Developing an Argument in Writing

Similar documents
Reading Critically LEARNING SKILLS

Academic argument does not mean conflict or competition; an argument is a set of reasons which support, or lead to, a conclusion.

Genre Guide for Argumentative Essays in Social Science

Adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy, for the Writing Center at Harvard University by Gordon Harvey. Counter-Argument

Prentice Hall U.S. History Modern America 2013

Prentice Hall United States History Survey Edition 2013

Positions 1 and 2 are rarely useful in academic discourse Issues, evidence, underpinning assumptions, context etc. make arguments complex and nuanced

9694 THINKING SKILLS

Structuring and Analyzing Argument: Toulmin and Rogerian Models. English 106

Argumentation and Positioning: Empirical insights and arguments for argumentation analysis

Overview: Application: What to Avoid:

Pearson myworld Geography Western Hemisphere 2011

Rules for NZ Young Farmers Debates

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Proof in mathematics education: research, learning and teaching

HANDBOOK (New or substantially modified material appears in boxes.)

Honours Programme in Philosophy

Argument Writing. Whooohoo!! Argument instruction is necessary * Argument comprehension is required in school assignments, standardized testing, job

Persuasive Essay Formatting the introductory paragraph

Argumentative Writing

Developing an Argument Map exercises

GREAT PHILOSOPHERS: Thomas Reid ( ) Peter West 25/09/18

THEY SAY: Discussing what the sources are saying

Prentice Hall World Geography: Building A Global Perspective 2003 Correlated to: Colorado Model Content Standards for Geography (Grade 9-12)

COACHING THE BASICS: WHAT IS AN ARGUMENT?

Prentice Hall The American Nation: Beginnings Through 1877 '2002 Correlated to: Chandler USD Social Studies Textbook Evaluation Instrument (Grade 8)

Living with Contradictory Convictions in the Church

Stratford School Academy RE year 10 curriculum-belief in God.

Strand 1: Reading Process

Science and Religion: Exploring the Spectrum

Guidelines for Research Essays on Scriptural Interpretation

Overview of College Board Noncognitive Work Carol Barry

Reading and Evaluating Arguments

Argumentative Writing. 9th Grade - English Language Arts Ms. Weaver - Qrtr 3/4

How persuasive is this argument? 1 (not at all). 7 (very)

Comments on Lasersohn

SUPPOSITIONAL REASONING AND PERCEPTUAL JUSTIFICATION

Philosophy 428M Topics in the History of Philosophy: Hume MW 2-3:15 Skinner Syllabus

Theory of knowledge prescribed titles

Theory of Knowledge Series

Skill Realized. Skill Developing. Not Shown. Skill Emerging

Argument vs Persuasion vs Propaganda. So many terms...what do they all mean??

Position Papers. Debating Positions to Develop a Complex Argument

Critical Appreciation of Jonathan Schaffer s The Contrast-Sensitivity of Knowledge Ascriptions Samuel Rickless, University of California, San Diego

HARE S PRESCRIPTIVISM

Introduction xiii. that more good is likely to be realised in the one case than in the other. 4


QCAA Study of Religion 2019 v1.1 General Senior Syllabus

The circuit riding judges

Nipawin Bible College Course: BT224 Hermeneutics Instructor: Mr. David J. Smith Fall Credit Hours

Sociology of Religion

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Collections 2015 Grade 8. Indiana Academic Standards English/Language Arts Grade 8

Argumentation Techniques

Does the Skeptic Win? A Defense of Moore. I. Moorean Methodology. In A Proof of the External World, Moore argues as follows:

2005 HSC Notes from the Marking Centre Studies of Religion I and II

Update your TOC & glue in your returned papers. Aim: How did the Persians build and maintain a tremendous empire? Do Now: Matching Review

Strand 1: Reading Process

Common Core Standards for English Language Arts & Draft Publishers' Criteria for History/Social Studies

MAIN BUILDING C

Description of Course. Course Learning Goals. Key Questions Addressed by the Course

Position Strategies / Structure Presenting the Issue

THE MORAL ARGUMENT. Peter van Inwagen. Introduction, James Petrik

Bar Mock Trial Competition 2017/18. Student Role Guide: Barrister England, Wales and Northern Ireland

RELIGION AND SOCIETY

The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology

Privilege in the Construction Industry. Shamik Dasgupta Draft of February 2018

Teaching Argument. Blanqui Valledor. SURN April 20, 2018

Cosmopolitan Theory and the Daily Pluralism of Life

Age-related expectations for Religious Education

ISSA Proceedings 2002 Dissociation And Its Relation To Theory Of Argument

(3) Be challenged to develop an appreciation for the historic contributions of faithful Christians on these topics.

HANDBOOK. IV. Argument Construction Determine the Ultimate Conclusion Construct the Chain of Reasoning Communicate the Argument 13

Knowledge and Authority

Temporal Passage and the no alternate possibilities argument

Is there a good epistemological argument against platonism? DAVID LIGGINS

Reasoning, Argumentation and Persuasion

The SAT Essay: An Argument-Centered Strategy

Perspectives. Theme: Provide students with off-game opportunities to reflect on important themes that may influence their in-game decision making

World Religions. These subject guidelines should be read in conjunction with the Introduction, Outline and Details all essays sections of this guide.

