Matthews Key for Informal Logic Exercises 1. Use these answers to grade and correct your homework assignment. A perfect score would be 100.

Similar documents
Handout 1: Arguments -- the basics because, since, given that, for because Given that Since for Because

Friday April 22, 2011 Schedule for the Day

Lecture 3 Arguments Jim Pryor What is an Argument? Jim Pryor Vocabulary Describing Arguments

Baronett, Logic (4th ed.) Chapter Guide

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

MCQ IN TRADITIONAL LOGIC. 1. Logic is the science of A) Thought. B) Beauty. C) Mind. D) Goodness

Philosophy 1100: Introduction to Ethics. Critical Thinking Lecture 1. Background Material for the Exercise on Validity

MPS 17 The Structure of Persuasion Logos: reasoning, reasons, good reasons not necessarily about formal logic

Pastor-teacher Don Hargrove Faith Bible Church September 8, 2011

What is an argument? PHIL 110. Is this an argument? Is this an argument? What about this? And what about this?

Philosophy 1100: Ethics

Varsity LD: It s All About Clash. 1:15 pm 2:30 pm TUESDAY, June 26

Unit. Categorical Syllogism. What is a syllogism? Types of Syllogism

Introduction to Philosophy

Unit 4. Reason as a way of knowing. Tuesday, March 4, 14

God s Great Passion. Burning Hearts. Recently a group of Christians were asked the question, Do you know God more than your spouse?

LOGIC. Inductive Reasoning. Wednesday, April 20, 16

PHILOSOPHY 102 INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC PRACTICE EXAM 1. W# Section (10 or 11) 4. T F The statements that compose a disjunction are called conjuncts.

Study Guides. Chapter 1 - Basic Training

5.6.1 Formal validity in categorical deductive arguments

A R G U M E N T S I N A C T I O N

How To Recognize and Avoid Them. Joseph M Conlon Technical Advisor, AMCA

The Field of Logical Reasoning: (& The back 40 of Bad Arguments)

CHAPTER THREE Philosophical Argument

Logical (formal) fallacies

ARGUMENTS. Arguments. arguments

Relevance. Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true

The Philosopher s World Cup

2/21/2014. FOUR WAYS OF KNOWING (Justifiable True Belief) 1. Sensory input; 2. Authoritative knowledge; 3. Logic and reason; 4. Faith and intuition

OSSA Conference Archive OSSA 5

Some Templates for Beginners: Template Option 1 I am analyzing A in order to argue B. An important element of B is C. C is significant because.

Skim the Article to Find its Conclusion and Get a Sense of its Structure

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Reading Comprehension Fallacies in Reading

Norva Y S Lo Produced by Norva Y S Lo Edited by Andrew Brennan. Fallacies of Presumption, Ambiguity, and Part-Whole Relations

Lecture 2.1 INTRO TO LOGIC/ ARGUMENTS. Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people s claims).

1. To arrive at the truth we have to reason correctly. 2. Logic is the study of correct reasoning. B. DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS

With prompting and support, identify the reasons an author gives to support points in a text.

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

1/19/2011. Concept. Analysis

PHI 244. Environmental Ethics. Introduction. Argument Worksheet. Argument Worksheet. Welcome to PHI 244, Environmental Ethics. About Stephen.

PHIL 115: Philosophical Anthropology. I. Propositional Forms (in Stoic Logic) Lecture #4: Stoic Logic

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Ethics and Science. Obstacles to search for truth. Ethics: Basic Concepts 1

A s a contracts professional, from

1 Chapter 6 (Part 2): Assessing Truth Claims

13.6 Euler Diagrams and Syllogistic Arguments

Tutorial A03: Patterns of Valid Arguments By: Jonathan Chan

PHILOSOPHY ESSAY ADVICE

Selections from Aristotle s Prior Analytics 41a21 41b5

Chapter 8 - Sentential Truth Tables and Argument Forms

Fallacies are deceptive errors of thinking.

SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

Critical Thinking 5.7 Validity in inductive, conductive, and abductive arguments

Chapter 5: Freedom and Determinism

FROM INQUIRY TO ACADEMIC WRITING CHAPTER 8 FROM ETHOS TO LOGOS: APPEALING TO YOUR READERS

LOGICAL FALLACIES/ERRORS OF ARGUMENT

Arguments. 1. using good premises (ones you have good reason to believe are both true and relevant to the issue at hand),

14.6 Speaking Ethically and Avoiding Fallacies L E A R N I N G O B JE C T I V E S

Argument and Persuasion. Stating Opinions and Proposals

Common Logical Fallacies

Is Klein an infinitist about doxastic justification?

