Brainstorming exercise

Similar documents
Pragmatic Presupposition

Figure 1: Laika. Definite Descriptions Jean Mark Gawron San Diego State University. Definite Descriptions: Pick out an entity in the world (Figure 1)

10. Presuppositions Introduction The Phenomenon Tests for presuppositions

Pronominal, temporal and descriptive anaphora

ANAPHORIC REFERENCE IN JUSTIN BIEBER S ALBUM BELIEVE ACOUSTIC

HS01: The Grammar of Anaphora: The Study of Anaphora and Ellipsis An Introduction. Winkler /Konietzko WS06/07

If I hadn t studied as much as I did, I wouldn t have passed my exams.

Factivity and Presuppositions David Schueler University of Minnesota, Twin Cities LSA Annual Meeting 2013

A Typology of Clause Combining

Discourse Constraints on Anaphora Ling 614 / Phil 615 Sponsored by the Marshall M. Weinberg Fund for Graduate Seminars in Cognitive Science

1 Clarion Logic Notes Chapter 4

Exercises Introduction to morphosyntax

Semantics and Pragmatics of NLP DRT: Constructing LFs and Presuppositions

Complex demonstratives as quantifiers: objections and replies

Presupposition and Rules for Anaphora

Adverb Clause. 1. They checked their gear before they started the climb. (modifies verb checked)

A Linguistic Interlude

Presupposition: Introduction

Topics in Linguistic Theory: Propositional Attitudes

Presuppositions (Ch. 6, pp )

Some observations on identity, sameness and comparison

Neg-Raising. The Case of Persian. Zahra Mirrazi & Ali Darzi University of Massachusetts, Amherst University of Tehran. April 28, 2017.

An earlier action or state has relevance at a later reference point, or point of orientation.

Quantifiers: Their Semantic Type (Part 3) Heim and Kratzer Chapter 6

Outline of today s lecture

, and Imperfect Verbs

Coreference Resolution Lecture 15: October 30, Reference Resolution

CONDITIONAL SENTENCES CONDITIONAL SENTENCES

ILLOCUTIONARY ORIGINS OF FAMILIAR LOGICAL OPERATORS

Affirmation-Negation: New Perspective

Anaphoric Deflationism: Truth and Reference

ZHANG Yan-qiu, CHEN Qiang. Changchun University, Changchun, China

The projection problem of presuppositions

Epistemic modals: relativism vs. cloudy contextualism

Phil 435: Philosophy of Language. [Handout 7] W. V. Quine, Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes (1956)

PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS & THE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE

I. PATTERNS OF CONNECTION

Kai von Fintel (MIT)

E [Type text] [Type text]

GRAMMAR IV HIGH INTERMEDIATE

Negation And The Strength Of Presuppositions Or There Is More To Speaking Than Words

If you hadn t. Well, if you hadn t braked so hard, we wouldn t have had the accident Page 1 of 6


Ling 98a: The Meaning of Negation (Week 1)

INTONATION PATTERNS. In the English Language

Class #9 - The Attributive/Referential Distinction

Comments on Lasersohn

UNIVERSIDAD AMÉRICA LATINA Estudios Universitarios Abiertos de México Bachillerato General en la Modalidad No Escolarizada

hates the woman [who rejected him i hates the woman [who rejected Peter i ] is hated by him i ] (Langacker 1969: 169) (2) (3) (4a) (4b) (4) a. S b.

Could have done otherwise, action sentences and anaphora

Mandy Simons Carnegie Mellon University June 2010

A Scopal Theory of Presupposition I

Slovenian (Rivero, 2001) a.janez se oblaci.

3. Negations Not: contradicting content Contradictory propositions Overview Connectives

On Aristotle and Baldness : Topic, Reference, Presupposition of Existence, and Negation

Coordination Problems

Towards a Solution to the Proviso Problem

, her sisters and half-sisters

DIRECT AND INDIRECT SPEECH WITH BACKSHIFT OF TENSES

Thompson on naive action theory

Russell on Descriptions

Achilles Heel, is You

Durham Research Online

Russell: On Denoting

Note: NEW = teachers should expect the grammar point to be new to most students at that level who have followed the ELI curriculum.

CAS LX 523 Syntax II February 10, 2009 Prep for week 5: The fine structure of the left periphery

DIRECT AND INDIRECT SPEECH WITH BACKSHIFT OF TENSES

Presupposition Projection and Anaphora in Quantified Sentences

Lecture 9: Presuppositions

DOWNLOAD OR READ : THE RULE AND EXERCISES OF HOLY LIVING AND DYING REVISED ABRIDGED AND ADAPTED TO GENERAL USE BY W H HALE PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

ELLIPTICAL CONSTRUCTION PASSIVE

Entailment as Plural Modal Anaphora

NEGATED PERFECTS AND TEMPORAL IN-ADVERBIALS *

Categories and On Interpretation. Philosophy 21 Fall, 2004 G. J. Mattey

(c) Mark Richard Please Cite published pagination. 1. Relativistic Content and Disagreement. Mark Richard Harvard University

Am I free? Freedom vs. Fate

Final Exam due on December 13, 2001

Presupposition In Lexical Knalysis and iascourae. Rbstract

Presupposition: An (un)common attitude?