Russell s Problems of Philosophy

Subject Overview Curriculum pathway

Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. BY TED POSTON (Basingstoke,

THEO 5911 Contextual Interpretation of the Bible Course Description Learning Outcomes List of Topics

Review of Erik J. Wielenberg: Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not text, cite appropriate resource(s))

Gettiering Goldman. I. Introduction. Kenneth Stalkfleet. Stance Volume

Revista Economică 66:3 (2014) THE USE OF INDUCTIVE, DEDUCTIVE OR ABDUCTIVE RESONING IN ECONOMICS

Writing Module Three: Five Essential Parts of Argument Cain Project (2008)

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT (If submission is not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Helpsheet. 5 minute self test. Giblin Eunson Library LANGUAGE FOR CITING. library.unimelb.edu.au/libraries/bee. Use this sheet to help you:

I Have A Dream. New Far East Book Six Lesson Four 黃昭瑞. Judy Huang 台南女中

Make sure you are properly registered Course web page : or through Class Notes link from University Page Assignment #1 is due

The stated objective of Gloria Origgi s paper Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Trust is:

1. Introduction Formal deductive logic Overview

Ethics. PHIL 181 Spring 2018 SUMMARY OBJECTIVES

PHILOSOPHY OF LOGIC AND LANGUAGE OVERVIEW LOGICAL CONSTANTS WEEK 5: MODEL-THEORETIC CONSEQUENCE JONNY MCINTOSH

BI-1115 New Testament Literature 1 - Course Syllabus

In this paper I will critically discuss a theory known as conventionalism

the paradigms have on the structure of research projects. An exploration of epistemology, ontology

Criteria for Historical Criticism

Transcription:

Developing an Argument in Writing This workshop will: - Identify the components of an argument - Suggest types of argument that an assignment can be built around - Offer strategies to apply evidence and theory into your written work Teaching points: 1. What is an argument 2. Types of arguments to construct 3. Using evidence to support your argument 4. Using theory in your writing 1

1. What is an argument? An argument is made up of many inferences and claims defending one viewpoint. From an academic point of view, a claim is making a point about something which makes a point about something else: such and such is the case so such and such is the case You can continue this by adding other claims: and such and such is the case so such and such is the case therefore x. You are making a series of claims which together make up your argument. What students need to do is apply critical thinking to a claim to ask is this saying something significant? and is there anything else you need to know in order to respond to the claim? Consider the claim: Including President Obama, five out of the most recent seven US presidents have been left-handed. Is there any significance to this claim? Possible questions to ask, i.e. research, to see if it is significant in any way include A. What proportion of the US population is left-handed? 10% so there may be something significant about such a high proportion of recent left-handed presidents. B. What about the presidents before the last seven? 3 out of 36, ie about 10%. So why are recent presidents so different? C. If Barack Obama had lost the election in 2008, would that have meant that four of the most recent seven US presidents had been left-handed? No: his opponent was left-handed. If George W. Bush (right-handed) had lost, his opponent was also left-handed! D. How many other countries have (had) left-handed leaders? It does appear the evidence and therefore the claim has significance. 2

When one claim is used to claim something else, then we have an inference. One of the most notorious examples of the disputed significance of a claim are the words Let him have it, Chris. These were apparently the words used by a young man called Derek Bentley to his friend, Chris Craig, who had a gun whilst they were planning to break into a warehouse. Craig shot and killed a policeman. The jury decided Derek meant shoot the policeman : he was found guilty and hung. Derek also had a learning disability and had the mental age of 11. Craig was too young to be executed. So, one example of an inference is. Derek Bentley had a mental age of 11, so he should not have been hanged. The first claim about Derek s mental age is used to infer (draw) the second claim that he shouldn t have been hanged. Multiple inferences make up an argument. What other inferences, based on the above, could you make to defend the position or argument that Derek should not have been hanged? Use the space below However many claims are used, just remember that an argument is just inference [i.e. claim claim] x many = argument This process of claim claim is designed to persuade others here is a claim, so this follows from this. We might or might not agree, so we re back to where we started from looking at the significance of claims and questioning them. 3

2. Types of arguments to construct Firstly, you have to have something to say. This could be done by. Agreeing with a particular argument/point of view and presenting reliable evidence to support the position taken. Rejecting a particular argument/point of view, but again using reliable evidence to do this. (In a counter-argument each individual claim in the argument in question is countered by another claim). Conceding that an existing argument/point of view has merits, but needs to be qualified in certain respects, and stating what these are. Proposing a new argument/point of view, or reformulating an existing one, so that the new version makes a better explanation for the situation under discussion. Reconciling two arguments/positions which may seem at variance by bringing a new perspective to bear on the topic. Connecting or synthesizing different ideas, so new approaches and arguments/points of view can be brought to bear on the subject. You need to build up your case bit by bit whatever your ultimate goal concerning the original argument is. To do this you will have to handle each of its claim/s one by one, thereby creating one discussion point or belief for each. Let s consider It is better to shop at Waitrose rather than Sainsbury s If we agree with the above statement, we have to defend that argument with different points representing beliefs supported by evidence. Point or belief Evidence So what? More convenient Seldom long queues Shopping done quicker Have a wider range of Stock unusual chocolate Girlfriend happy goods brands Goods are better quality Bread is fresher Sandwiches tastier 4

