Marcus Hamilton College Fall 2009

WITTGENSTEIN ON EPISTEMOLOGICAL STATUS OF LOGIC 1

Macmillan/McGraw-Hill SCIENCE: A CLOSER LOOK 2011, Grade 4 Correlated with Common Core State Standards, Grade 4

The Philosophical Review, Vol. 110, No. 3. (Jul., 2001), pp

THE ROLE OF APRIORI, EMPIRICAL, ANALYTIC AND SYNTHETIC IN PHILOSOPHY OF MATHEMATICS.

Conventionalism and the linguistic doctrine of logical truth

Spring 2015 Undergraduate Philosophy Department Courses

I Don't Believe in God I Believe in Science

Kant On The A Priority of Space: A Critique Arjun Sawhney - The University of Toronto pp. 4-7

Development of Thought. The word "philosophy" comes from the Ancient Greek philosophia, which

Pictures, Proofs, and Mathematical Practice : Reply to James Robert Brown

Artificial Intelligence: Valid Arguments and Proof Systems. Prof. Deepak Khemani. Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Charles Lassiter West 8th Ave, Apt. 1 Spokane, WA (201) gonzaga.academia.edu/charleslassiter

Humanistic Thought, Understanding, and the Nature of Grasp

CONTENTS A SYSTEM OF LOGIC

1.2. What is said: propositions

Constructive Logic, Truth and Warranted Assertibility

Postgraduate Workshop: The Materiality of Divine Agency in the Graeco-Roman World

Questionnaire answered in 1986 by John L. Bell Additional comments added 2002

Transcription:

Fachbereich Mathematik Zentrum für Interdisziplinäre Studien (ZIS) Gila Hanna, Toronto Hans Niels Jahnke, Essen Helmut Pulte, Bochum Explanation and Proof in Mathematics: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives Universität Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen, Nov. 1 through Nov. 4, 2006 Conference Program Conference Place Bildungszentrum für die Entsorgungsund Wasserwirtschaft GmbH Wimberstr. 1 D-45239 Essen-Heidhausen http://www.bew.de/bew/bew_essen/ 1

General remark: The presentations should not exceed 40 minutes; at least 20 minutes should be left for discussion October 31 Travel day 20.00 Opening dinner November 1 Morning session: 08.30 09.00 Welcome and introduction Section 1: The role of representations and diagrams in proof 09.00 10.00 Marcus Giaquinto (University College London, London), A false dichotomy: algebraic vs geometric thinking in mathematics 10.00 11.00 Mary Catherine Leng (Cambridge university), Mathematical Proof: An Algebraic Perspective 11.00-11.30 coffee break 11.30 12.30 Evelyne Barbin (Université de Nantes): Proofs of the main proposition on geometrical proportion : from icons to symbols 14.30 15.30 Willibald Dörfler (Universität Klagenfurt): Verbal argumentation as talk about diagrams Section 2: Proofs as experiments and their role in the empirical sciences 15.30 16.30 Alfred Nordmann (Technische Universität Darmstadt): Proof as Experiment in Wittgenstein 16.30 17.00 coffee break 17.00 18.00 Moritz Epple (Universität Frankfurt): Vague intuition vs. rigorous proof? Ways of argument in topology in late 19th and early 20th century. 18.00 19.00 Teun Koetsier (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Motion and geometry in antiquity 2

November 2 Morning session: Section 2: Proofs as experiments and their role in the empirical sciences (continued) 08.30 09.30 Michael Stöltzner (Universität Wuppertal): The principle of least action as a mathematical thought experiment 09.30 10.30 Kazuhiko Nunokawa: Explanations in mathematical problem solving 10.30 11.00 coffee break 11.00 12.00 Michael D. de Villiers (University of Durban Westville): Baking a mathematical pudding: what's the role of proof and experimentation? 14.00 15.00 Round Table 1: Proofs, diagrammatic thinking and empirical contexts (Moderator Helmut Pulte) Section 3: Genesis, epistemological functions and social practices of proof 15.00 16.00 Kenneth Ruthven (University of Cambridge): What needs explaining in classroom mathematics? What functions (h)as proof? 16.00 16.30 coffee break 16.30 17.30 Aiso Heinze (Universität München): On the acceptance of mathematical proofs: Observations about social processes in the mathematical community and possible implications for the mathematics classroom 17.30 18.30 Jean Paul van Bendegem (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), What Turns an Argument into a Proof? 3