Exhaustification over Questions in Japanese

2. A DESCRIPTION OF TENSES. such as Djuharie and George. Djuhari says Tenses is grammatical category that

The Structural and the Semantic Subject-Object and Referential-Predicative Asymmetries

NUMBER, GENDER AND CASE IN GRAMMAR, AND AGREEMENT PHENOMENA

Lexical Alternatives as a Source of Pragmatic Presuppositions

Strawson On Referring. By: Jake McDougall and Siri Cosper

Clause complexes. Part 4: Projection (cont)

Lesson 10 - Modals (Part 3)

IS HE LIVING OR IS HE DEAD MARK TWAIN Revised by Hal Ames

Quine: Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes

By the Time Viewing relative progress or completion

Phil 435: Philosophy of Language. P. F. Strawson: On Referring

Definiteness, Indefiniteness, and Anaphoric Relations in English. Koichi Nishida, Tohoku University, Japan

Part II: How to Evaluate Deductive Arguments

6,6. Boekverslag door een scholier 1964 woorden 14 december keer beoordeeld. Eerste uitgave 1988

Zero Conditionals. Check point Circle T (True) or F (False). T F The man may not be able to board the plane.

Philosophical Logic. LECTURE SEVEN MICHAELMAS 2017 Dr Maarten Steenhagen

The main plank of Professor Simons thoroughly pragmatic account of presupposition

MODAL VERBS EXERCISES

Grammar I. Determiners. Bradius V. Maurus III

The Unexpected Projection of Some Presupposition Triggers

Transcription:

Brainstorming exercise 1. What is the difference between the underlined nominals in sentences (a) -(d), in terms of referentiality and definiteness: John would like to marry a talented woman, but he couldn t find one. and he finally found one. if she is also tall. but she is dating someone else.

and Definiteness Givon Chapter 5

The function of Determiners Articles and demonstratives Marking referential coherence of NP s

1. Existence vs. Reference Consider the following: The Queen of England is bald. The King of France is bald. I rode a horse yesterday. I rode a unicorn yesterday. There was an old elf who lived in the forest. He lived all by himself and [] was very lonely. One day the old elf met a frog near a pond.

Grammar is sensitive to what is established and can be identified in the universe of discourse. Initial introduction Indefinite determiners (a/an, some, any ) Subsequent mentioning Definite articles Pronouns Zero anaphor Names demonstratives

2. Referential Intent: Specific or non-specific? Definite and referring: Richard wants to marry the rich woman he dated. Indefinite: referring or non-referring? Richard wants to marry a rich woman, i) though he doesn t know her well. ii) though he doesn t know any. Interpretation: Referring: He has a particular woman in mind. Non-referring: He has no particular woman in mind; wishes to marry someone of that type. Conclusion: Definite NP the woman must be referring. Indefinite NP a woman can be either referring or non-referring.

3. Reference and Modality (Realis) Richard married a rich woman, though he didn t know her well.??though he didn t know any. (presupposition) Because Richard married a rich woman, he bought a fancy car. Indefinite NP and modality Fact (Presupposition and R-assertion): referring Non-face (IRR- and NEG-assertion): either referring or non-referring

4. Grammatical environments for non-referring a : i) Irrealis modality A. condition: If he meets a rich woman, B. yes/no question: Did he meet a rich woman? C. Command: Go meet a rich woman! D. Modals: He may meet a rich woman. E. Epistemic Adverb: Maybe he met a rich woman. F. Modality and Manipulative V: He wants to meet a rich woman. They urged him to meet a rich woman. G. Non-factive PCU V: He dreamed that he met a rich woman.

ii) Habitual tense: He dated a rich woman every Tuesday. (different ones or the same one?) iii) Nominal predicate (Non-referring) John is a teacher, not a student. (Referring) John is a teacher I admired. (Which John?) Verbs with irrealis semantic modality He was looking for a tender-hearted girl. (cf. He was dating a tender-hearted girl.)

5. Indefinite DET any no some A. any and no : non-referring He will date any woman. *He dated any woman. (realis) He will date/dated no woman. B. some : Referring with factive Mode. Non-referring with non-factive mode Fact: I know that he joined some club. He joined some club yesterday. Non-fact: I will join some student club, and I know it welcomes me (referring). but I don t know which one yet (non-referring).

C. As pronouns (alone or with one, -body) I was looking for books on syntax, and I found some. but I couldn t find any/*some. If anybody/somebody shows up, tell them If anything/something happens, let me know. Someone did/may do it. Something happened/may happen. But, any is incompatible with realis mode: Anybody *did it/may do it. Anything *happened/may happen.

