APPENDIX C ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS

Similar documents
HP-35s Calculator Program Cantilever Retaining Wall Design

Calculating Moment of Inertia of Concrete alone and D018

CENTUM - components list

HP-35s Calculator Program Eccentrically Loaded Connections

Mehmet INAN January 02, 2007

HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD WYMAN BRIDGE HAER NO. AR-38. UTM: 15/ / Quad: Elkins, Arkansas. Washington County, Arkansas

CENTUM - components list

Pajari Instruments Ltd.

ANGELS SPECIALIST SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL SCHEME OF WORK FOR MATHEMATICS (TERM 2) GRADE 3

The following items summarize the procedure for concrete shell design, as implemented in the software:

HP-35s Calculator Program Compute Horizontal Curve Values given only 2 Parameters

Agreement for Professional Services In Connection With DeGraaf Nature Center Park Entrance Improvements

Fallacies of the Warren Commission Solution

Touch Receptors and Mapping the Homunculus

MINUTES PITTSBURG PLANNING COMMISSION

Analysis and simulation on unequal settlement of ancient masonry pagodas

RYE PLANNING BOARD RULES AND REGULATIONS COMMITTEE Monday, September 25, :00 p.m. Rye Town Hall

Albeo LED Luminaire. GE Lighting. ABHG Series DATA SHEET. Optics. Product information. Installation. Structures and materials.

GENERAL BUSINESS MEETING SEPTEMBER 27, 2011

2010 Church Building Conference

Determining Meetinghouse Adequacy

A Tourist s Guide To Heaven

Vernal Pools: One Consultants Perspective By David Marceau

The load carrier system designed for professionals

Mayor Mussatto Thank you very much for that. Is there a presentation by staff? Mr. Wilkinson, are you doing a staff presentation?

Chip Inductor (CIL Series)

Structures. Wood Shell Structures. Objectives 1 : Form and statics. Structures and connections. Analyses and construction.

EXHIBIT 4 FILED: ONONDAGA COUNTY CLERK 11/07/ :40 PM. the. Affirmation of Laurel J. Eveleigh

BEARING CAPACITY OF PARTIAL SKIRTED FOOTING ON CLAY. Final Project. To Complete The Requirements Of Achieving S-1 Graduate Degree Of Civil Engineering

NPTEL ONLINE CERTIFICATION COURSES. Course on Reinforced Concrete Road Bridges

Houghton Mifflin MATHEMATICS

What is Dowsing? Who Can Dowse? How Can I Tell If I Am A Dowser? Which Device Shall I Start With?

The Seven Pillars of Christian Growth

Updated 01/2015. page 1 Nikon

QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus

Table of Contents. 1 Mystik Canopy/Island Image Guidelines. 4 Mystik Pump Image Guidelines. 6 Mystik Building Image Guidelines. 7 Sign System: 6x6

Of Biblical Proportions

Grade 6 Math Connects Suggested Course Outline for Schooling at Home

Bloom as the Five-fold

MOBILE RESOURCE CENTER SCHEDULE - FEBRUARY 2016* * Days and times are subject to change, call 211 for more information

Torah Code Cluster Probabilities

Historic District Commission January 22, 2015 City of Hagerstown, Maryland

The Short Reign of Ryan Mackey

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. Box , Los Angeles, CA October 1,2002

This report is organized in four sections. The first section discusses the sample design. The next

Present: Tom Brahm Guests: Jack Centner

The Knowledge Bank at The Ohio State University. Ohio Mining Journal. Extravagant Mining

THE COMPASSES From the Square to the Compasses

Grade 6 correlated to Illinois Learning Standards for Mathematics

PLANNING BOARD MEETING MAY 20, 2015

Laboratory Exercise Saratoga Springs Temple Site Locator

Celebrated Central District

Your Last NAFS Presentation:

Chichen Itza and El Castillo cubits

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGAN. May 26, 2016

Varick Town Board August 7, 2012

MISSOURI S FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULAR DEVELOPMENT IN MATH TOPIC I: PROBLEM SOLVING

Boise City Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 4, 2014 Page 1

Structural Assessment and Rehabilitation Option for YudaganawaDagoba in Buttala

St. Joseph s Catholic Cemetery. Rules and Regulations. Beaulieu, Mn

TOWN OF JERUSALEM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. September 9, 2010

Unsealing of Christ's Reputed Tomb Turns Up New Revelations Kristin Romey

ORDINAL GENESIS 1:1/JOHN 1:1 TRIANGLE (Part 2) By Leo Tavares

AUROVILLE EARTH INSTITUTE MAJOR PROJECTS SRI KARNESHWAR NATARAJA TEMPLE

MINUTES OF TOWN COUNCIL MEETING OF THE TOWN OF STALLINGS, NORTH CAROLINA

NPTEL NPTEL ONINE CERTIFICATION COURSE. Introduction to Machine Learning. Lecture-59 Ensemble Methods- Bagging,Committee Machines and Stacking

The Soul Journey Education for Higher Consciousness

Draft 11/20/2017 APPENDIX C: TRANSPORTATION PLAN FORECASTS

The American Society of Dowsers 4, 3, 2, 1... Of Dowsing.

From: Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 at 11:43 AM. To: Subject: 3045 Fort Chalres Drive Variance Petition 16-V6

Exceedingly abundantly above all that we ask or think. Eph 3: 14-21

MINUTES PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MADISON REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 1, 2015

Background Packet. Name: I have done my observations and I am applying for:

Flexible Destiny: Creating our Future

Thom & Ellen Schotanus Update from Cameroon February 2018

First Parish Church Meetinghouse: Past and Plans

June 6, Chairman Ken Dull, Vice Chairman Jim Smith, Vivian Zeke Partin, Janice Clark, Jeff DeGroote

Exodus Chapter Thirty-Eight

Millcreek City Planning and Community Development 3330 South 1300 East Millcreek, Utah Phone: (801) Inspections: (385)

FRANCIS CITY Planning Commission Meeting. Wednesday April 24, Recreational Building 2319 South Spring Hollow Road Francis, UT

Book of Ezekiel. Chapter 42. Theme: Millennial Temple

City of Sidney, Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Disposal Project Specifications

Members present: John Antona (Chair), Tim Newton (Vice Chair), Tim Mowrey, Charles Waters, Jerry Wooldridge

3. Discussion and/or action to add one member (citizen) to the Public Works Committee.

Georgia Quality Core Curriculum

INTERPRETER. How Big A Book? Estimating the Total Surface Area of the Book of Mormon Plates. Bruce E. Dale. A Journal of Mormon Scripture

City of Cape May Planning Board Meeting Minutes Tuesday December 10, 2013

PLAINFIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS February 21, :00 p.m.

What Color Is Your Turtle? Rev. Don Garrett The Unitarian Universalist Church of the Lehigh Valley 11/7/10

A section of a corner post, two of the horizontal cross members, and a piece of planking in their original positions. Note the doweled joints and the

CITY OF KENT BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS PUBLIC HEARING & BUSINESS MEETING. October 15, 2012

Lynnwood Link Extension 2013 Draft EIS Comments and Responses. Page 1069

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF GARDEN CITY, UTAH

TEMPLES AT THE CENTER OF PHI

SEQR = State Environmental Quality Review PB = (Town of Bolton) Planning Board WCPS = Warren County Planning Board

Overview of the ATLAS Fast Tracker (FTK) (daughter of the very successful CDF SVT) July 24, 2008 M. Shochet 1

Motion was made by Mr. Robinson to approve the minutes as presented and carried as follows:

RAVENNA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS JEFF GAYNOR, CHAIRMAN, REMY ARNES,S DOROTHY GRIFFITHS, JIM ACKLIN, AND GARY LONG

