INSTRUCTION NO. 1 - INTRODUCTION

Similar documents
Trial Roles. Attorney Witness Research Assistant Jury Prepare testimony with witnesses Prepare questions for crossexamination

A Mock Trial based on The True Story of the Three Little Pigs

Assessment task. Task details. Content description. Year level 7. Civics and Citizenship

Verdicts: Trial D. The Church banned his Dialogue. The book remained banned for the next 200 years.

10.47am: Justice Byrne first summarised the defence case for the jury.

Matthew 28:1-10 ~ April 16, 2017 (Easter Sunday) ~ Heritage Lutheran Church

Exposing Biased Testimony On Cross. By Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan

To the president of Euro Commission Mr. Joze Manuel Durau Barosu!

EXCLUSIVE: PROSECUTOR IN SERIAL 1 CASE GOES ON THE RECORD

Chapters Page 1 of 15

Of Mice and Men Mock Trial Defense Attorney Packet

MOUNT CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH ENGLEWOOD, NJ

If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater, for this is the testimony of God that he has borne concerning his Son.

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH vs. Case No. 05 CF 381

Here Comes the Judge. Romans 2:1-11: Man s Judging is Wrong. God s Judging is Right. Randy Broberg Maranatha Mens Ministry October 30, 2018

Closing Arguments in Punishment

VOIR DIRE AND JURY SELECTION

Evaluating An Argument Essay

Bar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18. Student Role Guide: Barrister England, Wales and Northern Ireland

Daniel Lugo v. State of Florida SC

Application for Potential Volunteers Children s Ministry Department Updated 12/16/15

A Layperson s Guide to Hypothesis Testing By Michael Reames and Gabriel Kemeny ProcessGPS

In Search of the Lord's Way. "The Judgment"

Seattle PR firm reveals efforts to free Amanda Knox

Both Hollingsworth and Schroeder testified that as Branch Davidians, they thought that God's true believers were

Notes for Assistance in Respect of BSB Charges

Center on Wrongful Convictions

Becoming Whole : For Such A Time As This Week Twelve: Operating in the Courts of Heaven November 27

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2006

Thereupon FRANK J. KOLLARITS, being first. duly sworn, was exam;ined and testified as follows: EXAMINATION OF PROS. JUROR FRANK J.

Court of Appeals. First District of Texas

Time: ½ to 1 class period. Objectives: Students will understand the emergence of principles of freedom of the press.

English 2 Agenda Tuesday, March 10

Dr. Mitchell Houses 307 S. Church St. and 288 S. Park St. circa 1860s & 1880s.

Tavaana Interview Transcript

Case 2:10-cr MHT-WC Document 1815 Filed 09/19/11 Page 1 of 6

How Should Leaders Deal With Heresy Outside The Church?

ASSEMBLIES OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST

Matthew Marshall v. State of Florida SC

APPELLATE COURT NO. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

Sandra M. Halsey, CSR, Official Court Reporter 3205

State of the First Amendment 2009 Commissioned by the First Amendment Center

Social Networking Policy. for the Catholic Church in Australia. Social Networking Policy for the Catholic Church in Australia

1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, JURY TRIAL TRIAL - DAY 23 5 vs. Case No.

The King s Trial, pt. 1 Matthew 26:57 68

1. Trial on 3rd October 2018

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK BERNARD GILES NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

LISTEN A MINUTE.com. Knowledge. One minute a day is all you need to improve your listening skills.

3 Days of Seeking the Lord. Jon Redmond

Encouraging Fairness from the Bench

Molly Mormon Standards on Trial

Dana Williamson v. State of Florida SC SC

Chapter 11: "How Students Talk to Each Other: An Academic Social Networking Project" by VanVechten and Chadha

Page 1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA

Emmeline Pankhurst ( ) was a famous British suffragette. Eschewing the more

The Pledge: "As a member of the William and Mary community, I pledge on my honor not to lie, cheat, or steal, either in my academic or personal life.