Chapter 6: Relevance Fallacies

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Overview of Today s Lecture

Argumentative Analogy versus Figurative Analogy

Introduction to Logic

Philosophy of Love, Sex, and Friendship WESTON. Arguments General Points. Arguments are sets of reasons in support of a conclusion.

Introduction to Philosophy Crito. Instructor: Jason Sheley

b) The meaning of "child" would need to be taken in the sense of age, as most people would find the idea of a young child going to jail as wrong.

Intro Viewed from a certain angle, philosophy is about what, if anything, we ought to believe.

The antecendent always a expresses a sufficient condition for the consequent

LOGIC Lesson 10: Univocal, Equivocal, Analogical Terms. 1. A term in logic is the subject or the predicate of a proposition (a declarative sentence).

Logical Fallacies. Continuing our foray into the world of Argument. Courtesy of:

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

PHI 1500: Major Issues in Philosophy

ELEMENTS OF LOGIC. 1.1 What is Logic? Arguments and Propositions

Full file at

Introduction to Logic

I. What is an Argument?

Deduction. Of all the modes of reasoning, deductive arguments have the strongest relationship between the premises

Criticizing Arguments

In his paper Studies of Logical Confirmation, Carl Hempel discusses

Philosophy 12 Study Guide #4 Ch. 2, Sections IV.iii VI

24.09x Guide to Logic and Argumentation

Philosophy. Aim of the subject

IN DEFENCE OF CLOSURE

SYLLOGISTIC LOGIC CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS

Section 3.5. Symbolic Arguments. Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc.

Logic Appendix: More detailed instruction in deductive logic

Review Deductive Logic. Wk2 Day 2. Critical Thinking Ninjas! Steps: 1.Rephrase as a syllogism. 2.Choose your weapon

1.6 Validity and Truth

In more precise language, we have both conditional statements and bi-conditional statements.

Debate Vocabulary 203 terms by mdhamilton25

HOW TO ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT

Chapter 2. Moral Reasoning. Chapter Overview. Learning Objectives. Teaching Suggestions

Logic Book Part 1! by Skylar Ruloff!

SOME RADICAL CONSEQUENCES OF GEACH'S LOGICAL THEORIES

Chapter 9- Sentential Proofs

Practice Test Three Fall True or False True = A, False = B

Transcription:

Matthews Key for Informal Logic Exercises 1 Use these answers to grade and correct your homework assignment. A perfect score would be 100. Please submit your exercises, marked up with totals for each section, as well as your total score on the first page by your name. Syllogisms: each syllogism is worth 5 points for a total of 20 points. Judging Arguments Exercises for Step 1: ranslation: EACH SYLLOGISM IS WORH 5 POINS FOR A OAL OF 15 POINS: IMPLICI PREMISES HA FUNCION EXACLY LIKE PRESUPPOSIIONS DO IN OUR UNEXAMINED SYSEM OF BELIEFS. 1) P1 No one who wants fame can be trusted. P2 Peter is a journalist. P3 [Journalists want fame] (IMPLICI) C Peter cannot be trusted. 2) P1 [If something never existed, then it can t be restored]. (IMPLICI) P2 Democracy in Haiti never existed. ˆ Democracy in Haiti can t be restored. 3) P1 [Either the fetus becomes human at the moment of conception, or it becomes human at some moment thereafter.] (IMPLICI) P2 here is a continuity of development from conception on. P3 If P2, then no stage is radically different. P4 If no stage is radically different, then there is no stage after conception at which the fetus becomes human. ˆ he fetus becomes human at the moment of conception. Exercises for Step 2: Evaluation: EACH NUMBERED EXERCISE IS WORH 2 POINS FOR A OAL OF 40 POINS : Indicate if the following arguments are valid or invalid, and whether the premises

Matthews Key for Informal Logic Exercises 2 and conclusions are true or false. VALID/INVALID 1) Everyone who studies logic is Beautiful RUE/FALSE? ALL UP O YOUR OWN? OBSERVAION