THE ALLEY SHOPS PORTFOLIO SALE

Teacher's Manual Teen ALL SCRIPTURE NKJV

Transcription:

July 25, 2014 300-ft Guyed Tower Structural Modification Analysis Cumorah Hill TEP Project Number 50108.12262 Page 11 APPENDIX C ADDITIONAL CALCULATIONS tnxtower Report - version 6.1.3.1

Project Name: Project Number: Client Site Number: Cumorah Hill # 50108.12262 - Engineer: Check: Date: JRM AMA 07/21/14 Input: Foundation: Soil: Pier Shape: Square t 1 : 2.67 ft - thickness of soil layer (from t/ pad) d: 2.50 ft - length of side of pier γ 1 : 106.00 pcf - effective unit weight of soil L: 2.67 ft - pier length φ 1 : 30.00 deg - friction angle of soil layer l: 0.00 ft - pier extension above grade t 2 : ft - thickness of soil layer B: 6.00 ft - width of pad γ 2 : pcf - effective unit weight of soil t: 3.00 ft - thickness of pad φ 2 : deg - friction angle of soil layer γ c : 150.00 pcf - unit weight of concrete t 3 : ft - thickness of soil layer γ w : 62.40 pcf - unit weight of water γ 3 : pcf - effective unit weight of soil φ 3 : deg - friction angle of soil layer Code: TIA-G t 4 : ft - thickness of soil layer γ 4 : pcf - effective unit weight of soil Loads: φ 4 : deg - friction angle of soil layer P: 113.00 kip - maximum axial reaction t 5 : ft - thickness of soil layer V: 1.35 kip - maximum shear reaction γ 5 : pcf - effective unit weight of soil φ 5 : deg - friction angle of soil layer φ b : 0.6 - strength reduction factor for bearing q ult : 17.53 ksf - ultimate end bearing capacity φ L : 0.75 - strength reduction factor for lateral FS: 2.00 - factor of safety for bearing Net? Yes f s : 0.00 ksf - ultimate skin friction on sides of pad µ: 0.40 - friction factor along base of foundation F lat : 318 psf - ultimate lateral resistance per foot D w : 99.00 ft - depth to water table Bearing Capacity: Foundation is Adequate in Bearing 30.4% q max : q all : 3.20 ksf 10.52 ksf Lateral Capacity: Foundation is Adequate in Lateral 2.6% V: 1.35 kip V all : 51.13 kip

Project Name: Project Number: Client Site Number: Cumorah Hill Engineer: JRM # 50108.12262 Check: AMA - Date: 7/21/2014 Concrete pad: f`c: f y : cover: R/F: Qty. of R/F: A s : Shear Capacity: 3000.00 psi - concrete compressive strength 60.00 ksi - yield strength of reinforcing steel 3.00 in - clear cover to reinforcement 6 - bar size for flexural reinforcement 5 - quantity of reinforcing bars 2.2 in 2 - quantity of reinforcing bars α: 40.00-40 for interior columns β: 1.00 - ratio of long side to short side (pier) β: 0.85 - concrete strength ratio ε c : 0.003 - maximum concrete strain (typically 0.003) φ v : 0.75 - strength reduction factor for shear per ACI318 φ f : 0.9 - strength reduction factor for flexure per ACI318 LF: 1.00 - load factor for TIA-F V u : φv c : V u : φv c : 28.53 kip - ultimate punching shear 1319.50 kip - punching shear resistance kip - ultimate one-way shear 190.77 kip - one-way shear resistance Flexural Capacity: Foundation is Adequate in Flexure 9.4% M max : φ f M n : 29.13 kip-ft 308.29 kip-ft