Book of Acts - Course B

Decided: February 6, S16A1781. SMITH v. THE STATE. Appellant Christopher Rayshun Smith was tried and convicted of murder

Report of the Committee's Decision Regarding A Study in Scarlet by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

LISTEN A MINUTE.com. Death. One minute a day is all you need to improve your listening skills.

10 BEFORE: 11 HONORABLE REENA RAGGI, U.S.D.J. and a Jury APPEARANCES:

Strand: World Religions with links to Meditation, Prayer and Worship and Faith in Action. Topic: Islam

Satyamev Jayate NaAnritam

To show that Jesus was a real historical character, but the Christian faith believes him to be much more than that.

BREAKOUT SESSION: VIEW FROM THE BOX: The Jury Speaks. QUESTIONNIARE ANSWERS RECEIVED FROM OUR JURORS (Blinded and grouped by question)

A MATTER OF LIFE & DEATH THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST R. B. THIEME, JR. R. B. THIEME, JR., BIBLE MINISTRIES HOUSTON, TEXAS

DISCIPLINARY HEARING COMMISSION OF THE 13 DHC 11

Circle of Grace. Safe Environment Training Grade 8 Lesson Plan. Philosophy

10 Steps to Engaging Controversial Issues. Ed Stetzer Mission Group

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 09CR3532

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : v. : : :

No one was supposed to know about her conviction Kathy had expunged her criminal record so the mistake she made would not continue to haunt her.

BCLR STUDENT MINISTRIES SUMMER SERVICE APPLICATION Gospel Advance July 10-14, 2017

03CO743 Theology & Secular Psychology. Winter 2019 Week of January 28th Monday 1:00-4:30 Tue/Wed/Thu 9:00-4:30 Fri 9:00-12:00

THE HOUR THAT CHANGES THE WORLD

Q: HAVE I BEEN EXCUSED?


Cross Examination. High Council of Judges and Prosecutors, Republic of Turkey, Study Visit to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts June 25, 2013

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 27, 2010

HPS204F1H: Public Nudity: History, Law and Science Fall Term 2014

Pastor Vacancy Announcement- How to Apply. Senior Pastor Search Opening Date April 17, 2017 Closing Date-June 19, 2017

The Trials Of Socrates Six Classic Texts Book Library

Affirmative Defense = Confession

STATE OF OHIO DONTA SMITH

Testify with Boldness IINTRODUCTION

THE LIFE KEY POINTS IN THIS LESSON YOU WILL STUDY THESE QUESTIONS:

Don t Store It Up! (Romans 2:1-16)

King David on Trial Created by Rabbi Eve Rudin Weiner

National Association of Muslim American Women PO Box 72032, Columbus Ohio 43207

The majority. This is democracy. In almost any society, the majority can look after itself. - Lord Bingham

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1996

WEST COBB GROUP CURRICULUM

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR

General Policy On Sexual Offenders for Church of the Open Arms, UCC

Position(s) applied for Date of application / / m Walk-in m Bellevue Member, if different from above NAME. Name. Current Address.

No. 51,498-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *

Caught In the Act (Lesson 1 of 4)

Anticipatory Guide. Explanation. Statement. I Agree. Disagree

Patience for Relationships Cross Culture February 19, 2011 Joel Shorey

From Hon. Jacqueline Connor (ret.) WHAT ONE DAY ONE TRIAL MEANS TO YOU (Are you paying attention?)

Transcription:

INSTRUCTION NO. 1 - INTRODUCTION Congratulations on your selection as a juror! These Instructions are to help you better understand the trial and your role in it. In an Indictment, a Grand Jury has charged defendant Jean Theresa Hoffert, who is also known as Terry Hoffert, with mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, identity theft, and money laundering offenses arising from an alleged scheme to defraud borrowers and lenders of the proceeds of mortgage loans. An Indictment is simply an accusation it is not evidence of anything. The defendant has pled not guilty, and she is presumed absolutely not guilty of each offense charged unless and until the prosecution proves her guilt on that offense beyond a reasonable doubt. You must decide during your deliberations whether or not the prosecution has proved the defendant s guilt on each offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt. In making your decision, you are the sole judges of the facts. You must not decide this case based on personal likes or dislikes, generalizations, gut feelings, prejudices, sympathies, stereotypes, or biases. The law demands that you return a just verdict, based solely on the evidence, your individual evaluation of that evidence, your reason and common sense, and these instructions. Do not take anything that I have said or done or that I may say or do as indicating what I think of the evidence or what I think your verdict should be. Remember, only defendant Jean Theresa Hoffert, and not anyone else, is on trial. Also, the defendant is on trial only for the offenses charged against her in the Indictment, and not for anything else. Remember that each count charges a separate 1