6. Referring under the scope of negation Non-referring: I didn t see an eagle. I didn t see any eagle. I saw no eagle. *Referring indefinite: *I didn t see an eagle. (cf. I saw an eagle.) Referring definite: I didn t see the eagle (you saw). Why?? Negation is presuppositional. The speaker presupposes the hearer s belief in the event and the participants. The hearer can identify the participants. Definite means: identifiable to the hearer.

7. Gradation of indefinite referential intent Weakest Did you see anything there? Did you see anybody there? Did you see any man there? Did you see some man there? Did you see a man there? Did you see a tall man there? Did you see a tall man wearing a blue shirt there? Did you see a tall man there wearing a blue shirt and sitting on a red rock with a hat in his left hand? Strongest referring -> Definite Did you see the man/john there?

8. Referential intent along two dimensions: Speaker s perspective: How strongly does the speaker intend to suggest that they are referring to a particular individual? Hearer s perspective: How probable is the NP referring to a specific individual? Coding devices: Indefinite article modification NP type a > some > any more modification > less modification specific N > person > thing

9. Reference and plurality He s planning to sell a house. He s planning to sell houses. He always meets a girl for lunch. He always meets girls for lunch. (realis) What did he do last year? He sold houses. (as a real estate broker) He sold a house. Observations: Plural NP: downgrades the referential intent. Non-referring even under fact modality.

10. Pronouns and reference Indefinite pronouns one Definite pronouns he she them I am looking for a white horse. but couldn t find one. (non-referring) and finally found one. (referring) Richard wanted to marry a rich girl. but she also had to be pretty. though she wasn t pretty. If you see anybody, tell him/them I am here.

Four-way contrast in the use of pronouns: Richard was planning to marry a rich girl, A. definite, referring: but she rejected him. B. definite, non-referring: provided she was also smart. C. indefinite, referring: and he finally found one. D. indefinite, non-referring and he is still looking for one.

11. Pragmatic effect on Reference: On the way home, he bought a newspaper. More likely to be non-referring On the way home, he bought a book. 12. Pragmatic importance: Indefinite-referring this : Dear Abby: There s this guy I ve been going with for near three years. Well, he hits me He accused me of coming on to a friend of his I feel like an old married lady who lets her husband push her around.

A: You know what?! Definiteness B: I bought a TV yesterday. - referring, specific but non-identifiable vs. I bought the TV yesterday. - referring, specific and identifiable 1. Definite the : The speaker assumes that the hearer can identify the specific referent of the NP. The referent is identifiable to the hearer.

Definiteness 2. Sources for identifiability: 1) The shared background knowledge. 2) The shared current situation. 3) The shared current discourse. 3. Situation-based ( deictic ) Definites 1) Speaker & hearer: I, you, we 2) Demonstrative: this whiteboard, that blackboard 3) Adverbs of time: now, later, tomorrow 4) Adverbs of place: here, there

Definiteness 4. Culture/Knowledge-based Definites 1) Shared universe: the sun, the Mars 2) Shared experience/society/culture/environment: the President, the Major, the Chair, the bank, the activity center 3) Shared frames invoked by a preceding NP: He bought a house, but the living room was too small. He was sent to the emergency room, and the doctor He told us that his father was ill.

Difiniteness Extreme examples: The article in Newsweek magazine called it the ultimate reunion. Was it to be a gathering of war veterans? Perhaps a banquet in honor of our country s living ex-president. No, it was nothing of the kind just a rumor that surviving members of the popular music group the Beatles and Yoko Ono, widow of deceased Beatle John Lennon, were thinking of doing something together again.

Definiteness 5. Text-based ( anaphoric ) Definites 1) Zero, pronouns, and definite NPs After the queen said that, the king got mad. He retired into the chamber, 0 lay on the floor, and 0 refused to talk. Finally, the queen came to him and said 2) Stressed vs. unstressed pronoun Mary told Suzy, then she told Sally. Mary told Suzy, then SHE told Sally. Unstressed: for unproblematic subject continuity Stressed: switch-of-subject

Definiteness 3) Demonstratives as text-based Definites: It : preceding context And so she went and did all of it (the work) in one day, and it sure took some doing. But she got it done, all of it. That : a large chunk of text backward And that s what really happened, if you want to know. This : a chunk of text forward Now, this is what she did afterwards: She

Definiteness Compare: And that was the news, Wednesday, Jan 19th. This is Walter Cronkite, bidding you goodnight. This example shows that In general: This/these = near = more accessible That/those = far = less accessible

Generic Subjects He s thinking about the lion that killed his cows. He s thinking about a lion he once had. He s thinking about buying a lion. He s thinking about the lion (or lions).

Generic Subjects Type-referring in subject position: Definite: The lion is a dangerous animal. Plural: Lions are dangerous. Quantified Plural: All lions are dangerous. Some lions are dangerous. Most lions are dangerous. Indefinite: A lion is a dangerous animal. But in object position: He thought about the lion/lions. (generic) He thought about all lions/a lion. (referring).