Deadman Anchor Analysis: C - Proposed Inner Project Name: Cumorah Hill Job #: # 50108.12262 Anchor Block is Adequate for Uplift 72.4% Client: Analysis by: Central Communications JRM Anchor Block is Adequate for Lateral 79.2% Checked by: Code: AMA TIA - G Anchor Shaft is Adequate 61.5% Loads Capacity Foundation Input U max : 26.57 kips - maximum uplift reaction U all : 36.71 kips - allowable uplift H max : 35.07 kips - maximum horizontal reaction H all : 44.31 kips - allowable horizontal Guy Path: C W b : 4.00 ft - width of anchor block Anchor Ring: Proposed Inner L b : 9.00 ft - length of anchor block T b : 4.00 ft - thickness of anchor block d: 2.00 ft - depth from t/ grade to t/ anchor block b: 6.00 ft - depth from t/ grade to b/ anchor block Ultimate Soil Properties D w : 99.00 ft - depth from t/ grade to water table Geotechnical Firm: Report: Date: Notes: Tower Engineering Professionals 50108.1905 7/9/2014 Frost Depth: 0" Boring B-2 Begin End φ c γ f s µ (ft) (ft) Friction Angle Ult. Cohesion Eff. Unit Weight Ult. Skin Friction Friction Factor (deg) (psf) (pcf) (ksf) 1 0.00 1.00 30.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 1 2 1.00 2.00 30.00 0.00 100.00 0.11 0.36 3 2.00 4.00 30.00 0.00 106.00 0.11 0.36 2 4 4.00 6.00 33.00 0.00 113.00 0.24 0.40 5 6 Analysis Criteria Layer Uplift: F s_sides = 3.35 Yes Horizontal F s_sides = 4.42 Yes F s_front = 6.24 Yes F s_top = 0.00 No F s_back = 0.00 No F s_bottom = 0.00 No F µ = 6.07 Yes T:\50108\12262_Cumorah Hill\Structural\Structural Modifications\Additional Calculations\02C_Inner_Deadman analysis_2.1.4_proposed_worst - 7/25/2014 Deadman Analysis 2.1.2

Deadman Anchor Analysis: B - Outer Project Name: Cumorah Hill Job #: # 50108.12262 Anchor Block is Adequate for Uplift 49.8% Client: Analysis by: Central Communications JRM Anchor Block is Adequate for Lateral 52.2% Checked by: Code: AMA TIA - G Anchor Shaft is Adequate 93.8% Loads Capacity Foundation Input U max : 23.99 kips - maximum uplift reaction U all : 48.21 kips - allowable uplift H max : 22.87 kips - maximum horizontal reaction H all : 43.86 kips - allowable horizontal Guy Path: B W b : 4.50 ft - width of anchor block Anchor Ring: Outer L b : 12.50 ft - length of anchor block T b : 2.25 ft - thickness of anchor block d: 3.17 ft - depth from t/ grade to t/ anchor block b: 5.42 ft - depth from t/ grade to b/ anchor block Ultimate Soil Properties D w : 99.00 ft - depth from t/ grade to water table Geotechnical Firm: Report: Date: Notes: Tower Engineering Professionals 50108.19050 7/9/2014 Frost Depth: 0" Boring B-4 Layer Begin End φ c γ f s µ (ft) (ft) Friction Angle Ult. Cohesion Eff. Unit Weight Ult. Skin Friction Friction Factor (deg) (psf) (pcf) (ksf) 1 0.00 1.00 30.00 0.00 106.00 0.00 0.00 2 1.00 4.00 30.00 0.00 106.00 0.11 0.36 3 4.00 6.00 33.00 0.00 114.00 0.24 0.40 4 5 6 Analysis Criteria Uplift: F s_sides = 2.80 Yes Horizontal F s_sides = 2.67 Yes F s_front = 5.37 Yes F s_top = 0.00 No F s_back = 0.00 No F s_bottom = 0.00 No F µ = 13.58 Yes \\tep-vm-file01\towers\50108\12262_cumorah Hill\Structural\Structural Modifications\Additional Calculations\03B_Outer_Deadman analysis_2.1.4_existing_worst Deadman - 7/24/2014 Analysis 2.1.2