November 3 Morning session Section 3: Genesis, epistemological functions and social practices of proof (continued) 08.30 09.30 Thomas Mormann (University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian): Proof and Idealization in Mathematics 09.30 10.30 Nicolas Balacheff (Laboratoire Leibniz Grenoble): Bridging knowing and proving: the complexity of the epistemological genesis of mathematical proof 10.30 11.00 coffee break 11.00 12.00 Brendan Larvor (University of Hertfordshire de Havilland Campus): What can Lakatos teach about teaching? 14.00 15.00 Phil Davis (Brown university): Why do I believe a theorem? 14.00 16.00 Round Table 2: The cultural meaning of proof (Moderator Hans Niels Jahnke) Afternoon Visit of the Abbey of Werden and walk along the Ruhr river 4

November 4 Morning session Section 4: Proof and mathematical understanding. Different types of argumentation and proof 08.30 09.30 Karine Chemla (CNRS Paris): Understanding, proving and the description of algorithms in the Book of mathematical procedures from China (ca 186 BCE) 09.30 10.30 10.30 11.00 coffee break Mariolina Bartolini-Bussi (Università di Modena): Contexts for Approaching at Validation: The Function of Artefacts of Ancient Technologies 11.00 12.00 Maria Alessandra Mariotti (Università di Siena): Contexts for Approaching at Validation: The Function of Artefacts of Information Technologies 14.00 15.00 Michael Neubrand (Universität Oldenburg): Proving as Part of Mathematical Achievement: Concepts and Results from the PISA Study 15.00 16.00 David Tall (University of Warwick): The Cognitive Development of Different Types of Reasoning and Proof 16.00 16.30 coffee break 16.30 17.30 Erich Christian Wittmann (University of Dortmund): Operative Proofs 17.30 18.30 Round Table 3: Proof and explanation (Moderator Gila Hanna) November 5 Travel day 5

List of contributions Section 1: The role of representations and diagrams in proof Marcus Giaquinto (University College London, London), A false dichotomy: algebraic vs geometric thinking in mathematics Evelyne Barbin (Université de Nantes): Proofs of the main proposition on geometrical proportion : from icons to symbols Mary Catherine Leng (Cambridge university), Mathematical Proof: An Algebraic Perspective Willibald Dörfler (Universität Klagenfurt): Verbal argumentation as talk about diagrams Section 2: Proofs as experiments and their role in the empirical sciences Alfred Nordmann (Technische Universität Darmstadt): Proof as Experiment in Wittgenstein Moritz Epple (Universität Frankfurt): Vague intuition vs. rigorous proof? Ways of argument in topology in late 19th and early 20th century Teun Koetsier (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), Motion and geometry in antiquity Michael Stöltzner (Universität Wuppertal): The principle of least action as a Mathematical thought experiment Kazuhiko Nunokawa (Joetsu University of Education, Tokyo), Explanations in mathematical problem solving Michael D. de Villiers (University of Durban Westville): Baking a mathematical pudding: what's the role of proof and experimentation? Section 3: Genesis, epistemological functions and social practices of proof Kenneth Ruthven (University of Cambridge): What needs explaining in classroom mathematics? What functions (h)as proof? Aiso Heinze (Universität München): On the acceptance of mathematical proofs: Observations about social processes in the mathematical community and possible implications for the mathematics classroom Jean Paul van Bendegem (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), What Turns an Argument into a Proof? Thomas Mormann (University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian): Proof and Idealization in Mathematics Nicolas Balacheff (Laboratoire Leibniz Grenoble): Bridging knowing and proving: the complexity of the epistemological genesis of mathematical proof Brendan Larvor (University of Hertfordshire de Havilland Campus): What can Lakatos teach about teaching? Phil Davis (Brown University): Why do I believe a theorem? 6

Section 4: Proof and mathematical understanding. Different types of argumentation and proof Karine Chemla (CNRS Paris): Understanding, proving and the description of algorithms in the Book of mathematical procedures from China (ca 186 BCE) Mariolina Bartolini-Bussi (Università di Modena): Contexts for Approaching at Validation: The Function of Artefacts of Ancient Technologies Maria Alessandra Mariotti (Università di Siena): Contexts for Approaching at Validation: The Function of Artefacts of Information Technologies Erich Christian Wittmann (Universität Dortmund): Operative Proofs David Tall (University of Warwick): The Cognitive Development of Different Types of Reasoning and Proof Michael Neubrand (Universität Oldenburg): Proving as Part of Mathematical Achievement: Concepts and Results from the PISA Study Round Table 1: Proofs, diagrammatic thinking and empirical contexts (Moderator Helmut Pulte) Round Table 2: The cultural meaning of proof (Moderator Hans Niels Jahnke) Round Table 3: Proof and explanation (Moderator Gila Hanna) 7