This can be represented graphically using a family tree (see below) or any other style you prefer. Waitrose better Agree Convenience Range Quality Points/ beliefs Shorter queues Chocolate brands Fresher bread Evidence Adapted from Redman (2001: 48-51) What about rejecting the argument? What points or beliefs might you have to defend your counter-argument? Sainsbury's better Reject...... Points/ beliefs...... Evidence 5

Activity 1: Study Skills Workshops v Instant Action one-to-one which is better? Place yourself in pairs or small groups. Each will be asked to argue from one of the following stances: Conceding and show how both are right and both are wrong Proposing a new argument/point of view Reconciling to bring a new perspective to bear on the topic. Connecting or synthesizing different ideas to create something new Use the space below to make your graphic or list. 3. Using evidence to support your argument When selecting evidence: Use examples Which highlight the most significant or far-reaching implications To illustrate different aspects of your argument From a range of sources, e.g. journal articles, books, and reports To support general arguments. Use empirical evidence, i.e. evidence collected via systematic and rigorous observation Use maps, diagrams and numerical data (in appropriate assessments, i.e. not essays but reports and dissertations) Using theory in your writing Do not panic Theories are just different ways of seeing the world like putting on a pair of spectacles to create a different way of looking at our world. 6

Assessments will often ask you questions relating to theoretical arguments, or you may use theories as evidence to support your argument, just as you would more concrete examples. To go back to the spectacle metaphor, you have to find a pair that fits a particular view to see something in as useful way as possible. So, when considering slavery as a whole, it may be less useful to see this subject from a feminist point of view (which concerns itself with how women have been or are treated) than from a Marxist viewpoint (which deals with oppression of the working classes by the elite). Be careful: Competing theories are not equal different theories appeal to different kinds of evidence, so different theories are useful in different contexts. Do not lump together good bits of different theories into one super theory as they will contradict each other. Make sure you ask questions when you are wearing your spectacles to see if there is something you cannot see because it is out of range or it is obscuring your vision, or if they work with everything you look at. This is standing outside a theory to see its strengths and weaknesses, and you may be asked to take a neutral viewpoint on different theories world-views of a subject in order to make a judgement on their positions. through this together. Bourdieu and The Theory of Class Distinction. We will go Bourdieu s theory deals with the concept that we learn our social status, whatever that may be, at a very early age, and maintain it throughout our lives by behaving in certain ways, buying objects of a certain types and mixing with others of similar persuasions to distance ourselves from lower groups. Therefore you are unable to break free from your class or status. How do you think this relates to education and University? 7

Activity 2: School is a significant site in which sex/gender is produced. [This claim derives from a position (social constructionist) that views sex/gender as being the product of social meanings and practices rather than something you are biologically given.] Adapted from Redman (2001: 48-51) In small groups or pairs, come up with argumentative points, with evidence, to both agree and disagree with this claim. Jot down your ideas in any style you wish on the space below. Analyse your own work be your own critic References Clip art spectacles/question Cottrell, S. (2013) The Study Skills Handbook. 4 th Ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. dogfaceboy (2007) Slick flame stitch. [online] Available at: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dogfaceboy/377499363/ [Accessed 21.7.2014] Redman, P. (2001) Good Essay Writing. 2 nd Ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd. The Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (2014) Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pierre_bourdieu#bourdieu.27s_theory_of_class_distincti on [Accessed 21.7.2014] University of Surrey. (2014) Writing Skills. Guildford: University of Surrey. [online] Available at: http://libweb.surrey.ac.uk/library/skills/writing%20skills%20leicester/page_01.htm [Accessed 6.3.2014] 8

Van den Brink-Budgen, R. (2010) Critical Thinking for Students. 4th Ed. Oxford: How To Books Ltd. Answers (suggested) Derek Bentley a) Derek Bentley did not shoot the gun so he should not have been hung. b) Derek Bentley meant give the gun to the policeman so he should not have been hung. Sainsbury s better: Rejection Sainsbury's better Reject Cheaper Longer opening times Basics cheaper: bread, butter, milk Open earlier and later during the week Activity 1: Study Skills Workshops v Instant Action one-to-one Conceding Proposing new argument Reconciling Connecting or synthesizing Study Skills Workshops Instant Action one-to-one Can learn from students on Can only learn from advisor different courses Not enough personal attention Advisor provides undivided attention to student Have long time to work through Short time to work through specific problem more than one problem Have to wait for when Can access help without scheduled waiting Have more than one advisor in workshop so more 1:2:1 attention Make a group appointment for longer time with co-students Study skills could be delivered in subject sessions at appropriate times 9