June 04, 2014 Mr. Lawrence Wilson Tower Engineering Professionals Columbia County 5811 Memorial Hwy, Suite 204 263 NW Lake City Avenue Tampa, FL 33615 Lake City, FL 32055 (910) 622-0111 (386) 623-3616 cthompson@tepgroup.net Subject: Foundation Mapping Report Client Designation: Columbia County Site Name: Cumorah Hill Columbia County Site Number: Unknown Engineering Firm Designation: TEP Project Number: 50108-19050 Site Data: Near 1077 SW Cumorah Hill Street Fort White, Columbia County, FL 32038 Latitude N 29 57' 15.0, Longitude W 82 39' 36.9 300 Foot Guyed Tower Dear Mr. Wilson, Tower Engineering Professionals (TEP) is pleased to submit this Foundation Mapping Report to Columbia County for the above referenced site. The onsite investigation was performed by Chris Thompson and Trevor Kamm of Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. during the June 03, 2014 site visit. The foundation mapping was to include location of all tower foundation(s)/anchors relative to the tower base and magnetic north, depth below grade and measurement of all external tower foundation/anchor dimensions. For selfsupport and guyed towers, the tower legs were named by letter according to the magnetic azimuth defined by a line from the center of tower to the leg, with the A leg being the leg closest to magnetic north, followed clockwise by B and C. We at Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and Columbia County. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please give us a call. Sincerely, Christopher Thompson, P.E. Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc.

Tower Foundation Mapping Report June 04, 2014 TEP Project Number 50108-19050, Revision 0 Cumorah Hill Page 2 DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES: TEP field technicians perform all data collection by physical excavation of the foundation in question. Experienced excavators are hired and met on location by TEP field technicians who closely direct all aspects of the excavation. Noncaisson tower masts are uncovered from exposed portions outward with a minimum disturbance of the tower foundation and surrounding soil. Once the foundation is exposed, the TEP field technician will physically measure, record and photograph all relevant dimensions and foundation condition. Upon completion of recording the relevant data, the exposed foundation is covered and the site is restored as close as possible to the way it appeared prior to the excavation. Dead man anchors are uncovered by digging to the side and behind of where the anchor rod enters grade. This is done to prevent damage to the anchor rod and to minimize disturbing the soil above and in front of the anchor as much as possible. (TEP will unearth the entire anchor rod for inspection purposes upon request.) Once the edge of the dead man anchor is exposed, the TEP field technician will physically measure and record the depth below grade, thickness and length of the exposed area. The width of the dead man anchor is measured from the anchor rod to the edge. The anchor rod is assumed to be centered widthwise on the anchor foundation. Photographs of all relevant dimensions and the foundation s condition are then taken. Upon completion of recording the relevant data, the exposed foundation is covered and the site is restored as close as possible to the way it appeared prior to the excavation. Excavation is the deemed to be the most accurate method for mapping a non-caisson foundation with the added benefit of discovering the material condition of the concrete anchor. Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 5811 Memorial Hwy, Suite 204, Tampa, FL 33615 (o) 910-622-0111 (f) 919-661-6350 www.tepgroup.net

Tower Foundation Mapping Report June 04, 2014 TEP Project Number 50108-19050, Revision 0 Cumorah Hill Page 3 Mast Mast Mast Anchor A Anchor A Anchor A Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 5811 Memorial Hwy, Suite 204, Tampa, FL 33615 (o) 910-622-0111 (f) 919-661-6350 www.tepgroup.net

Tower Foundation Mapping Report June 04, 2014 TEP Project Number 50108-19050, Revision 0 Cumorah Hill Page 4 Anchor B Anchor B Anchor B Anchor C Anchor C Anchor C Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 5811 Memorial Hwy, Suite 204, Tampa, FL 33615 (o) 910-622-0111 (f) 919-661-6350 www.tepgroup.net