Matthews Key for Informal Logic Exercises 3 Matthews Philosophical Framework I am beautiful.? INVALID => AC 2) I am studying logic. Every Supreme Court Justice is a U.S. Citizen I am not a Supreme Court? INVALID => DA 3) Justice. I am not a U.S. Citizen. If I put my hand in a flame, then I will be burned. INVALID => DA I will not put my hand in a 4) flame. I will not be burned. If I have unprotected sex, then F I will be safe from disease. F I will not have unprotected F INVALID=> DA 5) sex. I will not be safe from disease. All Virginians are New F Yorkers. VALID CHAIN ARGUMEN All New Yorkers are U.S. 6) Citizens. All Virginians are U.S. Citizens All snakes are reptiles All reptiles are animals. VALID CHAIN ARGUMEN All snakes are animals RUE BECAUSE NONE OF HE INDIVIDUAL PROPOSIIONS ARE BLAANLY FALSE. FALSE SINCE HAVING PROECED SEX USUALLY HELPS US BE SAFE FROM DISEASE FALSE SINCE ONE CANNO BE A NEW YORKER AND A VIRGINIAN (I M SILL A VIRGINIAN, NO A NEW YORKER). RUE Formulate and write out a syllogistic argument that will satisfy the following conditions: 7) Valid but not sound. 8) rue but not sound. 9) Valid and true. 10) Invalid and false. AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU HAVE O FIGURE HIS ONE OU FOR YOURSELF. REMEMBER: A SOUND ARGUMEN MUS BE BOH VALID AND RUE. APPROPRIAE CRIICISMS OF AN ARGUMEN ARE: _NO 11) Your argument is false. _YES 12) Your conclusion is false. _YES 13) Your premises are false. _YES 14) Your argument is valid. _NO 15) Your conclusion is valid. _NO 16) Your premises are valid. _NO 17) You are arguing from false premises to a valid conclusion.

Matthews Key for Informal Logic Exercises 4 Matthews Philosophical Framework YES NO NO 18) Your argument is sound. 19) Your argument is not sound, but your conclusion is valid. 20) Your argument is sound, but not valid. Exercises for Step 3: Deliberate: EACH EXERCISE IS WORH 2 POINS FOR A OAL OF 25 POINS [13G is worth 1 point]: Write one example (of your own creation) of each of the following fallacies: (1) affirming the consequent (2) denying the antecedent, (3) equivocation (4) begging the question. (5) False dilemma (6) Straw Man AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU HAVE O FIGURE HIS ONE OU FOR YOURSELF. he following is a collection of all forms of fallacies, both fakes and distractions. It may include instances of false dilemma, straw man, affirming the consequent, denying the antecedent, equivocation, and begging the question. Identify the fallacy in each selection and discuss briefly why the fallacy makes the argument persuasive. 7A) FALSE DILEMMA: Obvious false dichotomy. If you can t lick em, then just leave them alone. 8B) BEGGING HE QUESION: here is no progression of reasons advanced in any of these propositions. Many people thought this was an instance of AC, but it is not. here are two main ideas at play here, and both are simply stated in circular fashion: 1 According to my theory, men who had doting mothers will seek women who are independent and not overly affectionate. his is a reaction to having been smothered by their mothers' affection. WHA S HAPPENING HERE? EQUIVOCAION BEWEEN DOING MOHERS AND MOHER S AFFECION HA MAKES I SEEM AS IF SOME NEW HOUGH IS BEING ADVANCED. 2 Now if my theory is correct, Ed would be attracted to someone like Carla. Ed is attracted to Carla. So I would say that my theory is correct. HAS HE AUHOR OFFERED ANY REASONS FOR CONCLUDING HA HIS HEORY IS CORREC? NO. HE MERELY SAES HA IS. A REASON FOR WHY I MIGH BE CORREC WOULD BE IF WE WERE OLD ABOU ED AND HIS MOHER S RELAIONSHIP O HIM. 9C) AFFIRMING HE CONSEQUEN:

Matthews Philosophical Framework If society is free, then creativity flourishes. 18 th century creativity flourished. ˆ 18 th century was free. 10D) FALSE DILEMMA: Simple. I hope. 11E) EQUIVOCAION: Job prospects or job are equivocated with vocation, thereby providing the illusion of a sequence or progression of thought in these sentences. 12F) FALSE DILEMMA: either you trust the people or you trust government. And our Republican Party ought to stand for trusting the people to spend their own money." 13G) BEGGING HE QUESION. [WORH ONLY ONE POIN!]