crime. You must consider each count separately and return a separate, unanimous verdict for each count. Please remember that this case is important to the parties and to the fair administration of justice. Therefore, please be patient, consider all of the evidence, and do not be in a hurry to reach a verdict just to be finished with the case. 2

INSTRUCTION NO. 16 - CONDUCT OF JURORS DURING TRIAL You must decide this case solely on the evidence and your own observations, experiences, reason, common sense, and the law in these Instructions. You must also keep to yourself any information that you learn in court until it is time to discuss this case with your fellow jurors during deliberations. To ensure fairness, you must obey the following rules:! Do not talk among yourselves about this case, or about anyone involved with it, until you go to the jury room to decide on your verdict! Do not talk with anyone else about this case, or about anyone involved with it, until the trial is over! When you are outside the courtroom, do not let anyone ask you about or tell you anything about this case, anyone involved with it, any news story, rumor, or gossip about it, until the trial is over. If someone should try to talk to you about this case during the trial, please report it to me.! During the trial, you should not talk to any of the parties, lawyers, or witnesses even to pass the time of day so that there is no reason to be suspicious about your fairness. The lawyers, parties, and witnesses are not supposed to talk to you, either.! You may need to tell your family, friends, teachers, co-workers, or employer about your participation in this trial, so that you can tell them 38

when you must be in court and warn them not to ask you or talk to you about the case. However, do not provide any information to anyone by any means about this case until after I have accepted your verdict. That means do not talk face-to-face or use any electronic device or media, such as the telephone, a cell or smart phone, Blackberry, PDA, computer, the Internet, any Internet service, any text or instant messaging service, any Internet chat room, blog, or website such as Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, or Twitter, to communicate to anyone any information about this case until I accept your verdict.! Do not do any research on the Internet, in libraries, in the newspapers, or in any other way or make any investigation about this case, the law, or the people involved on your own! Do not visit or view any place discussed in this case and do not use Internet maps or Google Earth or any other program or device to search for or to view any place discussed in the testimony! Do not read any news stories or articles, in print, on the Internet, or in any blog, about this case, or about anyone involved with it, or listen to any radio or television reports about it or about anyone involved with it, or let anyone tell you anything about any such news reports. I assure you that when you have heard all the evidence, you will know more about this case than anyone will learn through the news media and it will be more accurate. 39

! Do not make up your mind during the trial about what the verdict should be. Keep an open mind until you have had a chance to discuss the evidence with other jurors during deliberations.! Do not decide the case based on implicit biases. As we discussed in jury selection, everyone, including me, has feelings, assumptions, perceptions, fears, and stereotypes, that is, implicit biases, that we may not be aware of. These hidden thoughts can impact what we see and hear, how we remember what we see and hear, and how we make important decisions. Because you are making very important decisions in this case, I strongly encourage you to evaluate the evidence carefully and to resist jumping to conclusions based on personal likes or dislikes, generalizations, gut feelings, prejudices, sympathies, stereotypes, or biases. The law demands that you return a just verdict, based solely on the evidence, your individual evaluation of that evidence, your reason and common sense, and these instructions. Our system of justice is counting on you to render a fair decision based on the evidence, not on biases.! If, at any time during the trial, you have a problem that you would like to bring to my attention, or if you feel ill or need to go to the restroom, please send a note to the Court Security Officer (CSO), who will give it to me. I want you to be comfortable, so please do not hesitate to tell us about any problem. I will read the remaining two Instructions at the end of the evidence. 40